Hyperliquid unveils lobbying arm ahead of U.S. elections – Details

ambcrypto2026-02-19 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-02-19 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Hyperliquid, a leading perpetual DEX, has launched a lobbying group called the Hyperliquid Policy Center (HPC) ahead of the U.S. elections. Led by pro-crypto lawyer Jake Chervinsky, HPC aims to address regulatory challenges in DeFi and perpetual derivatives markets. The project is funding the initiative with 1 million HYPE tokens, worth approximately $29 million, to advocate for laws that protect users and builders. Founder Jeff Yan emphasized the importance of U.S. financial regulation in democratizing finance. Despite Hyperliquid's success—with over $1 billion in revenue and $4 trillion in trading volume—concerns exist about regulatory risks, including potential tax evasion or sanctions bypassing by traders. Analysts suggest the move may be a precaution against possible anti-crypto policies if Democrats regain congressional control, which could heighten regulatory scrutiny.

Hyperliquid, the popular perpetual DEX platform, has unveiled a lobby group ahead of the U.S elections.

In a statement, the lobby, Hyperliquid Policy Center (HPC), said that it seeks to “answer toughest policy questions facing perpetual derivatives and decentralized financial (DeFi) markets.”

It added,

“We will bridge the gap between law and next-generation market infrastructure.”

The project said it will unstake 1 million HYPE tokens to fund the advocacy outfit. As of the press time, that would translate to approximately $29 million.

Long-time pro-cryptocurrency lawyer and DeFi advocate, Jake Chervinsky, will lead HPC.

According to the project, the move could help set a smooth path forward and cover the regulatory risks from U.S regulators.

Commenting on the same, Hyperliquid Founder Jeff Yan said,

“Democratizing finance requires education and advocacy for laws that protect users and builders alike.”

He added,

“Global financial regulation will be shaped in the United States, and we must work to ensure that these new policies thoughtfully embrace the potential of the new financial system enabled by Hyperliquid.”

Community reactions

Hyperliquid has been live for about three years now. However, it is already outpacing incumbents like Binance and Coinbase on crypto perpetual markets and other metrics.

In fact, the platform has expanded to non-crypto assets that now account for over 30% of its overall trading volume.

With a cumulative revenue of over $1 billion and nearly $4 trillion in perpetual volumes, Hyperliquid has clearly become a crypto success story.

But beneath the growth story, there’s been speculation that most traders on the platform could be running a regulatory arbitrage for tax evasion or even bypassing sanctions.

For critics, these allegations could be a regulatory risk for Hyperliquid if the Department of Justice (DoJ) or the U.S Treasury comes knocking. In fact, Hyperliquid supporters agreed that the platform’s growth could be derailed either by the DoJ probe or a security breach.

Besides, the market is pricing an increasing chance of Democrats retaking control of Congress in the 2026 midterms.

If so, the previous anti-crypto movement may resurface and exacerbate Hyperliquid’s regulatory risk. And to some extent, this may partially explain the recent lobby move.

Ryan Scott, a trader and analyst, echoed a similar stance and added,

“It is clear why. Hyperliquid is not regulated or attached to any regulated entity. They are prepping for the Dems to come in and cause havoc.”

It remains to be seen whether the move will clear the perceived regulatory risk to the platform.


Final Summary

  • Hyperliquid has unveiled an advocacy arm, Hyperliquid Policy Center, to push for DeFi regulatory clarity ahead of the U.S elections.
  • Analysts believe the platform may be preparing for any changes at the Congress, especially if anti-crypto Democrats retake control.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the name of the lobbying group unveiled by Hyperliquid and what is its primary goal?

AThe lobbying group is called the Hyperliquid Policy Center (HPC), and its primary goal is to answer the toughest policy questions facing perpetual derivatives and decentralized financial (DeFi) markets, aiming to bridge the gap between law and next-generation market infrastructure.

QHow is Hyperliquid funding its new advocacy group and what is leading it?

AHyperliquid is funding the advocacy group by unstaking 1 million HYPE tokens, which is approximately $29 million at press time. It is being led by long-time pro-cryptocurrency lawyer and DeFi advocate, Jake Chervinsky.

QAccording to the article, what are the two main regulatory risks that could derail Hyperliquid's growth?

AThe two main regulatory risks are a potential probe by the Department of Justice (DoJ) or the U.S. Treasury, and a security breach on the platform.

QWhy does the article suggest that Hyperliquid's lobby move may be partially explained by the upcoming U.S. elections?

AThe market is pricing in an increasing chance of Democrats retaking control of Congress in the 2026 midterms. If this happens, the previous anti-crypto movement may resurface, exacerbating Hyperliquid's regulatory risk, which the lobby aims to address.

QWhat did trader and analyst Ryan Scott say about the reason for Hyperliquid's lobbying efforts?

ARyan Scott stated that Hyperliquid is not regulated or attached to any regulated entity and that they are preparing for the Democrats to come into power and 'cause havoc,' which explains the need for the lobby.

İlgili Okumalar

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit25 dk önce

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit25 dk önce

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

For years, the semiconductor equipment industry followed an unwritten "iron rule": suppliers offered steep discounts for new tool introductions (Design-in) and faced consistent price pressure during repeat orders, especially during market downturns. This long-standing buyer's market dynamic is now being upended. Recently, SK Hynix's primary equipment suppliers have reportedly requested a 3-4% price *increase*, a nearly unprecedented move. This shift is driven by a severe supply-demand imbalance fueled by the AI compute boom. Securing equipment has become an urgent arms race as chipmakers' expansion speed dictates their ability to fulfill massive AI chip orders. Key areas feeling the strain include: **TCB (Thermal Compression Bonding) Equipment:** Demand is exploding, driven by the simultaneous needs of HBM4 memory stacking, AI chip Chip-on-Substrate (C2S), and logic Chiplet Chip-on-Wafer (C2W) packaging. Players like Hanmi Semiconductor, Hanwha Semitech, and ASMPT are receiving major orders. While hybrid bonding is seen as the future, TCB remains the pragmatic choice for HBM4 mass production, with its lifecycle extended by relaxed specifications and ongoing technological upgrades. **Test Equipment Bottlenecks:** Ironically, AI-driven shortages are now crippling test equipment manufacturing. Critical components like FPGAs, Driver ICs, and CPUs face severe shortages and extended lead times (up to 52 weeks for FPGAs), as AI data center and server vendors prioritize supply. This creates a paradoxical cycle: AI chip shortages drive fab expansion, which requires more test equipment, whose production is delayed because its key parts are diverted to make AI chips. The industry is entering a broad, AI-powered upcycle. SEMI forecasts global semiconductor equipment sales to hit a record $156 billion by 2027, fueled by investment in advanced logic/foundry, HBM-driven DRAM, and advanced packaging (like CoWoS). Major players like TSMC, SK Hynix, and Micron are aggressively ramping capital expenditure. In conclusion, leading equipment vendors are no longer just selling tools; they are selling the critical capability to deliver AI-era capacity. Pricing power is shifting decisively to those with indispensable technology in key process nodes like advanced logic, HBM, and advanced packaging, rewriting the industry's traditional power structure.

marsbit38 dk önce

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

marsbit38 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片