TON: Pantera's Largest Investment Ever | Interview With Cosmo Jiang

Token Terminal2024-07-22 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-08-23 tarihinde güncellendi

In this episode of the Fundamentals podcast, we’re joined by Cosmo Jiang, Portfolio Manager at Pantera Capital to discuss the details behind Pantera’s largest investment ever, into The Open Network – or TON – the Layer 1 network originally designed by Telegram.

Listen to the episode

We speak about Pantera's long-term approach to fundamentals-based investing, and walk through their typical deal sourcing and due diligence processes. We explore the factors the helped Pantera build conviction for their largest investment to date, including the strategic partnership between Telegram and TON, how TON is uniquely positioned to onboard the first billion users to crypto, the importance of a thriving developer ecosystem, the impressive traction that mini games have been seeing on TON, and the growth of stable coins on the network.

We also speak about Pantera’s bull case for TON, the risks and 'unanalyzables' related to the investment, and how Pantera is supporting TON's growth post-investment.

Tune in for a great episode on the fundamentals of both Pantera and TON.

Timestamps:
00:00 Introduction
01:37 Meet Cosmo Jiang
04:38 Overview of Pantera
08:29 How TON Hit Pantera’s Radar
11:11 Telegram's Strategic Partnership with TON
15:38 Pantera's Due Diligence Process
21:15 Building Conviction for TON Investment
24:58 Telegram vs. Other Community Platforms
28:12 Gaming on TON
34:46 Notcoin & Hamster Kombat: The Popularity of Idle Games
36:06 Payments and Stablecoins on TON
40:40 Value Accrual and Investment Potential of TON
42:06 Risks and ‘Unanalyzables’
47:53 Supporting TON’s Growth
51:11 Conclusion and Future Outlook

Socials

Pantera: https://panteracapital.com/
Pantera on X: https://x.com/PanteraCapital
Cosmo on X: https://x.com/cosmo_jiang

The authors of this content, or members, affiliates, or stakeholders of Token Terminal may be participating or are invested in protocols or tokens mentioned herein. The foregoing statement acts as a disclosure of potential conflicts of interest and is not a recommendation to purchase or invest in any token or participate in any protocol. Token Terminal does not recommend any particular course of action in relation to any token or protocol. The content herein is meant purely for educational and informational purposes only, and should not be relied upon as financial, investment, legal, tax or any other professional or other advice. None of the content and information herein is presented to induce or to attempt to induce any reader or other person to buy, sell or hold any token or participate in any protocol or enter into, or offer to enter into, any agreement for or with a view to buying or selling any token or participating in any protocol. Statements made herein (including statements of opinion, if any) are wholly generic and not tailored to take into account the personal needs and unique circumstances of any reader or any other person. Readers are strongly urged to exercise caution and have regard to their own personal needs and circumstances before making any decision to buy or sell any token or participate in any protocol. Observations and views expressed herein may be changed by Token Terminal at any time without notice. Token Terminal accepts no liability whatsoever for any losses or liabilities arising from the use of or reliance on any of this content.

İlgili Okumalar

Switching Research Fields in the Final Year of My PhD, I Landed an Offer from OpenAI: My Interview Journey Was Full of 'Surprises'

Yong Zheng-Xin, a final-year PhD student at Brown University, secured an OpenAI offer after pivoting from multilingual models to AI safety research in his last year. In his blog post "Surprising lessons from my research scientist job search," he shares six unexpected insights from his job hunt. He found that often only one or two key papers matter for securing an interview, not the total number. Interview formats were highly diverse, including unexpected rounds on system design and AI agent usage. "Work trials," common in AI startups, involved paid, sometimes week-long collaborative tasks that disrupted other interview preparations. Timing proved crucial, with opportunity windows sometimes lasting less than a month. Return offers for research roles were rare compared to software engineering. Surprisingly, many interview rounds were unrelated to his specific AI safety focus, instead testing broader research competencies. Zheng-Xin concludes that the ability to demonstrate relevant expertise in a new field can unlock opportunities, regardless of one's previous publication record.

marsbit4 dk önce

Switching Research Fields in the Final Year of My PhD, I Landed an Offer from OpenAI: My Interview Journey Was Full of 'Surprises'

marsbit4 dk önce

David Villa Officially Appointed as Brand Ambassador for BitradeX

David Villa, the legendary Spanish striker and 2010 World Cup champion, has been officially appointed as the Global Brand Ambassador for BitradeX. This partnership, announced amid the global excitement for the 2026 World Cup, aims to enhance the platform's international brand influence. Villa, a key figure in Spain's golden era of football and the nation's all-time top scorer, embodies a spirit of perseverance, focus, and the relentless pursuit of excellence. BitradeX officials stated that this champion mentality aligns perfectly with their own core values of innovation, long-term development, and global strategic expansion. As a global AI-driven digital asset ecosystem, BitradeX will collaborate with Villa across branding, global market promotion, community engagement, and strategic initiatives. The company believes Villa's widespread influence and trusted international image will serve as a crucial bridge to connect with users worldwide. This collaboration marks a significant step in BitradeX's globalization strategy, with both parties committed to exploring new opportunities in the digital age and writing a new chapter of shared achievement.

链捕手16 dk önce

STRC 跌破面值，比特币财库实验进入下半场

The price of STRC, Strategy's dividend-paying preferred stock, has fallen below its $100 face value, triggering a re-evaluation of the "bitcoin treasury" corporate model. This highlights a critical tension: the company's asset base consists of high-volatility, non-cash-flow-generating Bitcoin, while its capital structure requires continuous cash payouts for dividends and interest. The decline of STRC signals that market pressure is shifting from asset price volatility to the pricing of the company's financing tools. Strategy's core model involves a three-step conversion: turning equity into Bitcoin exposure, converting Bitcoin holdings into capital market credit, and packaging non-yielding BTC into cash-paying securities like STRC. While Strategy holds a massive 847,363 BTC, the focus is now on cash flow mismatches. The company faces annual preferred stock dividend obligations of approximately $1.7 billion, far exceeding the cash flow from its legacy software business. Its ability to meet these obligations relies on continued access to capital markets. The market is now scrutinizing which of three potential costs becomes untenable first: rising dividend costs to attract investors, dilution costs from issuing more common stock, or the reputational cost of selling BTC—a move contrary to its "hodl" narrative. For the broader crypto market, a constrained Strategy means the potential loss of a predictable, narrative-driven marginal buyer for Bitcoin. The STRC discount serves as a reminder that the longevity of such models depends not just on Bitcoin's price, but also on financing windows, cash reserves, and investor willingness to pay a "trust premium" for the structure.

marsbit29 dk önce

marsbit29 dk önce

Standard Chartered Bank’s 50-Fold Fantasy: Predicting AAVE to Reach $3,500

Standard Chartered Bank has issued an optimistic research report predicting that the AAVE token could surge 50-fold to $3,500 by 2030. This forecast is based on the projection that the total value locked (TVL) in DeFi will grow 37x to approximately $2.7 trillion, driven by stablecoin expansion and the tokenization of real-world assets (RWA). The bank's model links Aave's potential valuation directly to its protocol revenue, which is primarily driven by net interest margins. The report highlights Aave's current dominant position, noting it captures over 80% of the net earnings ("protocol retained earnings") in the lending sector while holding only about half of its TVL. It also points to the recent launch of the Aave V4 architecture and a healthy revenue stream of $142 million in 2025 as positive fundamentals. Grayscale's separate analysis, applying traditional valuation metrics like DCF, concluded AAVE is currently undervalued. However, the article notes significant challenges. Aave's peer-to-pool lending model suffers from inherent capital inefficiency, with an estimated $52 million annual "deadweight loss" due to idle funds needed for liquidity buffers. This structural flaw was exposed during the April KelpDAO exploit, which locked a WETH pool at 100% utilization for days. Emerging protocols like Morpho, with more efficient point-to-point models, are cited as growing competitive threats. In summary, while institutional forecasts paint a macro picture of massive growth fueled by RWA adoption, Aave's path forward hinges on addressing its core structural limitations and competitive pressures within the evolving DeFi lending landscape.

链捕手1 saat önce

Standard Chartered Bank’s 50-Fold Fantasy: Predicting AAVE to Reach $3,500

链捕手1 saat önce

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But the Reasons Have Changed

Tidal Investment remains optimistic about the AI industry chain, but the rationale has shifted. The market narrative has changed. While recent large-scale IPOs (e.g., SpaceX) and major fundraising plans by tech giants like Alphabet and Meta have caused some nervousness, this isn't a sign of an AI peak. The focus has moved from the initial question of AI's viability to the sustainability of massive investment cycles. The key players—primarily the major cloud providers—are not slowing down; their capital expenditure (Capex) guidance for 2026 has been increased across the board (e.g., Alphabet to $180B, Amazon to $200B). This investment cycle is proving resilient and difficult to stop. Unlike traditional hardware cycles, current AI Capex is distributed across multiple physical layers—computing, memory, networking, and critically, power infrastructure. Bottlenecks are shifting from chips to elements like electricity, transformers, and cooling systems, which have much longer lead times and cannot be easily pre-built like fiber optics during the dot-com bubble. Supply chain data (e.g., Eaton's 240% YoY data center orders) confirms this broad-based, project-driven expansion. Market concerns are acknowledged but viewed differently. First, while Capex growth currently outpaces revenue growth, raising ROI questions, this mirrors the early scaling phase of cloud computing itself. A change in view would require concrete signals like downward Capex revisions or missed AI product targets, which haven't materialized by mid-2026. Second, comparisons to the 2000 dot-com bust are flawed. That crash was driven by a massive, parallel oversupply of cheap capacity (fiber). The current cycle faces *supply constraints* in critical, capital-intensive physical infrastructure that cannot be overbuilt as easily. In conclusion, the wave of fundraising reflects the next, more complex act of the AI story. Physical bottlenecks and sustained high Capex plans suggest this is not the finale but an ongoing, capital-intensive build-out phase. The script has changed, but the play is far from over.

marsbit2 saat önce

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But the Reasons Have Changed

marsbit2 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot

Futures