Arkham: Tesla по-прежнему владеет $780 млн в биткоинах

investing.ru2024-10-23 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-10-23 tarihinde güncellendi

Happycoin.club - Компания Arkham, занимающаяся анализом блокчейнов, сообщила, что производитель электромобилей Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) по-прежнему владеет 11 509 BTC на сумму около $780 млн.

Мы считаем, что перемещения средств в кошельке Tesla, о которых мы сообщали на прошлой неделе, были просто сменой кошельков, при этом биткоины по-прежнему принадлежали Tesla. Напомним, что Tesla перевела весь свой баланс в 11 509 BTC ($776,9 млн) на новые адреса, — написали аналитики Arkham.

15 октября Tesla впервые за долгое время распределила 11 509 биткоинов между семью кошельками. На каждом из них теперь хранится от 1100 до 2200 BTC, это данные Arkham. Кошельки 1Fnhp и 1LERL получили самые крупные переводы криптовалют на сумму $142,2 млн и $128,1 млн соответственно.

Перемещения биткоинов компанией Tesla

Крупные переводы биткоинов изначально вызвали опасения по поводу потенциального обвала рынка. Однако этого не произошло, потому что Tesla не продала свои криптоактивы, а просто переместила их. Компания Илона Маска по-прежнему остаётся четвёртым по величине корпоративным держателем BTC, уступая только MicroStrategy, Marathon Digital и Riot Platforms.

Руководители Tesla могут раскрыть свои планы в отношении биткоина во время телефонной конференции, посвящённой результатам за третий квартал, которая состоится 23 октября.

Читайте оригинальную статью на сайте Happycoin.club

İlgili Okumalar

What's It Like Working with Two "Madmen": Peter Thiel and Elon Musk? Palantir Co-founder Shares His Experience

Joe Lonsdale, co-founder of Palantir and a member of the "PayPal Mafia," shared his experiences working alongside Elon Musk and Peter Thiel. He described both as highly opinionated, ambitious, and intolerant of broken systems, demanding immediate fixes and rapid execution. Thiel is characterized as a strategic philosopher, while Musk is a hands-on engineer deeply involved in technical details. Musk is noted as one of the hardest workers Lonsdale has ever seen, a trait common in PayPal's early, passionate culture that later spawned numerous billion-dollar companies. Lonsdale recounted Palantir's origin story. While working at Thiel's hedge fund, he and Thiel discussed how Silicon Valley's technology far outpaced the government's, especially after 9/11. They saw an opportunity to build a platform to help stop terrorist attacks while protecting civil liberties. Their initial venture capital pitches were met with rejection and ridicule. However, Thiel viewed this as motivation. Critical funding eventually came from the CIA's venture arm and Thiel himself. Reflecting on Palantir's impact, Lonsdale believes their work helped neutralize thousands of terrorists and ensured government oversight, though he acknowledges the potential dangers if such powerful technology is misused. His key takeaway echoes Thiel's early advice: being rejected and laughed at can fuel the determination to prove the doubters wrong.

marsbit10 dk önce

What's It Like Working with Two "Madmen": Peter Thiel and Elon Musk? Palantir Co-founder Shares His Experience

marsbit10 dk önce

15 Reasoning Models Flip Collectively: Unpacking the Latent Risks Hidden in the Chain of Thought Behind Their Outputs

"15 Reasoning Models Collectively Fail: Revealing Hidden Risks in Chain-of-Thought Outputs" A systematic study led by researchers from Harvard, USC, Brown, and MIT warns that evaluating only the final output of large reasoning models (LRMs) is insufficient for safety. The research highlights that the intermediate reasoning chains (CoT) these models expose can contain dangerous content—like bomb-making instructions or poisoning recipes—even when the final answer appears safe. The core methodology involves separately assessing the reasoning chain and the final answer against 20 safety principles, each scored 1-5 for risk. This identifies three key failure modes: 'Unsafe' (both stages unsafe), 'Leak' (unsafe reasoning but safe answer), and 'Escape' (safe reasoning but unsafe answer). The team evaluated 15 reasoning models on a combined in-distribution dataset of 41K prompts from seven public harmful/jailbreak datasets. A universal finding across all 15 models was that reasoning chains are consistently riskier than final answers. Risk is concentrated in categories like misinformation, illegal activity, bias, and physical/psychological harm, with illegal compliance showing the starkest divergence. Case studies reveal instances where harmful operational details are 'leaked' in reasoning or a seemingly harmless chain 'escapes' into a dangerous final answer. To mitigate this, the researchers propose 'Adaptive Multi-Principle Steering,' a white-box, test-time intervention method. It identifies unsafe principles being activated during reasoning and gently steers the model's internal representations towards safer directions. Validated on open-source models, this approach reduced unsafe outputs by up to 40.8% while preserving 97.7% of benchmark performance. The work underscores the critical need to monitor and secure the entire reasoning process, not just the final output.

marsbit15 dk önce

15 Reasoning Models Flip Collectively: Unpacking the Latent Risks Hidden in the Chain of Thought Behind Their Outputs

marsbit15 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片