BlackRock, Apollo, Citadel Enter the Market in the Same Week, Investing Real Money in DeFi Governance Tokens

marsbit2026-03-25 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-03-25 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

In February 2026, major financial institutions including BlackRock, Apollo, and Citadel made significant moves into DeFi by directly purchasing governance tokens and integrating their products with decentralized infrastructure. Citadel invested in LayerZero’s ZRO token, BlackRock listed its $2.5B BUIDL fund on UniswapX and acquired UNI tokens, and Apollo committed to acquiring up to 9% of Morpho’s token supply over four years. These actions mark a shift from exploratory partnerships to tangible on-chain engagement, emphasizing economic alignment through token ownership and the use of live, revenue-generating DeFi protocols. The trend reflects growing institutional confidence in public, permissionless DeFi infrastructure, driven by proven scalability and network effects. Regulatory developments, such as the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, could further accelerate this institutional adoption of DeFi.

Author: José Sanchez & Kelvin Koh

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Introduction: In February 2026, the way traditional financial institutions entered DeFi underwent a qualitative change: no longer through strategic partnership announcements, but by directly purchasing governance tokens and routing products to decentralized infrastructure.

Within five days, Citadel bought ZRO, BlackRock bought UNI and listed BUIDL on UniswapX, Apollo committed to acquiring 9% of Morpho's token supply over four years. Spartan Group believes this is the true inflection point for the institutionalization of DeFi.

Full Text Below:

Inflection Point for DeFi Institutionalization

February 2026, within just five days, a cluster of landmark institution-crypto collaborations emerged, which we believe marks a qualitative change in how traditional finance participates in on-chain infrastructure.

Citadel Securities announced an investment in LayerZero's ZRO token; BlackRock listed its $2.5 billion BUIDL fund on UniswapX and purchased UNI tokens; Apollo Global Management committed to acquiring up to 9% of Morpho's total governance token supply over four years.

Previously, the NYSE had already announced on January 19th the launch of a tokenized securities platform supporting 24/7 on-chain settlement. The pattern is clear: institutional capital is shifting from exploration to real on-chain execution—buying tokens, acquiring governance rights, routing products to decentralized infrastructure.

This wave of entry differs from previous cycles in three ways.

First, these are direct token purchases that create economic alignment, not advisory arrangements or pilot declarations.

Second, the related products are actively operating with real revenue: BUIDL manages $2.5 billion, Morpho supports over $900 million in active loans for Coinbase, LayerZero has settled over $70 billion in USDT0 cross-chain transfers.

Third, institutions chose public, permissionless protocols, not proprietary closed systems, indicating that the composability and network effects of existing DeFi infrastructure are more valuable than the control offered by custom systems.

The NYSE kicked off this show on January 19th, announcing plans to build a blockchain-based venue supporting 24/7 trading and instant on-chain settlement of tokenized stocks and ETFs, combining its Pillar matching engine with a blockchain post-trade system. Although still subject to regulatory approval and implementation details are relatively limited, this is the highest-level directional signal: the world's most iconic stock exchange is targeting on-chain settlement as core infrastructure.

LayerZero followed on February 10th with Zero, a new L1 designed for institutional-grade financial infrastructure. Citadel Securities made a strategic ZRO token purchase, significant for a firm handling about 35% of US retail stock trading.

DTCC will explore using Zero to expand its tokenization and collateral management capabilities; ICE is evaluating the chain for 24/7 trading infrastructure; Google Cloud joined to explore AI Agent micropayments; ARK Invest holds both equity and token positions, with Cathie Wood joining the advisory board.

Tether also announced a separate strategic investment in LayerZero Labs on the same day. Zero is expected to launch in Fall 2026, with three zones: a general EVM environment, a privacy-focused payments zone, and a dedicated trading zone.

Institutional interest reflects proven throughput capability. USDT0—Tether's omnichain stablecoin built on LayerZero's OFT standard—has facilitated over $70 billion in cross-chain transfers since January 2025.

As shown in the figure below, daily settled value accelerated sharply after USDT0's launch, transforming LayerZero from a messaging layer into critical financial infrastructure.

Figure: USDT0 has facilitated over $70 billion in cross-chain transfers since launch

Source: BridgeWTF

The next day, BlackRock's $2.4 billion BUIDL fund (the largest tokenized US Treasury product) was listed and made tradable on UniswapX, marking the first time a BlackRock product became accessible via decentralized exchange infrastructure.

Securitize handles compliance and whitelisting, while Wintermute, Flowdesk, and Tokka Labs compete for quotes through UniswapX's RFQ framework. BlackRock also disclosed a strategic UNI token purchase (specific terms not yet public), its first DeFi governance token on its balance sheet.

Although BUIDL's access is still limited to qualified purchasers with a minimum of $5 million, Securitize CEO Carlos Domingo stated that the infrastructure is designed to scale to retail products over time.

The decision to list on Uniswap reflects BUIDL's evolution from a niche experiment to an institutional-scale product. Since launching in March 2024 with a $40 million size, the fund peaked at nearly $2.9 billion in mid-2025 and currently has a TVL of around $2.5 billion.

Figure: BlackRock's BUIDL fund currently has a TVL of $2.5 billion

Source: Defillama

On February 13th, Apollo Global Management signed a cooperation agreement, committing to acquire up to 90 million MORPHO tokens over 48 months, approximately 9% of the total supply.

In addition to the token acquisition (valued at approximately $110 million at mid-February prices), Apollo will also collaborate to build on-chain lending markets, extending its blockchain footprint—part of its credit strategies are already tokenized via Securitize (ACRED) and Anemoy (ACRDX).

This deal is one of the most significant collaborations to date between an institution and a native DeFi protocol.

The opportunities for institutions within Morpho extend beyond token ownership. The protocol's architecture allows any entity to become a vault curator, building lending markets with customized risk parameters. Curators can earn performance fees from generated yield and management fees (capped at 5%) from AUM, creating a sustainable revenue model for institutional participants.

Perhaps the most convincing validation of the infrastructure is the CeFi-DeFi "Mohawk" model pioneered by Coinbase: retail users borrow against BTC and ETH collateral through the Coinbase interface, while Morpho acts as the lending engine on the backend, currently supporting over $900 million in active loans and $1.7 billion in collateral.

This proves that institutional-grade DeFi can be abstracted and scaled to operate behind familiar consumer interfaces, with users not needing to interact with the underlying protocol.

For Apollo, the vault curator economics, the validated distribution channel via Coinbase, and the governance influence gained through token accumulation together form a strong positioning in the on-chain credit space.

This convergence validates the design choices of permissionless, composable protocols and suggests sustained demand for governance tokens of infrastructure layer projects.

Key risks remain in execution: regulatory approval for the NYSE platform and Zero is pending, institutional token purchases may test protocol governance, and the gap between announcements and sustained on-chain activity remains significant. Nonetheless, the directional signal is unmistakable.

Figure: Morpho vault curators have generated substantial fee revenue

Source: Blockworks Research

Looking ahead, we expect these partnerships to deepen further once the CLARITY Act is passed. The Act passed the House in July 2025 by a vote of 294 to 134 and is now advancing in the Senate, where the Banking and Agriculture Committees need to reconcile their respective draft versions before a full vote.

The main point of contention is the treatment of stablecoin yield: the banking side is pushing to restrict interest payments on stablecoin balances, while crypto firms argue this would push innovation overseas.

July is widely seen as a key deadline before the August recess; if missed, the next window will be delayed until the fall. Once enacted, the CLARITY Act will provide the US's first comprehensive digital asset regulatory framework, clarify SEC/CFTC jurisdiction, establish a registration path for digital commodity exchanges, and provide legal certainty for tokenized products.

For protocols like Morpho and Uniswap, this will remove the regulatory ambiguity that currently constrains the scope of institutional cooperation. We believe this will unlock a second, broader wave of TradFi-crypto integration.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat significant shift in how traditional financial institutions engage with DeFi occurred in February 2026?

AThe shift was a move from strategic partnership announcements to directly purchasing governance tokens and routing products to decentralized infrastructure, marking a qualitative change in their participation.

QWhich three major institutions made significant moves into DeFi within a five-day period, and what did each do?

ACitadel Securities invested in LayerZero's ZRO token; BlackRock listed its $2.5B BUIDL fund on UniswapX and purchased UNI tokens; Apollo Global Management committed to acquiring up to 9% of Morpho's token supply over four years.

QWhat are the three key differences between this wave of institutional entry into DeFi and previous cycles?

A1. They involve direct token purchases creating economic alignment, not just advisory roles or pilot announcements. 2. The involved products are actively operating with real revenue. 3. Institutions chose public, permissionless protocols over proprietary closed systems, valuing composability and network effects.

QWhat is the significance of the 'Mohawk' model pioneered by Coinbase, as mentioned in the context of Morpho?

AThe 'Mohawk' model is a CeFi-DeFi hybrid where retail users borrow against BTC and ETH through the Coinbase interface, while Morpho acts as the lending engine on the backend. It proves that institutional-grade DeFi can be abstracted and scaled behind a consumer interface.

QWhat potential future development does the article suggest could further deepen these TradFi-DeFi partnerships, and what is a key point of contention surrounding it?

AThe passage of the CLARITY Act is expected to deepen partnerships. A key point of contention is the treatment of stablecoin yield, with banks pushing to restrict interest payments on stablecoin balances, while crypto firms argue this would push innovation overseas.

İlgili Okumalar

The Era Has Arrived Where Human Writers Must Prove They Are Not Machines

The article describes an era where AI-generated content is flooding the market, forcing human authors to prove they are not machines. It begins with the example of dozens of AI-written, error-ridden biographies of Henry Kissinger appearing on Amazon within hours of his death, a pattern repeated for other deceased celebrities and even living experts who find fraudulent books under their names. This spam content has exploded, with monthly new book releases on platforms like Amazon reaching 300,000 by late 2025. The issue spans genres, from suspiciously high proportions of AI-written teen romance and self-help books to dangerous, AI-generated foraging guides containing lethal advice. The platforms' automated review systems, designed to catch plagiarism and banned words, are ill-equipped to detect AI-generated text that avoids these pitfalls while being nonsensical or fraudulent. The problem has infiltrated traditional publishing. A major publisher, Hachette, had to recall a bestselling horror novel after AI detection tools suggested 78% of its content was machine-generated. An acclaimed European philosophy book was later revealed to be entirely written by AI under a fake author persona. In response, authors are fighting back. At the 2026 London Book Fair, 10,000 writers published a blank book titled "Don't Steal This Book" containing only their signatures—using emptiness as a protest weapon in an age of AI overproduction. Initiatives like the "Human Author Certification" program have emerged, ironically placing the burden on humans to prove their work is not machine-made. The article warns of a vicious cycle: AI-generated low-quality books pollute the data used to train future AI models, leading to "model collapse" and an ever-worsening flood of digital waste, eroding trust in publishing and devaluing human creativity.

marsbit14 dk önce

The Era Has Arrived Where Human Writers Must Prove They Are Not Machines

marsbit14 dk önce

Strategy CEO Highlights Scenarios Where Company Would Sell Bitcoin — Report

Strategy CEO Phong Le outlined potential scenarios for the company to sell portions of its massive Bitcoin holdings, a departure from its "Never Sell" philosophy. In a CNBC interview, Le stated sales could occur to finance dividend payments for its Perpetual Preferred Stock if doing so increases shareholder value, defined as a rise in "Bitcoin per share." He emphasized a data-driven approach, prioritizing math over ideology. Other reasons include when the company's book value is below market value or to capture tax benefits. As the largest corporate holder with 818,334 BTC (~$65 billion), Strategy has significant annual dividend obligations (~$1.5 billion). Le believes the Bitcoin market's high liquidity (~$60B daily volume) can absorb such sales without major price impact. Bitcoin currently trades around $80,840.

bitcoinist25 dk önce

Strategy CEO Highlights Scenarios Where Company Would Sell Bitcoin — Report

bitcoinist25 dk önce

Crypto Funds See Six Consecutive Weeks of Net Inflows, CLARITY Act Drives $858 Million Influx

Global cryptocurrency investment products recorded a net inflow of $857.9 million last week, marking the sixth consecutive week of positive flows and the largest single-week inflow since April 24, according to CoinShares' latest report. The primary catalyst was legislative progress on the U.S. CLARITY Act, specifically the final compromise text for stablecoin yield provisions, alongside Bitcoin's price breaking above $80,000. U.S.-listed products dominated with $776.6 million in inflows, a significant jump from the prior week's $47.5 million. European markets also saw increased participation. Bitcoin products led with $706.1 million in inflows, while short-Bitcoin products experienced their largest weekly outflow of 2026, indicating unwinding bearish positions. Major altcoins like Ethereum, Solana, and XRP all saw renewed positive flows, with Ethereum reversing its prior week's outflow to attract $77.1 million. Total assets under management (AUM) climbed to $160 billion.

marsbit28 dk önce

Crypto Funds See Six Consecutive Weeks of Net Inflows, CLARITY Act Drives $858 Million Influx

marsbit28 dk önce

Silicon Valley Wang Chuan: How Can You Not Feel Anxious When the Neighbor Lao Wang Earned 30x by Investing in Storage Stocks?

The author explores anxiety, attributing it to the amygdala's stress response, and suggests writing down worries to shift control to the rational prefrontal cortex, easing anxiety more effectively than mere reassurance. The piece then examines a source of financial anxiety in May 2026: a 150% surge in the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index, with storage stock SNDK skyrocketing 38x. The author analyzes the underlying logic behind this boom, tracing it to soaring valuations of AI startups like Anthropic (Anth). Anth's reported $400 billion ARR is scrutinized, revealing that cumulative revenue since founding is only about $108 billion, with the company still losing billions monthly and relying on continuous funding (having raised $723 billion). The author contrasts Anth's $1+ trillion valuation speculation with Berkshire Hathaway's fundamentals ($3.7 trillion revenue, $669 billion profit, $4 trillion cash, $1 trillion market cap), questioning the belief that a loss-making, funding-dependent startup could be worth more than the established giant. The narrative concludes by linking the massive valuations of Anth and OpenAI to a surge in AI industry capital expenditure (capex), which in turn fueled the storage sector's prosperity, setting the stage for a further discussion.

marsbit39 dk önce

Silicon Valley Wang Chuan: How Can You Not Feel Anxious When the Neighbor Lao Wang Earned 30x by Investing in Storage Stocks?

marsbit39 dk önce

The King of Blind Date Attire in Korea: How SK Hynix Made a Comeback Against Samsung?

In South Korea's dating scene, SK Hynix employees are now highly sought after, a status shift fueled by the company's astronomical profits and employee bonuses, projected to reach up to 6.1 million RMB per person by 2027. This marks a dramatic reversal for the long-time second-place player in memory semiconductors, which has now surpassed its rival Samsung in annual operating profit. The turnaround story began in 2008 when a struggling Hynix, emerging from bankruptcy restructuring, took a risky bet by agreeing to develop High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) with AMD. At the time, HBM had no clear market beyond high-end graphics cards and was a costly, complex technology. Major players like Samsung, pursuing its own HMC technology, declined. For Hynix, with only memory as its core business, it was a gamble born of necessity. The pivotal moment came in 2012 when SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won acquired Hynix. Defying industry downturns, he invested heavily in R&D and fabrication, sustaining the HBM project through over a decade of commercial uncertainty and internal challenges. A key break occurred around 2016-2017 when Samsung faced production issues supplying HBM2 for Google's TPU, allowing SK Hynix to gain a crucial foothold in the data center market. The AI explosion post-ChatGPT in 2022 was the catalyst, turning HBM into a critical bottleneck for AI accelerators like NVIDIA's GPUs. By 2025, SK Hynix captured 62% of the global HBM market, leaving Samsung at 17%. For the first time, its annual operating profit exceeded Samsung's. Analysts point to the "innovator's dilemma" to explain Samsung's miss: its vast, successful business portfolio made it risk-averse, preventing an all-in bet on the initially niche HBM technology. In contrast, SK Hynix, as a challenger with its back against the wall, had no choice but to commit fully. The story highlights how Korea's chaebol system allows for ultra-long-term bets beyond quarterly pressures. However, SK Hynix's lead isn't guaranteed. Samsung is aggressively catching up on HBM4, and challenges like customer concentration (heavy reliance on NVIDIA) and technical hurdles in advanced packaging remain. The narrative underscores a market truth: the greatest alpha often comes from betting on uncertain, long-term directions others dismiss, much like HBM in 2008.

marsbit54 dk önce

The King of Blind Date Attire in Korea: How SK Hynix Made a Comeback Against Samsung?

marsbit54 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot

Futures