Fireblocks与Mesh联手优化数字支付

币界网2024-07-23 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-07-23 tarihinde güncellendi

币界网报道:

金融操作系统Mesh已与Fireblocks合作,以加强数字资产管理和支付。此次合作旨在通过为企业和消费者创造更好的体验来提高安全性和效率。

对数字资产采用的影响

在谈到新的合作伙伴关系时,Mesh的联合创始人兼首席执行官Bam Azizi表示:“与Fireblocks联手,为企业及其最终用户提供数字资产管理和交易的最佳工具,这是一件大事。这种合作关系利用了Mesh的无缝嵌入式连接,实现了跨平台的安全、无摩擦的交互和交易,创造了一个有利于所有参与者的动态生态系统。”

通过将Fireblocks的平台与Mesh的连接解决方案集成,该合作伙伴关系旨在优化支付流程,简化各种钱包类型的数字资产交易。该伙伴关系还将增强数字资产服务的可访问性和功能性,使其在整个金融部门得到更广泛的采用。

Fireblocks支付和网络高级副总裁Ran Goldi表示:“我们很高兴有机会重新定义机构金融和加密货币交叉点的可能性,这一切都归结为降低数字资产交易的复杂性和摩擦。对于支付服务提供商来说,这种合作意味着他们现在可以为最终用户提供更精简、更安全的体验。”。

更多涉及防火墙的合作伙伴关系

今年5月,数字资产的交易所、经纪商和托管人Archax将区块链应用程序和数字资产管理整合到另一个涉及Fireblocks的合作伙伴关系中。该倡议旨在提高Archax运营的安全性,扩大产品供应和市场占有率。

此次合作使Archax能够更好地管理其财务运营,并利用Fireblocks的多层安全性来保护客户资金。通过添加Fireblocks,Archax旨在从该公司的多方计算技术和英特尔SGX中受益。这家受FCA监管的公司强调了与技术提供商合作扩大其产品组合的重要性。

İlgili Okumalar

Why Is No One Buying DeFi Insurance?

"Why DeFi Insurance Remains Unpurchased" explores the paradox of decentralized finance insurance. While DeFi insurance promises automatic, unbiased payouts via smart contracts—eliminating traditional insurers' denial practices—it struggles to attract users. The core issue is economic viability. Premiums are prohibitively high relative to the yields from DeFi protocols. For example, insuring a deposit on Aave or Maple Finance can consume most or even all of the annual yield, leaving returns comparable to or worse than traditional savings. Only the safest protocols, like MakerDAO, offer affordable premiums. Furthermore, the DeFi insurance model is structurally fragile. Unlike traditional insurance where risks are uncorrelated, DeFi risks are highly interconnected (e.g., oracle failures, bridge hacks). A single major exploit can simultaneously threaten multiple protocols, potentially bankrupting the entire insurance pool, which holds only millions against billions in total value locked. The governance model also creates a conflict of interest. In platforms like Nexus Mutual, token holders who vote on claims risk their own capital if payouts are approved, incentivizing denials. Consequently, the market is tiny and shrinking. Nexus Mutual dominates with $81.56 million in assets, but the industry lacks the capacity to cover a catastrophic event like the $292M Kelp DAO hack. Other providers have dwindled or shut down. The article concludes that DeFi insurance faces a "tragedy of the commons": its stability requires widespread adoption, but individual users have no incentive to pay for it, as premiums destroy their yields. Current solutions involve preventative measures like bug bounties and seeking external capital from traditional reinsurance, acknowledging that on-chain capital alone is insufficient to cover on-chain risks.

marsbit3 saat önce

Why Is No One Buying DeFi Insurance?

marsbit3 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片