Behind the $1 Billion Revenue: How Long Can Pump.fun's Money Printer Keep Running?

比推2026-03-17 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-03-17 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Pump.fun, a leading meme coin launch platform on Solana, has surpassed $1 billion in cumulative revenue, becoming the first on the chain to reach this milestone. Despite a broader market downturn in 2026, its dominance has solidified, capturing over 90% of daily trading volume and token creation on Solana. While its daily metrics remain strong, a significant portion of its revenue is shared with creators and LPs or used for token buybacks, which hasn't prevented its native token's price from falling over 76% from its peak. The analysis extends to other major players, revealing a market consolidation where traffic and profits are increasingly concentrated among top platforms. GMGN saw a five-fold quarterly revenue increase, primarily driven by activity on BSC, while Four.meme, BSC's main launchpad, operates at a fraction of its peak income. In contrast, platforms like Axiom, Photon, BullX, and BONKbot show steeper, sustained declines in revenue. The conclusion is that the meme coin sector is not disappearing but is undergoing a rapid shakeout. The survivors are platforms with robust, full-cycle ecosystems for token launches, trading, and liquidity. If another meme wave emerges, these established players are poised to capture the majority of the gains.

Author: Frank, PANews

Original Title: Pump.fun Joins the Billion-Dollar Club, How Much Business Does the "MEME Cash Machine" Have Left?


On March 8, Pump.fun's cumulative revenue exceeded $1 billion, making it the first platform on Solana to reach this milestone and solidifying its position as the most prominent money printer in the MEME sector. However, after the hype subsided, the question is no longer just "who made the most money," but rather how much business these MEME-driven platforms still have left.

Looking at top ecosystem projects like Pump.fun, GMGN, Four.meme, Axiom, as well as Photon, BullX, and BONK, the answer is becoming increasingly clear: MEME hasn't disappeared, but the business is increasingly concentrated among the top players, and the divergence between chains and platforms is becoming more pronounced.

Pump.fun: The "Absolute Oligarch" Across Bull and Bear Markets, Billions in Profits but Hard to Retain

If the last wave of MEME frenzy was a non-stop gold rush, then Pump.fun was undoubtedly the most profitable toll booth in this gold rush town. Public data shows that as of March 2026, Pump.fun's cumulative total revenue has exceeded $1 billion. Of this, 2024 contributed approximately $321 million, and 2025 further increased to about $664 million. Starting in 2026, the MEME industry experienced a significant downturn, but Pump.fun seemed relatively unaffected, still generating about $98.3 million in revenue to date.

In terms of market structure, Pump.fun's dominant position in the Solana ecosystem has further strengthened. Taking data from March 15 as an example, Pump.fun's token creation share reached 99.1%, the graduation rate of tokens was 94.8%, and its daily trading volume share was about 93%. That day, Pump.fun launched 24,938 tokens, while LetsBonk had only 132, Bags had 50, and Moonshot had 28. The daily volume of other token launch platforms is no longer competitive with Pump.fun.

Looking back at Pump.fun's own data, it has also maintained a surprisingly high standard. Rough calculations based on visible data from the past two weeks show that Pump.fun currently averages about 29,700 token launches per day, with approximately 157,700 daily active wallets, a daily trading volume of about $93.65 million, and daily revenue of about $870,000. At the same time, the graduation rate, long seen as a weakness of the platform, has shown signs of recovery, recently even surging to around 1.70%. Although the specific reason behind this short-term peak is not yet clear, Pump.fun's graduation efficiency is indeed improving.

However, although fee generation remains robust, for Pump.fun, it does not mean that all this revenue can be fully converted into protocol profits. First, more than half of the fees are given to creators and LPs. Second, the remaining revenue is also used for token buybacks. In the first quarter of 2026, Pump.fun generated a total of $227 million in fees, of which $123 million was distributed to creators and LPs, and the remaining $100 million was almost entirely used for token buybacks.

The problem is that the buybacks did not automatically translate into a rise in token price. As of March 16, the price of PUMP was about $0.002, still about 76.21% lower than its all-time high of $0.0088. A more reasonable explanation is that buybacks can only provide support and maintain the narrative but are insufficient to reverse the overall compression of valuations in the MEME sector. In other words, Pump.fun's cash flow machine is still running at high speed, but the market is no longer willing to give it higher valuation multiples simply because it "makes money," as it did during the last hype cycle.

In summary, for Pump.fun, the market structure remains relatively stable. Although the entire meme coin sector is experiencing a decline, it's mostly the competitors that have died off,反而 making Pump.fun's dominance even stronger. If this market can explode again, Pump.fun is likely to capture even greater红利.

GMGN: Quarterly Revenue Grows Fivefold, BSC Becomes the "New Traffic Hotspot"

GMGN's revenue saw another explosive growth in the first quarter of 2026. Total revenue for Q1 2026 reached $25.31 million, a nearly fivefold increase compared to $5.64 million in Q4 2025. This quarter's revenue also became the second-highest quarterly revenue in GMGN's history (only lower than Q1 2025's $40.81 million).

A closer look at this revenue structure shows that it is mainly driven by the BSC chain. Starting in October 2025, GMGN's trading volume on the BSC chain began to significantly exceed that on Solana, and by 2026 this trend had stabilized. To date, the trading share on the BSC chain on GMGN is nearly three times that of the Solana chain.

From an overall trading volume perspective, user activity and trading volume on GMGN improved somewhat in Q1 2026, but the increase is not as high as the revenue change suggests. Therefore, from this angle, the revenue improvement in Q1 2026 is real, but the explosive growth is likely a statistical issue with DefiLlama (BSC chain revenue data was empty before October 2025).

However, this growth was primarily driven by a surge in MEME trading volume on the BSC chain in January, which generated $16.34 million in cross-chain revenue that month. This number dropped to $5.18 million in February and is about $3.77 million so far in March. The overall level for Q1 this year is similar to that of the same period in 2025.

Four.meme: The "Face" of BSC, Daily Revenue Only a Fraction of Its Peak

If Pump.fun has almost absorbed most of the traffic on Solana launch platforms, then on BSC, the closest to a similar role is Four.meme.

DeFiLlama data shows that as of March 16, Four.meme's protocol revenue for Q1 2026 has reached $16 million, significantly lower than the $54.24 million in Q4 2025. However, looking at the monthly revenue changes this year, there has been a slight recovery.

According to visible data tracked by Dune for the last 10 days, Four.meme averages about 4,858 token launches per day, with approximately 5,749 daily users. Only about 25.7 tokens are listed on the DEX Pancake daily, and the short-term graduation rate has further dropped to around 0.53%. Judging from these data changes, the current Four.meme is also operating at a low level. Compared to the peak daily revenue of $4.22 million in October 2025, current revenue has fallen to the $200,000-$300,000 level.

For comparison, estimates based on Pump.fun's data from the past two weeks show it still averages about 29,700 token launches per day and a daily trading volume of about $93.65 million. Clearly, as the main platforms for MEME coins on Solana and BSC respectively, there is a significant gap in scale and token quality between Four.meme and Pump.fun, reflecting the development of MEME on these two chains.

Axiom: Farewell to High Growth, Stuck in a Continuous Volume Contraction Quagmire

If GMGN's growth in Q1 2026 was more like catching the红利 of the BSC rotation, then Axiom's situation is almost the opposite.

According to DeFiLlama data, as of now, the protocol's revenue in Q1 2026 is approximately $29.03 million, higher than GMGN's $25.31 million for the same period.

However, Axiom's current problem is that its business is in a state of continuous decline. According to DeFiLlama's quarterly revenue data, Axiom's protocol revenue reached highs of $133 million and $150 million in Q2 and Q3 2025 respectively, but fell to $60.66 million in Q4 2025, and is currently $29.03 million for Q1 2026. Compared to the most疯狂 phase last year, the business volume has significantly contracted. Comparing this with GMGN reveals that although both are in a post-peak decline phase, GMGN's revenue still has occasional阶段性 rebounds, while Axiom seems unable to regain its momentum.

For Axiom, it is no longer just a tool reliant on MEME hype bursts but更像是一台经历过多轮行情检验的成熟交易机器 (more like a mature trading machine that has been tested through multiple market cycles). Compared to GMGN, which is still talking about growth elasticity, Axiom's imagination space seems to be shrinking.

Photon, BullX, and BONK: The "Stragglers" After the Tide Recedes

Compared to GMGN, which still has rebounds, and Axiom, which maintains a leading scale, the revenue curves of Photon, BullX, and BONKbot have more clearly entered a downward trend in 2026.

According to DeFiLlama data as of March 16, Photon's cumulative revenue is approximately $438 million, but its quarterly revenue has declined from $122.8 million in Q1 2025, to $32.31 million in Q2, $18.99 million in Q3, $5.29 million in Q4, and is only $4.52 million so far in Q1 2026, showing a nearly阶梯式坠落 (stepped decline) trend.

BullX's cumulative revenue is about $203 million, but it also experienced rapid contraction. Quarterly revenue dropped from $87.37 million in Q1 2025 to $14.25 million in Q2, $3.86 million in Q3, $878,000 in Q4, and is only $491,000 so far in Q1 2026.

BONKbot's decline is relatively less steep but has also clearly receded. According to DeFiLlama data, its cumulative revenue is about $93.57 million. Quarterly revenue was $12.61 million in Q1 2025, then fell to $3.40 million in Q2, $2.85 million in Q3, $1.85 million in Q4, and is $1.84 million so far in Q1 2026.

However, the BONK ecosystem itself has not simultaneously熄火 (fizzled out). As of now, BONK.fun's protocol revenue for Q1 2026 is approximately $8.51 million, already higher than the $7.06 million in Q4 2025. Of this current quarter's revenue, about $6 million comes from Bonk.Fun, and about $1.84 million comes from BonkBot.

Looking at this MEME coin battle royale, it's not hard to draw a conclusion: the MEME track is not dying out; it's just that the era of wild competition has彻底终结 (completely ended), and the reshuffling speed has far exceeded everyone's expectations.

After the tide receded, the platforms that truly remained are no longer just the fastest runners but those that have built a complete closed loop encompassing launch, trading, liquidity, and fee collection. If the next wave of MEME行情 (market trend) starts again, they are most likely the ones to benefit first.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7620497

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is Pump.fun's total cumulative revenue as of March 8th, and why is this milestone significant?

APump.fun's cumulative revenue reached $1 billion as of March 8th, making it the first platform on Solana to achieve this milestone. It solidifies its position as the most prominent revenue generator in the MEME sector.

QHow has Pump.fun's revenue distribution changed, and what happens to the fees collected?

AA significant portion of Pump.fun's fees are distributed to creators and liquidity providers (LPs). For example, in Q1 2026, out of $227 million in fees, $123 million was given to creators and LPs, and the remaining $100 million was almost entirely used for token buybacks.

QWhich platform experienced a nearly 5x quarter-over-quarter revenue growth in Q1 2026, and on which blockchain was this growth primarily driven?

AGMGN experienced a nearly 5x quarter-over-quarter revenue growth in Q1 2026, reaching $25.31 million. This growth was primarily driven by a surge in activity on the BSC (Binance Smart Chain), which now accounts for nearly three times the trading volume of its Solana chain.

QHow does the current daily revenue of Four.meme compare to its peak, and what does this indicate about the BSC MEME market?

AFour.meme's current daily revenue has fallen to the $200,000-$300,000 range, which is only a fraction of its peak daily revenue of $4.22 million in October 2025. This indicates a significant cooling off and lower activity levels in the BSC MEME market compared to its previous highs.

QWhich MEME-related platforms are described as 'laggards' with clearly declining revenue curves in 2026?

AThe platforms described as 'laggards' with clearly declining revenue curves in 2026 are Photon, BullX, and BONKbot. Their quarterly revenues have shown a consistent and significant downward trend throughout 2025 and into 2026.

İlgili Okumalar

From Theft to Re-entry: How Was $292 Million "Laundered"?

A sophisticated crypto laundering operation was executed following the $292 million hack of Kelp DAO on April 18. The attack, attributed to the North Korean Lazarus group, began with anonymous infrastructure preparation using Tornado Cash to fund wallets untraceably. The hacker exploited a vulnerability in Kelp’s cross-chain bridge, stealing 116,500 rsETH. To avoid crashing the market, the attacker used Aave and Compound as laundering tools—depositing the stolen rsETH as collateral to borrow $190 million in clean, liquid ETH. This move triggered a bank run on Aave, causing an $8 billion drop in TVL. After consolidating funds, the attacker fragmented them across hundreds of wallets to evade detection. A major breakpoint was THORChain, where over $460 million in volume—30 times its usual activity—was processed in 24 hours, converting ETH into Bitcoin. This shift to Bitcoin’s UTXO model exponentially increased tracing complexity by shattering funds into countless untraceable fragments. The final destination was Tron-based USDT, the primary channel for illicit crypto flows. From there, funds were cashed out via OTC brokers in China and Southeast Asia, using unlicensed underground banks and UnionPay networks outside Western sanctions scope. Ultimately, the laundered money supports North Korea’s weapons programs, which rely heavily on crypto hacking for foreign currency. The incident underscores structural challenges in DeFi: its openness, composability, and lack of central control make such laundering not just possible, but inherently difficult to prevent.

marsbit5 dk önce

From Theft to Re-entry: How Was $292 Million "Laundered"?

marsbit5 dk önce

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

In a span of four days, Amazon announced an additional $25 billion investment, and Google pledged up to $40 billion—both direct competitors pouring over $65 billion into the same AI startup, Anthropic. Rather than a typical venture capital move, this signals the latest escalation in the cloud wars. The core of the deal is not equity but compute pre-orders: Anthropic must spend the majority of these funds on AWS and Google Cloud services and chips, effectively locking in massive future compute consumption. This reflects a shift in cloud market dynamics—enterprises now choose cloud providers based on which hosts the best AI models, not just price or stability. With OpenAI deeply tied to Microsoft, Anthropic’s Claude has become the only viable strategic asset for Google and Amazon to remain competitive. Anthropic’s annualized revenue has surged to $30 billion, and it is expanding into verticals like biotech, positioning itself as a cross-industry AI infrastructure layer. However, this funding comes with constraints: Anthropic’s independence is challenged as it balances two rival investors, its safety-first narrative faces pressure from regulatory scrutiny, and its path to IPO introduces new financial pressures. Globally, this accelerates a "tri-polar" closed-loop structure in AI infrastructure, with Microsoft-OpenAI, Google-Anthropic, and Amazon-Anthropic forming exclusive model-cloud alliances. In contrast, China’s landscape differs—investments like Alibaba and Tencent backing open-source model firm DeepSeek reflect a more decoupled approach, though closed-source models from major cloud providers still dominate. The $65 billion bet is ultimately about securing a seat at the table in an AI-defined future—where missing the model layer means losing the cloud war.

marsbit6 saat önce

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

marsbit6 saat önce

Computing Power Constrained, Why Did DeepSeek-V4 Open Source?

DeepSeek-V4 has been released as a preview open-source model, featuring 1 million tokens of context length as a baseline capability—previously a premium feature locked behind enterprise paywalls by major overseas AI firms. The official announcement, however, openly acknowledges computational constraints, particularly limited service throughput for the high-end DeepSeek-V4-Pro version due to restricted high-end computing power. Rather than competing on pure scale, DeepSeek adopts a pragmatic approach that balances algorithmic innovation with hardware realities in China’s AI ecosystem. The V4-Pro model uses a highly sparse architecture with 1.6T total parameters but only activates 49B during inference. It performs strongly in agentic coding, knowledge-intensive tasks, and STEM reasoning, competing closely with top-tier closed models like Gemini Pro 3.1 and Claude Opus 4.6 in certain scenarios. A key strategic product is the Flash edition, with 284B total parameters but only 13B activated—making it cost-effective and accessible for mid- and low-tier hardware, including domestic AI chips from Huawei (Ascend), Cambricon, and Hygon. This design supports broader adoption across developers and SMEs while stimulating China's domestic semiconductor ecosystem. Despite facing talent outflow and intense competition in user traffic—with rivals like Doubao and Qianwen leading in monthly active users—DeepSeek has maintained technical momentum. The release also comes amid reports of a new funding round targeting a valuation exceeding $10 billion, potentially setting a new record in China’s LLM sector. Ultimately, DeepSeek-V4 represents a shift toward open yet realistic infrastructure development in the constrained compute landscape of Chinese AI, emphasizing engineering efficiency and domestic hardware compatibility over pure model scale.

marsbit6 saat önce

Computing Power Constrained, Why Did DeepSeek-V4 Open Source?

marsbit6 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片