Crypto Bill Faces a New Challenge, Delaying its Implementation

TheNewsCrypto2026-03-05 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-03-05 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

The crypto bill, known as the Clarity Act, faces new challenges that could delay its implementation until at least July 2026. Banks and crypto firms remain opposed, with banks warning of potential deposit flight and risks to financial stability, while crypto companies support the bill for regulatory clarity and the ability to offer yield-bearing products. Despite criticism from former President Trump toward banks, the American Bankers Association has offered suggestions for the bill's advancement. In the Senate, Democrats are seeking additional conditions, including a ban on officials profiting from crypto and stricter anti-money laundering rules. The ongoing conflict in Iran and the approaching 2026 mid-term elections further complicate progress, though some remain optimistic about a potential agreement.

The crypto bill now has a new challenge, not overcoming the same, which could delay its implementation for a longer time. Banks and crypto firms are still on opposite sides despite the intervention of the White House. A maximum stretch has been drawn for July 2026 because months after that could see more focus on the mid-term election.

Challenge for the Crypto Bill

The Clarity Act essentially aims to state regulations for crypto firms more effectively; however, banks have penned a line to obstruct its implementation. Banks have flagged a possibility of deposit flight. This could affect their lending capacity, which is then expected to impact the macro economic condition of the nation.

US President Donald Trump has criticized banks by saying that they were trying to undermine the bill. Trump, in a social media post, called it a powerful crypto agenda and said that they would not allow banks to undermine it.

The American Bankers Association has sought a precautionary move to prevent deterrence to economic growth and financial stability. It has, reportedly, offered constructive suggestions for the advancement of the bill.

Support from Crypto Giants

Needless to say, crypto giants are in support of the crypto bill for two reasons. They have operated in gray areas for a long time, and they are still on the lookout to reward/recruit users in their ecosystem. The Clarity Bill underlines regulations that could help promote adoption of cryptocurrencies.

Another reason is that it enables crypto firms to extend yield-bearing products to users. Companies have reportedly spent approximately $119 million to support pro-crypto candidates in 2024, and are hoping to get a favorable result by July 2026.

Challenges in the Senate

Democrats have sought additional conditions before giving a green light. The crypto bill has to be supported by a minimum of seven democrats. The group has asked for a ban on officials profiting from crypto ventures and to tighten anti-money laundering rules.

The ongoing conflict in Iran is also making it difficult to have a discussion on the bill, according to a statement by Brian Gardner, the Chief Washington Strategist at Stifel.

Many anticipate that no discussion or no progress by July 2026 could delay the bill for a long time, as discussions would then shift to the mid-term election, which is scheduled to happen in November 2026.

Nevertheless, Blockchain Association CEO Summer Mersinger has signalled that the path to a workable agreement is clearer than it was before.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

From Bear Trap to Breakout? Ethereum (ETH) Tests a Crucial Momentum Shift After a 7% Jump

TagsCrypto Bill

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the main reason for the potential delay in the implementation of the crypto bill?

AThe main reason for the potential delay is a new challenge that the bill is facing, with banks and crypto firms remaining on opposite sides despite White House intervention. Furthermore, the focus is expected to shift to the mid-term elections after July 2026, which could postpone the bill for a longer time.

QWhy are banks opposing the Clarity Act for crypto regulations?

ABanks are opposing the Clarity Act because they have flagged the possibility of deposit flight, which could affect their lending capacity and subsequently impact the nation's macroeconomic condition.

QHow have crypto giants shown their support for the crypto bill?

ACrypto giants support the bill because it provides regulatory clarity after they have operated in gray areas for a long time, and it enables them to extend yield-bearing products to users. They have also spent approximately $119 million in 2024 to support pro-crypto candidates.

QWhat additional conditions have Democrats requested before supporting the crypto bill?

ADemocrats have requested a ban on officials profiting from crypto ventures and to tighten anti-money laundering rules before giving their support to the bill.

QAccording to the article, what external event is making it difficult to discuss the crypto bill?

AAccording to Brian Gardner, the Chief Washington Strategist at Stifel, the ongoing conflict in Iran is making it difficult to have a discussion on the bill.

İlgili Okumalar

Feishu Has Become Doubao

This may be the most important day in the ten-year history of Feishu. On July 30, ByteDance announced a major restructuring via internal email. Feishu, an independent operation for a decade, will no longer function separately and will lose its independent sales and marketing teams. Its product team is being integrated into Doubao AI, and its Go-to-Market strategy merges into the Volcano Engine's To B system. This move signals a strategic pivot, not a failure of Feishu. The era where Feishu sought to be an all-encompassing super-app for productivity is ending. AI has become the dominant logic. Industry trends show a shift from building platform "entrances" to embedding AI directly into workflows, as seen with Microsoft Copilot and Google's Gemini. Data reveals the driver: over 90% of Feishu's new clients in Q2 2026 purchased its AI products. Enterprises are now buying integrated AI solutions, not standalone software. By integrating Feishu's deep enterprise workflow scenarios, Doubao evolves from a consumer-facing chatbot into a powerful enterprise productivity engine. This gives Doubao a critical asset: real-world business application. Concurrently, ByteDance established the "Creative Services Platform," unifying its previously fragmented sales fronts (Feishu, Doubao, Volcano Engine) into a single customer-facing entity. This represents ByteDance's first genuine shift to thinking like a true To B company, organizing around client needs rather than internal product silos. The restructuring underscores that AI is no longer just a business line but foundational infrastructure. Doubao is becoming the new organizational core, mirroring TikTok's past ascendancy. This demonstrates a profound shift: AI is beginning to reshape corporate structures, determining resource allocation and strategic priorities. ByteDance is likely just the first of many companies to undergo such an AI-driven reorganization.

marsbit7 dk önce

Feishu Has Become Doubao

marsbit7 dk önce

The Second Half of the RWA Issuance Race: Amidst the Utilization Dilemma, Trillions Worth of On-Chain Assets Awaken

RWA (Real-World Asset) tokenization has surged to a record $32 billion in on-chain value. However, a structural challenge has emerged: approximately 87% of these tokenized assets are inactive, not participating in DeFi lending or trading activities. This "utilization gap" highlights a key question: what happens after assets are brought on-chain? Data shows a stark contrast among major platforms. While Securitize leads in scale ($4.9B), it has a DeFi utilization rate of only 0.7%. Similarly, Ondo Finance ($3.5B) sees about 2.7% utilization. In contrast, Maple Finance, with a smaller $2.3B in assets, achieves a 62% utilization rate by embedding its assets directly into lending activities from the outset. Three primary factors contribute to low utilization: 1) **Asset Nature**: Tokenized treasuries are often held for yield, not traded. 2) **Regulatory Barriers**: Securities laws and KYC requirements restrict free movement into permissionless DeFi pools. 3) **Infrastructure Gaps**: A lack of deep secondary markets, real-time pricing, and mature clearing mechanisms hinders liquidity. The RWA narrative is now shifting from a "race to issue" to a "battle for application." While native lending protocols like Maple have inherent advantages, distribution channels are becoming critical. The success of products like SyrupUSDG on platforms like Robinhood Crypto demonstrates that access to existing user bases can accelerate adoption far more effectively than protocol-led efforts alone. The $32 billion milestone validates the feasibility of tokenization, but low utilization underscores that bringing assets on-chain is just the first step. The true test for the sector is enabling these assets to circulate, be utilized, and create new economic value within the DeFi ecosystem.

marsbit7 dk önce

The Second Half of the RWA Issuance Race: Amidst the Utilization Dilemma, Trillions Worth of On-Chain Assets Awaken

marsbit7 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片