Trump Backs U.S. Clarity Act, Accuses Major Banks of Undermining GENIUS

TheNewsCrypto2026-03-04 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-03-04 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Former U.S. President Donald Trump has called for the enactment of the U.S. Clarity Act, which aims to link the country’s economic strength with clear cryptocurrency regulations. In a speech to lawmakers and industry representatives, Trump accused major financial institutions of stifling innovation by impeding technological progress. He argued that regulatory ambiguity has driven crypto businesses and talent overseas, and that well-defined legislation would attract investment and bolster U.S. financial competitiveness. Trump emphasized that legislative clarity would balance innovation with investor protection, warning that the U.S. risks falling behind other nations that offer more certain regulatory environments. The Clarity Act has garnered bipartisan support and seeks to clarify the roles of the CFTC and SEC regarding digital assets, potentially reducing compliance costs and encouraging market confidence. The bill also includes provisions for certain exemptions to foster innovation. Negotiations over the final language of the legislation are ongoing amid mixed reactions from financial institutions and other stakeholders.

The former president of the United States, Donald Trump, urged lawmakers to enact the U.S. Clarity Act, which links the economic prowess of the country with clear crypto rules. In a speech to lawmakers and industry representatives, Trump urged them to enact the Clarity Act to bring clarity to crypto markets. In the speech, Trump accused big financial institutions of undermining innovation in the country by slowing down technological advancements.

Trump claimed that unclear rules have harmed the development of crypto businesses and encouraged talent to move abroad. However, with clear legislation, the country can attract investment and increase its financial prowess globally. In addition, the former president urged lawmakers to avoid excessive regulation without clear legislative backing.

However, enforcement-based regulation, as described by Trump, creates uncertainty for both entrepreneurs and established businesses. According to him, legislative clarity can strike a balance between innovation and investor protection. The statements made by Trump underscored his view that America is at risk of losing a competitive advantage in digital asset regulation. He said that if other countries are able to provide certainty in their regulation, they could attract capital and talent from the American market.

Trump urged lawmakers to put aside their differences and help him move the Clarity Act forward. He said that the bill has already gained bipartisan support from both Congress and the Senate. The statements made by Trump underscored the debate about regulating new financial technologies. The Clarity Act has been supported by those who believe that institutional and retail participation can be facilitated by a clear legal framework, while others believe that poorly structured laws could become barriers to innovation.

Regulatory Context and Market Implications of the Clarity Act

The purpose of the Clarity Act is to determine the jurisdiction of the CFTC and the SEC in different digital assets. According to its proponents, this will help reduce compliance costs for crypto firms. Analysts have pointed out that regulatory confusion has been a problem for various platforms in the crypto space.

There is also a provision for special exemptions for different digital asset activities to encourage innovation in the space. According to various market participants who have been tracking the bill’s progress in Congress, this will help build confidence in the market. Different financial institutions have reacted to the bill in different ways.

Others recognize the potential for legal certainty to facilitate the integration of digital assets into traditional systems of finance. Negotiations on the language of the final bills are underway for lawmakers, and the debate continues on the response from various stakeholders before the final passage.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Pardoned BitMEX Cofounder Pledges £20 Million to London Maths Institute

TagsBlockchainCFTCClarity ACTDonald Trump PardonGenius ACTSECTRUMPU.SUnited States

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the main purpose of the U.S. Clarity Act according to Donald Trump?

AThe main purpose of the U.S. Clarity Act is to link the economic prowess of the country with clear crypto rules, bringing clarity to crypto markets and attracting investment.

QWho does Trump accuse of undermining innovation in the United States?

ATrump accuses big financial institutions of undermining innovation in the country by slowing down technological advancements.

QWhat two regulatory bodies' jurisdictions does the Clarity Act aim to determine for digital assets?

AThe Clarity Act aims to determine the jurisdiction of the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission) and the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) for different digital assets.

QAccording to the article, what problem has regulatory confusion caused for crypto platforms?

ARegulatory confusion has been a problem for various platforms in the crypto space by increasing compliance costs and creating uncertainty.

QWhat potential benefit does the Clarity Act offer to encourage innovation, as mentioned by its proponents?

AThe Clarity Act offers special exemptions for different digital asset activities to encourage innovation in the space and help build market confidence.

İlgili Okumalar

Behind the $TAO Crash: The Bittensor Internal Strife and the 'Impossible Trinity' of DeAI

The decentralized AI (DeAI) sector is facing a major crisis following a public conflict within Bittensor ($TAO), a leading DeAI project. Covenant AI, one of its top development teams, which recently successfully trained a 72-billion-parameter large language model, announced its exit from the Bittensor network. The team accused founder Jacob Steeves of having "absolute and dictatorial" control over the network, alleging he arbitrarily cut off token rewards to their subnet without transparent governance. This triggered a panic sell-off, causing $TAO’s price to drop 15-25% in a single day and wiping out hundreds of millions in market value. The incident has raised serious questions about the viability of decentralized AI, highlighting a fundamental tension—referred to as DeAI’s "impossible trilemma"—between model quality and scale, credible neutrality of decentralization, and Sybil-resistant incentive alignment. Covenant’s departure exposed the centralized reality beneath Bittensor’s decentralized facade: although the network relies on a Yuma consensus mechanism for reward distribution, key validator nodes are controlled by early investors and the founder, allowing unilateral intervention. The event underscores systemic governance risks that may deter high-quality developers and institutional participants, threatening the entire DeAI narrative centered around trustless, incentive-driven AI development.

marsbit9 dk önce

Behind the $TAO Crash: The Bittensor Internal Strife and the 'Impossible Trinity' of DeAI

marsbit9 dk önce

Short-Term Rebound or Bull Market Return? What Do Traders Think?

The S&P 500 has rebounded nearly 10% from its March 27 low, with the Nasdaq posting a 10-day winning streak—its longest since 2021. Bitcoin surged past $76,000, and crypto-related stocks rallied. The market is showing a V-shaped recovery, but the question remains: is this a true bull market return or just a short-term rebound? Bullish analysts, including Tom Lee and Ed Yardeni, argue the bottom is in. Lee cites the U.S.-Iran ceasefire as a key factor, while Yardeni maintains a year-end S&P 500 target of 7700, stating "pessimism is now out of style." Goldman Sachs labels this a "marathon expansion," expecting a 12% earnings growth to form a "fundamental bottom," with AI driving nearly 40% of S&P 500 earnings growth. Morgan Stanley notes that bull markets in their fourth year historically deliver positive returns, with AI-driven productivity gains yet to fully diffuse. Bearish voices, led by Bank of America’s Michael Hartnett, caution that true market lows require extreme pessimism, which is absent now. Cash levels are low at 4.3%, and institutional investors remain overweight on stocks. Hartnett warns that oil’s 60% rise since the Iran war could hurt profits more than inflation data suggests. Goldman’s trading desk also views the rally as a technical rebound, not a trend, pending real-world oil shipping data from the Strait of Hormuz. Piper Sandler’s Michael Kantrowitz has stopped issuing year-end targets due to high uncertainty. The divide is clear: bulls see a fundamentals-driven bull run with earnings growth and geopolitical de-escalation, while bears see a sentiment-driven bounce with weak inflows—equity funds saw $15.4 billion in outflows last week. The key variable is the U.S.-Iran talks; a ceasefire extension could solidify the rally, but failure may trigger a drop. As Hartnett warns, "investors should not mistake a relief rally for a solution."

marsbit1 saat önce

Short-Term Rebound or Bull Market Return? What Do Traders Think?

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片