CARF Global Implementation Timeline Overview: What Are the Commitments of Mainland China and Hong Kong?

marsbit2026-01-28 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-01-28 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

CARF (Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework) is a global framework for the automatic exchange of tax-related data on crypto-assets, targeting crypto-asset service providers as reporting entities. As of the end of 2025, 76 jurisdictions have committed to implementing CARF, with a phased rollout plan. The first group, including the UK and EU member states, will begin automatic information exchange in 2027. The second group, which includes Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, and Hong Kong, is scheduled to fully implement the framework in 2028. Data collection for reportable transactions will begin one year prior, starting in 2026. Hong Kong has explicitly committed to implementing CARF. It plans to start collecting crypto-asset transaction data in 2027 and commence automatic tax information exchange with partner jurisdictions in 2028. Service providers operating in Hong Kong must establish compliance and reporting mechanisms. In contrast, Mainland China has not yet committed to CARF and is not included in any of the implementation batches. It is also not listed by the OECD as a jurisdiction with relevance that has yet to commit. Under its current regulatory framework, which imposes strict limitations on crypto-asset activities, there are no legal crypto-asset service providers that could be integrated into the CARF system. Therefore, in the short term, Mainland China does not meet the conditions for participating in CARF's routine information exchange. It is noted that Mainland C...

Author: Fintax

Basic Positioning of CARF

CARF is a framework for the automatic exchange of tax-related information on crypto-assets, with crypto-asset service providers as the reporting entities, used to support tax authorities in various jurisdictions in obtaining information related to transactions involving their taxpayers.

Global Implementation Progress and Timeline

According to information released by the OECD Global Forum, as of the end of 2025, 76 countries and regions have committed to implementing CARF and will advance its implementation in batches.

The first group of jurisdictions plans to commence the first automatic information exchange in 2027, primarily including the UK and EU member states, etc.; the second group of jurisdictions plans to fully implement in 2028, including Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, and China Hong Kong, etc.

According to the institutional arrangement, the collection of relevant transaction data will commence one year in advance, starting from 2026, crypto-asset service providers will need to systematically organize reportable transaction information.

Figure 1: Overview of CARF Implementation Progress in Major Jurisdictions

China Hong Kong: Clear Participation and Timetable Advancement

In the aforementioned arrangement, China Hong Kong has clearly committed to implementing CARF and will advance related work according to the international timetable.

Hong Kong plans to start collecting crypto-asset transaction data from 2027 and commence automatic tax information exchange with other cooperating jurisdictions in 2028.

Crypto-asset service providers operating under Hong Kong's regulatory framework need to establish corresponding data compliance and reporting mechanisms, and relevant reportable transactions will be included in the cross-border information exchange process.

Mainland China: Not Yet Committed and Outside the Implementation Scope

In comparison, Mainland China has not yet made an implementation commitment to CARF.

As of the current stage, Mainland China is not included in any implementation batch of CARF, nor has it been listed by the OECD as a jurisdiction that is relevant but has not yet committed to participation.

Under the current regulatory framework, the mainland adopts a strict restrictive attitude towards cryptocurrency trading activities, and there are no legal crypto-asset service providers within the country that can be纳入 the CARF reporting system; therefore, it does not currently meet the institutional conditions for participating in CARF's regularized information exchange.

Future Possibilities and Realistic Judgment

It should be pointed out that Mainland China has fully implemented CRS since 2018 and has mature experience in financial account information exchange.

If future crypto-asset regulatory policies are adjusted, the mainland has the institutional and technical conditions to对接 CARF.

However, given the current policy environment, the possibility of Mainland China joining this framework around the 2027 launch of CARF and in the following years remains relatively low.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the CARF and what is its primary purpose?

AThe CARF (Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework) is an international framework for the automatic exchange of tax-related information on crypto-assets. It targets crypto-asset service providers as the reporting entities, aiming to support tax authorities in various jurisdictions in obtaining information related to transactions involving their taxpayers.

QHow many jurisdictions have committed to implementing the CARF as of the end of 2025, and what is the implementation timeline?

AAs of the end of 2025, 76 countries and regions have committed to implementing the CARF. The first group of jurisdictions, including the UK and EU member states, plan to commence the first automatic information exchange in 2027. The second group, which includes Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, and Hong Kong, China, is scheduled to fully implement the framework in 2028.

QWhat is the commitment and implementation plan of Hong Kong, China regarding the CARF?

AHong Kong, China has explicitly committed to implementing the CARF. It plans to start collecting crypto-asset transaction data from 2027 and begin automatic exchange of tax information with other cooperating jurisdictions in 2028. Crypto-asset service providers operating under Hong Kong's regulatory framework will need to establish corresponding data compliance and reporting mechanisms.

QWhat is the current status of Mainland China's commitment to the CARF?

AMainland China has not yet made a commitment to implement the CARF. It is not included in any of the implementation batches listed by the OECD and is not currently classified as a relevant jurisdiction that has yet to commit. Under its current regulatory framework, which imposes strict restrictions on crypto-asset activities, there are no legitimate crypto-asset service providers that could be incorporated into the CARF reporting system, making short-term participation unlikely.

QDoes Mainland China have the foundational experience to potentially join the CARF in the future?

AYes, Mainland China has comprehensive experience in financial account information exchange, having fully implemented the CRS (Common Reporting Standard) since 2018. This provides it with the technical and institutional foundation to potentially adapt to the CARF requirements if its crypto-asset regulatory policy were to change in the future. However, given the current policy environment, the possibility of joining the CARF around its 2027 launch or in the subsequent few years remains relatively low.

İlgili Okumalar

Apple Also Has to Pay Rent Now

Apple Pays Rent Too: The Two-Way Flow of "Traffic Tax" and "AI Capability Rent" Between Tech Giants For over two decades, Google has paid Apple an estimated $20 billion annually to remain the default search engine on Safari, a "traffic tax" for a critical user entry point. However, in 2026, the direction of this cash flow partially reversed. Apple agreed to pay Google roughly $1 billion per year to license its Gemini AI models, as Apple's own models reportedly struggled with complex tasks. This creates a unique dynamic: Apple acts as the "landlord" in the established search ecosystem, collecting rent from Google for access. Simultaneously, in the emerging AI arena, Apple becomes the "tenant," paying Google for access to cutting-edge AI capabilities it cannot currently match internally. While Apple claims its new models are "distilled" from Gemini outputs and contain "not a drop" of Google's original code, core dependencies remain. Its knowledge base is refined using Gemini's outputs, and its most powerful cloud model runs on Google's infrastructure. Apple has structured the deal as non-exclusive, allowing it to theoretically switch AI suppliers—a hedge against over-reliance. The future hinges on whether advanced AI models become a commodity (cheap and abundant) or remain a concentrated, scarce resource (expensive and controlled by few). Apple is betting on the former, leveraging its massive device ecosystem to be a powerful, choosy customer. If the latter proves true, its bargaining power could erode. This power dynamic is extending to developers. Apple, Google, and WeChat are all pushing for apps to expose their core functions as standardized "actions" or "intents" that their respective AI assistants (Siri, Gemini, WeChat AI) can directly call. The new scarce resource is no longer just app store visibility, but "being selected by the AI." The currency of "rent" has changed from a 30% revenue share to ceding control over how users interact with an app's functions.

marsbit1 saat önce

Apple Also Has to Pay Rent Now

marsbit1 saat önce

Missed the SpaceX IPO? WEEX's "First Trade Protection" Lets You Experience US Stock Trading Risk-Free.

With the excitement around SpaceX's recent public listing reigniting interest in the US stock market, Chinese investors face significant challenges accessing compliant and convenient trading channels following regulatory actions against major online brokers. This article explores the available options, highlighting their risks and limitations. Traditional paths for US stock investments remain problematic. Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) and Listed Open-Ended Fund (LOF) products, while compliant, suffer from high fees, significant purchase premiums, and a very limited selection of assets. Small, unregulated offshore brokers pose substantial risks, including potential insolvency. While secure, VIP accounts at banks in Hong Kong or Singapore require high minimum deposits (often 1-2 million RMB) and in-person visits, placing them out of reach for most retail investors. The article positions cryptocurrency exchanges, specifically their TradFi (traditional finance on-chain) offerings, as a compelling alternative. Platforms like WEEX are noted for providing access to a wide range of US stocks and ETFs, including SpaceX (SPCXON), through tokenized assets. This method offers advantages such as a single account for both crypto and traditional assets, USDT-based settlement avoiding fiat complexities, flexible leverage, and robust risk management. To attract users, WEEX is promoting a "First Trade Guarantee" campaign. Running from June 15 to July 8 (UTC+8), it features a $30,000 prize pool. Users who trade $500 worth of US stock contracts can qualify for a guarantee on their first eligible trade: 100% loss coverage up to $30 or a 20% bonus on profits up to $30. The campaign is presented as a low-risk opportunity for both crypto natives and traditional investors to experience US stock trading.

marsbit1 saat önce

Missed the SpaceX IPO? WEEX's "First Trade Protection" Lets You Experience US Stock Trading Risk-Free.

marsbit1 saat önce

How Difficult is Chip Making? A Division Error Costs 475 Million Dollars

How Hard Is It to Make a Chip? A Division Error Cost $475 Million Chip expert Shi Kan, a researcher at the Chinese Academy of Sciences and a popular tech creator, explains the immense challenges of chip development. Chips are foundational to modern technology, but their creation is extraordinarily difficult. The journey from sand to a functional chip involves complex design and manufacturing, but a critical bottleneck is verification—ensuring the design works flawlessly before costly production. A single, undetected bug can have catastrophic consequences, as illustrated by the infamous 1994 Intel Pentium FDIV bug. A flaw in the floating-point division unit forced a recall costing $475 million. Unlike software, chips cannot be easily patched after manufacture, making "first-time success" paramount. However, industry surveys show only 24% of chip projects achieve this; over three-quarters require at least one costly re-spin due to design flaws. Verification has thus become the dominant phase, consuming up to 70% of the design cycle. The core challenge is a "verification impossible triangle" between high performance, good debuggability, and low cost. Exhaustively verifying a modern CPU core could take 15,000 years with software simulation, or 30 years with advanced hardware emulation—timeframes utterly impractical for development. Despite being essential, verification is often seen as unglamorous "dirty work," receiving less academic attention than fields like AI. Shi and his team are tackling this by developing an agile verification research framework called ENCORE, based on FPGA technology, to improve verification efficiency and debug capability. Beyond research, Shi engages in public science communication through long-form video content, aiming to demystify chip technology, AI, and computer science. He argues for the value of pursuing "hard and long-term" endeavors, whether in the meticulous world of chip verification or in creating substantive educational content, believing such sustained effort is likely the right path forward.

marsbit1 saat önce

How Difficult is Chip Making? A Division Error Costs 475 Million Dollars

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片