El Tesoro de EE. UU. avanza con las normas de la Ley GENIUS tras el plazo de julio

cointelegraph2026-08-17 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-08-17 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

El Departamento del Tesoro de EE. UU. ha publicado un aviso de propuesta normativa para implementar la Ley GENIUS, que establece un marco para las stablecoins de pago, firmada en 2025. La ley entrará en vigor el 18 de enero de 2027. El Tesoro solicitó comentarios públicos sobre las normas propuestas, que estarán abiertos durante 60 días. Junto con otras agencias como la OCC, la FDIC y la Reserva Federal, el Tesoro avanzó en las reglas, pero todos los departamentos incumplieron el plazo de julio para finalizarlas, lo que podría llevar a que la ley se aplique sin una guía regulatoria clara. Una vez vigente, generalmente se requerirá una licencia federal o estatal para emitir stablecoins de pago en EE. UU. En julio, reguladores de EE. UU. y el Reino Unido discutieron la cooperación en la implementación de la ley, mientras que algunos en la industria cripto argumentan que el Reino Unido se está quedando atrás.

El Departamento del Tesoro de EE. UU. emitió un aviso de reglamentación propuesta relacionado con la implementación de la Ley Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS), un proyecto de ley para establecer un marco para las stablecoins de pago que fue firmado como ley el año pasado.

En un aviso del lunes, el Departamento del Tesoro dijo que abriría una regla propuesta a comentarios públicos antes de la implementación de la Ley GENIUS en enero de 2027. Según los términos del proyecto de ley, la ley de stablecoins estaba programada para entrar en vigor 120 días después de que las agencias finalizaran las reglamentaciones, o 18 meses después de su aprobación en julio de 2025, lo que establece su fecha efectiva el 18 de enero de 2027.

El Secretario del Tesoro, Scott Bessent, dijo que el departamento "da la bienvenida a los comentarios de las partes interesadas mientras [trabaja] para proporcionar la certeza regulatoria que las empresas necesitan para innovar y crecer en Estados Unidos."

Junto con el Departamento del Tesoro, otras agencias del gobierno de EE. UU., incluyendo la Oficina del Contralor de la Moneda (OCC), la Corporación Federal de Seguros de Depósitos (FDIC) y la Junta de la Reserva Federal, emitieron avisos de reglas propuestas en 2026 relacionadas con la implementación de GENIUS. Sin embargo, según los informes, todos los departamentos no cumplieron con el plazo de 120 días en julio para finalizar las regulaciones antes de enero, lo que indica que GENIUS podría entrar en vigor sin una orientación clara.

Relacionado: Wise volverá a presentar su solicitud de carta bancaria en EE. UU. bajo la Ley GENIUS

Según el Tesoro, una vez que la Ley GENIUS entre en vigor, una entidad generalmente no podrá "emitir una stablecoin de pago" en EE. UU. sin una licencia federal o estatal relacionada. Los comentarios públicos sobre las reglas propuestas por el departamento estarán abiertos durante 60 días después de su publicación en el Registro Federal.

Reguladores de EE. UU. y Reino Unido discuten el progreso de GENIUS

En julio, el Grupo de Trabajo de Regulación Financiera entre EE. UU. y Reino Unido se reunió en Londres para discutir la cooperación entre las agencias financieras de los dos países, incluida la implementación de la Ley GENIUS.

Aunque las autoridades del Reino Unido han tomado medidas para abordar la regulación de las stablecoins, la implementación pendiente de GENIUS ha llevado a algunos expertos de la industria cripto a argumentar que el país se está quedando atrás de EE. UU.

Revista: Se filtraron datos de 54.000 usuarios de carteras, probabilidades de CLARITY solo del 10%: Hodler’s Digest

Trend Kriptolar

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

İlgili Sorular

Q¿Qué es la Ley GENIUS y cuándo se promulgó?

ALa Ley GENIUS (Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins) es un proyecto de ley para establecer un marco regulatorio para las monedas estables de pago. Fue promulgada el año pasado.

Q¿Cuál es la fecha efectiva prevista para que la Ley GENIUS entre en vigor?

ALa fecha efectiva prevista para que la Ley GENIUS entre en vigor es el 18 de enero de 2027, de acuerdo con los plazos establecidos en el proyecto de ley.

Q¿Qué agencias gubernamentales estadounidenses han emitido avisos de reglas propuestas relacionadas con la implementación de GENIUS?

AAdemás del Departamento del Tesoro, otras agencias como la Oficina del Contralor de la Moneda (OCC), la Corporación Federal de Seguros de Depósitos (FDIC) y la Junta de la Reserva Federal han emitido avisos de reglas propuestas en 2026.

Q¿Qué restricción general se aplicará a las entidades una vez que la Ley GENIUS entre en vigor?

AUna vez que la Ley GENIUS entre en vigor, una entidad generalmente no podrá "emitir una moneda estable de pago" en los Estados Unidos sin una licencia federal o estatal correspondiente.

Q¿Qué tema discutió el Grupo de Trabajo de Regulación Financiera EE. UU.-Reino Unido en su reunión de julio?

AEl Grupo de Trabajo de Regulación Financiera EE. UU.-Reino Unido se reunió en Londres en julio para discutir la cooperación entre las agencias financieras de ambos países, incluyendo la implementación de la Ley GENIUS.

İlgili Okumalar

The Biggest Political Economy Question in the AI Era: As Robots Become More Capable, How Do Humans Share the Value?

In the AI era, the most pressing political economy question is: as machines become increasingly capable, how can humanity share in the value they create? An article originally critiquing China's tech focus has sparked a deeper debate on this global challenge. Historically, industrial progress improved efficiency but still relied on human labor for wealth creation and distribution. AI is fundamentally different—it is now replacing cognitive and knowledge work. As AI and robots take over more tasks, economic growth may continue while direct human participation in value creation shrinks, creating a core tension between productivity gains and widespread income generation. The issue is not unique to China. While leading tech companies amass enormous wealth, labor's share of income is declining globally. The core problem is a broken link: technological innovation and corporate profits are not translating into sufficient consumer income and demand. Three potential paths forward are outlined: a traditional capitalist model where profits primarily go to capital owners; a state-capitalist approach with public investment in AI; and more innovative models like digital sovereign wealth funds, universal shareholding, or AI-era basic income schemes to directly distribute AI-generated value. The future competitive advantage may lie not just in technological supremacy, but in which society can build a new, inclusive distribution system for the intelligent economy. The ultimate challenge is ensuring that as AI creates value, humans have a means to obtain income and share in the resulting widespread social benefits.

marsbit9 dk önce

The Biggest Political Economy Question in the AI Era: As Robots Become More Capable, How Do Humans Share the Value?

marsbit9 dk önce

Generating Profits for Seven Consecutive Quarters, Emerging Markets Carry Trade Outperforms Everything

For the seventh consecutive quarter, dollar-funded emerging market carry trades have delivered positive returns, marking the longest winning streak since 2008. According to Bloomberg's index, this strategy has gained approximately 22% since late 2024, outperforming U.S. Treasuries, emerging market sovereign, and corporate dollar debt. The core of the trade involves borrowing low-interest currencies like the U.S. dollar, euro, or yen to invest in high-yielding emerging market assets, such as Turkish lira bonds offering over 40% returns. Returns were amplified by favorable currency moves, with the dollar weakening against most emerging market currencies and other traditional funding currencies. For instance, the trade gained 48% on the Colombian peso in the past year. A key test came in August 2024 with a historic joint U.S.-Japan currency intervention, which caused only a modest 1% dip in the carry trade risk premium as investors shifted funding from the yen to the euro and Swiss franc. Looking ahead, the primary risk is the timing of Federal Reserve policy changes. While persistent inflation allows the Fed to hold rates, a rapid rise in long-term U.S. yields could threaten the trade. Another concern is crowding, as massive inflows increase vulnerability to a sudden reversal. High interest rates in regions like Latin America and Eastern Europe, supported by external factors like Middle East tensions and energy prices, continue to sustain the opportunity. Major investors remain engaged, favoring currencies like the Mexican peso, South African rand, and Turkish lira.

marsbit24 dk önce

Generating Profits for Seven Consecutive Quarters, Emerging Markets Carry Trade Outperforms Everything

marsbit24 dk önce

Tsinghua and Whiton Mentor-Disciple Team Cracks 40-Year-Old Mystery, Core Math All Written by GPT, Anyone Could Do It

Tsinghua and Wharton researchers have used GPT-5.6 Sol Pro to solve a 40-year-old open problem in optimization theory, proving a fundamental limit for gradient descent. They demonstrated that by adjusting only the step size sequence—without adding momentum or changing the algorithm's structure—the convergence rate of gradient descent cannot exceed Ω(T^{-1.9319}). This establishes a mathematical ceiling, showing that structural modifications are necessary to achieve the fastest possible convergence rates like O(1/T²). The core proof, involving a geometric construction based on "resisting oracles," was entirely generated through iterative interaction with the AI. The proof was then formally verified using the Lean 4 theorem prover, achieving zero "sorry" or "admit" statements, confirming its logical correctness without human intervention in the non-trivial mathematical steps. This result bridges the gap between the known O(T^{-1.2716}) rate achieved by the "silver stepsize" sequence and the newly proven impossibility bound. The work suggests a new paradigm where researchers can leverage general-purpose AI to explore and formally verify complex theoretical proofs.

marsbit34 dk önce

Tsinghua and Whiton Mentor-Disciple Team Cracks 40-Year-Old Mystery, Core Math All Written by GPT, Anyone Could Do It

marsbit34 dk önce

Anthropic Admits Fault, Evidence of Secretly Downgrading Claude's Intelligence

Anthropic publicly apologized after users discovered a hidden A/B test in Claude Code (versions 2.1.237+) that seemingly "dumbed down" the model. Developer argofowl found that selecting the "high" reasoning effort was being mapped internally to a value of "10," which previously corresponded to the "low" setting. While Anthropic engineers clarified this was only a change to the numerical mapping scale and assured it did not affect performance based on internal evaluations, the lack of communication about the test sparked widespread user backlash and self-tests on social media. Separately, significant complaints emerged about the flagship Opus 5 model, with users reporting it became "unstable," prone to lazy outputs, factual errors, and repetitive corrections. An Anthropic engineer acknowledged Opus 5's performance instability, calling its resolution a top priority. The incident highlights a growing industry-wide rift between improving benchmark scores and declining user-perceived quality and reliability. It underscores the lack of transparency in continuous model updates, where server-side changes, A/B tests, and configuration adjustments occur without clear user notification, eroding trust as AI models become critical infrastructure.

marsbit34 dk önce

Anthropic Admits Fault, Evidence of Secretly Downgrading Claude's Intelligence

marsbit34 dk önce

Unpacking the Truth Behind On-chain Assets: Leverage, Liquidity, and Risk

The article analyzes the concept of "real-world asset" (RWA) tokenization, arguing that while tokenizing assets on-chain is a useful step, it is far from transformative on its own. The author compares it to placing a barcode on a shipping container—it enables identification but does not build the necessary market infrastructure. The core argument is that true value emerges not from tokenization, but from integrating these tokens into DeFi systems where they can be valued, financed, hedged, traded, and liquidated under stress. Key challenges identified include: 1. **Multiple Time Clocks**: A fundamental tension exists between blockchain's 24/7 settlement and the slower, business-hour-dependent processes of traditional markets, custody, and redemption. This "duration mismatch" can create dangerous liquidity gaps during crises. 2. **Liquidity Misconceptions**: True liquidity is not measured by Total Value Locked (TVL) or trading pairs, but by the ability to exit a position within a required timeframe at an acceptable price. It requires analyzing multiple exit paths and stress-testing scenarios. 3. **Leverage and Risk**: Leverage unlocks economic utility (e.g., using tokenized assets as collateral) but also introduces fragility. Risk models must account for more than asset volatility, incorporating factors like legal enforceability, oracle freshness, and market structure. Paradoxically, a "safer" asset like tokenized Treasury bonds could require a higher collateral discount than ETH due to slower, less-proven liquidation mechanisms. 4. **A Risk Graph**: RWA risk should be modeled as a network of interconnected dependencies (e.g., issuers, custodians, oracles, stablecoin pools), not a single score. Failures can propagate through this graph, turning operational issues into systemic liquidity crises. The article states that tokenized government bonds are merely an entry point, while more complex frontiers like computing power and energy assets present greater challenges and opportunities. It also examines the interplay and risks between tokenized stocks and perpetual futures contracts. The conclusion is that the future lies not in "tokenizing everything," but in building robust market layers where tokenized rights become resilient financial primitives within a programmable capital system. The token is just the barcode; the market is the machine.

marsbit49 dk önce

Unpacking the Truth Behind On-chain Assets: Leverage, Liquidity, and Risk

marsbit49 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot

Popüler Makaleler

GENIUS Nasıl Satın Alınır

HTX.com’a hoş geldiniz! Genius (GENIUS) satın alma işlemlerini basit ve kullanışlı bir hâle getirdik. Adım adım açıkladığımız rehberimizi takip ederek kripto yolculuğunuza başlayın. 1. Adım: HTX Hesabınızı OluşturunHTX'te ücretsiz bir hesap açmak için e-posta adresinizi veya telefon numaranızı kullanın. Sorunsuzca kaydolun ve tüm özelliklerin kilidini açın. Hesabımı Aç2. Adım: Kripto Satın Al Bölümüne Gidin ve Ödeme Yönteminizi SeçinKredi/Banka Kartı: Visa veya Mastercard'ınızı kullanarak anında Genius (GENIUS) satın alın.Bakiye: Sorunsuz bir şekilde işlem yapmak için HTX hesap bakiyenizdeki fonları kullanın.Üçüncü Taraflar: Kullanımı kolaylaştırmak için Google Pay ve Apple Pay gibi popüler ödeme yöntemlerini ekledik.P2P: HTX'teki diğer kullanıcılarla doğrudan işlem yapın.Borsa Dışı (OTC): Yatırımcılar için kişiye özel hizmetler ve rekabetçi döviz kurları sunuyoruz.3. Adım: Genius (GENIUS) Varlıklarınızı SaklayınGenius (GENIUS) satın aldıktan sonra HTX hesabınızda saklayın. Alternatif olarak, blok zinciri transferi yoluyla başka bir yere gönderebilir veya diğer kripto para birimlerini takas etmek için kullanabilirsiniz.4. Adım: Genius (GENIUS) Varlıklarınızla İşlem YapınHTX'in spot piyasasında Genius (GENIUS) ile kolayca işlemler yapın.Hesabınıza erişin, işlem çiftinizi seçin, işlemlerinizi gerçekleştirin ve gerçek zamanlı olarak izleyin. Hem yeni başlayanlar hem de deneyimli yatırımcılar için kullanıcı dostu bir deneyim sunuyoruz.

622 Toplam GörüntülenmeYayınlanma 2026.04.29Güncellenme 2026.06.02

Tartışmalar

HTX Topluluğuna hoş geldiniz. Burada, en son platform gelişmeleri hakkında bilgi sahibi olabilir ve profesyonel piyasa görüşlerine erişebilirsiniz. Kullanıcıların GENIUS (GENIUS) fiyatı hakkındaki görüşleri aşağıda sunulmaktadır.