Web3: Onboarding the next billion users — The road ahead

Cointelegraph2022-03-27 tarihinde yayınlandı2022-03-27 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Recent geopolitical events have polarized the world. Partisanship and the ideological divide have further balkanized the internet, whose gatekeepers have trampled upon the rights of millions to access financial services.

Recent geopolitical events have polarized the world. Partisanship and the ideological divide have further balkanized the internet, whose gatekeepers have trampled upon the rights of millions to access financial services. Nations are gradually waking up to the reality of having neutral protocols and national stacks. 
Hailed as the next generation of the internet, Web3 will be sanction-resistant and free of data silos. Gavin Wood, co-founder of Ethereum and creator of Polkadot and Kusama, coined the term Web3 in 2004. Five years later, the Bitcoin (BTC) white paper was released in 2009, which further cemented the imperative of decentralization. Is the decentralization narrative here to stay? Let’s find out why Web3 is gaining ground today.
Web3: Role of decentralization in the innovation economy
Web3 can offer global digital rails to aid innovation and independence. The clamor to reign in Big Tech have propelled the discussions around Web3. Big Tech’s dominance over the internet and its control over personal data has fueled the war cry for its decentralization. A renowned Silicon Valley Venture Capital firm, a16z published its policy paper “How to Build a Better Internet: 10 Principles for World Leaders Shaping the Future of Web3.” It states that data ownership and monetization will lead to newer business models in the Web3 era, advocating that:
“The world deserves technology that can unlock opportunity for the millions on the margins of the innovation economy and enable people to take control of their digital lives.”
The fundamental premise of the internet centered around connecting people. The internet has evolved over the last 30 years, and our interaction with it has also changed. Despite the changes, the era of online communities can be broadly classified into three time periods.

“Privacy is necessary for an open society in the electronic age,” said Eric Hughes, an American mathematician and founder of the cypherpunk movement, underscoring the importance of privacy and how it’s more pronounced in a decentralized version of the internet. The current state of the internet, Web2, reeks of Big Tech monopoly; Facebook, Amazon, Apple and Google today own and govern the internet.
The proponents of Web3 have urged that the future of the internet should be built upon the first principles of decentralization, self-sovereignty, data ownership and censorship resistance. At the core of Web3 is the philosophy of decentralized internet infrastructure designed to ensure individual privacy.

Web3 has yet to reach its full potential. At this point, the idea of individuals exercising complete ownership of their data and privacy seems quite dystopian because adoption is insignificant and limited to crypto-savvy individuals. There is a need to address the entry-level friction in the Web3 space.
Web3 adoption
The lofty ideals of ownership in a truly decentralized economy can only come to fruition if we create enabling tools and complementary infrastructure compatible with Web2 and Web3. Web3 adoption is still in its infancy, though a few Web2 companies have gradually begun migrating to Web3 and are embracing decentralization. Easy-to-use enabling services and infrastructure need to be built to ensure the seamless onboarding of users in the Web3 era. A lot still needs to be done.
The idea of portable digital identities and ownership on the internet is incumbent upon easy-to-use Web3 wallets for everyone, including non-native crypto audiences. Credential management coupled with the custody of digital assets is the missing link inhibiting Web3 adoption. A composite wallet that can enable users to assert their identity in the physical and digital realm, store credentials digital assets such as NFTs tokens, ensure payments, staking and more are the need of the hour. The current players’ on-ramp (fiat to crypto) and off-ramp (crypto to fiat) services are far from satisfactory, which needs to be addressed from a user-experience point of view to enable mass adoption.
Web3 and ownership economy
Web3 will bring a paradigm shift in the ways people in online communities use technology. Value creation and distribution will no longer be at the mercy of centralized actors, and decentralized groups will enable new forms of ownership and co-creation.
Gaming, a $200-billion industry in 2021, is the way forward for onboarding users to the Web3 ecosystem. Emerging gaming markets such as India have more than 450 million gamers. Emerging markets have lower per-capita income, creating huge opportunities for gamers to earn an income via blockchain-based play-to-earn games.

Financialization-first Web3 games are expected to grow further in the longer term. Web3 is at the heart of discourse, focused on the creator and ownership economy. JPMorgan’s recent report, “Opportunities in the Metaverse,” highlights the importance of a single-wallet user experience in Web3 and meta-commerce. The report states that a single wallet should include the following:

  • Web2 traditional finance payment rails, digital currencies and digital assets.
  • Web3 crypto, NFTs and digital assets.
  • Digital identity verifiable credentials, Know Your Customer and Anti-Money Laundering compliance keys, and reputation points.
  • Multiple aliases to preserve privacy and enable digital freedom.
    Privacy-preserving- and self-sovereignty-based tools and services are essential for harnessing the full potential of Web3 and leveraging trillion-dollar opportunities in the metaverse. An enhanced user experience is crucial for mainstream adoption.

İlgili Okumalar

Fei-Fei Li's Team Clarifies the Concept of 'World Models', Sora Merely a Renderer

"World Models" has become a widely used yet confusing term in AI. To address this, a team led by Fei-Fei Li and World Labs proposed a functional taxonomy based on the Partially Observable Markov Decision Process framework. This taxonomy categorizes systems called "world models" into three distinct projections: Renderers, Simulators, and Planners. Renderers, like OpenAI's Sora and other video generation models, focus on producing photorealistic visual outputs for human perception. They prioritize visual fidelity over physical accuracy. Simulators, such as NVIDIA Omniverse, aim to compute precise future environmental states for computational tasks like engineering analysis or digital twins. Planners, like Vision-Language-Action models, take in observations and goals to output executable actions for robots or agents. The article clarifies that most current "world models," including Sora, are primarily Renderers. They generate convincing visuals but lack the core ability to simulate state transitions based on actions, a key requirement for a true world model in classic reinforcement learning definitions. This conceptual confusion has practical implications, leading to potential misalignment in technology selection, investment, and public understanding of AI capabilities. Clear categorization is crucial. It helps enterprises avoid costly mistakes (e.g., using a renderer for robot training), allows investors to accurately assess markets, and enables researchers to build comparable benchmarks. While future systems may integrate these functions, recognizing current boundaries is essential for honest assessment and progress.

marsbit14 dk önce

Fei-Fei Li's Team Clarifies the Concept of 'World Models', Sora Merely a Renderer

marsbit14 dk önce

Bloomberg Uncovered: How Do China's Wealthy Circumvent the Annual $50,000 Limit to Transfer Assets?

**Summary: How Wealthy Chinese Circumvent $50,000 Annual Foreign Exchange Limits** Despite China's strict capital controls, including an annual $50,000 per person foreign exchange quota, an estimated $150 billion in funds still leaves the country annually via various gray and underground channels. This report outlines the evolution of China's "capital wall" and the methods used to bypass it. **The Evolving Capital Controls:** * **Foundation (1994):** The system of "current account convertibility with strict capital account controls" was established. * **Quota Set (2007):** The $50,000 individual annual forex purchase limit was formalized. * **Crackdown Begins (2015-2017):** Following market volatility, enforcement tightened. Banks were required to scrutinize transactions, and channels like using UnionPay cards for Hong Kong insurance premiums or buying overseas property were blocked. * **Digital & Legal Upgrades (2024-2026):** Enhanced algorithms now flag suspicious patterns (e.g., "smurfing"). The Common Reporting Standard (CRS) provides Chinese tax authorities with data on citizens' offshore accounts. Unlicensed cross-border brokers have been targeted. **Five Primary Methods for Moving Capital:** 1. **Underground Banking / "Hawala" (Duiqiao):** The largest-scale method. No money crosses borders. Clients pay RMB to a domestic account; an overseas associate deposits equivalent foreign currency into the client's offshore account. Risks include high fees, account freezes, and legal penalties. 2. **"Smurfing" or "Ant Moving":** Using multiple individuals' $50,000 quotas to pool funds for one offshore recipient. Increasingly detected by anti-money laundering algorithms. 3. **Trade Invoice Manipulation:** Businesses over-invoice imports or under-invoice exports via offshore shell companies, creating a pretext to transfer excess funds abroad under the guise of trade. 4. **Channel Migration:** After a crackdown on internet brokers, funds flow toward more compliant but costly channels like major banks' cross-border wealth management services or Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) quotas. 5. **Structural Arrangements:** High-net-worth individuals use complex, high-cost legal structures involving offshore trusts, insurance, and investment migration programs to transfer asset ownership. **Regulatory Response: Focusing on People, Not Just Money** The current strategy extends oversight from enterprises to **individual residents**. Tools like CRS allow retroactive visibility into offshore assets. Cryptocurrencies, once seen as a potential loophole, are now actively monitored and prosecuted as an illegal channel. The underlying driver remains: with significant wealth concentrated among millions of affluent households seeking diversification amid domestic economic shifts, the incentive to move assets offshore persists despite regulatory barriers.

marsbit34 dk önce

Bloomberg Uncovered: How Do China's Wealthy Circumvent the Annual $50,000 Limit to Transfer Assets?

marsbit34 dk önce

Ethereum's Ballmer Moment: As Everyone Is Bearish, the Circulating Supply Is Disappearing

"Ethereum's Ballmer Moment: Circulation Shrinks Amid Bearish Sentiment" Amid widespread bearish sentiment, with prominent figures like Bankless founder David Hoffman selling ETH and young developers flocking to Solana, some argue Ethereum is entering its "Ballmer era"—akin to Microsoft's perceived stagnation under Steve Ballmer. While surface-level criticisms about slow protocol development, cautious leadership, and competitive pressure are valid, underlying fundamentals tell a different story. Approximately 30% of ETH is staked, major holders like BitMine are accumulating, and spot ETFs continue to absorb supply. Regulatory clarity, including the SEC/CFTC's March ruling on staking rewards and the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, is transforming crypto from a regulatory threat into a legitimized framework. This institutionalization, alongside a shrinking circulating supply (with net issuance around 0.23% annually), creates significant buy-side pressure independent of fee-based value capture. The broader crypto total addressable market is expanding through regulated stablecoins, tokenized assets, and institutional adoption. While public chains face competition from permissioned alternatives, the winning model appears to be permissioned assets settling on public chains like Ethereum and Solana. The author advocates a non-maximalist, barbell strategy: holding ETH for its institutional role and supply squeeze, SOL for consumer/throughput trends, BTC as a macro hedge, and a basket of next-gen L1s. Key bullish drivers for ETH include rapid circulation shrinkage, potential Q2 staked ETF approvals, regulatory tailwinds solidifying its role as a default settlement layer, and the optionality of an eventual "Satya moment" leadership shift. Despite bearish consensus, the current setup—where crypto is "not hot" and regulatory groundwork is being laid—presents a compelling investment opportunity. The crypto cycle's focus may have shifted to AI, but blockchain infrastructure is gaining a legal and institutional foothold precisely while attention is elsewhere.

marsbit34 dk önce

Ethereum's Ballmer Moment: As Everyone Is Bearish, the Circulating Supply Is Disappearing

marsbit34 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片