Crypto urges SEC to see the good in blockchain privacy tools

cointelegraph2025-12-16 tarihinde yayınlandı2025-12-16 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Crypto industry leaders urged the U.S. SEC to recognize the legitimate uses of blockchain privacy tools beyond criminal activity during a recent roundtable discussion. Participants argued that the assumption should be that these tools are used for good unless evidence suggests otherwise, rather than placing the burden on users to prove compliance. They highlighted that privacy-preserving technologies are essential for many lawful applications, including competitive business strategies and identity verification. Stablecoin adoption could increase if privacy features are integrated, according to industry executives. The discussion also addressed outdated KYC and AML measures, noting that AI and cryptographic solutions could improve security without unnecessarily compromising user privacy. SEC Chair Paul Atkins warned against excessive regulation that could turn crypto into a mass surveillance tool, emphasizing the need to balance deterring illicit activity with protecting Americans' privacy rights.

Crypto industry executives have urged the US Securities and Exchange Commission to shift its thinking on blockchain privacy tools, pitching that there are legitimate applications for them outside of criminal use.

The SEC hosted crypto and finance executives for a discussion and panel on financial surveillance and privacy on Monday, the agency’s sixth crypto-focused roundtable this year, as it seeks to overhaul its approach to crypto.

StarkWare general counsel Katherine Kirkpatrick Bos, who participated in a panel discussion, told Cointelegraph after the event that a major takeaway was that there shouldn’t be an assumption that those using and creating privacy tools are “overwhelmed by wrongdoers.”

“Why is the assumption that an individual needs to affirmatively prove that they are compliant or they’re using the tool for good?”

“As opposed to it being the other way around, where the assumption is that this individual is using the tool for good until there is some sort of indication that they’re using it for bad,” she said.

Kirkpatrick Bos added that “of course, wrongdoers were using, or are using those tools, but there needs to be a balance.”

Katherine Kirkpatrick Bos (left) discussing financial privacy at an SEC roundtable on Monday. Source: Paul Brigner

During the roundtable, Wayne Chang, the founder and CEO of the credential management company SpruceID, said some percentage of users of stablecoins, a crypto tool that is slowly becoming mainstream, will want privacy.

“There are a ton of stablecoins that aren’t onchain yet that would come onchain if there is privacy,” he said. “We’re going to see an increase in demand for privacy-preserving blockchains.”

“My hope is that regulators continue to engage industry, and we can have those discussions on how to keep privacy for folks while also having tools that are useful,” Chang said.

Customer checks are becoming outdated

Kirkpatrick Bos said a discussion on Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) measures focused on whether current rules are sufficient in the age of artificial intelligence.

“The question arose and was debated on the panel, well, what is necessary for Anti-Money Laundering?” she said. “Now we have AI. It’s made manual, AML and KYC antiquated. How do we solve for that?”

“There was a sense that the current system of AML and KYC is antiquated, it’s problematic, it’s ineffective,” she added. “But there needs to be some sort of check when it’s a centralized entity facilitating flows of money to ensure that they’re not helping wrongdoers.”

Many financial institutions request a picture of a user’s driver’s license for its KYC checks, which Kirkpatrick Bos said was “absurd, because an individual can go on the internet and develop a fake driver’s license in a matter of seconds.”

“So the question is, can cryptography-based tools improve that and make it harder for bad guys to do that? But can they also do that and make it harder for bad guys while preserving an individual’s privacy and not revealing data like an address, where it is not necessary to vet the legality of the funds?” she added.

Some projects have begun to test crypto-based solutions for proving identity while claiming to preserve privacy, such as Sam Altman’s World, which gives users a cryptographic key they can use to prove they’re human.

SEC’s Atkins warns of potential for crypto mass surveillance

SEC chair Paul Atkins had given opening remarks at the roundtable, warning that if “pushed in the wrong direction, crypto could become the most powerful financial surveillance architecture ever invented.”

“If the instinct of the government is to treat every wallet like a broker, every piece of software as an exchange, every transaction as a reportable event, and every protocol as a convenient surveillance node, then the government will transform this ecosystem into a financial panopticon,” he added.

Related: SEC ’eased up on’ 60% of crypto enforcement cases under Trump: Report

Atkins said that crypto allows for “privacy-preserving tools that the analog world could not provide,” which some institutions depend on to build positions or test strategies without “instantly telegraphing that activity to competitors.”

He added that some of the technology could balance the government’s interest in deterring security threats and the public’s privacy.

“But to best strike this balance, we must make certain that Americans can use these tools without immediately falling under suspicion.”

Magazine: 2026 is the year of pragmatic privacy in crypto — Canton, Zcash and more

İlgili Okumalar

AI "Transfer Station" Earning Millions Monthly? Five Questions Uncover the Truth of Token Arbitrage

The article "AI 'Transfer Station' Earns Millions Monthly? Five Questions Uncover the Truth of Token Arbitrage" explores the emerging business of API token transfer stations, which profit from global AI service price disparities and access barriers. These intermediaries purchase low-cost tokens from overseas AI providers (e.g., OpenAI, Claude) through grey-market methods—such as exploiting enterprise credits, bulk accounts, or subscription benefits—and resell them to Chinese users at a markup. Key drivers include the high cost of using top AI models (e.g., Claude Code costs ~$5 per million tokens), the performance gap between domestic and foreign models, and mismatches between subscription and API pricing. However, the practice carries significant risks: upstream token sources may be unstable or illegal; user data passing through intermediaries can be harvested or injected with hidden prompts; and models might be downgraded without disclosure. The market is evolving, with some operators now exporting cheaper Chinese models (e.g., Qwen3.5 at ~$0.11 per million tokens) to overseas users, leveraging price gaps. Yet, sustainability is low due to compliance crackdowns, instability, and reputational risks. Users are advised to employ detection methods (e.g., prompt adherence tests) and avoid sensitive data usage. The authors caution that while transfer stations offer short-term arbitrage, they lack long-term reliability and security compared to official APIs.

marsbit10 dk önce

AI "Transfer Station" Earning Millions Monthly? Five Questions Uncover the Truth of Token Arbitrage

marsbit10 dk önce

The Cost of an 11.5% Annualized Return: Will MicroStrategy's STRC Face a Moment of Reckoning?

This article analyzes the potential risks associated with MicroStrategy's (MSTR) use of structured financial products like STRC to leverage its BTC exposure. While these tools have enabled impressive returns (e.g., 11.5% annualized) and fueled significant capital inflows ($13.5B outstanding), they also create substantial annual dividend obligations (~$400M). The author argues that this structure, while effective in a bull market, could become a liability if BTC price stagnates or declines. The core risk is a potential negative feedback loop: the growing dividend burden from continued STRC issuance may eventually outweigh the benefits of increased BTC holdings. To meet these obligations, MicroStrategy might need to use new issuance proceeds for dividends instead of buying more BTC, which could disappoint equity investors. If the market capitalization (mNAV) falls below the value of its BTC holdings, the company could be forced to sell BTC instead of issuing new shares, potentially triggering a panic. The author estimates a potential inflection point in 6 months, where annual dividend costs reach $3-4B. At that stage, CEO Michael Saylor might face a difficult choice: sell BTC to meet obligations or sacrifice the credibility of the preferred shares by halting dividends. The article concludes that this financial engineering, while powerful, could ultimately "backfire" on MicroStrategy if market conditions turn.

marsbit1 saat önce

The Cost of an 11.5% Annualized Return: Will MicroStrategy's STRC Face a Moment of Reckoning?

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片