Zcash drops 12% as $52mln exits – Can ZEC avoid deeper breakdown?

ambcryptoОпубликовано 2026-02-19Обновлено 2026-02-19

Введение

Zcash (ZEC) experienced a significant 12% price decline, driven by a major capital outflow of $52 million from its perpetual futures market, which included $2.98 million in liquidated positions. This sell-off intensified downside pressure, as momentum indicators like MACD and Chaikin Money Flow signaled weakening bullish momentum and dominant selling activity. The Long/Short Ratio also fell below 1, indicating more traders are betting on further declines. However, not all signals are bearish: spot market data showed approximately $18 million in inflows on February 18, suggesting accumulation by buyers. Although derivatives market weakness persists, continued spot demand and a still-positive funding rate leave the possibility open for a short-term rebound if buying pressure sustains.

Capital outflows continue to pressure privacy tokens, compounding an already fragile market environment.

Zcash’s ZEC token has not escaped the broader downturn. The altcoin slid 12% as capital flight intensified, amplifying downside risks.

Despite the pullback, the potential for a rebound remains intact, as underlying buy-side interest has yet to fully erode and could support a near-term recovery.

ZEC momentum dries up

Momentum indicators show clear signs of exhaustion, raising the likelihood that Zcash [ZEC] could extend its losses if sentiment continues to deteriorate.

Data from the Moving Average Convergence and Divergence (MACD) indicator shows that bullish momentum is fading, reinforcing the prevailing downside bias.

The MACD histogram, which reflects the strength of price momentum, has gradually shifted from deep green to a lighter shade—evidence that buying pressure has thinned and liquidity has weakened.

Similarly, the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF), which tracks whether volume flows into or out of an asset, indicates that most of the past day’s trading activity has favored the sell side.

Rising sell-side volume, combined with rapidly weakening bullish momentum, has intensified pressure on the asset and contributed to its recent downturn.

Capital flight intensifies

The clearest sign of capital flight has emerged from the perpetual futures market, where traders have pulled significant liquidity.

According to CoinGlass data, approximately $52 million exited ZEC’s perpetual market, with $2.98 million in positions liquidated.

An outflow of this magnitude often sends a shock through the market, signaling heightened fear and risk aversion among derivatives traders.

Total Open Liquidity in ZEC perpetual contracts stood near $400 million. While still sizable, this level does not eliminate the downside risk, particularly as sellers continue to dominate flows.

Perpetual market volume mirrors the trend seen in the spot market. Trading activity has skewed heavily toward the sell side, reinforcing the bearish structure.

The Long/Short Ratio has dropped to 0.923, reflecting stronger short positioning. A ratio below 1 signals that short traders currently outnumber longs, suggesting that participants are positioning for further price declines.

Where the tide could turn

Despite mounting pressure in the derivatives market, sentiment has not completely turned against the bulls.

At press time, the Open Interest Weighted Funding Rate showed that long contracts still hold relative dominance. This suggests that, despite recent turbulence, a significant portion of market liquidity continues to support an upside scenario.

However, this metric has trended lower and is approaching negative territory. A decisive move below zero would signal that shorts have seized control of the derivatives market.

The spot market adds nuance to the outlook. While perpetual traders have reduced exposure, spot investors continue to accumulate. According to CoinGlass, buyers deployed roughly $18 million into ZEC on the 18th of February, strengthening their positions.

If buying pressure persists into the daily close, bulls could regain short-term control. In that case, sustained Spot demand, combined with a still-positive Open Interest Weighted Funding Rate, may improve the probability of a rebound.


Final Summary

  • Zcash (ZEC) dropped 12% as $52 million exited its perpetual futures market, with $2.98 million liquidated.
  • Despite derivatives’ weakness, Zcash (ZEC) saw roughly $18 million in spot inflows on February 18.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat was the percentage drop in Zcash (ZEC) and how much capital exited its perpetual futures market?

AZcash (ZEC) dropped 12% as $52 million exited its perpetual futures market.

QAccording to the MACD indicator, what is the trend for ZEC's bullish momentum?

AData from the Moving Average Convergence and Divergence (MACD) indicator shows that bullish momentum is fading, reinforcing the prevailing downside bias.

QWhat does the Long/Short Ratio of 0.923 indicate about trader positioning?

AA Long/Short Ratio of 0.923, which is below 1, signals that short traders currently outnumber longs, suggesting participants are positioning for further price declines.

QDespite the downturn, what positive activity was noted in the spot market on February 18th?

ADespite the downturn, buyers deployed roughly $18 million into ZEC on the spot market on February 18th, strengthening their positions.

QWhat would a decisive move below zero in the Open Interest Weighted Funding Rate signal?

AA decisive move below zero in the Open Interest Weighted Funding Rate would signal that short traders have seized control of the derivatives market.

Похожее

Lowering Expectations for BTC's Next Bull Market

The author, Alex Xu, explains his decision to significantly reduce his Bitcoin holdings (from full to ~30% of his portfolio) during the current bull cycle, citing a lowered long-term outlook for BTC's price appreciation in the next cycle. He outlines six key reasons for this reduced expectation: 1. **Diminished Growth Drivers:** The narrative of exponential user adoption has largely played out with institutional ETF adoption. The next major growth phase—adoption by sovereign national reserves or central banks—seems unlikely in the near future. 2. **Personal Opportunity Cost:** More attractive investment opportunities have emerged in other assets, such as undervalued companies. 3. **Industry-Wide Contraction:** The broader crypto industry is struggling, with most Web3 business models (SocialFi, GameFi, DePIN) failing. This overall萧条 (depression) reduces the fundamental demand and consensus for Bitcoin. 4. **Strain on Major Buyer:** MicroStrategy, a major corporate buyer of BTC, faces rising financing expenses for its debt, which could slow its purchasing rate and create significant marginal pressure on the market. 5. **Increased Competition from Gold:** The emergence of "tokenized gold" has closed the functional gap (portability, divisibility) between physical gold and Bitcoin, offering a strong competitor in the non-sovereign store-of-value space. 6. **Security Budget Concerns:** The block reward halving continues to exacerbate the long-standing issue of funding Bitcoin's network security, with new fee source explorations like Ordinals and L2s largely failing. The author's decision to hold a significant (though reduced) position reflects a cautious, not bearish, outlook. He remains open to increasing his exposure if the fundamental reasons for his skepticism change or if new positive catalysts emerge.

marsbit35 мин. назад

Lowering Expectations for BTC's Next Bull Market

marsbit35 мин. назад

Can Iran 'Control' the Strait of Hormuz?

Iran has announced a comprehensive plan to assert control over the strategic Strait of Hormuz, a critical global oil shipping chokepoint. The proposed measures include requiring all vessels to obtain Iranian permission for passage, imposing fees for security, environmental protection, and navigation management—preferably paid in Iranian rials—and absolutely banning Israeli ships. Vessels from countries deemed hostile by Iran’s top security bodies may also be barred. Analysts suggest Iran’s motives are multifaceted: increasing pressure on the U.S. and Israel by leveraging control over oil transit to influence global prices and inflation; creating a new revenue stream, potentially exceeding $7.7 billion annually, to counter Western sanctions and support postwar reconstruction; and using transit permissions as bargaining chips in future negotiations, notably with the U.S. However, the plan faces significant practical and diplomatic challenges. Enforcing comprehensive interception and fee collection in the busy waterway, patrolled by international military forces, would be difficult. The U.S. has already countering with a blockade of Iranian ports and threats to intercept any ship paying fees, potentially strangling Iran’s oil exports and fee revenue. Broad international opposition, led by European and Gulf states, and legal controversies further complicate implementation. The proposal may ultimately serve more as a negotiating tactic than a feasible policy, with its execution remaining highly uncertain.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Can Iran 'Control' the Strait of Hormuz?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片