Infighting Erupted on Launch Day: Robinhood Chain's Launch Platform vlad.fun Sabotaged by Its Own People

Foresight NewsPublished on 2026-07-20Last updated on 2026-07-20

Abstract

On July 15th, the Robinhood Chain token launchpad vlad.fun experienced internal sabotage on its launch day. Two external developers secretly hardcoded their own token into the platform's frontend, making it the only token visible to users and hiding all others. The core team detected the anomaly within two hours, fired the developers, and removed the malicious code. The developers claimed the action was for "clicks." They refunded approximately $15,000 in creator fees and test token profits, totaling about 7.8 ETH, to the team. An additional 4.16 ETH in protocol fees from the launch is held in a team multisig wallet. Built by a five-person team in 48 hours, vlad.fun's code was provided by the two external developers. Their last commit added the hardcoded line. When confronted, they initially blamed technical issues, but later attempted to delete the evidence before confessing. The platform is currently paused. A community member, Will Mexi, clarified he was not involved and was the one who discovered and reported the issue, having previously enabled branch protection which preserved the evidence. vlad.fun's design allows token deployment and direct listing on Uniswap V3/V4 in one transaction, with liquidity permanently locked to reduce rug pull risks. It features anti-whale measures and flexible fee routing. Despite this incident, the Robinhood Chain launchpad ecosystem remains active, with platforms like PONS gaining significant traction.


Author: Nicky, Foresight News


On July 15th, the Robinhood Chain token launch platform vlad.fun experienced malicious actions by internal developers on its launch day. According to official sources, two external developers involved in building the platform secretly created their own token and hardcoded it into the frontend code, causing only that token to be visible to users upon platform launch, while all other creators' tokens were completely hidden. The team discovered the anomaly within two hours, promptly dismissed the involved developers, and removed the malicious code.


The official statement emphasized that the team never approved issuing a vlad.fun platform token, and the two individuals unilaterally decided to launch one for "page views." After negotiation, the duo returned approximately $15,000 in creator fees and test token proceeds. The recovered funds, totaling about 7.8 ETH, have been deposited into the team's secure wallet. Additionally, approximately 4.16 ETH in protocol fees generated from the platform launch are held in the team's multi-signature address.


Public information shows that vlad.fun was rapidly built by a small team of 5 within 48 hours. Currently, two project-affiliated members have issued statements, but the specific identities of the two external developers have not been disclosed as of publishing. According to the incident explanation thread posted by the project's official account on July 18th, the two external developers were responsible for providing the core codebase for the launchpad. In the final code commit before the platform went live, they manually added a line of hardcoded logic to the frontend, forcing their own token to be displayed on the homepage, while other creators' tokens were completely obscured due to loading issues.


After the launch, users quickly noticed the anomaly, with the entire platform displaying only one token. Team members began reviewing the code and found the manually added hardcoded line in the commit history. When questioned by the team, the two developers initially blamed technical issues such as RPC failures, environment variable problems, and caching, but the persistent visibility of the relevant token contradicted such explanations.


According to the official account, one of the developers later requested the disabling of the branch protection feature on the code repository, claiming a need to "rollback some content." Before removing the protection, the team performed a timestamp backup of the entire repository and observed the two deleting the line containing the hardcoded logic. The official statement noted that this attempt to destroy evidence ultimately revealed their intent. Confronted with the evidence, the two developers admitted to their actions.


This incident highlights the trust risks faced by rapidly built crypto projects when involving external developers. The identities of the two involved developers have not been publicly disclosed, with the team stating they have taken advice to withhold their identities for now. vlad.fun stated that in the future, external personnel will no longer be allowed access to sensitive systems, and the team prefers developing based on open-source contracts.


The official website shows that vlad.fun is currently in a suspended operational state. The team stated they will prioritize handling matters for affected users.


Community member Will Mexi publicly clarified his role after the incident. He stated he was responsible for project application listings, frontend optimization, design, branding, and animations, and was not one of the two developers involved, nor did he participate in planning or executing the operation. According to his account, he tested a normal version of the website about 20 minutes before launch, so he did not notice the anomaly.


Will Mexi said that after the platform officially launched, he saw the token appearing illogically, immediately read the newly committed code, discovered the hardcoded line, and promptly reported it to the core team. He also mentioned that enabling branch protection earlier was due to caution regarding external code, and this setting ultimately preserved the complete commit history and evidence of intent. He simultaneously denied purchasing any platform tokens and claimed to have incurred losses due to expensive RPC, API, and server deployment costs.


Core team member @SOLsesame also expressed support in the incident thread. He belongs to the core small team that has collaborated with Will Mexi and others for over a year and is not one of the involved external developers. His background shows he is an active builder in the Solana ecosystem, having been deeply involved in the ai16z ecosystem and its PartnersNFT and PartnersDAO projects. Recently, he collaborated with Will Mexi to build and launch the Black Bull NFT series from scratch for the ANSEM community within 24 hours.


As a token launchpad on Robinhood Chain, vlad.fun differs from traditional bonding curve launchpads. Its design goal is to complete token deployment and direct launch to Uniswap V3 or V4 in a single transaction, making tokens instantly tradable on decentralized exchanges without going through a "graduation" migration step. Liquidity pool positions are permanently locked via a locker contract and cannot be withdrawn by the team, reducing the risk of rug pulls at the mechanism level.


In terms of fairness design, the platform employs mechanisms such as a fixed supply, no presale, and no large team allocations. It also offers an optional developer priority buy feature, allowing developers to buy at launch with zero transaction fees. An anti-whale mechanism limits single wallet holdings to 2%, preventing concentrated holdings by a single address. For fee routing, the platform supports setting a 1% to 5% transaction fee, which can be instantly directed to specified recipients, including wallet addresses, social accounts, or buyback/burn proxies. Fees are locked at launch and cannot be changed. Additionally, the platform plans optional models such as staking for rewards.


Despite vlad.fun hitting pause due to the internal incident, the launchpad ecosystem on Robinhood Chain has not cooled down. According to DefiLlama data, the chain's current TVL is approximately $258 million, with 24-hour fees around $118,000 and revenue about $106,000. Uniswap's 24-hour fee expenditure on the chain reached $1.95 million. The ecosystem has already gathered multiple launchpads, each forming a differentiated competitive landscape: the latecomer PONS holds the leading launchpad position with intensive development and continuous updates. Its platform token has a market cap of about $12 million, with a gain of over 4200% in the past 7 days. Furthermore, the Butterfly platform focuses on stock-like meme tokens but has yet to produce a hit. Native Uniswap innovative mechanism tokens, such as RWA dividend-sharing tokens like index, which received official attention, once surged to a market cap of $30 million on July 17th.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the primary technical action taken by the two external developers that led to the incident on vlad.fun?

AThey secretly added a line of hardcoded script to the platform's front-end code, which forced only their own token to be displayed on the homepage, while hiding all other creators' tokens.

QAccording to the article, what was the main reason given by the developers for their actions, and what key evidence contradicted this reason?

AThey claimed it was for 'page views.' However, the key contradictory evidence was that when questioned, they initially tried to blame technical issues like RPC failures or cache problems, but the fact that their token remained consistently visible made these excuses implausible.

QHow did the core team discover and prove the malicious intent of the external developers?

AAfter users reported seeing only one token, the team reviewed the code commit history and found the manually added hardcoded line. The developers then tried to delete this code and asked to disable branch protection on the repository, which the team had already backed up. Their attempt to destroy evidence confirmed their malicious intent.

QWhat are two key design features of the vlad.fun platform aimed at reducing scam risks compared to traditional launchpads?

A1. Tokens are launched directly to Uniswap V3/V4 in a single transaction, making them instantly tradable without a migration step. 2. The liquidity pool is permanently locked via a locker contract, preventing the team from withdrawing it and reducing 'rug pull' risks.

QWhat is the current status of the vlad.fun platform following the incident, and what does the article suggest about the broader launchpad ecosystem on Robinhood Chain?

AThe vlad.fun platform is currently paused. The article suggests that despite this incident, the launchpad ecosystem on Robinhood Chain remains active, with platforms like PONS gaining significant traction and others exploring different niches.

Related Reads

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbit1h ago

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

marsbit1h ago

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

OpenAI is shifting its business strategy away from promoting its most expensive, flagship models for every task. Recent price cuts—80% for GPT-5.6 Luna and 20% for Terra—signal a deeper change: the company now actively advises users that many tasks don't require the most powerful model. Instead, OpenAI recommends a tiered approach: use the high-end GPT-5.6 Sol for complex planning and analysis, then delegate execution to cheaper models like Luna. This mirrors moves by Anthropic, which recently launched Claude Opus 5 at half the price of its top model, Fable 5. Both companies are de-emphasizing flagship models as primary revenue drivers, using them instead for brand prestige and technological showcases. The industry is entering a "mass-market" phase, similar to automotive, where high-volume, cost-effective models handle daily operations and drive scale. OpenAI's price reductions are partly enabled by AI models themselves optimizing underlying code and infrastructure, creating a self-reinforcing cycle of efficiency gains and cost reduction. Competition is shifting from "who is smartest" to "who offers the best value." The goal is no longer selling individual models but fostering widespread API adoption and ecosystem lock-in. By making AI calls cheap and ubiquitous, companies like OpenAI aim to become the indispensable, utility-like infrastructure powering automated workflows—the "water and electricity" of software, quietly embedded everywhere.

marsbit1h ago

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

How to Buy PEOPLE

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE)After purchasing your ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE)Easily trade ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

7.8k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy PEOPLE

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of PEOPLE (PEOPLE) are presented below.

活动图片