XRPL prepares for ‘institutional DeFi’ – Will it boost XRP price?

ambcryptoОпубликовано 2026-01-31Обновлено 2026-01-31

Введение

Key stakeholders in the XRPL ecosystem are pushing for institutional DeFi adoption, with the upcoming 'XRP Lending Protocol' (XLS-66) seen as a critical upgrade. Evernorth, a major XRP treasury firm, announced it will make this protocol its core strategy, believing it could unlock a multi-billion-dollar annual yield opportunity and fundamentally shift institutional on-chain liquidity. Currently, the XRPL DeFi ecosystem lags behind rivals like BNB Chain and Solana, with its TVL dropping to $100 million, compared to their billions. However, Ripple’s stablecoin RLUSD has grown rapidly, surpassing $1 billion in supply. Market signals are mixed: 42 wallets holding over 1 million XRP have resumed accumulation for the first time since September, indicating long-term confidence. Yet, large holders remain net sellers overall, though selling pressure has slightly eased. XRP price consolidated around $1.7, awaiting broader market direction.

Key stakeholders in the Ripple-backed XRPL ecosystem want the chain optimized to drive institutional DeFi strategies and capital deployment similar to Ethereum’s ‘yield vaults.’

In a recent statement, Evernoth, one of the top XRP treasury firms, said it will make the upcoming ‘XRP Lending Protocol’ its core digital asset strategy.

“It’s (lending protocol) what we believe could be a fundamental shift in how institutional liquidity moves onchain.”

According to Asheesh Birla, CEO at Enernorth, the move will further drive XRP DeFi.

“By participating in this native lending ecosystem, Evernorth aims to help unlock what could be a multi-billion-dollar annual yield opportunity for the XRP community.”

For the firm, the lending protocol is the ‘missing piece’ for XRP DeFi. The upgrade, also known as XLS-66, is currently on a testnet, seeks to enable single-asset vaults to drive fixed-rate loans.

State of XRPL DeFi

Although the XRPL DeFi ecosystem has seen some traction since 2025, the chain lags behind its rivals in the top 10 assets by market cap.

At press time, its DeFi ecosystem’s TVL (total value locked) had dropped from around $100 million to $60 million.

In contrast, its closest rivals, BNB chain and Solana, had $6.5 billion and $9.3 billion, respectively, in TVL. This signalled that the two chains had a deeper DeFi liquidity and, by extension, higher investor trust than XRPL.

Although the chain has scored several institutional partnerships, including Japan’s Gumi and SBI, its DeFi activity has lagged behind its perceived peers. It remains to be seen how the upcoming lending protocol upgrade will help it close the DeFi gap with its rivals.

However, Ripple’s stablecoin RLUSD is amongst the fastest-growing and recently crossed above $1 billion in supply.

XRP whales flash mixed signals

On the market side, 42 wallets with over 1 million XRP tokens have returned for the first time since September. Their recent accumulation spree was an ‘encouraging sign for the long-term prospect of the altcoin, noted analytics firm Santiment.

However, according to the 30-day XRPL Whale Flow, large XRP players are still net sellers at press time. But it’s worth pointing out that this pressure had eased slightly in January, as shown by the metric climbing slowly higher.

If the metric surges to the neutral position or turns positive, a firm XRP price recovery for the altcoin may be likely. At press time, XRP consolidated recent losses around $1.7, waiting for the next broader market direction.


Final Thoughts

  • XRP treasury firm Evernorth was betting on the upcoming ‘lending protocol’ upgrade as a key DeFi unlock and strategy.
  • XRP whales flashed mixed signals; wallets holding +1 million XRP tokens back to slow accumulation, but some were still dumping their stash.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the main goal of the upcoming 'XRP Lending Protocol' (XLS-66) upgrade on the XRPL according to key stakeholders?

AThe main goal is to optimize the XRPL chain to drive institutional DeFi strategies and capital deployment, similar to Ethereum's 'yield vaults', by enabling single-asset vaults for fixed-rate loans. It is seen as the 'missing piece' to unlock a multi-billion-dollar annual yield opportunity for the XRP community.

QWhich analytics firm provided data on the return of large XRP wallets, and what did they consider this activity to signify?

AAnalytics firm Santiment provided the data, noting that the return of 42 wallets holding over 1 million XRP tokens for the first time since September was an 'encouraging sign for the long-term prospect' of the altcoin.

QHow does the Total Value Locked (TVL) of the XRPL DeFi ecosystem compare to its rivals BNB Chain and Solana?

AAt the time of writing, the XRPL DeFi TVL was around $60 million, which is significantly lower than its rivals. BNB Chain had a TVL of $6.5 billion, and Solana had a TVL of $9.3 billion, indicating they have deeper DeFi liquidity and higher investor trust.

QWhat recent milestone did Ripple's stablecoin, RLUSD, achieve?

ARipple's stablecoin RLUSD recently crossed above $1 billion in supply and is among the fastest-growing stablecoins.

QWhat was the mixed signal flashed by XRP whales according to the 30-day XRPL Whale Flow metric?

AThe mixed signal was that while a group of large wallets had returned to slow accumulation, the overall large XRP players were still net sellers at the time of writing, though the selling pressure had eased slightly in January.

Похожее

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

**Title: Has the "Digital Gold" Narrative for Bitcoin Failed?** The article argues that Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative remains valid despite a recent sharp price decline (from a peak near $126k in Oct 2025 to briefly under $61k in Feb 2026). It presents a long-term investment framework based on three core points: **1. Viewing Bitcoin as an Asset:** Bitcoin is presented as a superior potential store of value compared to gold. Key arguments are its absolute scarcity (21 million cap), superior portability, and transparent auditability via its public ledger. While acknowledging its current use in early, volatile stages (~3-4% global adoption), the author draws parallels to the early, disruptive phases of the internet and e-commerce. **2. Understanding the Recent Downturn:** The current ~50% correction is framed as a predictable, consensus-driven cycle following its post-halving peak (the 2024 halving preceded the Oct 2025 high). A crucial factor is a historic "changing of hands": the influx of new institutional buyers via ETFs allowed early, low-cost holders (miners, OG believers) to take profits. The author notes that while severe, Bitcoin's historical drawdowns (e.g., 93% in 2011, 77% in 2021-22) have been progressively smaller, suggesting maturing holder structure and decreasing volatility over time. **3. The Long-Term Perspective:** The long-term thesis hinges on Bitcoin capturing a portion of gold's market value. With Bitcoin's market cap at ~$1.4 trillion (at $70k) versus gold's ~$20 trillion, significant upside potential exists if the "digital gold" narrative is partially realized. However, the author strongly cautions that short-term risks remain, the bottom is unpredictable, and high volatility is inherent. The real risk is not Bitcoin failing but poor personal position management (over-leverage, wrong capital) and a lack of deep understanding, which can force investors out during severe downturns. The conclusion uses Amazon's 95% crash post-2000 dot-com bubble and subsequent 42x recovery as an analogy. The ultimate question is not if Bitcoin's price will rise, but if an investor's strategy and conviction can withstand the volatility to see the long-term play out. The recent divergence (gold up, Bitcoin down) is posed not as a narrative failure, but as potential evidence of this ongoing, painful transition from a speculative asset to a mainstream allocation.

marsbit5 ч. назад

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

marsbit5 ч. назад

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

The article discusses Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative, its recent price drop, and long-term outlook through the perspective of "Jason". It argues the narrative is not a failure but that Bitcoin represents a superior, new asset class due to its fixed supply (21 million), portability, and auditability. The piece compares its current ~3-4% global adoption rate to early internet/e-commerce, suggesting significant growth potential. Regarding the 2025-2026 price decline (from ~$126k to briefly under $61k), the author views it as a predictable, consensus-driven sell-off within Bitcoin's ~4-year cycle post-halving, exacerbated by a major "handover" from early, low-cost holders to new institutional buyers via ETFs. A key observation is that historical peak-to-trough drawdowns have lessened over time (e.g., 93% in 2011 to ~50% in 2026), indicating maturing volatility as holder structure changes. For the long term, the author uses a simple framework: Bitcoin's total market cap (~$1.4T at $70k) is only about 7% of gold's (~$20T). Even capturing 30-50% of gold's value would imply substantial upside. However, the article strongly cautions against viewing this as investment advice, emphasizing extreme volatility and the critical importance of risk management, position sizing, and deep fundamental understanding to survive severe drawdowns. It concludes by drawing a parallel to Amazon's 95% crash in 2000 and subsequent 42x recovery, stressing that the key is surviving market cycles to realize long-term potential.

链捕手5 ч. назад

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

链捕手5 ч. назад

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

"From Code to Cognition: The Evolution of Robot Brains" The journey of robotic intelligence has shifted dramatically from manually coded systems to AI-driven brains. For decades, robots relied on layered software stacks—perception, state estimation, planning, control—each handcrafted. While predictable, they lacked adaptability. The 2010s saw deep learning revolutionize perception (e.g., object detection) and control (via reinforcement learning), but learned skills remained narrow. The arrival of Large Language Models (LLMs) marked a turning point. LLMs acted as high-level planners, interpreting natural language instructions and generating sequences of actions for traditional robotic systems to execute. However, true integration came with Visual-Language-Action (VLA) models, which fused vision, language, and motion prediction into a single network. Pioneered by models like RT-2 and open-source projects like OpenVLA, VLAs enable robots to reason and act directly from visual input and commands. The most advanced humanoid robots now employ a "dual-brain" architecture: a slow-thinking, large VLA (System 2) for reasoning and planning, and a fast-reacting, small network (System 1) for high-frequency motion control, sometimes with an even lower-level System 0 for balance. This split balances cognition with the physics of real-time movement. Computation is split between onboard hardware (e.g., NVIDIA Jetson) for safety-critical control loops and cloud/edge servers for non-critical tasks like learning and interfaces. A crucial driver is the open-source ecosystem—models like GR00T and OpenVLA allow startups to build upon pre-trained brains and fine-tune them with their own data, accelerating development. Despite progress, current systems struggle with recovery from errors, sample inefficiency, and long-horizon tasks. This has spurred the rise of **World Models**—neural networks that predict the consequences of actions. By simulating possible futures before acting (like NVIDIA Cosmos or Meta V-JEPA), robots can plan, recover, and generalize better. This represents the next frontier: shifting intelligence from learned reactions to an internal model of physics and cause-and-effect. The field is rapidly evolving. While not yet at its "ChatGPT moment," the convergence of cheaper hardware, scalable simulation, and world models points toward robots that are increasingly capable, adaptive, and useful. The question is shifting from "what can robots do?" to "what *should* they do?"

marsbit6 ч. назад

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

marsbit6 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片