Five Historic Indicators Simultaneously Flash, Bitcoin Bear Market Bottoming

链捕手2026-07-27 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-07-27 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Summary: Bitcoin is exhibiting a confluence of five historical indicators suggesting it may be at or near a long-term cycle bottom. The analysis notes diminishing marginal returns for a passive "always long" strategy, increasing the need for conditional investment approaches. Key indicators: 1. **Nasdaq/BTC RSI:** The 14-week RSI moving average of the Nasdaq 100/BTC ratio has reached a record high of 72.6, indicating Bitcoin is at its most oversold level relative to the Nasdaq in history. Historically, similar extremes have preceded strong 1-3 year outperformance for Bitcoin. 2. **Gold/BTC RSI:** Similarly, the Gold/BTC RSI reached a record high in February 2026, signaling extreme oversold conditions. Past instances led to Bitcoin outperforming gold and USD over multi-year horizons. 3. **Realized Price (On-Chain Cost Basis):** Bitcoin's current price (~$43,400) is 18% below its realized price ($53,000). Historically, price trading below this level has occurred only 12% of the time and has marked the final stages of bear markets, followed by significant positive long-term returns. 4. **Long-Term Forward Returns:** Analysis of periods when the Nasdaq/BTC RSI was above 66 shows asymmetric upside for Bitcoin/USD and BTC/Nasdaq returns over 1-3 years, though the magnitude of returns has diminished each cycle. 5. **Cycle Clock:** Historically, Bitcoin bear market lows have occurred approximately 60 weeks after the prior all-time high. The current cycle is ~40 weeks in, ...

Original:Blockworks Research

Translation: Odaily Planet Daily Golem

Key Summary:

  • Bitcoin is currently down 50% from its all-time high, the bear market has lasted over 40 weeks. A series of long-term cycle indicators suggest the market may be at or near price and time cycle lows.
  • This month, Bitcoin hit its most oversold level ever against the Nasdaq index, and in February this year, it also reached its most oversold level ever against gold. Approaching these extreme levels historically has typically signaled long-term cycle lows and presaged Bitcoin's outperformance and positive returns over the next 1-3 years.
  • Bitcoin's Realized Price (the total on-chain cost basis of the circulating Bitcoin supply) is currently $53,000, 18% below the spot price. Historically, every bear market low has seen Bitcoin price below the Realized Price. Bitcoin price has only spent 12% of its history below the Realized Price. Starting from such time points, Bitcoin has delivered considerable returns over 1-3 year timeframes.
  • Historical bear market cycles have typically bottomed around week 60 after the all-time high, suggesting the low for this cycle may form in late November 2026.
  • Taken together, the current confluence of factors suggests the period from now until December 2026 may be an extremely attractive time for long-term Bitcoin reaccumulation.

Diminishing Returns and the Need for Conditional Investing

Since March 2021, Bitcoin's price has remained flat; since November 2017, Bitcoin has remained flat against the Nasdaq index for nearly nine years. Over these timespans, Bitcoin's performance relative to equity indices has been flat, while its volatility has been significantly higher. On a risk-adjusted basis, Bitcoin has underperformed equity indices.

This context is crucial for how Bitcoin is held. As Bitcoin rallies and declines, its marginal gains diminish. The passive, always-long strategy that worked for holders across past cycles is now failing. Thus, achieving outperformance increasingly requires seizing opportunities to time additions to, or reductions from, Bitcoin holdings.

To locate these windows, the indicators presented here are conditional signals. They lie dormant for most of history, with their strongest signals occurring in the tails, only a few times per decade.

Presently, these signals have fired simultaneously, and all point to the same conclusion: Bitcoin is likely at or near the price low of its long-term cycle.

Indicator One: Nasdaq/Bitcoin Relative Strength Signal

The first signal is constructed on the Nasdaq 100 index to Bitcoin ratio, based on weekly closes over the last 875 periods. We calculate a 14-period Relative Strength Index (RSI) for this ratio, smoothed with a 14-period Simple Moving Average.

A rising RSI indicates the Nasdaq is overbought relative to Bitcoin; a declining RSI indicates the opposite. This is not an intraday trading indicator. It is the 14-week moving average of a 14-week oscillator, with overbought and oversold regimes lasting multi-year market cycles, not days or weeks.

Nasdaq/BTC RSI

Nasdaq overboughtness is a rare event. The RSI moving average has only spent 5.78% of its history above 65, and only 0.35% above 70. These thresholds have only been breached in four periods: February 2015, February 2019, August 2022, and the period beginning in late January 2026 and persisting to the present.

The current reading must be analyzed in three ways:

  • First, the current 72.6 level is an all-time high, exceeding the previous peak of 68.5 in September 2022 by 4.1 points. All readings above 70 have occurred in the last month.
  • Second, this current episode has lasted 24 weeks, a record duration, far exceeding the 11 weeks in 2015, 4 weeks in 2019, and 10 weeks in 2022.
  • Third, this has only occurred four times in the last 16 years; the present situation is among the rarest phenomena of this indicator. By this measure, this is the most overbought the Nasdaq has ever been relative to Bitcoin, or, inversely, viewed over longer timeframes, this is the most oversold Bitcoin has ever been relative to the Nasdaq.

Indicator Two: Long-Term Forward Returns

Marked by each instance where the Nasdaq/Bitcoin RSI exceeded 66, the forward return profiles for both BTC/USD and BTC/NAS100 in the three historical episodes show upward asymmetry, but only over longer horizons.

BTC/USD and BTC/NAS100 Forward Return Profiles Comparison

Nasdaq/BTC RSI Forward Returns

Two important properties of this table stand out:

  • The first is the time horizon. Short-term forward returns carry almost no information, as the magnitude and direction are minor and inconsistent over 30-120 days, e.g., Bitcoin holdings in 2022 were down 29.1% after 120 days but up 397% after three years. The relative strength signal is largely uninformative for the next one to three months.
  • The second is the decay in return magnitude. Three-year Bitcoin returns in each cycle are about one-quarter to one-third of the prior cycle's, consistent with the diminishing marginal returns discussed above. In all observations, Bitcoin meaningfully outperformed the Nasdaq over the subsequent three years.

Indicator Three: Gold/Bitcoin Relative Strength Signal

If the Nasdaq represents Bitcoin's status as a risk asset, gold represents its status as a monetary store of value.

Constructing a similar metric on the Gold/Bitcoin ratio, we observe a similar dataset, with readings above 66 being rare, exhibiting mean-reverting properties, and clustered around extremes. By this measure, February 2026 was the most overbought period in Gold/Bitcoin history.

Gold/Bitcoin RSI

Peak RSI readings in this pair coincide with long-term cycle price lows for Bitcoin, demonstrating a typical profile. The forward return profile of this indicator is analogous to the Nasdaq findings studied above: over 1-3 year horizons, Bitcoin has historically outperformed both gold and the US dollar from such extreme RSI readings.

BTC/USD and XAU/BTC Forward Return Profiles Comparison

Indicator Four: Bitcoin Realized Price (On-Chain Cost Basis)

Bitcoin's Realized Price estimates the total on-chain cost basis of all Bitcoin in circulation. Unlike spot price, which reflects Bitcoin's current market value, Realized Price measures the average price at which the existing supply last moved on-chain, thus estimating the on-chain cost basis. Historically, Realized Price has represented a deeper valuation level for Bitcoin.

Bitcoin On-Chain Realized Price

Realized Price is a reference level, not a floor. Currently, Bitcoin's Realized Price is $53,000, 18% below the spot price. Bitcoin spot price has only spent 12% of its history below the Realized Price.

Like the RSI indicators above, this is a tail-of-cycle signal. Historically, every bear market low in Bitcoin spot price has occurred below the Realized Price, and historically, after entering this zone, price typically declines further before bottoming. Thus, a decline to or below $53,000 would be consistent with history, not contrary to it.

From entry into this zone, forward returns have historically been positive and sizable.

Bitcoin Price Trajectory After Spot Price Falls Below Realized Price

Measuring from the first weekly close below Realized Price in each cycle, the historical data shows pronounced positive performance over the next 150 weeks. The magnitudes of these numbers decline each cycle, aligning with the decay trend seen in RSI metrics, but the direction is consistent.

Historically, Bitcoin's first close below Realized Price has marked the terminal phase of bear markets, not their onset or middle. Nonetheless, the spot-to-realized price multiple has collapsed from previous highs of over 20x, indicating reduced market froth.

Indicator Five: The Cycle Clock

The final indicator is the most straightforward, illustrating the historical structure of Bitcoin bear markets, measured in both price and time.

Bitcoin Bear Market Duration

In the 2013, 2017, and 2021 cycles, Bitcoin price lows typically occurred around week 60 after the all-time high. The current cycle is in week 40, with a drawdown of 50%, broadly tracking the first three cycles. If the week 60 pattern holds, a Bitcoin low would form in late November 2026.

Despite the Nasdaq 100/Bitcoin and Gold/Bitcoin RSI readings showing extremes, the drawdown this cycle remains consistent with historical drawdown paths.

The time dimension also compresses the intervals between cycles, with each cycle falling back to a new all-time high in progressively shorter timeframes. In other words, the time required to return to the prior all-time high is shorter than in the previous cycle. Assuming this trend continues, a new all-time high should occur within 120 weeks of the prior one, implying a new high by February 2028.

These two observations themselves contain no mechanism; they are empirical regularities across a few cycles. They act as time anchors, layered on top of the conditional signals above, to bound Bitcoin's remaining downside. If the historical structure holds, Bitcoin is roughly 20 weeks from its low, or may have already bottomed.

The Path Forward for Bitcoin Price

Given the current context, the following composite scenario combines the backdrop and historical outcomes outlined above to paint a range of potential paths for Bitcoin over the next three years. This is not a forecast or assertion of likely outcomes, but aims to answer: if the present situation resolves similarly to past analogous situations, where would price go?

Assuming diminishing marginal gains on both up and down moves, a discount to realized price, and referencing historical drawdown paths in both price and time, we construct Bitcoin price path possibilities under these conditions. Each possibility is drawn from Bitcoin's three-year trajectory following a signal firing, scaled by varying intensities from 0.33 to 0.80 to account for cyclical return compression. The bands mark the scaled-down bounds of the historical distribution, not the range within which markets are likely to move.

The shaded bands show the range of these possibilities.

Bitcoin Forward Price Path Projection

These bands are scaled recreations of the historical paths following indicator signals. All these outcomes are satisfactory; they describe plausible scenarios of history repeating, not all possible outcomes, and exclude the possibility of signal failure.

While returns are expected to be mixed by the end of 2026, by 2027 and 2028, the return distribution clearly shifts toward a positively skewed and upward asymmetric trajectory. Given the current market environment and projected path, the coming quarters may present an exceptionally attractive opportunity for long-term investment in Bitcoin.

Bitcoin Price Projection for the Next 3 Years

Risks and Limitations

Each indicator should be evaluated and weighted on its own merits. These indicators should not be interpreted as mechanisms or causal factors for Bitcoin cycle lows, but as manifestations that have coincided with and share characteristics of historically observed long-term cycle lows.

Furthermore, the listed indicators are not exhaustive of all metrics that can approximate long-term cycle price lows. The sample sizes underlying these analyses are small. The RSI moving average shows effective samples of four distinct cycles, one of which is not yet resolved; realized price studies are based on four cycles; and cycle symmetry is based on the first three completed cycles. With such small samples, historical forward return distributions can describe historical trajectories, but a single cycle of deviation will meaningfully weaken all presented relationships.

Additionally, the presented signals should not be considered independent corroborations. RSI readings, proximity to realized price, and cycle clock position are largely measures of the same fact: Bitcoin has undergone a significant, sustained drawdown from highs. In any deep, sustained drawdown, each indicator should trend toward extremes, so their co-occurrence is more a measurement of a single observation in multiple ways than multiple independent and unique observations.

Structural changes may result in this cycle diverging. The current cycle is the first featuring ETF adoption, significant corporate holdings, and more complex derivative trading via options and perpetual futures. The four-year cycle framework may ultimately prove to be a description of four observations, not a persistent feature of the asset.

Finally, the RSI signals are relative. Bitcoin outperforming the Nasdaq or gold can occur as both assets rise or as both fall at different rates. Bitcoin's nominal price could be dragged lower if equities or gold correct from current highs, even if RSI signals are favorable for Bitcoin. The signals presented here have little predictive power for moves before November, reflecting only the asymmetry of forward price moves over 1-3 years.

Conclusion

Nevertheless, considering the indicators above, the conclusion drawn is that Bitcoin is likely at or near a cycle low that may form before year-end, after which an uptrend may resume.

Each signal is firing near extreme levels rare in its history, and previously, each has presaged meaningful outperformance and positive returns for Bitcoin over the next several years against equities. If the low is not yet in, the period between now and that low likely presents an extremely attractive long-term range for Bitcoin reaccumulation. These signals lie dormant for most of history; they are now flashing 'green.'

İlgili Sorular

QAccording to the article, what are the five key indicators that suggest Bitcoin may be at or near a long-term cycle bottom?

AThe five key indicators are: 1. Nasdaq/BTC Relative Strength Signal (showing extreme overbought conditions for Nasdaq vs. Bitcoin, i.e., extreme oversold for Bitcoin). 2. Historical Return Expectations following such RSI signals, which show positive asymmetric returns for Bitcoin over a 1-3 year horizon. 3. Gold/BTC Relative Strength Signal (also showing historically high overbought conditions for gold relative to Bitcoin). 4. Bitcoin's Realized Price (the on-chain cost basis), which is currently above the spot price, a condition that historically precedes cycle bottoms. 5. The Cycle Clock, indicating that historical bear market lows have typically occurred around week 60 after a peak, projecting a potential low around late November 2026 for the current cycle.

QWhat does the article say about Bitcoin's Realized Price and its significance in the current market context?

ABitcoin's Realized Price (approximately $53,000) is the average on-chain acquisition cost of the circulating supply. The current spot price is about 18% below this realized price. Historically, Bitcoin's price has spent only 12% of its time below the realized price, and every historical bear market low has occurred when the price fell below it. This suggests that being at or below the realized price is characteristic of the final stages of a bear market and has historically been followed by significant positive returns over the next 1-3 years.

QBased on the historical 'Cycle Clock' pattern described, when does the article suggest the current Bitcoin bear market could potentially bottom?

ABased on the historical pattern where previous cycle lows occurred around week 60 after the all-time high, and with the current cycle being in week 40 (as of the article's writing), the article suggests the potential low for this cycle could form around late November 2026.

QWhat cautionary points or limitations does the article mention regarding the presented indicators and analysis?

AThe article mentions several limitations: 1. The analysis is based on a small sample size (e.g., only a few completed cycles). 2. The indicators are not independent proofs but different measurements of the same underlying condition—a deep and sustained price drawdown. 3. Structural changes in the current cycle (like ETF adoption, corporate holdings, complex derivatives) could cause a deviation from historical patterns. 4. The RSI signals are relative; Bitcoin outperforming Nasdaq or gold does not guarantee its absolute USD price will rise if those other assets decline sharply. 5. The signals have little predictive power for short-term price movements (e.g., the next few months).

QWhat is the overall conclusion of the article regarding the investment opportunity in Bitcoin?

AThe article concludes that the convergence of the five rare and extreme indicators suggests Bitcoin is likely at or near a long-term cycle bottom, potentially forming by the end of 2026. It argues that the period from now until that potential low represents a highly attractive long-term accumulation zone for Bitcoin. Historically, similar signal conditions have been followed by substantial positive and asymmetric returns for Bitcoin over a 1-3 year timeframe, outperforming stocks and gold.

İlgili Okumalar

The 800x Golden Dog, "Gacha" Saves NFT Trading

Title: 800x Golden Dog: How 'Gacha' Mechanics Are Rescuing NFT Trading In the past month, the on-chain TCG (Trading Card Game) narrative, centered around "gacha" or loot box mechanics, has emerged as a major crypto-native revenue generator, second only to platforms like Hyperliquid and pump.fun. Recently, this trend hit Ethereum with Fake World Assets (FWA). Within just over a week, FWA generated approximately $1.3 million in revenue, ranking 15th in the past week's crypto app earnings. Its token, $FWA, surged from an initial market cap of ~$47,550 to a peak of ~$38.8 million—an 800x gain. Meanwhile, Collector Cards' token $CARDS declined significantly from its previous highs. FWA, developed by the team behind "PunkStrategy," operates as an NFT gacha system with a built-in token flywheel. Users deposit NFTs paired with ETH as liquidity into pools. Each deposit creates a personal pool; more ETH deposited lowers the chance of the NFT being "won" in a draw. Players spend ETH to "draw" (gacha). If they get an undesirable NFT, they can instantly sell it back to the original depositor at an 85% discount, generating income for the depositor. A 1% fee is taken on each draw and on depositor earnings when an NFT is kept. The key to FWA's momentum is its token $FWA. It cannot be bought directly externally. The primary way to acquire it is by playing the gacha and choosing to receive $FWA (instead of ETH) when selling back an unwanted NFT. This mechanism creates constant buy pressure for $FWA as players engage, especially during its price ascent. Early participants who held $FWA benefited massively from subsequent inflows. This contrasts with projects like Collector Cards, which, despite strong revenues, suffer from perceived low token utility beyond buybacks. In conclusion, while FWA's flywheel design—linking speculative token gains directly to NFT trading activity—has driven rapid growth, its sustainability is questionable. The model relies heavily on continuous $FWA price appreciation to offset the inherent negative expectancy of each draw. When price momentum stalls, activity will likely decline. The case highlights that in crypto markets, pure profitability narratives can be fleeting; understanding the relationship between attention, token buy pressure, and sustainable mechanics is crucial to avoid speculative pitfalls.

marsbit24 dk önce

The 800x Golden Dog, "Gacha" Saves NFT Trading

marsbit24 dk önce

The Quantum Computing Threat Approaches, Cryptocurrency May Be Exposed to Risks Before Banks

Quantum computing poses a significant threat to all cryptographic systems, including banks and governments, but decentralized cryptocurrencies with public ledgers like Bitcoin are likely the first practical target. Experts warn that a cryptographically relevant quantum computer (CRQC), capable of running Shor's algorithm to break the elliptic curve cryptography securing most crypto wallets, could emerge around 2029. Recent research shows the required quantum resources for such attacks are shrinking dramatically, potentially enabling key extraction in minutes. The core vulnerability for cryptocurrencies is not the cryptography itself—post-quantum standards are being developed—but the slow, decentralized governance required to implement upgrades. Unlike centralized banks that can swiftly transition, Bitcoin needs near-unanimous consensus among its global network, a historically difficult process as seen in past upgrades. Estimates suggest migrating all vulnerable Bitcoin funds could take at least 76 days of dedicated network time, and it must be completed before a CRQC exists to prevent "now-or-never" attacks on exposed keys. The threat is not binary; it begins when a quantum computer can decrypt data before it loses value, not necessarily in real-time. A significant portion of Bitcoin (estimated at millions of coins) already has public keys permanently exposed on-chain, making them vulnerable to eventual "static attacks." While technical solutions exist, the race is against time for decentralized networks to coordinate a defensive transition, serving as an early warning for the broader financial system.

marsbit35 dk önce

The Quantum Computing Threat Approaches, Cryptocurrency May Be Exposed to Risks Before Banks

marsbit35 dk önce

On the First Day of Listing, Changxin Technology's Market Value Exceeds 3 Trillion Yuan, Which Securities Firm Has the Largest Floating Profit?

On July 27th, Changxin Technology, the largest-ever IPO on China's STAR Market, debuted with its share price soaring 465.82% to close at 49 yuan. Its market capitalization reached 3.28 trillion yuan, instantly making it the most valuable A-share company. The stellar performance delivered substantial gains for involved securities firms, primarily through equity investments rather than underwriting fees. China Merchants Securities emerged as the biggest winner. Its direct investment subsidiary, Zhaozheng Investment, alone holds a 0.54% pre-issue stake, translating to a paper profit exceeding 155 billion yuan based on the first-day closing price—surpassing the firm's entire 2025 net profit of 123.5 billion yuan. Other major beneficiaries include Huaan Securities, with an estimated profit of around 123 billion yuan from its 0.44% stake, and the lead underwriters, CICC and CITIC Securities, which each gained approximately 46 billion yuan from mandatory follow-on investments. Firms like Founder Securities, Haitong Securities, and GF Securities also reported significant holdings valued in the billions. Despite these paper gains, shares of some brokerages like Huaan and China Merchants fell on the listing day, reflecting broader market pressures. Analysts remain bullish on Changxin's long-term prospects, citing the AI-driven demand surge for DRAM (Dynamic Random-Access Memory) and a supportive supply-demand dynamic with projected shortages through 2028. As China's largest and most advanced integrated DRAM designer and manufacturer, Changxin is poised to capture growth from domestic substitution and global market shifts, potentially challenging the current "big three" oligopoly (Samsung, SK Hynix, Micron). The IPO proceeds, focused on capacity upgrades and R&D, are expected to accelerate China's semiconductor self-sufficiency.

marsbit1 saat önce

On the First Day of Listing, Changxin Technology's Market Value Exceeds 3 Trillion Yuan, Which Securities Firm Has the Largest Floating Profit?

marsbit1 saat önce

Will Changxin Technology Continue to Rise Today?

Changxin Technology made a historic debut on the stock market, with its share price soaring 465.82% to close at 49 yuan. Its market capitalization reached 3.28 trillion yuan, surpassing Industrial and Commercial Bank of China to become the largest company by market cap on the A-share market. Daily trading volume exceeded 140 billion yuan, a first in A-share history. This created a moment of realization for 7.7 million investors who won the lottery for its shares. On the first day, investor strategies varied: some sold immediately and later regretted missing intraday highs, others secured profits to avoid future volatility, while a third group held or even bought more shares, betting on long-term growth. The staggering IPO, massive public enthusiasm, and debut during a peak industry cycle led some to compare Changxin to PetroChina's 2007 listing, which was followed by a long decline. Key similarities noted include comparable fundraising scales (approx. 666 billion yuan for Changxin vs. 668 billion for PetroChina) and both companies listing at a perceived high point in their respective commodity cycles (oil then, memory chips now). However, analysts caution against over-simplifying the comparison. They highlight core differences: Changxin operates in the high-growth semiconductor sector with strong "domestic substitution" tailwinds. Brokerages like Huaxi Securities project significant revenue and profit growth from 2026 to 2028, driven by DDR5 adoption, product mix optimization, and economies of scale. Nomura Securities issued a "buy" rating with a 116 yuan target price, citing AI-driven demand for DRAM, tight supply as major players shift to HBM production, and Changxin's vast room for market share growth. Some analysts position the current memory cycle, fueled by AI, as just beginning, contrasting with the mature energy cycle PetroChina entered. The article concludes that for investors, monitoring the memory cycle's progression and Changxin's breakthroughs in high-end technologies like HBM will be crucial, rather than relying on superficial historical parallels.

marsbit1 saat önce

Will Changxin Technology Continue to Rise Today?

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片