一文解读3月3日加密市场大跌消息背景

重本聪聪2023-03-03 tarihinde yayınlandı2023-03-10 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Silvergate真的会存在暴雷问题么?

3月3日早间9时左右,比特币出现快速下跌,15分钟内跌幅超5%,市场整体同步下行。据火必行情,BTC最低报21970美元,ETH最低报1529美元。

其中有三条消息大家需要重点关注:加密友好银行Silvergate出现经营危机股价大跌;FTX确认有89亿美元的客户资金已丢失;美SEC主席起草新规则,加密交易平台的资金托管需要得到监管。

3月2日晚间,美股上市公司、加密友好银行Silvergate宣布亏损可能会使运营资金不足,其正在评估自身持续经营的能力。Silvergate股价随即暴跌,当日跌幅超57%,较历史最高价下跌超95%。

Silvergate Bank成立于1988年。2014年1月,Silvergate成为第一批愿意为加密货币交易开设账户的银行之一。据悉,该银行已经服务了750个加密货币交易平台。2022年三季度,Silvergate的实时支付系统Silvergate Exchange Network存有120亿美元的存款,其中包括所有主要的加密货币交易所和1000多个机构投资者。

在Silvergate股价下跌后,加密市场相关机构纷纷表态撇清关系,目前为止表态的公司如下。

Coinbase、Galaxy Digital、Crypto.com、Bitstamp、Gemini、Circle宣布停止合作;

MicroStrategy、Tether、Paxos表示没有资金往来;

摩根大通和Canaccord下调Silvergate股票评级。

但Silvergate真的会存在暴雷问题么?

Silvergate是正规的美股上市公司,会定期公开财务报表。而且它是一家银行,加密资产相关的主要是建立法币和加密货币的支付通道,以及存款。与三箭资本或FTX相比,Silvergate的透明度要高的多,而且业务清晰。即使暴雷,也不会产生纯加密机构暴雷那么大的影响。目前主要的问题是加密机构在其中的存款会不会受到影响。但从经验判断,交易所和加密机构会把大笔资金放在银行么?

另外一个关于FTX的消息则并未得到市场重视,但从下跌时点上看则非常吻合。

北京时间3月3日早上9点15分,华尔街日报发布消息称,FTX存在89亿美元财务赤字,这是FTX首次明确自己的资金状况。FTX实际公布自己财务情况的时间则是3月3日凌晨2点40分,当时市场并未反应,直到早间媒体报道,并扩散到华语市场后,才出现大跌。

这里有个标题党的文字问题,华尔街日报的标题使用的是“FTX丢失89亿美元”,而实际上是FTX财务的缺口有什么这么多,而且是大部分钱被Alameda Research LLC借走了。如果真是被盗丢了89亿美元,那问题确实非常严重。

即使这样,FTX糟糕的财务状况也引发了市场担忧。

最后一个消息来自监管压力。

3月3日,美国SEC主席Gary Gensler在SEC官网发文表示,其人已加入投资者咨询委员会。该委员会近期提交了一项新的投资顾问保护规则。该规则根据国会2010年的规定,将托管规则扩大到涵盖投资者的所有资产,而不仅仅是他们的资金或证券。拟议规则还将要求顾问和托管方之间达成书面协议,增加对外国机构担任托管方的要求,并将保障规则明确扩展至全权委托交易。

Gary Gensler在文章中强调,根据加密货币交易和借贷平台的一般运作方式,加密交易平台今后将不再能依托投资顾问的角色而成为合格托管方。要成为新规则下的合格托管人,平台需要确保所有资产都得到妥善隔离,接受公共会计师的年度审计,并采取其他透明度措施。

意思就是加密交易平台如果存放客户资产则必须增加透明度,接受监管,否则加密资产不能存放在交易平台上。虽然法规还正在起草,到具体执行还有很长时间,但这是一种监管收紧的态度,在熊市下对交易平台非常不利。

重本聪认为,以上三条消息共同作用,最终导致了今日市场下跌。

后续的关注点,FTX的资金缺口已成定局,市场预期已经在价格上反应过了,今日只是一时恐慌罢了。Silvergate则需要重点关注,到底有没有雷,有多大的资金量受到影响,如果小概率出现意外,影响金额较大,可能会再次引发机构暴雷,打开更深的下跌空间。SEC监管影响的只是长期走势,靴子落地还早。

İlgili Okumalar

Silicon Valley VC's On-the-Ground Observations of Chinese Entrepreneurship: A Harsher Capital Environment Breeding Fiercer Companies

A Silicon Valley VC's on-the-ground observations of China's startup ecosystem reveal a harsher capital environment forging more aggressive and execution-driven companies. Unlike Silicon Valley's patient capital focused on long-term growth, China's venture landscape is characterized by intense pressure for exits. Startups often face "equity in name, debt in reality" terms with strict timelines and personal founder liability, pushing IPO as the nearly mandatory exit path due to a virtually non-existent M&A market. This high-stakes system, while potentially fostering short-termism, cultivates extreme cost discipline, rapid execution, and formidable commercialization skills—traits evident as these companies expand overseas. The funding ecosystem comprises three main pools: local RMB funds (often government-backed with economic development mandates), domestic USD funds (more founder-friendly, like Sequoia China), and dwindling direct foreign capital. Financial Advisors (FAs) play a crucial intermediary role, packaging deals and navigating China's opaque, relationship-based business networks where platforms like LinkedIn haven't taken root. Underpinning it all is significant state influence through industrial policy, directing capital and incentives toward strategic sectors like semiconductors and AI. The result is a distinct, parallel innovation model—less forgiving than Silicon Valley's, but capable of concentrating resources, accelerating iteration, and producing fiercely competitive companies in targeted industries.

marsbit3 dk önce

Silicon Valley VC's On-the-Ground Observations of Chinese Entrepreneurship: A Harsher Capital Environment Breeding Fiercer Companies

marsbit3 dk önce

SharpLink's Helm: Buying Only, Never Selling, Making ETH Generate Profits Through the Cold Winter

SharpLink co-CEO Joseph Chalom shares his bullish outlook on Ethereum during the recent "Injective Summit 2026." Despite prevailing negative market sentiment, Chalom argues that fundamentals and data tell a different story: Ethereum dominates with over 50% of stablecoin transaction volume, nearly 60% of tokenized real-world assets (RWA), and remains the uncontested leader in DeFi. He attributes the communication gap and lack of confidence partly to the Ethereum Foundation's restructuring. In response, SharpLink, alongside ConsenSys and Bitmain, is funding three key spin-off teams from the Foundation: ETH Labs (for institutional-scale scalability), Ethereum Institutional (for business development and marketing), and EthSystems (for next-gen privacy and compliance solutions). Chalom emphasizes these are critical for accelerating institutional adoption. Regarding SharpLink's strategy, Chalom details a conservative, yield-focused approach. The firm holds 886,725 ETH, acquired with zero leverage or debt. They generate revenue by staking ETH and strategically deploying capital into DeFi protocols via a dedicated fund, aiming for returns above the native staking yield. This contrasts with some Bitcoin-focused firms that have become net sellers. On the broader institutional adoption of tokenization, Chalom sees current progress as just the beginning. He breaks it down into layers: stablecoins as the currency/value layer, tokenized assets as the exposure layer, and DeFi as the execution layer. He predicts regulatory clarity, like the potential Clarity Act, will be a major catalyst. A key future inflection point will be when fiduciary managers prefer tokenized, 24/7 tradable digital assets over traditional "analog" versions due to their programmability and instant settlement. In conclusion, Chalom positions SharpLink not just as an ETH accumulator and yield generator, but as an active "ecosystem steward," funding essential development and marketing initiatives to support Ethereum's long-term growth, which he believes is directly aligned with shareholder interests.

Odaily星球日报4 dk önce

SharpLink's Helm: Buying Only, Never Selling, Making ETH Generate Profits Through the Cold Winter

Odaily星球日报4 dk önce

Ten European Banks Launch Blockchain Initiative RL1

On July 28, 2026, ten European financial institutions launched the Regulated Layer One (RL1) initiative. This open, neutral, and compliance-focused blockchain network is specialized for institutional digital asset operations. The founding members include ABN AMRO, Cecabank, Chartered Investment, Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale, DekaBank, DZ BANK, LBBW, Natixis CIB, SC Ventures, and Seturion, formed as a European cooperative society (SCE) and led by Henning Voelkel, former head of SWIAT. The network is open to new participants, with NatWest currently in discussions to join. RL1 is built on the SWIAT blockchain, which will remain its software and services provider. The underlying SWIAT network, operational for three years, has processed 50 transactions totaling €700 million. The initiative is described as a collective European effort to create a foundation for a shared, openly and trustworthily managed distributed ledger. Its primary goal is to overcome fragmentation in the regulated financial sector by establishing a neutral, participant-owned, pan-European DLT infrastructure for tokenized assets, digital money, and next-generation financial services. The move responds to growing EU demand for scalable real-world asset (RWA) infrastructure, evidenced by projects like Pontes and Appia. This launch aligns with broader sector growth expectations, including Standard Chartered's forecast for DeFi and RWA market capitalization to reach $2 trillion.

cryptonews.ru9 dk önce

Ten European Banks Launch Blockchain Initiative RL1

cryptonews.ru9 dk önce

Losing the "Anchor": Walsh's Minimalist Communication is Forcing the Market to Price Itself

Losing the "Anchor": Walsh's Minimalist Communication Forces Markets to Self-Price The probability of a rate hike priced into the market ahead of the Thursday meeting is unusually high at 40%. This stems from the new framework under Chairman Walsh, characterized by "data dependence and low communication." Since taking office, Walsh has implemented reforms: drastically shortening statements, removing traditional forward guidance, and emphasizing that statements only provide facts. He has also established working groups to review practices and strongly reiterated a commitment to price stability amid prolonged high inflation. Walsh does not submit a personal dot-plot forecast, urging markets to price based on their own data interpretation rather than reflecting Fed signals. This has removed the traditional "anchor," forcing markets to independently price in the possibility of sudden action in a truly data-driven environment. Consequently, short-term rate volatility and tail risk premiums have increased, as markets pay for protection against a potential sudden hike to reinforce anti-inflation credibility. Specific catalysts supporting this uncertainty include: 1) Iran-related tensions and volatile energy prices raising inflation tail risks, and 2) The new chairman's potential need to establish his anti-inflation credibility with an early, decisive move. In essence, the 40% hike probability reflects the market pricing protection for tail risks under Walsh's new low-guidance framework, compounded by geopolitical and data uncertainties, rather than treating a hike as the base case. The outcome will signal how this new communication paradigm shapes market adaptation. If rates are held steady, focus will shift to September. An unexpected hike would reinforce the "data and credibility first" narrative, prompting a repricing for higher-for-longer rates and tighter financial conditions.

marsbit14 dk önce

Losing the "Anchor": Walsh's Minimalist Communication is Forcing the Market to Price Itself

marsbit14 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片