Brad Garlinghouse says CLARITY Act could pass by April as Polymarket odds hit 85%

ambcrypto2026-02-19 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-02-19 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Brad Garlinghouse, CEO of Ripple, has stated that the US CLARITY Act could pass as early as April, signaling potential regulatory clarity for digital assets. This optimism is reflected in prediction markets, with Polymarket traders assigning an 85% probability of the bill becoming law by 2026, a significant increase from 60% earlier this year. Garlinghouse and other industry leaders view the legislation as a crucial step toward resolving long-standing regulatory uncertainty, which they argue has disadvantaged US crypto firms. While some industry reservations remain about specific provisions, the rising market confidence suggests passage is increasingly seen as the base case. The act is viewed as a medium-term structural shift rather than an immediate market catalyst.

Brad Garlinghouse has said the US CLARITY Act could pass as early as April, adding momentum to a growing narrative that regulatory clarity for digital assets may finally be within reach.

Garlinghouse’s comments, made during a recent television interview, came as prediction markets sharply increased their confidence in the bill’s prospects.

Data from Polymarket shows traders now assigning an 85% probability that the legislation will be signed into law in 2026, up from around 60% earlier this year.

Prediction markets signal rising confidence

The jump in Polymarket odds suggests that confidence in the CLARITY Act has hardened beyond industry rhetoric. Prediction markets aggregate capital-weighted sentiment, meaning the surge reflects traders backing their views with money rather than opinion alone.

The move higher followed a series of public remarks from industry leaders, including Garlinghouse, who framed the bill as a meaningful—if imperfect—step toward resolving long-standing uncertainty around how digital assets are regulated in the US.

Ripple executive frames April as a key window

Garlinghouse, CEO of Ripple, said the industry is “closer than ever” to clear rules and pointed to April as a realistic timeline for passage, provided negotiations continue to move forward.

Ripple has been one of the most vocal supporters of market-structure legislation, following its multi-year legal battle with the US Securities and Exchange Commission.

Garlinghouse has consistently argued that prolonged regulatory ambiguity has pushed innovation offshore and disadvantaged US-based crypto firms.

Industry alignment remains uneven

While the Polymarket data suggests optimism, industry consensus is not universal.

Some firms have expressed reservations about aspects of the CLARITY Act, particularly around how authority would be divided between regulators and how certain crypto products would be classified.

Still, the combination of public executive support and rising market-priced probabilities indicates that traders increasingly see passage as the base case rather than a long shot.

Policy momentum versus market reality

The growing confidence in Washington contrasts with the broader crypto market, which remains sensitive to macro conditions and liquidity.

For now, the CLARITY Act’s progress appears to be viewed as a medium-term structural shift rather than an immediate market catalyst.

If the bill does advance on the timeline Garlinghouse outlined, it would mark one of the most consequential regulatory milestones for the US crypto industry to date.


Final Summary

  • Brad Garlinghouse’s April timeline aligns with a sharp rise in market-priced confidence around the CLARITY Act.
  • Polymarket odds at 85% suggest traders increasingly expect regulatory clarity despite remaining industry divisions.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the current probability assigned by Polymarket traders for the CLARITY Act being signed into law in 2026?

APolymarket traders currently assign an 85% probability that the CLARITY Act will be signed into law in 2026.

QAccording to Brad Garlinghouse, when could the CLARITY Act potentially pass?

ABrad Garlinghouse stated that the CLARITY Act could pass as early as April.

QWhy has Ripple been a vocal supporter of market-structure legislation like the CLARITY Act?

ARipple has been a vocal supporter following its multi-year legal battle with the US Securities and Exchange Commission, arguing that prolonged regulatory ambiguity has pushed innovation offshore and disadvantaged US-based crypto firms.

QWhat does the surge in Polymarket odds for the CLARITY Act indicate about trader sentiment?

AThe surge in Polymarket odds to 85% indicates that traders are backing their optimistic views with money, reflecting a hardened confidence beyond mere industry rhetoric.

QIs there universal industry consensus on the CLARITY Act, and what are some reservations?

ANo, industry consensus is not universal. Some firms have expressed reservations about how authority would be divided between regulators and how certain crypto products would be classified under the act.

İlgili Okumalar

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit13 dk önce

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit13 dk önce

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

For years, the semiconductor equipment industry followed an unwritten "iron rule": suppliers offered steep discounts for new tool introductions (Design-in) and faced consistent price pressure during repeat orders, especially during market downturns. This long-standing buyer's market dynamic is now being upended. Recently, SK Hynix's primary equipment suppliers have reportedly requested a 3-4% price *increase*, a nearly unprecedented move. This shift is driven by a severe supply-demand imbalance fueled by the AI compute boom. Securing equipment has become an urgent arms race as chipmakers' expansion speed dictates their ability to fulfill massive AI chip orders. Key areas feeling the strain include: **TCB (Thermal Compression Bonding) Equipment:** Demand is exploding, driven by the simultaneous needs of HBM4 memory stacking, AI chip Chip-on-Substrate (C2S), and logic Chiplet Chip-on-Wafer (C2W) packaging. Players like Hanmi Semiconductor, Hanwha Semitech, and ASMPT are receiving major orders. While hybrid bonding is seen as the future, TCB remains the pragmatic choice for HBM4 mass production, with its lifecycle extended by relaxed specifications and ongoing technological upgrades. **Test Equipment Bottlenecks:** Ironically, AI-driven shortages are now crippling test equipment manufacturing. Critical components like FPGAs, Driver ICs, and CPUs face severe shortages and extended lead times (up to 52 weeks for FPGAs), as AI data center and server vendors prioritize supply. This creates a paradoxical cycle: AI chip shortages drive fab expansion, which requires more test equipment, whose production is delayed because its key parts are diverted to make AI chips. The industry is entering a broad, AI-powered upcycle. SEMI forecasts global semiconductor equipment sales to hit a record $156 billion by 2027, fueled by investment in advanced logic/foundry, HBM-driven DRAM, and advanced packaging (like CoWoS). Major players like TSMC, SK Hynix, and Micron are aggressively ramping capital expenditure. In conclusion, leading equipment vendors are no longer just selling tools; they are selling the critical capability to deliver AI-era capacity. Pricing power is shifting decisively to those with indispensable technology in key process nodes like advanced logic, HBM, and advanced packaging, rewriting the industry's traditional power structure.

marsbit26 dk önce

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

marsbit26 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片