空投趋向泡沫化,协议应当如何重构信任与价值?

Odaily星球日报2024-07-11 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-07-11 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

2024年的空投现状:用户感到沮丧,协议基本面下降。

原文作者:Stacy Muur(@stacy_muur)

原文编译:Peisen,BlockBeats

编者按:
Delphi Digital 对整个空投现状进行研究,从最初的 Uniswap 到近期由积分制引发无数争议的大型协议,空投越来越泡沫化,协议留不住客户成为了最显著趋势。加密研究员 Stacy Muur 对报告内容做了总结,原文编译如下:

2024 年的空投现状:用户感到沮丧,协议基本面下降。

Delphi Digital 撰写了一份《空投伤害大于帮助吗?》的报告,以下是主要见解。这份报告对用户来说必不可少,对创始人来说必读。

Uniswap 空投标志着 Web3 市场的关键时刻,即使已经过去四年,它仍然是有史以来最大的空投,在巅峰时期价值达到惊人的 64 亿 B。

从那时起,该行业发生了重大变化,产生了女巫和空投农民。

空投趋向泡沫化,协议应当如何重构信任与价值?

加密货币领域最大的 50 次空投已分配了超过 266 亿美元的价值。

这个「免费资金」的机会并没有被忽视。现在,每一次激动人心的加密货币协议发布都会吸引渴望获得初始空投代币的大部分的女巫和机器人。因此,协议制定了新的空投标准和反女巫措施。

最初,使用固定奖励系统(Uniswap)。然后,出现了分层空投(Jito)。Optimism 团队推广了多种基于标准的空投。现在,我们有了积分系统。

空投趋向泡沫化,协议应当如何重构信任与价值?

然而,对于许多受空投猎人欢迎的 dApp 来说,空投的主要问题是泡沫效应:一旦拍摄快照,使用指标就会急剧下降。

空投趋向泡沫化,协议应当如何重构信任与价值?

让我们以 LayerZero 为例。自 4 月以来,Stargate 桥接交易量从 16.7 亿美元下降到 4.067 亿美元,交易量下降了 75%。我个人从未 farm 过 $ZRO,我的分配很普通——大约 400 美元。这种模式非常主流。

空投趋向泡沫化,协议应当如何重构信任与价值?

在 $ZK 空投之前,zkSync 产生的每日费用与 Arbitrum 相当。然而,自快照公告和代币分发以来,这个数字一直在下降。最近,自 zkSync Era 推出以来,每日费用首次跌破 1 万美元。

空投趋向泡沫化,协议应当如何重构信任与价值?

Delphi Digital 的研究详细探讨了类似的案例,包括 Kamino、Parcl、 Jito 和 Manta Network。所有这些都显示出类似的模式:快照后,活动经历显着下降,随后的激励揭示了 PMF 的现实。

这种无机增长的最大问题是公平的协议评估和做出明智的投资决策。在这里,有几件事可能会有所帮助:

• 跟踪 DAU 和 MAU 指标随时间推移,以查看在宣布空投快照和之后的激励后是否有下降。

空投趋向泡沫化,协议应当如何重构信任与价值?

• 衡量空投后预定时间(例如, 1 周、 1 个月)后有多少用户继续使用平台。

• 衡量新用户与老用户相比的 DAU 或 WAU 的比例。

• 监控每个用户的交易数量。

空投趋向泡沫化,协议应当如何重构信任与价值?

监控正在使用哪些功能以及使用频率。空投后核心功能的持续或增加使用表明持续的兴趣或产品市场契合度。

• 跟踪钱包参与度指标。

• 监控社区讨论和治理论坛上的活动。

空投趋向泡沫化,协议应当如何重构信任与价值?

2024 年空投的另一个问题是许多新协议广泛采用「低浮动、高 FDV」代币模型。这种模式使新买家难以评估增长潜力并抵消空投抛售压力。

但那是另一回事了。

空投趋向泡沫化,协议应当如何重构信任与价值?

个人说明:空投可以吸引新用户,其中一些可能会留下来。然而,这类似于 X 上的赠品:一些用户会访问,一些用户可能会成为活跃的读者,但大多数会消失。

作为投资者,区分有机增长和无机增长。作为协议,确保您可以留住用户以构建长期成功的产品。

原文链接

İlgili Okumalar

Glue Finance Founder: ETH Has Entered a Phase of Non-Consensus, an Inflection Point Is Coming

"Glue Finance founder argues Ethereum's current price underperformance stems from its 'unfinished machine' status. Despite record usage and settlement value in 2026, ETH remains below its 2021 peak because the protocol's continued development creates a dependency on the Ethereum Foundation for guidance and fixes. Key issues include centralized L2 sequencers, governance-based freezes (as seen with Arbitrum), state bloat, a vulnerable public mempool, and looming quantum computing threats. This 'dependency discount' prevents ETH from accruing the 'ossification premium' that markets award to immutable, trustless systems like Bitcoin. The author, a self-described Ethereum maximalist, rejects two flawed escape paths: a 'war mode' shift towards centralization for speed (which would sacrifice Ethereum's core value), or simply replacing the EF with another governing body. The only solution is the 'Manhattan Plan' or 'Lean Ethereum': a concerted, accelerated effort to complete and then *freeze* the protocol's neutral core. This involves finalizing critical upgrades in consensus (Lean Consensus), scaling (targeting 1 trillion gas/sec), quantum resistance (leanXMSS signatures), and full ZK-provable execution. The goal is to pass the 'walk-away test'—where Ethereum could run forever, neutrally, without the EF. Success would transform Ethereum into the first programmable, quantum-resistant, immutable global settlement layer, flipping its current discount into a unique 'eternity premium' that surpasses Bitcoin's. Failure—stagnation or trading neutrality for speed—would relegate it to being a slower, less trustworthy competitor."

marsbit6 dk önce

Glue Finance Founder: ETH Has Entered a Phase of Non-Consensus, an Inflection Point Is Coming

marsbit6 dk önce

Glue Finance Founder: ETH Has Entered a Phase of Non-Consensus, an Inflection Point Is Approaching

Glue Finance founder argues that Ethereum's current price underperformance, despite high on-chain activity, stems from its incomplete state and lingering dependency on central stewards like the Ethereum Foundation. The core thesis is that the market is discounting ETH not for lack of use, but because the protocol remains a "machine under construction." Key unresolved issues include centralized L2 sequencers with limited escape hatches, state bloat, vulnerable public mempools, and the looming quantum computing threat. This perpetual "work-in-progress" status forces reliance on a small group of maintainers, undermining the network's promise of credible neutrality and immutability. The author, a self-described Ethereum maximalist, rejects two flawed paths: a "wartime mode" of centralizing for speed (surrendering Ethereum's unique value) or merely replacing the Foundation with another governing entity. The only solution is to complete and then "freeze" the protocol's neutral core through a focused "Manhattan Project" dubbed "Lean Ethereum." This project aims to bundle critical upgrades—consensus layer overhaul, massive scaling via ZK-proofs, quantum resistance, and statelessness—into a decisive push to finalize the base layer. Once the core rules are cryptographically solidified and beyond anyone's control (passing the "walk-away test"), Ethereum would shed its dependency discount and earn a "rigidity premium" for its credible neutrality and programmability, potentially surpassing Bitcoin's valuation. The race is between completing this hardening and the risks of protocol capture or stagnation.

链捕手8 dk önce

Glue Finance Founder: ETH Has Entered a Phase of Non-Consensus, an Inflection Point Is Approaching

链捕手8 dk önce

Hackers Steal Nearly $17 Million in 40 Days as 'Zombie Contracts' Become Their ATMs

According to an analysis published by ZeroDrift on June 22, 2026, attackers have stolen approximately $16.9 million over 40 days from five deprecated but still operational smart contracts across various blockchains. The primary issue is not a specific vulnerability but the incomplete decommissioning of legacy contracts. These "zombie contracts" often retain economic value, operational permissions, and callable functions, making them prime targets long after teams cease active development. The most significant loss occurred at DxSale, where an old locker contract lost about $7.3 million due to a forgotten control path becoming accessible again. Other affected projects include TrustedVolumes (~$5.87M), Raydium's legacy AMM pool (~$1.34M), Aztec Connect (~$2.28M), and Huma Finance V1 pool (~$101k). These incidents involved diverse systems—RFQ settlement, credit pools, liquidity lockers, AMMs—demonstrating the widespread nature of the risk. The analysis highlights that automated tools are lowering the cost for attackers to systematically scan for these long-tail targets, which have public code and weaker monitoring. In contrast, defensive practices for contract retirement remain underdeveloped. While the DeFi industry has mature audit processes for new deployments, it lacks strict protocols for securely sunsetting old contracts, which only become truly "retired" after all funds, permissions, authorizations, and trust assumptions are removed.

marsbit1 saat önce

Hackers Steal Nearly $17 Million in 40 Days as 'Zombie Contracts' Become Their ATMs

marsbit1 saat önce

Valuation Rout of Old Titans: The Demise of a Generation's Asset Valuation Framework

"The Old Titans' Valuation Collapse: The Death of an Era's Valuation Framework" Between Alibaba's 2014 NYSE debut at $93.89 and its 2026 price of ~$95, twelve years have passed with zero price appreciation. This stagnation symbolizes a wholesale valuation reset for an entire generation of Chinese internet assets. Companies like Tencent, Pinduoduo, Meituan, Bilibili, and Kuaishou have seen catastrophic declines of 80-98% from their peaks. The core question arises: what framework now prices these companies, or has the framework itself expired? The valuation logic for Chinese internet stocks followed a clear "anchor-setting and anchor-removing" process. From 2014-2017, the dominant narrative was "US comparable discounting" – applying a growth premium and governance discount to US peers' multiples. This anchor loosened with the 2018 US-China trade war and the VIE structure risk, then was violently uprooted by the 2020-2021 regulatory crackdowns (Ant Group, Didi, anti-monopoly fines). The 2022 delisting panic and subsequent 2025-2026 geopolitical shocks (US military lists, AI espionage accusations) completed the demolition. The old "US对标打折" model is dead. However, this is not solely a China story. A structural mirror exists in US "old titan" stocks ("老登股"). In 2026, even Microsoft – with robust fundamentals – saw its PE compress from a 34x median to 22x, its worst performer status among the "Magnificent Seven" driven by a $190 billion annual AI capex crushing free cash flow. The core dilemma is universal: legacy platform giants, whether Alibaba or Microsoft, are spending colossal sums to chase an AI paradigm that may颠覆 their own high-margin, user/subscription-based business models. They have shifted from "companies defining the future" to "companies needing to prove they won't be淘汰ed by the future." This phenomenon of a dying valuation坐标系 has a historical precedent: post-1989 Japan. After its bubble burst, the "Japan premium" narrative ("most efficient manufacturing + perpetual growth") collapsed. A 25-year valuation vacuum ensued until Warren Buffett provided a new language in the 2010s: "low valuation + high dividend + governance reform." China's internet sector is now in a similar vacuum six years into its reset. While different from Japan's deflationary context, the parallel is clear: the old macro assumption of "deep integration with global capital" is falsified, but a new pricing framework is absent. Potential "new languages" for Chinese internet valuations are contradictory. AI transformation requires gutting profitable core businesses (e.g., Alibaba's ad-driven e-commerce) for an unproven consumption-based model, risking a Microsoft-like cash flow crunch. Alternatively, shareholder returns (buybacks/dividends) could build a floor, following Buffett's Japanese playbook, but current scales are insufficient to form a standalone anchor. The current state mirrors mid-1990s Japan: the old framework is dead, the new one unborn. The market waits in a vacuum for a重新定义ing force – a person, event, or proven business model shift – to answer "why buy." This may only be the middle phase of a prolonged re-rating.

marsbit1 saat önce

Valuation Rout of Old Titans: The Demise of a Generation's Asset Valuation Framework

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片