CFTC pilot opens path for crypto as collateral in derivative markets

cointelegraph2025-12-09 tarihinde yayınlandı2025-12-09 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has introduced updated guidance and a pilot program allowing futures commission merchants (FCMs) to accept Bitcoin, Ether, and USDC as collateral in derivatives trading. The initiative aims to integrate cryptocurrencies into regulated markets, enhance customer protection, reduce settlement friction through instant on-chain transfers, and improve risk management. The program includes strict reporting requirements for FCMs and withdraws outdated advisories. Industry leaders from firms like Circle, StarkWare, and Coinbase have praised the move as a significant step toward broader adoption of digital assets and more efficient, automated settlement processes in derivatives markets.

The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has issued updated guidance for tokenized collateral in derivatives markets, paving the way for a pilot program to test how cryptocurrencies can be used as collateral in derivatives markets.

Collateral in derivatives markets serves as a security deposit, acting as a guarantee to ensure that a trader can cover any potential losses.

The digital asset pilot, announced by CFTC acting chairman Caroline Pham on Monday, will allow futures commission merchants (FCM) — a company that facilitates futures trades for clients — to accept Bitcoin (BTC), Ether (ETH) and Circle’s stablecoin USDC (USDC) for margin collateral.

The CFTC pilot is another step toward integrating crypto into regulated markets, and Circle CEO Heath Tarbert said it will also protect customers, reduce settlement frictions because tokenized collateral moves instantly onchain, and assist with risk reduction.

Pham said in a statement that the pilot program also “establishes clear guardrails to protect customer assets and provides enhanced CFTC monitoring and reporting.”

As part of the pilot, participating FCMs will be subject to strict reporting criteria, which require weekly reports on total customer holdings and any significant issues that may affect the use of crypto as collateral.

Source: Caroline Pham

Updated CFTC guidance for tokenized assets

The CFTC’s Market Participants Division, Division of Market Oversight, and Division of Clearing and Risk also issued updated guidance on the use of tokenized assets as collateral in the trading of futures and swaps.

The guidance covers tokenized real-world assets, including US Treasury’s money market funds, and topics such as eligible tokenized assets, legal enforceability, segregation, and control arrangements.

Pham said in an X post on Monday that the “guidance provides regulatory clarity and opens the door for more digital assets to be added as collateral by exchanges and brokers, in addition to US Treasurys and money market funds.”

The Market Participants Division also issued a “no-action position” on specific requirements regarding the use of payment stablecoins as customer margin collateral and the holding of certain proprietary payment stablecoins in segregated customer accounts.

A CFTC Staff Advisory that restricted FCMs’ ability to accept crypto as customer collateral, Staff Advisory 20-34, was also withdrawn because it is “outdated and no longer relevant,” in part due to the GENIUS Act.

Crypto execs back CFTC move

Several crypto executives applauded the move by the CFTC.

Katherine Kirkpatrick Bos, the general counsel at blockchain company StarkWare, said the use of “tokenized collateral in the derivatives markets is MASSIVE.”

Related: US regulators dismiss SEC-CFTC merger rumors, move to dispel crypto ‘FUD’

“Atomic settlement, transparency, automation, capital efficiency, savings. Feels abrupt but who recalls the tokenization summit in 2/24, a glimmer of hope in the darkness,” she said.

Coinbase chief legal officer Paul Grewal also supported the action, calling Staff Advisory 20-34 a “concrete ceiling on innovation.”

“It relied on outdated info, went well beyond the bounds of regulation and frustrated the goals of the PWG.”

Source: Paul Grewal

Meanwhile, Salman Banaei, the general counsel at layer-1 blockchain, the Plume Network, said it was a “major move” by the CFTC, and another push toward wider adoption.

“This is a step toward the use of onchain infra to automate settlement for the biggest asset class in the world: OTC derivatives, swaps,” he added.

Magazine: XRP’s ‘now or never’ moment, Kalshi taps Solana: Hodler’s Digest, Nov. 30 – Dec. 6

İlgili Okumalar

a16z Crypto: Marc Andreessen and Chris Dixon Explain Why the 'CLARITY Act' Is Urgently Needed

The CLARITY Act proposes a critical federal regulatory framework for the U.S. crypto market. Currently, a lack of clear rules creates uncertainty, hinders innovation, and leaves consumers exposed. The Act would clearly divide regulatory jurisdiction between the SEC and CFTC, mandate disclosures and insider restrictions for projects, and bring exchanges and other intermediaries under a comprehensive oversight system akin to traditional finance. This clarity is urgently needed as crypto has evolved from a niche interest into a major industry with institutional involvement. Clear, lasting rules would protect consumers by requiring proper audits, custody of client assets, and anti-fraud measures for registered platforms, helping prevent failures like FTX. Regulatory ambiguity currently punishes compliant U.S. firms with high costs while rewarding offshore competitors who bypass rules, creating a race to the bottom. The Act addresses national security by applying existing anti-money laundering rules to crypto intermediaries and distinguishes between legitimate privacy and illicit concealment. It also resolves banking sector concerns by prohibiting interest payments on stablecoin balances while permitting transaction-based rewards. For developers, it establishes liability based on intent and direct assistance to crime, not for unforeseeable downstream misuse of open-source software. Regarding securities law, the Act introduces a risk-based framework. Assets begin under SEC oversight when a network is centralized, transitioning to CFTC commodity regulation if it becomes sufficiently decentralized, with clear definitions to avoid constant litigation. Without the Act, regulatory uncertainty driven by shifting agency interpretations will persist, discouraging long-term investment in the U.S. and pushing development offshore, reducing American oversight and economic leadership. Support for the bipartisan bill comes from lawmakers, law enforcement (like the Fraternal Order of Police), and major financial institutions. Ultimately, the CLARITY Act is essential to establish a stable, sensible regulatory environment that fosters responsible innovation, enhances consumer protection, and ensures U.S. leadership in shaping the future of financial technology.

marsbit1 saat önce

a16z Crypto: Marc Andreessen and Chris Dixon Explain Why the 'CLARITY Act' Is Urgently Needed

marsbit1 saat önce

Citi's Interpretation: Why Does Citi Still Give SanDisk a Target Price of $2500 After Earnings Report Despite a Significant Stock Price Drop?

Citi maintains a "Buy" rating on SanDisk with a $2500 price target despite a post-earnings stock drop. This target, implying an 85.1% upside from the August 5th close of $1350.50, hinges on the firm's view that SanDisk merits a higher valuation than traditional NAND cyclical stocks. Although SanDisk reported strong Q4 FY26 results with revenue up 51% sequentially and robust full-year data center growth (+437%), its stock fell sharply on August 6th. Investors are concerned about potential NAND price growth moderation and guidance that failed to meet elevated market expectations. Citi's bullish thesis centers on SanDisk's new long-term "New Business Model" (NBM) agreements. These contracts, covering a significant portion of its NAND bit output for FY27 and FY28, represent minimum revenue commitments of approximately $94 billion backed by financial guarantees. This structure aims to increase revenue and cash flow predictability. The report links this visibility to AI data center demand, driven by the expansion of inference workloads requiring more storage. Citi estimates data center storage capacity demand will grow about 35% in CY27. However, the analysis notes long-term contracts cannot eliminate the NAND cycle. Risks include potential oversupply from industry capacity expansion, competition, and macroeconomic headwinds. The $2500 target essentially bets that AI demand and these contracts can reduce earnings volatility enough to support a premium valuation (~11x CY27E EPS). Key factors to watch are the execution of the $94B commitments, pricing mechanisms, actual data center demand, and industry supply dynamics.

marsbit1 saat önce

Citi's Interpretation: Why Does Citi Still Give SanDisk a Target Price of $2500 After Earnings Report Despite a Significant Stock Price Drop?

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片