全球近 90% 央行降息,宏观数据证实加密牛市仍处初期

深潮2025-09-08 tarihinde yayınlandı2025-09-09 tarihinde güncellendi

当前经济环境更支持市场持续扩张,而非收缩。

来源:Cryptoslate

编译:区块链骑士

Global Macro Investor 宏观研究主管 Julien Bittel 表示,基于全面的经济指标判断,当前加密货币牛市仍处于初期阶段。

在 9 月 8 日通过 X 平台分享的分析中,Bittel 反驳了加密货币市场中普遍存在的「周期峰值」情绪,并通过分析传统经济指标,对「周期后期」的说法提出挑战。

典型的周期后期经济通常具备以下特征:制造业情绪极度高涨(ISM 指数在 60 左右)、服务业情绪居高不下、房屋建筑商信心强劲、消费者与劳动者信心充足、投资者情绪看涨,以及薪资增长加速。

但 Bittel 指出,当前数据呈现出截然不同的图景。他将 ISM(美国供应管理协会)、NAHB(全美房屋建筑商协会)、NFIB(全美独立企业联盟)、BLS(美国劳工统计局)、AAII(美国个人投资者协会)及 The Conference Board(世界大型企业联合会)的指标纳入综合情绪衡量体系后发现,美国经济情绪仍「非常温和」,远未达到周期后期的极度乐观水平。

他表示:「当前经济并非呈现高于趋势水平的周期后期特征,更像是正试图积聚动力的周期初期经济。」

央行政策为这一观点提供了额外支撑。全球近 90% 的央行正在实施降息,Bittel 称这创造了「非常规」环境,并从长远来看为「商业周期提供了强劲推动力」。

油价走势进一步印证了「周期初期」的判断:当前油价较趋势水平低近 20%,且仍在持续下跌。这意味着当前金融环境处于宽松状态,而非周期后期通常出现的紧缩状态。

从历史数据来看,自 20 世纪 70 年代初以来,油价较趋势水平高出 50% 时,往往预示着经济衰退的到来。

临时帮助服务行业(Temporary Help Services)数据显示出「周期初期特征」:该行业增长从极低水平逐步回升,这表明经济正处于复苏阶段,而非回落阶段。

Bittel 指出,周期后期通常表现为「同比增长由正转缓」,反映出过热经济正失去动力。

他将失业率上升归因于就业数据的滞后性,称其为「后视镜里的过去六个月情况」。

企业在决定招聘「附带福利与养老金的高成本全职员工」前,通常会先增加员工加班时长、雇佣临时员工。

Bittel 还将当前经济环境定义为「从周期初期向周期中期过渡」,并将这一进程描述为从「宏观春季」(增长上升、通胀下降)迈向「宏观夏季」(增长上升、通胀上升)。

他总结称,这一宏观视角对当前加密货币市场的主流情绪提出了挑战,当前市场情绪认为牛市周期已经见顶。相反,当前经济环境更支持市场持续扩张,而非收缩。

İlgili Okumalar

Same $5 Rate, Bill Differs by 30%, OpenAI Exec: Token Pricing Is Never Directly Comparable

Here is a summary of the article in English: **Title: Priced at $5, Bills Vary by 30%. OpenAI Executive: Token Prices Are Not Directly Comparable** A key takeaway from OpenAI's Codex lead, Tibo, is that a "token" is not a standardized unit for comparing AI model costs, akin to grams or kilowatt-hours. He uses an analogy: two identical pizzas priced per slice can yield different total costs depending on how they're cut. Similarly, different models use different "tokenizers" to segment text, meaning the same input text can produce vastly different token counts. For instance, the same text was tokenized as 766 tokens by GPT-5.6 Sol and 1170 tokens by Claude Opus 5—a 34.5% difference—despite both models advertising the same input price of $5 per million tokens. This discrepancy arises because each company trains its own tokenizer based on its training data, affecting how common or rare word combinations are split. The problem isn't cross-vendor only. Even Anthropic warns that its newer models (Claude 4.7+) use a different tokenizer, producing roughly 30% more tokens for the same text than earlier versions, so cost estimates shouldn't be reused across model generations. Bill differences stem from four main factors: 1) Tokenizer efficiency (input token count), 2) Caching (e.g., GPT-5.6 Sol offers a much lower cache input rate), 3) Output pricing (which can outweigh input savings in agent workflows), and 4) Context length pricing tiers (e.g., GPT-5.6 Sol charges double the input rate for entire requests exceeding 272K tokens). Tibo also addressed user reports of GPT-5.6 Sol's context window being limited in practice, sharing configuration code to manually expand it to 1 million tokens. However, he cautioned that larger windows increase the risk of hitting higher pricing tiers as longer session histories are processed repeatedly. The article concludes that the true metric should shift from "price per million tokens" to "price per successful outcome." The most accurate way to compare costs is to run identical real-world tasks (with the same prompts, tools, and data) through different models, accounting for all variables like tokenization, caching, output length, and context pricing. Ultimately, what matters is the total cost to complete a specific job, not the nominal token price.

marsbit5 dk önce

Same $5 Rate, Bill Differs by 30%, OpenAI Exec: Token Pricing Is Never Directly Comparable

marsbit5 dk önce

Are Big VC Funds Monopolizing the Seed Round, Leaving Small VCs with No Choice but to Give Up?

**Title: Are Big VCs Monopolizing Seed Rounds? Is Giving Up the Only Path for Small VCs?** In a frank and critical commentary, the author argues that the venture capital landscape has shifted dramatically: large, multi-stage funds are aggressively moving into seed-stage investing, leveraging their brand recognition, massive capital, and resources to dominate deals. They outcompete smaller, specialized funds for stakes in even the earliest startups, as founders increasingly prefer established names. The piece asserts that success in VC now hinges almost entirely on securing a position in the handful of globally transformative companies each year (e.g., OpenAI, Anthropic). For funds that miss these "winner-takes-most" opportunities, relevance fades. The author sarcastically suggests small fund managers should advise their portfolio companies to seek acquisition by such giants and then invest via SPVs, or abandon early-stage investing altogether to chase less ambiguous growth rounds. Further, the author claims the "best" founders—those from elite backgrounds—command premium valuations and align with top-tier funds, leaving little room for others. The relentless focus on AI is presented as another pressure point; not dedicating a fund entirely to AI is deemed a path to irrelevance, akin to missing prior cycles like SaaS or crypto. Ultimately, the letter delivers a cynical conclusion: with capital and power concentrating, true differentiation is nearly impossible. It suggests that for many small VCs, surrendering to this new reality—rather than evolving, competing, or trying something different—might be the most rational, if grim, course of action. The piece serves as a stark warning about capital concentration and the existential challenges facing smaller investment firms.

marsbit6 dk önce

Are Big VC Funds Monopolizing the Seed Round, Leaving Small VCs with No Choice but to Give Up?

marsbit6 dk önce

Bank of Russia: 12 Largest Banks to Connect Digital Ruble from September 1, 2026

The Central Bank of Russia (CBR) announced that all 12 of the country's systemically important banks will be ready to offer clients digital ruble accounts and transactions starting September 1, 2026. According to Alla Bakina, director of the CBR's national payment system department, these banks cover over 80% of the domestic payment market. The digital ruble is described as a new form of the existing currency, functioning as a cashless payment method but held directly in a user's wallet on the CBR platform. Nine other banks designated as significant payment market participants are also expected to provide access, with most aiming to complete integration by autumn 2026. Starting from the September launch date, major retail chains with annual revenue exceeding 120 million rubles will be required to accept digital ruble payments, though adoption for citizens remains voluntary. The rollout follows a delayed pilot phase, with mass implementation postponed from 2025. The CBR's model currently offers basic account functionality without interest accrual, unlike China's digital yuan, which began paying interest in early 2026. The announcement positions Russia among dozens of countries testing Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), though the digital ruble's potential role in cross-border settlements, particularly within BRICS, remains an open question for its future international relevance.

cryptonews.ru11 dk önce

Bank of Russia: 12 Largest Banks to Connect Digital Ruble from September 1, 2026

cryptonews.ru11 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片