TrendX研究院:LayerZero空投引发争议,撸毛是否已经走到末路?

Odaily星球日报2024-06-20 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-06-20 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

ZK之后,LayerZero的空投结果却让很多用户再次“破防”。

经过一个多月的女巫清洗活动,LayerZero 基金会今天在 X 平台上宣布空投资格查询页面已经上线。然而,空投的结果却让很多用户“破防”。

作为社区最受期待的潜在空投项目之一,LayerZero 的空投曾被寄予厚望,人们期待着「大手笔」的空投。然而,随着女巫清洗活动的展开,大量工作室甚至普通用户的账户被举报为女巫账号,最终在辛苦了大半年后却发现一无所获。

作为近期和 Zksync 同样被重视的唯二大型空投项目,LayerZero 此次引发的争议不小,在用户对项目方的“诚意”提出质疑的同时,也对当前行业是否会诞生新的代币分配范式提出思考。

在此之前,我们要先了解下什么是女巫清洗活动。

为期一个月的女巫清洗

LayerZero 成立于 2021 年 11 月,正值区块链市场的牛市。凭借强大的资本支持和业内关键意见领袖的推广,LayerZero 在一年内迅速崛起。宣布计划推出治理代币空投的消息在社区内引起了极大的关注。强大的资本背景、高项目估值和顶级地位,让很多人期待着丰厚的空投,这吸引了大量的空投猎手。根据 Dune 的数据,自去年四月以来,LayerZero 链上的交互量显著增加,单日交易笔数超过 20 万次,最高达到 49 万次。如此高频的交互不仅提升了平台的数据表现,还带来了可观的收入。例如,LayerZero 上第一个跨链 DApp Stargate 的月收入超过 100 万美元,而这仅仅是其生态系统中的一个产品。

TrendX研究院:LayerZero空投引发争议,撸毛是否已经走到末路?

在这种高期待下,社区对 LayerZero 的空投预期一直很高。尽管频频传出空投的消息,但却不断推迟。终于,今年 5 月 2 日,LayerZero 在 X 平台宣布第一期快照已经完成,市场情绪达到顶点。

根据 WOO X Research 的预测,LayerZero 的空投价值可能在 6 亿至 10 亿美元之间。保守估计,若 TGE 估值为 4 倍,初始流通量为 15% ,则 FDV 为 120 亿美元,空投价值约为 6 亿美元,每位用户预计可获得 750 至 1500 美元。而在乐观估计中,若流通量为 20% ,TGE 估值为 4.5 倍,FDV 为 135 亿美元,空投总价值预计达到 10.8 亿美元,每位用户预计可获得 1350 至 2700 美元。

然而,正当用户满怀期待地等待空投时,LayerZero 却突然宣布了一个意外的消息。5 月 3 日,LayerZero 发布公告称,为了确保空投的公平性,将进行为期一个月的女巫审查行动。

在空投中进行女巫审查并不罕见。女巫通常指通过大量账户进行无意义或小额交易以获取空投的行为。然而,这次审查引入了一种全新的“赏金举报机制”。根据官方公告,审查将分为三个阶段。第一阶段是为期 14 天的自曝阶段,用户可以自我曝光其女巫行为,官方将保留这类账户 15% 的空投分配;第二阶段是官方审查阶段,LayerZero 将根据特定规则进行筛查,发现的女巫账号将不保留任何空投额度。最具争议的是第三阶段——赏金举报阶段,从 5 月 18 日至 5 月 31 日,任何人都可以在 Github 上提交举报,成功举报者将获得被举报者 10% 的空投分配,其余 90% 回归空投池,被举报者则不再获得任何空投。

最终,随着今天 LayerZero Labs 首席执行官 Bryan Pellegrino 在 X 表示,共 128 万合格地址;并且会将追回的约 1000 万枚代币返还给真实用户。女巫审查告一段落。有 80.3 万个地址被判定为潜在女巫,其中超过 33.8 万个地址自曝为女巫。

“老鼠仓”风波和 3U 的场外价格

当女巫审查结束,用户翘首期盼空投到来的同时,LayerZero 又陷入了老鼠仓风波。在大部分用户因为空投结果而感到不满和嘲讽的情况下,仍有一些用户表示自己获得了大量的 ZRO 代币。这些幸运儿大多持有 Kanpai Pandas 的 NFT。例如,一个拥有 50 个 Kanpai Pandas NFT 的地址获得了 5335.55 枚 ZRO 代币,而另一个以0x 816 开头的地址因持有 152 个 NFT 而获得了 1 万枚 ZRO 代币。平均来说,每个 NFT 大约获得 100 枚 ZRO,并根据 NFT 的稀有度有所调整。

由于 Kanpai Pandas 项目并不广为人知,这引发了用户对“老鼠仓”的怀疑。但根据 nftgo 的数据,Kanpai Pandas 的交易量高峰与 LayerZero 空投快照时间并无明显相关性,且官方 Twitter 一直正常运营。因此,关于 Kanpai Pandas 存在“老鼠仓”的指控尚未得到证实。

与此同时,不少用户表示,他们投入了大量人力和精力,花费了数百美元的成本,但可能只能获得 25 枚 ZRO 代币。按照场外 3 美元一枚的价格计算,这远不足以覆盖成本。这些用户认为 LayerZero 的此次空投“毫无诚意”。

一个持有 36 枚 Kanpai Pandas NFT(约 36 E)的 X 用户 Axel Bitblaze 获得了 1 万枚 LayerZero(ZRO)空投。他发文表示,LayerZero 给予链上用户的空投份额令人失望:“排名前 1% 的钱包只获得 200-500 个代币,这简直太疯狂了……我和我的家人也努力进行了交互,以获得空投份额,尽管我们排名进入了前 1% ,但这些交互只换来了一小笔空投。”

甚至有用户认为,Zksync 和 LayerZero 空投的结束,将成为空投 EndGame。

不仅仅是 ZRO 空投,最近的 ZK 空投也引发了类似的争议。合格地址数量远低于预期、决策过程不透明、被 Nansen 撇清关系以及频繁出现的可疑地址,官方却未作出直接回应,这一系列操作让 ZK 空投陷入了“老鼠仓”风波。之前,AltLayer 也因为 OG NFT 而被社区质疑存在“老鼠仓”。

问题的根本在于社区对空投分配的不满。散户们无法确定如何符合官方的空投标准,而官方的“最终解释权”只会增加操作不透明的嫌疑,导致空投代币被分配给“老鼠”,这些“老鼠”抛售代币,散户接盘,剩余的代币供应不断解锁继续打压市场。

相比之下,空投最早期的代表性墙面 Uniswap 的空投显得更透明和公平。Uniswap 官方表示,只要用过 Uniswap,不论兑换是否成功,每人都可以领取 400 枚 UNI 空投。同时,持有 UNI 还能获得 SOCKS 代币等一系列福利。

尽管这种无门槛的空投也曾被批评,但在如今空投项目被诟病反撸和接盘的时代,UNI 显得是一个成功的空投案例。

有观点认为,ZRO 空投引发强烈不满的真正原因是这些空投项目方打破了 VC、项目方和“撸毛”用户三者之间的平衡。

“撸毛”用户或工作室,在 VC 推高估值、疯狂撒钱的博弈中本就是最弱势的一方。项目方需要用户的交互数据来吸引 VC 投资,VC 需要项目方发代币来套现离场。项目方用未来可能变成代币的承诺吸引“撸毛”用户为其数据增长免费打工。但同时,也有观点认为,巨鲸不应该因为投入大量资本就获得所有代币,但最小的用户无论如何都应该得到一些基础数量的代币。

这也是当前Web3领域普遍存在反机构情绪的由来,因为,由于 VC 的贪婪或投资判断失误,这些项目获得了超高估值,但无法形成一个可靠、稳定的商业模式,只能依靠发代币这一招让散户为其消化不良的资产买单。

但尽管 ZK 和 LayerZero 两次空投让人大跌眼镜,但对于普通用户而言,撸毛依旧是一个可以博取收益的方式,尽管收益在持续下降。

LayerZero 之后值得关注的空投

Manta Network:Manta 代币是 OFT 代币,团队不同的链上部署 OFT Manta Token,支持多链之间的 Manta 代币跨链。

分配计划: 10% 分配给开发者;30% 分配给早期采用者;20% 分配给生态系统合作伙伴;40% 分配给 LP 提供者。

项目链接:https://app.trendx.tech/project/Manta%20Network/1d5 07 e 4 c

Canto:Canto 是使用 Cosmos SDK 构建的 Layer 1 区块链,通过 LayerZero 的 OFT 标准,CANTO 的跨链表示被部署到以太坊,使用户能够在主网上为 CANTO 提供流动性和交易 CANTO,从而也为 Canto 提供了额外的桥接路径。

分配计划: 70% 分配给 CANTO OFT 跨链用户,总共跨链至少 50 个 CANTO 到 / 从以太坊,其中 20% 平均分配, 80% 按跨链量比例分配;20% 分配给 PancakeSwap(以太坊)上的 CANTO/WETH LP,按快照时流动性池的所有权百分比比例分配;10% 分配给 Canto 开发者。

项目链接:https://app.trendx.tech/project/Canto/57fcc700

DappRadar:DappRadar 是一个 DApp 数据分析平台。

分配计划: 10% 分配给开发者;90% 分配给 RADAR 质押者。

项目链接:https://app.trendx.tech/project/DappRadar/a09d08a0

KelpDAO:KelpDAO 是一个流动性再质押协议,其 rsETH 采用 OFT 可跨链至其他 L2。

分配计划: 40% 分配给跨链至各种 L2 的用户;20% 分配给在 L2 上原生铸造 rsETH 的用户;20% 分配给主网和 L2 上的前 500 名流动性提供者;10% 分配给主网的 rsETH 持有者;10 % 分配给 Kelp 的核心团队,以支付开发人员的费用和审计。

项目链接:https://app.trendx.tech/project/KelpDAO/73360fcf

Pendle:Pendle 是一个收益率交易协议。

分配计划: 10% 分配给开发者;90% 分配给 vependle 持有者。

项目链接:https://app.trendx.tech/project/Pendle/3d 1 e 2 ed 8 

关注我们 TrendX

TrendX 是全球领先的人工智能(AI)驱动Web3趋势追踪和智能交易平台,旨在成为未来 10 亿用户进入Web3领域的首选平台。通过结合多维度趋势追踪和智能交易,TrendX 提供全方位的项目发现、趋势分析、一级投资和二级交易体验。

Website:https://app.trendx.tech/

Twitter:https://twitter.com/TrendX_tech

投资有风险,项目仅供参考,风险请自担

İlgili Okumalar

Standard Chartered Bank’s 50-Fold Fantasy: Predicting AAVE to Reach $3,500

Standard Chartered Bank has issued an optimistic research report predicting that the AAVE token could surge 50-fold to $3,500 by 2030. This forecast is based on the projection that the total value locked (TVL) in DeFi will grow 37x to approximately $2.7 trillion, driven by stablecoin expansion and the tokenization of real-world assets (RWA). The bank's model links Aave's potential valuation directly to its protocol revenue, which is primarily driven by net interest margins. The report highlights Aave's current dominant position, noting it captures over 80% of the net earnings ("protocol retained earnings") in the lending sector while holding only about half of its TVL. It also points to the recent launch of the Aave V4 architecture and a healthy revenue stream of $142 million in 2025 as positive fundamentals. Grayscale's separate analysis, applying traditional valuation metrics like DCF, concluded AAVE is currently undervalued. However, the article notes significant challenges. Aave's peer-to-pool lending model suffers from inherent capital inefficiency, with an estimated $52 million annual "deadweight loss" due to idle funds needed for liquidity buffers. This structural flaw was exposed during the April KelpDAO exploit, which locked a WETH pool at 100% utilization for days. Emerging protocols like Morpho, with more efficient point-to-point models, are cited as growing competitive threats. In summary, while institutional forecasts paint a macro picture of massive growth fueled by RWA adoption, Aave's path forward hinges on addressing its core structural limitations and competitive pressures within the evolving DeFi lending landscape.

链捕手14 dk önce

Standard Chartered Bank’s 50-Fold Fantasy: Predicting AAVE to Reach $3,500

链捕手14 dk önce

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But the Reasons Have Changed

Tidal Investment remains optimistic about the AI industry chain, but the rationale has shifted. The market narrative has changed. While recent large-scale IPOs (e.g., SpaceX) and major fundraising plans by tech giants like Alphabet and Meta have caused some nervousness, this isn't a sign of an AI peak. The focus has moved from the initial question of AI's viability to the sustainability of massive investment cycles. The key players—primarily the major cloud providers—are not slowing down; their capital expenditure (Capex) guidance for 2026 has been increased across the board (e.g., Alphabet to $180B, Amazon to $200B). This investment cycle is proving resilient and difficult to stop. Unlike traditional hardware cycles, current AI Capex is distributed across multiple physical layers—computing, memory, networking, and critically, power infrastructure. Bottlenecks are shifting from chips to elements like electricity, transformers, and cooling systems, which have much longer lead times and cannot be easily pre-built like fiber optics during the dot-com bubble. Supply chain data (e.g., Eaton's 240% YoY data center orders) confirms this broad-based, project-driven expansion. Market concerns are acknowledged but viewed differently. First, while Capex growth currently outpaces revenue growth, raising ROI questions, this mirrors the early scaling phase of cloud computing itself. A change in view would require concrete signals like downward Capex revisions or missed AI product targets, which haven't materialized by mid-2026. Second, comparisons to the 2000 dot-com bust are flawed. That crash was driven by a massive, parallel oversupply of cheap capacity (fiber). The current cycle faces *supply constraints* in critical, capital-intensive physical infrastructure that cannot be overbuilt as easily. In conclusion, the wave of fundraising reflects the next, more complex act of the AI story. Physical bottlenecks and sustained high Capex plans suggest this is not the finale but an ongoing, capital-intensive build-out phase. The script has changed, but the play is far from over.

marsbit1 saat önce

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But the Reasons Have Changed

marsbit1 saat önce

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But for Different Reasons Now

Tidal Investments remains optimistic about the AI industry chain, but the rationale has shifted. The market is concerned about massive concurrent fundraising by tech giants like SpaceX, OpenAI, Alphabet, and Meta, fearing an AI peak. However, the authors argue this signals the next act of AI development, not its end. Capital expenditure (Capex) from major cloud providers (Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, Oracle) continues to surge aggressively into 2026. This investment cycle is more resilient than past hardware cycles due to its scale and complexity. Bottlenecks have shifted from chips to critical physical infrastructure like power grids, transformers, cooling, and data center construction—areas with long lead times and limited capacity for rapid expansion. Supply chain data (e.g., Eaton's orders) confirms substantial, tangible progress. Key market concerns are addressed: 1. **ROI vs. Capex Growth**: While Capex growth outpaces revenue, the authors note cloud giants have historically overcome similar phases through scale. The cycle will only be in danger if Capex guidance is cut, orders are canceled, or AI product demand falters—none of which are currently observed. 2. **Comparison to the 2000 Dot-com Bubble**: Unlike the telecom bubble, where cheap, oversupplied fiber crashed prices, AI infrastructure (especially power) is constrained, customized, and subject to lengthy approvals, making a similar supply glut and crash unlikely. In conclusion, the wave of fundraising reflects the immense, ongoing capital needs for AI's next phase, constrained by slow-moving physical bottlenecks. The AI cycle is not over; the script has simply changed.

链捕手1 saat önce

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But for Different Reasons Now

链捕手1 saat önce

Grayscale: These 15 Profitable Crypto Protocols Are Severely Undervalued

Grayscale Research identifies 15 top-revenue crypto protocols trading at significant valuation discounts, with many at single-digit or even 1x revenue multiples. Protocols like Pump.fun, PancakeSwap, and Meteora have market capitalizations roughly equal to their annual revenue. The report argues these financially-focused protocols (DEXs, lending, staking) are fundamentally undervalued and could benefit from the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, expected as soon as next month. This legislation aims to clarify digital asset regulation, potentially reducing institutional barriers and driving on-chain activity. The analysis breaks down the protocols into three groups: the "1x Club" (market cap ≈ revenue), mid-tier protocols with 3-9x multiples (e.g., Aave, Lido, Jupiter), and high-multiple protocols like Hyperliquid (15x) and Uniswap (37x), where valuation reflects future potential rather than current cash flows. Grayscale applies a traditional DCF model to Aave, suggesting a one-year price target of ~$175, representing ~130% upside from current levels. The report notes a risk-off macro environment since the Iran conflict has further compressed valuations, creating a potential entry window. The conclusion highlights that while the valuation data presents an intriguing opportunity, the investment thesis is contingent on the CLARITY Act's passage and subsequent institutional capital flows. Investors are cautioned to consider Grayscale's inherent conflict of interest as a crypto asset manager with products tied to these assets.

marsbit1 saat önce

Grayscale: These 15 Profitable Crypto Protocols Are Severely Undervalued

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片