为什么现在的加密市场散户赚不到钱?

Odaily星球日报2024-05-06 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-05-06 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

“传统”加密市场不再有 500 倍的价格了,现在有一个更有趣的赌场。

原文作者:Regan Bozman

原文编译:深潮 TechFlow

为什么总有人说这个周期已经结束了?为什么每个人都感到痛苦?我们可以将所有问题归结为:在当前的市场结构下,散户再也赚不到真正的钱了。

关于回归本源、摆脱当前周期的一些杂谈

为什么本轮行情中没有散户的身影,答案其实很简单——这是因为 "传统 "加密货币市场(如 infra 代币)不再有 500 倍的价格了。现在有一个更有趣的赌场,有更好的meme,他们唾手可得。

为什么现在的加密市场散户赚不到钱?

我们实际上是在重现 VC/IPO 市场中发生的事情,在这些市场中,公司保持私有化的时间更长,这意味着更多的上升空间保持“私有化”(例如风险投资基金),并且散户无法进入。

为什么现在的加密市场散户赚不到钱?

加密货币一度扭转了这种情况,并使非对称上涨空间的获取更加民主化。但现在不再如此了!L1和L2从风险投资者那里筹集了更多资金。没有公开的代币销售。风险投资者赚钱。散户投资者被边缘化。也许散户投资者对这个周期的幻想破灭并不那么令人惊讶。

公司愿意保持私有化更长时间的一个重要原因是,风险投资者现在的资金比十年前多了五倍。公司现在可以在私人市场筹集 10 亿美元以上的资金,并且不必处理公开市场的额外开销。

为什么现在的加密市场散户赚不到钱?

毫不奇怪,加密风险投资也出现了同样的趋势——现在比五年前有更多的资金流入加密风险投资基金。

为什么现在的加密市场散户赚不到钱?

加密货币应该解决这个问题!

ICO 旨在使资本形成民主化,并进一步获得风险回报。他们绝对成功地做到了这一点。

以 2014 年 ICO 时的 30 美分的价格购买以太坊,到今天价格涨到 3, 000 美元,这意味着在 10 年时间里获得了 10, 000 倍的回报,绝对能够击败同期内的任何风险投资。任何地球上的人都可以参与,这太棒了。

现在这个行业明显增长了,所以入门价格自然而然地攀升,但这些机会并没有消失。2020 年的 $SOL 推出价格为 0.22 美元,而今价格为 140 美元,这意味着 4 年内获得了 636 倍的回报,这也可能击败了过去五年中几乎所有的风险投资回报。

在这个周期中,我们已经远离了这种市场结构。现在几乎没有散户投资者有机会在代币发行前购买代币,或者在公开市场以低价购买代币。

为什么现在的加密市场散户赚不到钱?

空投确实是一种改进,与现有的风险投资范式相比,早期用户可以获得一些财务上的收益。但它们在财务上并不如代币销售,从定义上讲,你只能从空投中赚到这么多钱。

为什么现在的加密市场散户赚不到钱?

我们已经从一个有无上限的上涨空间市场转变为一个有上限的市场——这是一个巨大的变化。在 SOL 的 ICO 中投入的 1, 000 美元现在变成了 636, 000 美元;

而在 Eigen 中投入的 1, 000 美元只能变成约 1, 030 美元……即使它涨了 10 倍,也只有 1, 300 美元。上一个周期中,你掌握自己的命运;而在这个周期中,你在等待 Eigen 爸爸的施舍。

金融虚无主义意味着承认这些市场一直都是关乎金钱的。是的,这些钱资助了科技发展,但正是这些资金推动了整个行业。如果削弱了金钱部分,整个行业将会崩溃。

为什么现在的加密市场散户赚不到钱?

我们可以做几件事情来改善当前的发行结构。关键在于为早期用户和社区创造无上限的上涨空间。

为什么现在的加密市场散户赚不到钱?

也就是说,市场中存在更大的结构性问题,L1和L2的大规模筹资,导致在上线前估值达到数十亿美元。这带来了两个问题:(A)大量卖方压力;(B)上线时发行价的下限。

我认为,本周期大多数山寨币所面临的结构性问题之一是,风险投资的抛售压力没有被散户流入所抵消。如果在上线前筹集了 5 亿美元,那么将会产生 5 亿美元的卖出压力(如果代币价格上涨,潜在压力甚至更大)。

为什么现在的加密市场散户赚不到钱?

在高估值的情况下私下筹集资金,意味着你会试图以更高的估值出货。这可能导致行情只能向下的情况

为什么现在的加密市场散户赚不到钱?

风险投资者和散户投资者之间的关系不需要是敌对的。$SOL 上的每个人都赚到了钱。

为什么现在的加密市场散户赚不到钱?

但是,如果你试图将过多的风险投资资金塞进流动性不强的市场,这就变得更加困难了。如果你剥夺了最重要的市场参与者的无上限上涨空间,那几乎是不可能的。

我们可以指责和争论有关 meme 币,但这完全忽略了问题的本质。meme 币不是问题所在——我们当前的市场结构才是问题所在。让我们回到我们的民主根基,解决当前市场的问题。

İlgili Okumalar

Chip Stocks Lead U.S. Market Decline: Is AI Trading Being Hit by Both Interest Rates and Returns?

Chip stocks led a broad decline in US markets, with the Nasdaq dropping 2.2% and the S&P 500 falling 1.4%. This selloff reflects a dual challenge for the once-high-flying AI hardware trade: rising interest rate expectations and growing investor impatience for clear returns from massive AI capital expenditures. The pressure was most acute on hardware leaders. Nvidia fell about 4%, dipping below a $5 trillion market cap, while Micron plunged 13.2% ahead of its earnings report. Declines across memory, storage, AI, and mobile chips indicated a sector-wide retreat. The selloff spread globally, with South Korea's KOSPI index dropping nearly 10% as key suppliers SK Hynix and Samsung recorded double-digit losses. Investors appeared to be taking profits from the most crowded trades first. Macro headwinds intensified as market expectations shifted toward a more aggressive Federal Reserve. Forecasts for multiple rate hikes in 2026 pressured high-valuation tech stocks, which rely on long-term growth projections that become less attractive as discount rates rise. Concurrently, investors are scrutinizing the profit potential of the immense AI spending by cloud giants like Alphabet, Amazon, and Meta. While these expenditures drive demand for chips and hardware, the market is now questioning whether AI services will generate sufficient returns to justify the ongoing costs. This adjustment is not necessarily a bubble burst but a recalibration. AI demand fundamentals remain, but the narrative of endless growth can no longer fully offset concerns over higher interest rates and a longer path to profitability. Near-term direction may hinge on Micron's upcoming earnings guidance and incoming inflation data, which will influence both the AI demand outlook and the Fed's policy path. The market is transitioning from blindly buying growth to demanding clearer visibility on returns.

marsbit58 dk önce

Chip Stocks Lead U.S. Market Decline: Is AI Trading Being Hit by Both Interest Rates and Returns?

marsbit58 dk önce

OpenAI's New Paper: How to Train an AI that "Doesn't Deteriorate Under Pressure"?

OpenAI's new paper "Reinforcement Learning Towards Broadly and Persistently Beneficial Models" explores training AI to maintain safe, helpful, and honest behavior even under pressure, in unseen scenarios, or after being fine-tuned for harmful purposes. Moving beyond simple rule-based "don'ts," the research focuses on cultivating "beneficial traits" like honesty, risk-awareness, corrigibility, and transparency. It investigates if reinforcement learning (RL), often prone to "reward hacking" where models exploit loopholes, can instead be used to instill robust, generalized positive behaviors. Researchers created a multi-domain synthetic dialogue dataset covering areas like healthcare and law. They trained a model by replacing 5% of standard RL data with "beneficial trait" data. This model outperformed the baseline in 83% of 53 evaluations, showing average gains of 9.1% in alignment, safety, and helpfulness. Crucially, improvements generalized: a model trained only on healthcare "good behavior" data also performed better in 17 out of 19 non-healthcare alignment tests. The paper also tests "alignment persistence." When subjected to adversarial prompts or harmful fine-tuning, the beneficial trait model showed greater resilience, with smaller performance drops and less "spillover" of bad behavior to unrelated tasks. While not a complete solution, this work suggests a shift from post-hoc correction to proactively shaping robust, principled AI behavior, a critical step for deploying models in high-stakes, complex decision-making scenarios.

marsbit1 saat önce

OpenAI's New Paper: How to Train an AI that "Doesn't Deteriorate Under Pressure"?

marsbit1 saat önce

Semiconductor Stock Rebound: Is the Technical Correction Over or a Trend Reversal?

The core of recent semiconductor stock volatility is not about daily price swings, but rather the market questioning whether AI-driven semiconductor pricing has entered a new phase. Following a sharp sell-off in Korean stocks on June 23rd, led by Samsung and SK Hynix, a subsequent rebound is seen more as a technical positioning adjustment rather than a confirmed trend reversal. The key variable is HBM (High Bandwidth Memory), essential for AI chips. Its supply-demand imbalance granted memory makers significant pricing power. The current market focus is on whether this dynamic remains strong enough to justify elevated valuations. All eyes are on Micron's upcoming earnings report. The critical factor is not whether results meet already high expectations, but whether the company's guidance confirms that AI memory pricing power, order visibility, and future margins are still expanding. Micron's outlook will serve as a crucial test for the broader AI semiconductor chain, including Samsung, SK Hynix, and other infrastructure players. The recent bounce appears to be a pre-earnings positioning repair. For it to evolve into a sustained uptrend, concrete evidence is needed that the AI infrastructure expansion cycle's fundamentals—particularly for high-end memory—remain robust and can continue to surpass elevated market expectations. The risk is that strong demand alone may not be sufficient if future guidance hints at peaking momentum or increasing supply-side pressures.

marsbit1 saat önce

Semiconductor Stock Rebound: Is the Technical Correction Over or a Trend Reversal?

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片