MiCA监管注册信息显示:欧盟截止期限前出现加密货币牌照申请热潮

ambcrypto2026-07-03 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-07-03 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

欧洲证券和市场管理局(ESMA)最新注册数据显示,在欧盟《加密资产市场法规》(MiCA)过渡期结束前的最后几天,监管机构密集批准了数十家加密公司的许可申请。注册记录显示,在6月23日至7月1日期间共有36项加密资产服务提供商(CASP)授权获批,其中仅6月30日就有13项,凸显了企业为遵守新规在截止日期前的“冲刺”现象。 截至数据发布,ESMA注册表中共有283条已授权的CASP记录,其中66项授权在6月当月完成。德国以59条授权记录领先,法国、荷兰、马耳他和塞浦路斯紧随其后。这表明授权活动仍集中在少数司法管辖区。 值得注意的是,并非所有MiCA许可证权限相同。托管、转账和兑换服务许可较为普遍,而运营加密交易平台的授权相对严格,目前仅有17家公司获得此项许可。这意味着欧洲市场上完全授权的加密交易所数量远少于CASP总数。随着过渡期结束,未获授权的服务商已按要求停止接纳新客户并逐步终止受监管活动。

根据对欧洲证券和市场管理局最新注册数据的分析,欧盟监管机构在MiCA过渡期结束前的最后几天批准了数十家加密货币公司。

注册数据显示,在6月23日至7月1日期间,新增了36个加密资产服务提供商授权,这表明在欧盟新的统一加密法规生效前,各公司正加紧努力以满足合规要求。

加密货币公司在MiCA截止期限前急于获得批准

已上传的CASP注册文件显示,共有283条已授权的加密资产服务提供商记录,其中仅六月份就有66项授权

临近截止日期,审批速度加快。注册文件显示,在过渡期结束的前一天(6月30日)有13项授权7月1日还有1项。

ESMA此前曾警告,向欧盟客户提供服务的未授权供应商应在过渡期结束后停止接纳新客户,并开始逐步缩减受监管的活动。

德国领跑欧洲MiCA许可申请

德国在注册中的授权CASP数量最多,有59条记录。

法国以31条紧随其后,荷兰28条,马耳他22条,塞浦路斯21条

数据表明,尽管该法规为持牌公司创建了在整个欧洲经济区经营的“通行证”框架,但MiCA授权仍然集中在少数几个司法管辖区。

交易平台获批数量有限

注册信息还显示,并非所有的MiCA牌照都是相同的。

托管、转移服务和交易所许可似乎远比交易平台授权更为常见。文件中只有17家公司被授权运营加密货币交易平台。

这一区别很重要,因为庞大的CASP数量并不意味着欧洲拥有283家完全授权的交易所。许多公司持有更有限的许可,例如托管、转移服务、订单执行或加密法币兑换。


最终摘要

  • ESMA注册数据显示,在6月23日至7月1日期间签发了36项CASP授权,表明欧盟截止期限前出现了一波MiCA审批热潮。
  • 德国以59条授权CASP记录领先,但仅有17家公司被授权运营加密货币交易平台。

Trend Kriptolar

İlgili Sorular

Q根据ESMA的注册数据,在MiCA过渡期结束前的最后几天,有多少家加密货币公司获得了授权?

A根据ESMA注册数据显示,在MiCA过渡期结束前的最后几天(6月23日至7月1日),共有36家加密资产服务提供商获得了授权。

Q在欧盟各成员国中,哪个国家拥有的已授权CASP数量最多?

A德国拥有的已授权加密资产服务提供商数量最多,达到59家。

Q获得运营加密货币交易平台授权的公司在注册文件中有多少家?

A根据注册文件,仅有17家公司获得了运营加密货币交易平台的授权。

Q文章中提到,在MiCA过渡期结束前一天(6月30日)获得了多少项授权?

A在MiCA过渡期结束前一天,即6月30日,注册表中列出了13项授权。

Q除了交易平台权限,MiCA授权还涵盖了哪些更常见的服务类型?

A除了交易平台权限外,托管、转账服务以及交易所(兑换)许可在注册表中出现得更为普遍。许多公司持有更狭窄的许可,如托管、转账服务、订单执行或加密法币兑换。

İlgili Okumalar

Trump, the President Who Knows Best How to 'Trade Stocks'

Former US President Donald Trump reported a record-breaking $2.2 billion in personal income for 2025, the highest annual income ever disclosed by a sitting president. This figure, from a 927-page government ethics filing, represented a 3.5-fold increase from his $600 million income in 2024 and boosted his net worth to $6.5 billion. The primary drivers were cryptocurrency (64% of income, approximately $1.4 billion) and real estate (26%, approximately $575 million). His crypto earnings stemmed largely from the launch of his personal meme coin, $TRUMP, generating over $600 million in licensing fees, and substantial profits from the WLFI token and its parent company. Despite a sluggish property market, his Mar-a-Lago resort and associated golf clubs saw revenue surges of 50% and 27%, respectively, attributed to their use as venues for presidential events. Trump's financial disclosure also revealed an unprecedented level of stock market activity, with over 22,000 trades executed in 2025, averaging 87 trades per market day. Media analyses noted several instances where significant trading coincided with major policy announcements, such as proposed tariffs, raising questions about potential conflicts of interest. While the White House stated these trades were handled by a family-managed trust fund and not Trump directly, critics highlighted this as a departure from the blind trusts traditionally used by presidents post-Watergate. The report has intensified debate over the commercialization of the presidency. Supporters view it as a success story of a businessman-president, while critics argue it demonstrates an unprecedented conversion of public influence into private wealth, with policy decisions potentially linked to personal financial gains. The controversy centers on whether Trump's earnings represent innovative entrepreneurship or a fundamental conflict of interest, sparking renewed calls for stricter ethics reforms in US governance.

marsbit9 dk önce

Trump, the President Who Knows Best How to 'Trade Stocks'

marsbit9 dk önce

Countdown to Q-Day: Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrencies?

The article explores the existential threat quantum computing poses to cryptocurrencies and the urgent need for "post-quantum" migration. It outlines that quantum computers, through Shor's algorithm, could break the elliptic-curve cryptography (ECC) underlying blockchain security, potentially allowing private keys to be derived from public keys. The core challenge is not a lack of post-quantum cryptography (PQC) standards—like NIST's ML-KEM and ML-DSA—but the immense complexity of upgrading entire ecosystems before "Q-Day" (when quantum computers become capable of such attacks, estimated around 2035-2045). Key points include: * **Bitcoin's** risk is concentrated in legacy UTXOs with exposed public keys (e.g., early P2PK outputs). Migration faces massive hurdles: PQC signatures are much larger, increasing transaction size and cost, and the governance dilemma of handling un-migrated assets threatens its "code is law" ethos. * **Ethereum's** strategy focuses on "cryptographic agility," using Account Abstraction for user accounts and developing compressed hash-based signatures (like leanXMSS with SNARK aggregation) for consensus. Its migration is a complex, full-stack overhaul of execution, consensus, and data layers. * The "security debt" is enormous. The comfortable engineering window for a coordinated, ecosystem-wide upgrade is only 5-8 years. High-value infrastructure (exchanges, bridges) may face pressure before mainnet protocols. In conclusion, quantum computing is not an instant "doomsday" event but a forcing function for systemic change. Bitcoin's ultimate test is social consensus and property rights governance, while Ethereum's is technical complexity. Failure to migrate in time could lead to a fundamental re-pricing of crypto assets.

链捕手13 dk önce

Countdown to Q-Day: Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrencies?

链捕手13 dk önce

Losing $55 Million to Sell Bitcoin, MicroStrategy's Faith Reaches Its Interest Payment Day

On July 6th, Michael Saylor's MicroStrategy announced the sale of 3,588 BTC for approximately $216 million, incurring a realized loss of around $55.45 million compared to its average cost basis. This move, contradicting Saylor's long-standing "never sell" Bitcoin philosophy, was executed to pay dividends on its digital credit securities. The article traces this shift from a small "desensitization test" sale of 32 BTC in late May to the board's authorization on June 30th to sell up to $1.25 billion in Bitcoin for corporate purposes like dividends and buybacks. Analysis reveals that MicroStrategy's previous growth "flywheel"—using stock premiums to fund more Bitcoin purchases—has stalled. With its stock trading near a critical threshold (1.22x its Bitcoin NAV), issuing new shares would dilute value. Simultaneously, its financing channels (preferred stock, common stock ATM, convertible notes) are constrained while facing rigid annual dividend/interest obligations of roughly $1.76 billion. Consequently, selling Bitcoin became the calculated "optimal solution" under its own financial model. This transforms MicroStrategy from crypto's most prominent steady buyer into a predictable seller, creating a potential overhead of ~2,400 BTC in monthly selling pressure if obligations are fully covered by sales. This shift challenges the valuation models of the entire Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) sector that emulated MicroStrategy. The company's path forward now hinges on Bitcoin's price recovery, which would allow its preferred stock to trade at par and reopen its financing flywheel, creating a cyclical dependency between the firm's financial model and the asset it holds.

链捕手42 dk önce

Losing $55 Million to Sell Bitcoin, MicroStrategy's Faith Reaches Its Interest Payment Day

链捕手42 dk önce

OUSD Fake Partnership Controversy? Stablecoins and the Credit Game of Giant Endorsements

Author: Chloe, ChainCatcher Last week, Open Standard launched the dollar stablecoin OpenUSD (OUSD) with a list of over 140 supposedly supporting companies, including major names like Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, American Express, BlackRock, BNY, Standard Chartered, Google, Shopify, Samsung, Coinbase, Solana, and Ripple. The announcement initially impacted Circle's stock price, but doubts about the list quickly emerged. Several Korean firms named, including Samsung Electronics, Shinhan Financial Group, Dunamu (Upbit's parent), and K Bank, clarified they had not formally agreed to join the alliance. Some stated they were only approached for potential interest or learned of their inclusion from news reports, expressing surprise. Similar concerns were raised by U.S. entities, suggesting the list may be misleading. OUSD, led by Zach Abrams of Bridge (acquired by Stripe in 2024), promotes zero-fee minting/redemption, no transaction limits, and sharing reserve asset yields with partners instead of keeping profits. However, this model makes listed partnership imply economic benefits, turning it into a serious credibility issue. This incident reflects a common crypto marketing tactic of leveraging big names. A Chainstory analysis found over 62% of crypto press releases in late 2025 were high-risk or scams. The situation recalls Facebook's Libra (later Diem), which collapsed in 2022 after initial heavyweight backers like Visa and PayPal withdrew under regulatory pressure. Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire welcomed the competition but highlighted the challenges. He argued stablecoin success relies on network effects and real usage, not just alliances. He criticized OUSD's "free" model and full revenue sharing as potentially starving infrastructure development. Noting the dominance of USDT (~$1.84T) and USDC (~$730B) in the ~$2.91T stablecoin market, he suggested many new entrants lack real utility despite inflated circulation from incentives. In conclusion, while OUSD has genuine backing and a distinct model, its future depends on actual adoption in B2B payments, settlements, and cross-border transactions, not just a prestigious partner list. The market will determine if it is a credible challenger or merely another marketing promise.

链捕手44 dk önce

OUSD Fake Partnership Controversy? Stablecoins and the Credit Game of Giant Endorsements

链捕手44 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot

Popüler Makaleler

T Nasıl Satın Alınır

HTX.com’a hoş geldiniz! Threshold Network Token (T) satın alma işlemlerini basit ve kullanışlı bir hâle getirdik. Adım adım açıkladığımız rehberimizi takip ederek kripto yolculuğunuza başlayın. 1. Adım: HTX Hesabınızı OluşturunHTX'te ücretsiz bir hesap açmak için e-posta adresinizi veya telefon numaranızı kullanın. Sorunsuzca kaydolun ve tüm özelliklerin kilidini açın. Hesabımı Aç2. Adım: Kripto Satın Al Bölümüne Gidin ve Ödeme Yönteminizi SeçinKredi/Banka Kartı: Visa veya Mastercard'ınızı kullanarak anında Threshold Network Token (T) satın alın.Bakiye: Sorunsuz bir şekilde işlem yapmak için HTX hesap bakiyenizdeki fonları kullanın.Üçüncü Taraflar: Kullanımı kolaylaştırmak için Google Pay ve Apple Pay gibi popüler ödeme yöntemlerini ekledik.P2P: HTX'teki diğer kullanıcılarla doğrudan işlem yapın.Borsa Dışı (OTC): Yatırımcılar için kişiye özel hizmetler ve rekabetçi döviz kurları sunuyoruz.3. Adım: Threshold Network Token (T) Varlıklarınızı SaklayınThreshold Network Token (T) satın aldıktan sonra HTX hesabınızda saklayın. Alternatif olarak, blok zinciri transferi yoluyla başka bir yere gönderebilir veya diğer kripto para birimlerini takas etmek için kullanabilirsiniz.4. Adım: Threshold Network Token (T) Varlıklarınızla İşlem YapınHTX'in spot piyasasında Threshold Network Token (T) ile kolayca işlemler yapın.Hesabınıza erişin, işlem çiftinizi seçin, işlemlerinizi gerçekleştirin ve gerçek zamanlı olarak izleyin. Hem yeni başlayanlar hem de deneyimli yatırımcılar için kullanıcı dostu bir deneyim sunuyoruz.

554 Toplam GörüntülenmeYayınlanma 2024.12.10Güncellenme 2026.06.02

T Nasıl Satın Alınır

Tartışmalar

HTX Topluluğuna hoş geldiniz. Burada, en son platform gelişmeleri hakkında bilgi sahibi olabilir ve profesyonel piyasa görüşlerine erişebilirsiniz. Kullanıcıların T (T) fiyatı hakkındaki görüşleri aşağıda sunulmaktadır.

活动图片