Musk: I Work 90 Hours a Week; Beware of Crayfish 'Going Crazy'...

比推2026-03-12 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-03-12 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

In a roundup of discussions from the crypto community on X, Elon Musk claimed he works 90 hours per week, sparking mixed reactions. Some users questioned whether he was subtly criticizing public figures like Biden or Gates, while others sarcastically commented on his wealth accumulation. Separately, there were observations about increased solidarity among Silicon Valley’s Chinese community. Another topic involved unusual use cases for crayfish, described as "crazy." The post also featured a discussion on ideal work environments. The article includes multiple embedded images and ends with links to related social channels and news sources.

Dear readers, hello~

What have the KOLs in the crypto circle been talking about in the past 24 hours?

Note: The following content is compiled from the X platform and represents personal opinions, not the stance of this platform, and does not constitute investment advice.

Musk: I Work 90 Hours a Week

Popular Replies:

Who is he subtly criticizing? Old Biden or Gates?

Musk: You 8 billion people, put all your money in my pocket;

Work hard, everyone, to help Musk reach 1 trillion as soon as possible.

Silicon Valley Chinese Have Become Very United

Crayfish Application Scenarios

Ideal Work Environment Discussion

Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7618943

İlgili Sorular

QHow many hours per week does Elon Musk claim to work?

AElon Musk claims to work 90 hours per week.

QWhat is the main topic of the section 'Silicon Valley Chinese have become very united'?

AThe section discusses the increased unity among Chinese professionals in Silicon Valley.

QWhat is the warning given about crayfish in the article?

AThe article warns that crayfish are 'too crazy', though the exact context is not detailed in the provided text.

QWhich social media platform is the source for the discussions mentioned in the article?

AThe discussions are sourced from the X platform (formerly known as Twitter).

QWhat is the disclaimer provided about the opinions expressed in the article?

AThe disclaimer states that the content consists of personal opinions from the X platform, does not represent the platform's stance, and is not investment advice.

İlgili Okumalar

Post-Mortem of the Venus THE Attack: How to Profit in a Fleeting Window?

Approximately two hours ago, Venus Protocol's THE token was exploited using a classic Mango Markets-style price manipulation attack. The attacker targeted THE, a low-liquidity collateral asset, by depositing it, borrowing other assets, and using those to buy more THE, artificially inflating its price. Once the time-weighted average oracle updated, the inflated price allowed further leveraged borrowing. To bypass THE's borrowing cap, the attacker performed a "donation attack" by transferring THE directly to the vTHE contract, increasing the recognized collateral value. After the first manipulation phase, THE's price stabilized around $0.50. The attacker attempted to further amplify gains by continuing to buy THE, but mounting sell pressure limited price increases and pushed their health factor near 1.0, risking liquidation. The collateral, nominally valued around $30M, had extremely low liquidity, making large-scale liquidation at inflated prices impossible. Recognizing the situation, the writer opened a short position on THE with high leverage, anticipating a price collapse due to overvaluation, illiquidity, and forced selling. After liquidation, THE price plummeted to ~$0.24, below its pre-attack level, resulting in a ~$15K profit for the writer. Venus Protocol was left with ~$2M in bad debt. The attacker likely gained little or lost funds, though may have profited from off-chain positions. The event highlights that nominal collateral value in DeFi does not equal realizable value during liquidity crises.

marsbit33 dk önce

Post-Mortem of the Venus THE Attack: How to Profit in a Fleeting Window?

marsbit33 dk önce

Trading Moment: Bitcoin Rallies for 7 Consecutive Days, Breaks Through $74K Strongly, $71.3K CME Gap Still Needs Caution, Whales and Institutions Await ETH Break Above $2400

**Market Analysis: Bitcoin Breaks $74K, Eyes $2400 for Ethereum** Bitcoin** surged over 10% last week, breaking the $74,000 resistance and marking its best performance since September 2025. The rally, now in its 8th consecutive day of gains, has decoupled from tech stocks. However, analysts are divided. Bears warn of a potential bull trap, citing a bearish flag pattern on the daily chart and a looming CME gap near $71,300 that could pull the price back below $60,000. They argue that the macroeconomic impact of ongoing geopolitical tensions has yet to fully materialize. Bulls, conversely, point to aggressive accumulation by whales (addresses holding 10-10K BTC now control 68.17% of supply) and strong technical momentum, targeting the next resistance zone between $75,000 and $80,000. **Ethereum** mirrored BTC's strength, posting its strongest weekly gain in months. Whales are accumulating, with ShapeShift's founder buying over 29,000 ETH (~$61.65M) in a week. A massive supply cluster exists around $2,800, and with little historical resistance between $2,200 and $2,800, the price could be magnetized upward. Traders believe a sustained break above $2,400 could trigger a rapid move toward $2,800. **Macro risks** persist. Trump's strike on Iran's Kharg Island (which handles 90% of its oil exports) and the threat to oil facilities if the Strait of Hormuz is blocked continue to fuel uncertainty. This triggered a spike in aluminum prices and led to a record $36.2 billion single-week sell-off in S&P 500 futures by asset managers. Goldman Sachs warns the market is at a tipping point: a lack of geopolitical resolution within two weeks could risk a crash, though a de-escalation could spark a massive short squeeze. **Market sentiment** improved from "Extreme Fear" to "Fear." AI tokens (e.g., TAO +55%) and meme coins (PEPE, BONK, WIF +10%+) led altcoin breakouts. ETF flows were positive for BTC (+$767M) and ETH (+$161M) for the third consecutive week, though XRP ETFs saw outflows. Over $255M was liquidated in 24 hours. Key events to watch include the Fed's FOMC meeting, Nvidia's GTC conference, and major token unlocks for ZRO and ARB.

marsbit43 dk önce

Trading Moment: Bitcoin Rallies for 7 Consecutive Days, Breaks Through $74K Strongly, $71.3K CME Gap Still Needs Caution, Whales and Institutions Await ETH Break Above $2400

marsbit43 dk önce

Crypto lender BlockFills files for bankruptcy: ‘Most responsible path forward’

Crypto lending and trading firm BlockFills has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. The company stated that this action represents the "most responsible path forward" to address its financial challenges. The filing aims to allow BlockFills to restructure its operations and manage its debts while continuing to serve its clients. This development reflects the ongoing volatility and difficulties within the cryptocurrency lending sector.

ambcrypto49 dk önce

Crypto lender BlockFills files for bankruptcy: ‘Most responsible path forward’

ambcrypto49 dk önce

From Power to Chips: How Ordinary People Can Participate in the Wealth Opportunities of the AI Era

From Power to Chips: How Ordinary People Can Participate in the Wealth Opportunities of the AI Era This article analyzes the AI industry through a five-layer "AI stack" framework: energy, chips, cloud infrastructure, models, and applications. It argues that while public attention focuses on the top application layer (e.g., ChatGPT), the vast majority of capital investment and profits are currently concentrated in the underlying infrastructure layers. Key points include: - An estimated $700 billion in annual capital expenditure is flowing into AI infrastructure (energy, chips, data centers), not applications. - Infrastructure companies (Nvidia, TSMC, ASML) show massive profits and near-monopolies, while model companies (OpenAI, Anthropic) experience rapid revenue growth but burn enormous cash due to compute costs. - Historical parallels are drawn to the electricity revolution and internet infrastructure boom, where infrastructure builders captured most early value. - The article advises investors to focus on infrastructure layers currently generating concentrated profits, while acknowledging future value may shift to applications as the market matures. - Risks include capital misallocation, supply chain concentration, and efficiency breakthroughs (like DeepSeek's lower-cost models) that could disrupt current assumptions. The conclusion emphasizes understanding this layered structure, tracking capital flow, and participating at appropriate levels based on risk tolerance and expertise.

marsbit53 dk önce

Solana (SOL) Gains Ground: Will the Momentum Trigger a $100 Breakout?

Solana (SOL) is showing signs of a potential bullish breakout, trading around $93.08 with a 5.72% gain. A weekly inflow of $10.70 million into Solana spot ETFs suggests growing institutional interest, supporting gradual price recovery. Despite broader market uncertainty, SOL's daily trading volume surged over 87.52% to $4.05 billion. Technical indicators are mixed: the RSI at 71.75 signals overbought conditions, while the Bull Bear Power value of 7.64 indicates strong bullish pressure. The MACD confirms a bullish trend, though the Chaikin Money Flow shows only light buying momentum. If the uptrend continues, SOL could target resistance levels at $93.47 and beyond, but a reversal might see it test support near $92.67.

TheNewsCrypto54 dk önce

Solana (SOL) Gains Ground: Will the Momentum Trigger a $100 Breakout?

TheNewsCrypto54 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot

Futures