Axie Infinity up 14% – AXS faces decisive $2 test next

ambcrypto2026-01-20 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-01-20 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Axie Infinity (AXS) leads gaming tokens with a 14% daily gain, continuing the bullish momentum from the previous week. However, the broader gaming sector shows mixed performance, with only SAND and MANA also posting gains among the top 10 tokens. AXS faces a critical resistance test at the $2 level after breaking out from a consolidation phase below $1. Technical indicators like the MACD show weakening bearish pressure, while the On Balance Volume suggests strong buying interest. On-chain data reveals mixed sentiment, with some addresses depositing (potentially profit-taking) and others withdrawing (indicating bullish belief). A sharp decline in holders could challenge further upside, but a break above $2 remains possible if bullish momentum continues.

Gaming tokens were still maintaining the bullish momentum that started as the previous week came to a close. However, most of them have not sustained this trend in the past 24 hours.

Axie Infinity is leading all the top-capped tokens with double-digit gains of 14%. This rally was within the 113% range of last week.

Only three of them have managed positive returns among the top 10 in terms of capitalization. The Sandbox [SAND] and Decentraland [MANA] recorded 6% and 5%, respectively, while the others were in red.

The rally follows capital rotation into gaming tokens. They have been the strongest sector among all altcoins over the past week. Will AXS bulls sustain the trend?

AXS bears testing bulls’ strength

The chart showed that AXS was in an uptrend after breaking out of the sideways consolidation below $1. The breakout was followed by a surge that was paused around the higher high of $2.

The pause came as bears kicked in. As such, the MACD was red, though the strength was diminishing after bulls countered the pullback.

This signal showed sellers were being taken out gradually after recovery was initiated at $1.6.

Meanwhile, the On Balance Volume (OBV) of over $90 million explained what drove the recovery. However, bulls needed to beat bears at the $2 zone, which was the decision area for the next move.

Transactions show mixed signals

The network activity on Etherscan showed that there were over 2,600 transactions on the day. This indicated why AXS had outperformed its peers during the day.

However, this on-chain activity was mixed in sentiment despite the gauge being 84% bullish and 16% bearish. There were addresses that were withdrawing from exchanges, and at the same time, there were those depositing.

For instance, a wallet deposited over $40K AXS to Bybit. Another wallet withdrew $16.9K worth of AXS from Binance.

Furthermore, there was inter-exchange token movement. For instance, Coinbase moved $5K to Binance, while OKX moved $1.3K to the Gate.io exchange.

The withdrawing addresses showed belief in a continued uptrend, while those depositing were potentially taking profit. The balance in the two activities showed there was no consensus in direction bias.

Axie Infinity holders dip sharply

The number of Axie Infinity holders dropped sharply, with over 1.5K lost in a week, at 166.72K at press time. This meant that they were taking profit from the aforementioned rally.

Such an outcome could derail Axie Infinity’s potential to break past $2. However, if bulls beat bears and gaming tokens continue thriving, AXS may breach $2.

Final Thoughts

AXS rallies 14%, leading all the gaming tokens in terms of daily gains.
AXS price faces a key test at $2, with holders declining sharply.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the current price movement of Axie Infinity (AXS) and what key level is it testing?

AAxie Infinity (AXS) is up 14% and is currently testing the key resistance level of $2.

QWhich other gaming tokens, besides AXS, recorded positive returns among the top 10 by market cap?

ABesides AXS, The Sandbox (SAND) recorded a 6% gain and Decentraland (MANA) recorded a 5% gain.

QWhat on-chain metric, with a value of over $90 million, is cited as a driver for the AXS price recovery?

AThe On Balance Volume (OBV) of over $90 million is cited as a driver for the AXS price recovery.

QWhat does the sharp decline in the number of Axie Infinity holders suggest about investor behavior?

AThe sharp decline of over 1,500 holders suggests that investors are taking profits from the recent price rally.

QAccording to the network activity on Etherscan, what was the mixed sentiment among AXS traders?

AThe mixed sentiment was shown by some addresses depositing AXS to exchanges to take profits, while others were withdrawing AXS from exchanges, indicating a belief in a continued uptrend.

İlgili Okumalar

Bitcoin Price Could See Another Crash, But What Is The Long-Term Prognosis?

Bitcoin recently surpassed $78,000, reigniting bullish sentiment and expectations of reaching six figures. However, analyst Behdark warns of a potential price crash before any sustained recovery. He suggests current optimism may be misleading, possibly a tactic by market makers to attract buyers before a downturn. Technical analysis indicates bearish patterns, such as a triangle or diamagnetic formation, signaling a likely decline. Key resistance levels to watch are $77,000 and $80,552, where a reversal may occur. If a correction happens, support levels are identified near $72,800, $67,885, and $67,677, with a break below possibly leading to a further 10% drop. The long-term outlook remains above the $60,000 cycle support, suggesting eventual recovery after a short-term dip.

bitcoinist1 saat önce

Bitcoin Price Could See Another Crash, But What Is The Long-Term Prognosis?

bitcoinist1 saat önce

Prediction Markets Under Bias

The article "Prediction Markets Under Bias" by Jeff Park of Bitwise argues against the common media portrayal of prediction markets as mere gambling or a social ill. It distinguishes between gambling and investment based on whether a participant's strategy has a positive expected value (+EV), not the market's structure. The author contends that prediction markets, like poker, are skill-based and can be a legitimate form of investment, offering individuals autonomy, truth discovery, and decentralized value. The piece critiques the common conflation of prediction markets with casino gambling, highlighting their role in risk hedging and capital efficiency, similar to insurance and securitization. A key differentiator is their precision and finite expiration, which makes prices directly anchor to factual outcomes, rewarding deep research and information advantage rather than punishing the uninformed. The author concludes that media opposition often stems from a structural bias, as these markets challenge traditional information gatekeepers and promote a more democratic, transparent system for pricing truth. The real debate is not about information having a price, but about who controls and profits from it.

marsbit1 saat önce

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

Why do you always lose money on Polymarket? Because you bet on news, while the pros study the rules. This article explains how top traders ("che tou") profit by meticulously analyzing market rules, not just predicting events. Polymarket, a prediction market platform, often sees disputes over event outcomes due to ambiguous rule wording. For instance, a market asking "Who will be the leader of Venezuela by the end of 2026?" was misinterpreted by many who bet on Delcy Rodríguez, assuming she held power. However, the rules specified "officially holds" as the formally appointed, sworn-in individual. Since Nicolás Maduro was still recognized as president officially, he won the market—even being in prison. To resolve such disputes, Polymarket uses a decentralized arbitration system via UMA protocol. The process involves: 1. Proposal: Anyone can propose a market outcome by staking 750 USDC, earning 5 USDC if unchallenged. 2. Dispute: A 2-hour window allows challenges with a 750 USDC stake; successful challengers earn 250 USDC. 3. Discussion: A 48-hour period on UMA Discord for evidence and debate. 4. Voting: UMA token holders vote in two 24-hour phases (blind then public). Outcomes require >65% consensus and 5M tokens voted; otherwise, four re-votes occur before Polymarket intervention. 5. Settlement: Results are final and automatic. Unlike traditional courts, Polymarket’s system lacks separation between arbitrators and stakeholders—voters often hold market positions, creating conflicts of interest. This leads to herd mentality in discussions and non-transparent outcomes without explanatory rulings, preventing precedent formation. Thus, success on Polymarket hinges on deep rule interpretation, not just event prediction, exploiting gaps between reality and contractual wording.

marsbit1 saat önce

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

marsbit1 saat önce

DeepSeek Funding: Liang Wenfeng's 'Realist' Pivot

DeepSeek, a leading Chinese AI company, has initiated its first external funding round, aiming to raise at least $300 million at a valuation of no less than $10 billion. This move marks a significant shift from its founder Liang Wenfeng’s previous idealistic stance of rejecting external capital to maintain independence. Despite strong financial backing from its parent company, quantitative trading firm幻方量化 (Huanfang Quant), which provided an estimated $700 million in revenue in 2025 alone, DeepSeek faces mounting challenges. Key issues include a 15-month gap in major model updates, delays in its flagship V4 release, and the loss of several core researchers to competitors offering significantly higher compensation. The company is also undergoing a strategic pivot by migrating its infrastructure from NVIDIA’s CUDA to Huawei’s Ascend platform, a move aligned with China’s push for technological self-reliance amid U.S. export controls. However, DeepSeek lags behind rivals like智谱AI and MiniMax—both now publicly listed—in areas such as product ecosystem, multimodal capabilities, and commercialization. The funding round, though relatively small in scale, is seen as a way to establish a market-validated valuation anchor, making employee stock options more competitive and facilitating talent retention. It also signals DeepSeek’s transition from a pure research-oriented organization to a commercially-driven player in the global AI ecosystem.

marsbit2 saat önce

DeepSeek Funding: Liang Wenfeng's 'Realist' Pivot

marsbit2 saat önce

Warsh, Trump's Next 'Scapegoat' at the Federal Reserve?

Kevin Warsh, a nominee for the Federal Reserve chair, faces a challenging confirmation hearing amid political pressure from former President Donald Trump to implement immediate and significant interest rate cuts. Warsh has proposed reforms including reducing the Fed’s communication frequency and shrinking its $6.7 trillion balance sheet. However, market expectations for rate cuts remain limited, creating tension with Trump’s demands. Warsh’s stance has shifted over time, from hawkish during the financial crisis to more dovish recently, citing AI-driven productivity gains. His confirmation is further complicated by Republican Senator Thom Tillis’s threat to block the nomination unless an investigation into current Chair Jerome Powell is dropped. Trump has warned of firing Powell if he doesn’t leave on time. Observers note that Warsh risks becoming a "scapegoat"—either by yielding to political pressure and fueling inflation, or by resisting and facing Trump’s backlash. His ties to Trump’s circle and Wall Street support may aid his nomination, but his ability to balance political demands with the Fed’s credibility remains uncertain. Historical precedents, like Arthur Burns’s compliance with Nixon, highlight the risks of political interference in monetary policy.

marsbit2 saat önce

Warsh, Trump's Next 'Scapegoat' at the Federal Reserve?

marsbit2 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot

Futures