蒙面入侵者带着200万美元的加密货币逃跑:泰国警方展开调查

币界网2024-08-18 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-08-18 tarihinde güncellendi

币界网报道:

警方正在积极搜寻四名中国公民,据信他们闯入了泰国中部省份之一巴吞他尼的一处豪宅,并迫使该居民转移了200万美元(7000万泰铢)的加密资产。

闯入事件发生在周三凌晨2点左右,地点在孟区的坦邦班迈。

加密货币失窃

据警方报道,事件发生时,六名居民,包括三名男子和三名女子,占据了这所房子。35岁的中国商人柯继宝报告说,当四名蒙面嫌疑人携带枪支和刀具进入该物业时,他和妻子正在睡觉。

据报道,入侵者制服了柯、他的妻子和一名女佣,并将他们的手脚捆了起来。然后,他们强迫他联系中国的一位亲戚,将200万美元的加密资产转入他们的账户。在确认转移后,袭击者偷走了监控摄像头服务器,并乘坐受害者的黑色丰田Alphard逃跑。

事件发生后,柯的右手腕受了轻伤。26岁的男性助手陈明发(音译)额头被枪击中,面部受伤。周三下午1:30,被盗车辆被发现遗弃在Liap Khlong Prapa路的一家发电厂附近,并被送往警方法医科学中心1进行检查。

受害者告诉调查人员,他不知道抢劫背后的动机,也不知道肇事者是如何认识他的亲属的。警方认为这起抢劫案是精心策划的,并指出嫌疑人步行进入该住宅区,从而避免了需要身份验证的安全检查。

Pak Khlong Rangsit站指挥官Pol Col Narong Iamrahong表示,调查人员正在审查该地区其他安全摄像头的录像,以追踪嫌疑人。当局还计划进一步询问受害者和邻居。

泰国采用加密货币

泰国加密货币采用率的增加导致了骗局的激增。该国及其监管机构目前正在寻求鼓励加密生态系统和遏制欺诈之间的平衡。

有趣的是,泰国证券交易委员会(SEC)于今年3月允许机构投资者和高净值个人投资加密货币ETF。

与此同时,根据美国证券交易委员会的规定,加密货币托管提供商必须使用数字钱包管理系统,以确保客户资产的安全。

泰国目前在Chainalysis 2023年全球加密货币采用指数中排名第10,许多加密货币交易所获得了许可证。

İlgili Okumalar

Why Is No One Buying DeFi Insurance?

"Why DeFi Insurance Remains Unpurchased" explores the paradox of decentralized finance insurance. While DeFi insurance promises automatic, unbiased payouts via smart contracts—eliminating traditional insurers' denial practices—it struggles to attract users. The core issue is economic viability. Premiums are prohibitively high relative to the yields from DeFi protocols. For example, insuring a deposit on Aave or Maple Finance can consume most or even all of the annual yield, leaving returns comparable to or worse than traditional savings. Only the safest protocols, like MakerDAO, offer affordable premiums. Furthermore, the DeFi insurance model is structurally fragile. Unlike traditional insurance where risks are uncorrelated, DeFi risks are highly interconnected (e.g., oracle failures, bridge hacks). A single major exploit can simultaneously threaten multiple protocols, potentially bankrupting the entire insurance pool, which holds only millions against billions in total value locked. The governance model also creates a conflict of interest. In platforms like Nexus Mutual, token holders who vote on claims risk their own capital if payouts are approved, incentivizing denials. Consequently, the market is tiny and shrinking. Nexus Mutual dominates with $81.56 million in assets, but the industry lacks the capacity to cover a catastrophic event like the $292M Kelp DAO hack. Other providers have dwindled or shut down. The article concludes that DeFi insurance faces a "tragedy of the commons": its stability requires widespread adoption, but individual users have no incentive to pay for it, as premiums destroy their yields. Current solutions involve preventative measures like bug bounties and seeking external capital from traditional reinsurance, acknowledging that on-chain capital alone is insufficient to cover on-chain risks.

marsbit3 saat önce

Why Is No One Buying DeFi Insurance?

marsbit3 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片