新加坡将起诉 2 名中国籍银行家,涉新加坡最大洗钱案

链捕手2024-08-18 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-08-18 tarihinde güncellendi

来源:瑞恩资本 RyanbenCapital

 

新加坡于去年爆出历来最大规模洗黑钱案,10名外籍人士被判刑后,新加坡当局最新新增3名被告。

外电消息,新加坡定于周四(8月15日)起诉两名中国籍的前银行家,两名男子分别是26岁的Wang Qiming、35岁的Liu Kai;第三名被指控的人是一名新加坡司机41岁的Liew Yik Kit。

去年8月,新加坡爆出大规模洗黑钱案,来自中国的犯罪团伙通过新加坡至少16家金融机构,洗掉逾22.3亿美元的网络博彩收益。新加坡当局去年扣押了总计30亿新加坡元的现金、物业、加密货币和其他资产,10名来自中国的人士,因非法海外赌博活动洗钱和其他犯罪行为被判入狱,仍有更多人在逃。

2 名中国籍银行家,案发分别任职花旗或瑞士宝盛

两名中国籍新被告中,较年轻的Wang Qiming为花旗银行的前客户经理,其客户包括10名被定罪的洗钱者中的两名。新加坡提出10项指控,包括Wang Qiming涉嫌协助两名罪犯制作虚假贷款协议,欺骗渣打银行、花旗银行关于其存款来源。他亦被指代其中一名罪犯收取48.2万坡币(约285万港元)现金,涉洗黑钱。

除此以外,Wang Qiming因删除涉及客户对话的WhatsApp记录,被控妨碍司法公正。另外,他在2021年向移民与关卡局官员提供虚假信息,声称他丢失了护照,而实际上护照已被新加坡警察扣留。

Liu Kai是瑞士宝盛银行(Julius Baer)的客户关系经理,被指控教唆案中唯一一名女被告Lin Baoying使用伪造税务文件,以作为开户的支持文件。

司机代拥 4 架法拉利或劳斯莱斯,谎称雇主没留贵重物

新被控的司机Liew Yik Kit则涉嫌向警方谎称,其在逃雇主没有留下任何贵重物品,而他实际上拥有该商人的四辆豪华车:劳斯莱斯幻影、劳斯莱斯Cullinan、法拉利F8 Spider和法拉利Stradale 。他最终在去年9月和10月处置了该4部名车。

因应他未有及时通布,让新加坡警方错过了扣押该4辆名车,涉嫌妨碍司法公正。

新加坡非常严肃对待通过新加坡金融系统的洗钱行为

新加坡警察部队商业事务部主任David Chew在声明中表示,会非常严肃地对待通过新加坡的金融系统将犯罪所得的清洗行为。那些帮助客户规避金融机构尽职调查程序或帮助客户伪造文件以掩盖其资产真实性质的人,必须根据新加坡的法律予以严厉打击。

Wang Qiming获准以2.5万坡币(约14.8万港元)保释,Liu Kai、Liu Kai各获准以1.5万坡币(约8.9万港元)。案件9月再审。

至于洗钱案中早前10名被定罪者被判处13至17个月监禁。所有人都被驱逐出境,并被禁止重新进入新加坡。

İlgili Okumalar

Why Is No One Buying DeFi Insurance?

"Why DeFi Insurance Remains Unpurchased" explores the paradox of decentralized finance insurance. While DeFi insurance promises automatic, unbiased payouts via smart contracts—eliminating traditional insurers' denial practices—it struggles to attract users. The core issue is economic viability. Premiums are prohibitively high relative to the yields from DeFi protocols. For example, insuring a deposit on Aave or Maple Finance can consume most or even all of the annual yield, leaving returns comparable to or worse than traditional savings. Only the safest protocols, like MakerDAO, offer affordable premiums. Furthermore, the DeFi insurance model is structurally fragile. Unlike traditional insurance where risks are uncorrelated, DeFi risks are highly interconnected (e.g., oracle failures, bridge hacks). A single major exploit can simultaneously threaten multiple protocols, potentially bankrupting the entire insurance pool, which holds only millions against billions in total value locked. The governance model also creates a conflict of interest. In platforms like Nexus Mutual, token holders who vote on claims risk their own capital if payouts are approved, incentivizing denials. Consequently, the market is tiny and shrinking. Nexus Mutual dominates with $81.56 million in assets, but the industry lacks the capacity to cover a catastrophic event like the $292M Kelp DAO hack. Other providers have dwindled or shut down. The article concludes that DeFi insurance faces a "tragedy of the commons": its stability requires widespread adoption, but individual users have no incentive to pay for it, as premiums destroy their yields. Current solutions involve preventative measures like bug bounties and seeking external capital from traditional reinsurance, acknowledging that on-chain capital alone is insufficient to cover on-chain risks.

marsbit53 dk önce

Why Is No One Buying DeFi Insurance?

marsbit53 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片