衍生品赛道竞争升温,一文盘点当前值得关注的五个 Perp DEX

链捕手2025-04-10 tarihinde yayınlandı2025-04-10 tarihinde güncellendi

作者:Scof,ChainCatcher

编辑:TB,ChainCatcher

进入二季度以来,全球市场面临多重不确定性:美联储延迟降息,通胀预期反复;特朗普提出的对等关税政策则引发投资者对全球经济走势的担忧。在此背景下,加密资产同步走弱,交易情绪明显降温,市场风险偏好回落。

与此同时,多个基于不同公链构建的永续合约交易平台在此阶段加速产品推进和激励释放,试图在“空投周期”与“结构性机会”中建立自己的用户基础。

本文选取当前五个较具代表性的 Perp DEX 项目,从链上归属、交易结构、激励机制与项目背景等角度,提供一份基础观察。

1、edgeX:由机构孵化,交易对覆盖有限

  • 公链归属:暂未公开具体链部署信息
  • 项目背景:由 Amber Group 孵化,Amber 是总部位于香港的做市与资管平台
  • 交易表现:当前支持币种较少,AAVE 等主流币未上线。以 TRUMP 交易对为例,1% 范围内深度在 6–7 万美元之间,订单簿存在断层

  • 用户激励:处于 Alpha 阶段积分活动中,版本命名暗示后续可能有扩展计划。用户可以通过交易或者邀请新用户获得积分。
  • 当前状态:项目处于早期阶段,功能覆盖和币对支持有待扩展

2. Ethereal:尚未上线交易,当前以积分预存为主

  • 公链归属:构建于 Ethena 网络之上
  • 项目背景:Ethereal 由 Ethena Labs 推出,Ethena 当前 TVL 约 62 亿美元,排名 DeFiLlama 全网前列;其合作方包括贝莱德(BlackRock)
  • 交易表现:尚未开放现货与合约交易功能
  • 用户激励:正处于“Season Zero”阶段,用户可通过存入 USDe 获得 eUSDe 收据代币,并积累 Ethereal 和 ENA 双重积分;无锁仓要求,预计 TGE 时间为 2025 年 5 月。目前总锁仓量为 97 亿美元。
  • 当前状态:尚未进入正式交易阶段,主要吸引用户通过预存参与早期积分计划

3、Aster:合并重塑后的衍生品平台,双模式交易与收益并重

  • 公链归属:目前为多链部署,主要适配以太坊主网和 BNB Chain
  • 项目背景:由 Astherus 与 APX Finance 于 2024 年底合并后组建,整合了前者的收益类产品能力与后者的永续交易基础设施
  • 交易功能:支持两种模式切换

Simple Mode:链上执行、一键开仓、抗 MEV

Pro Mode:订单簿交易,具备深度流动性、低交易费与高级工具,支持高杠杆交易

  • 用户激励机制:目前处于 Stage 1:Spectra 阶段,分为两类积分体系

Au 积分:通过铸造并持有 Aster Earn 相关资产(如 ALP、USDF、LP Token)获得,用于分配 $AST 空投份额

Rh 积分:在 Pro Mode 交易永续合约可获得,支持 1.1 倍积分加成或获得 100 美元等值交易奖金

  • 后续计划:路线图包括零知识证明(ZKP)集成、专用 Layer 1、公链意图系统等,用于提升用户体验和去中心化程度
  • 当前状态:交易功能已开放,积分活动活跃,平台正处于品牌重塑与用户获取初期阶段

4、Paradex:基于 Layer 2 的订单簿式衍生品交易平台

  • 公链归属:基于StarkNet网络,具体细节暂未公开
  • 项目背景:Paradex 由 Paradigm 开发,目前已上线主网,支持链上自托管交易。当前产品围绕订单簿结构构建,强调链上结算与风险管理。
  • 风险控制:平台采用链上风控引擎,对用户资产风险进行实时评估。支持基于组合仓位的保证金计算框架
  • 扩展产品:推出链上永续期权产品(Perpetual Options)

-资金费率由期权时间价值(即市价与内在价值的差额)决定,按小时结算

-盈亏持续计入未实现 PnL,并在持仓更新时结算

  • 当前状态:平台已上线主网,功能正在逐步扩展,期权产品尚处早期阶段。目前正在 Warzone season 2,用户可以通过交易、提供流动性、向 Paradex 保险库存入保证金等方式获得 XP。官方表示 XP 可用于后续奖励。

5、Backpack:基于 Solana,流动性仍待加强

  • 公链归属:Solana
  • 团队背景:由前 FTX 法律顾问 Can Sun 和前 Alameda 工程师 Armani Ferrante 联合创立。母公司 Coral 于 2022 年获得 FTX Ventures、Jump Crypto 等领投的 2000 万美元融资。
  • 交易体验:当前主流币种流动性相对薄弱。以 Sui为例,1% 下浮深度约为 23 万美元,订单簿存在明显断档,难以支撑大资金高频交易。
  • 激励机制:正在进行为期十周的积分活动(Season 1)。积分计算包括交易量、盈亏表现、持仓时间、存款金额等多个变量。
  • 适用场景:更适合中小资金参与交易和获取积分奖励。

总的来说,在实际使用过程中,Backpack 的界面相对更简洁、操作流畅,适合轻量参与或初次尝试者。而 Aster 在功能设计上更为丰富。以上为笔者的个人体验,仅供参考,欢迎持不同观点的读者共同探讨。

İlgili Okumalar

BIS Report Compliance Observations: The True Risks of Stablecoins Go Beyond 'De-pegging'

The BIS report, "Anchoring trust in money: innovation beyond stablecoins," highlights that the primary risks of stablecoins extend beyond potential de-pegging. It argues that the core challenge is whether stablecoins can be integrated into a financial system that is identifiable, monitorable, accountable, and regulatable. While acknowledging efficiency gains like faster payments and programmability, BIS emphasizes that money requires an institutional framework—including legal certainty, liquidity support, and financial integrity controls—which many stablecoins currently lack. The report details compliance risks, noting that while blockchain transactions are transparent, address visibility does not equate to identity or purpose clarity. This creates a systemic risk as pseudonymity, non-custodial wallets, and cross-chain bridges can undermine AML/CFT controls. Furthermore, these risks can spill over into the traditional financial system through on- and off-ramps. The future direction, per BIS, is not to prohibit innovation but to embed regulatory rules—such as identity verification and transaction screening—directly into the technological infrastructure of tokenized finance. The key takeaway for compliance is that any new financial instrument must clearly address questions of customer identification, transaction monitoring, accountability, and cross-border rule consistency to be viable as a mainstream payment tool.

marsbit52 dk önce

BIS Report Compliance Observations: The True Risks of Stablecoins Go Beyond 'De-pegging'

marsbit52 dk önce

When US Giants Collectively "Defect" to Chinese AI Models

When Silicon Valley Giants Turn to Chinese AI Models to Cut Costs A surprising trend is emerging: major U.S. tech companies are significantly reducing AI costs by switching to Chinese models. Coinbase, the largest U.S. cryptocurrency exchange, reportedly halved its AI spending after migrating to China's GLM-5.2 and Kimi 2.7 models, despite increasing usage. They achieved this through a sophisticated three-part strategy: implementing an automatic routing system to select the most cost-effective model per task, boosting cache hit rates from 5% to 60% to reuse computations, and employing "context engineering" to provide AI with more precise, less cluttered information. They are not alone. AI startup Lindy switched from Claude to DeepSeek, saving millions, while Snowflake's tests found GLM-5.2 solved 66% of coding tasks compared to Claude Opus's 67%—but at a fraction of the cost (output pricing is 5-7 times lower). While the top Western models may offer slightly better stability, the massive price differential is leading many businesses to reconsider their value proposition. This shift signals a deeper change in the AI industry, moving beyond pure performance benchmarks to a fierce cost competition. As pressure mounts, even OpenAI and Anthropic have begun slashing prices. For users, this means more choices, lower costs, and a crucial lesson: using multiple models based on task complexity, optimizing with caching, and keeping contexts lean are now key to leveraging AI efficiently and affordably.

marsbit59 dk önce

When US Giants Collectively "Defect" to Chinese AI Models

marsbit59 dk önce

BIS Report Compliance Watch: The Real Risks of Stablecoins Are Not Just 'De-pegging'

BIS Report Compliance Observations: The real risks of stablecoins go beyond "depegging" The BIS report "Anchoring trust in money: innovation beyond stablecoins" argues that while stablecoins and tokenization offer efficiency gains, their primary risk lies in fitting into an identifiable, monitorable, accountable, and regulatable financial system. Money's trust stems not just from technology but from institutional arrangements: a common unit of account, guaranteed redemption at par, liquidity support, regulatory frameworks, and financial integrity requirements. Stablecoins, operating on permissionless blockchains with pseudo-anonymity and non-custodial wallets, create systemic compliance gaps: unclear customer identity, incomplete fund origins, unexplained transaction purposes, fragmented cross-chain paths, and ambiguous liability. On-chain transparency does not equal compliance transparency. Public addresses don't reveal identity or intent. While blockchain analytics aid law enforcement, they cannot replace routine, large-scale AML/CFT controls. Effective compliance requires a closed-loop process encompassing customer onboarding, transaction monitoring, investigation, reporting, and audit. Stablecoin risks are not confined to the blockchain; they re-enter the traditional financial system via on/off-ramps, exchanges, and payment institutions. This forces banks to monitor client accounts for activity linked to virtual assets. The future direction is not to prohibit innovation but to embed rules into the technology. Tokenized finance should integrate with the existing two-tier monetary system, embedding compliance—like customer identification, pre-transaction screening, and auditable data trails—directly into the transaction flow. For compliance professionals, the key takeaway is that any new financial instrument must answer core questions: Who identifies the customer? Who monitors transactions? Who handles exceptions? Who is liable? Compliance is not the antithesis of innovation but the essential infrastructure for its sustainable growth.

链捕手1 saat önce

BIS Report Compliance Watch: The Real Risks of Stablecoins Are Not Just 'De-pegging'

链捕手1 saat önce

When American Giants 'Defect' to Chinese AI Models

Summary: The trend of major U.S. technology firms adopting more cost-effective Chinese AI models is gaining momentum. A prime example is Coinbase, the largest U.S. cryptocurrency exchange, which reportedly halved its AI expenditure by switching to Chinese models GLM-5.2 and Kimi 2.7, while its usage volume increased. This was achieved through a sophisticated cost-saving system featuring intelligent model routing (selecting the most suitable model per task), dramatically improving cache hit rates from 5% to 60%, and implementing "Context Engineering" to streamline prompts. This shift is not isolated. Other companies like the AI startup Lindy and data cloud firm Snowflake are making similar moves, drawn by the significant price disparity. For instance, GLM-5.2 costs $1.40/$4.40 per million tokens (input/output), compared to $5/$25 for Claude Opus 4.7. While top Western models may offer slightly higher stability or speed in complex tasks, the performance gap is narrowing, making the price difference harder to justify for many enterprise use cases. The implications are significant for both businesses and individual users. It highlights the importance of a multi-model strategy based on task requirements, the value of caching and reusing outputs, and the effectiveness of providing concise context. Ultimately, this migration signals a potential reshaping of the AI industry's pricing model, moving competition from pure performance benchmarks to practical cost-effectiveness, with increased choice and downward price pressure benefiting end-users.

链捕手1 saat önce

When American Giants 'Defect' to Chinese AI Models

链捕手1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片