Why traders are abandoning NFTs for high-turnover memecoins

ambcryptoОпубликовано 2025-12-29Обновлено 2025-12-29

Введение

NFT trading activity has significantly declined, with volume becoming dominated by just two major marketplaces, OpenSea and Blur, while smaller platforms fade. Traders have shifted their attention and capital to high-turnover memecoins, particularly on the Solana network. Memecoins like Dogecoin, Shiba Inu, and newer Solana-based tokens offer fast, low-cost trading, allowing for quick entries and exits—aligning with the current preference for speed and flexibility. This shift is driven by the desire for more engaging, accessible assets that don’t require large upfront investment or long holding periods, making memecoins the new focus for speculative activity.

NFTs don’t feel like they used to. Trading is slower, and a lot of people just... seem to have moved on. That doesn’t mean traders are done taking risks. The attention has gone back to memecoins, especially those built on Solana [SOL].

NFTs are so yesterday!

Over the past year, overall NFT activity has gradually decreased, with few spikes and a flat trading pattern across marketplaces. What’s interesting is where the remaining volume is going. NFT market share has become increasingly concentrated, with OpenSea and Blur accounting for the bulk of total trading volume, while smaller platforms lose relevance.

A handful of marketplaces dominate NFT trading, while most others contribute only a sliver of activity. Interest is shrinking, with traders sticking to the most liquid venues and avoiding risk.

NFTs are definitely losing pace, and they are no longer where the spotlight is right now.

Attention is flocking into memecoins instead

CoinMarketCap data shows consistent volume across the largest memecoins; big names like Dogecoin [DOGE], Shiba Inu [SHIB], Pepe [PEPE] are proof – even on tame days, their numbers are astounding. Newer entrants are seeing strong daily trading activity too. Many of the most actively traded tokens over the past week are either native to Solana or heavily traded on it.

This is where the network stands out. Several Solana-based memecoins post high volume despite smaller market caps; they’re frequently traded rather than held long-term. Low transaction fees and fast settlement make it easier for traders to enter and exit positions quickly. This keeps activity elevated.

This was perhaps what lead to the quick rotation from NFTs.

What traders are responding to

It’s not just about NFTs versus memecoins; it’s about how traders want to participate. Capital is moving toward fast, flexible and constantly engaging assets. Memecoins fit that need better right now than NFTs, which often require patience, higher upfront costs, and longer holding periods.

Another change is scale. Memecoins allow smaller traders to stay active without committing large amounts of money. That’s harder in both NFTs and large-cap crypto. There’s more participation, even if it is mindless fun. Traders are choosing markets that let them move quickly, and step away just as fast.


Final Thoughts

  • NFT trading volume is lesser and concentrated on just two marketplaces.
  • Memecoins, especially on Solana, are where it’s at now, with low fees and fast trades.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QAccording to the article, why are traders moving from NFTs to memecoins?

ATraders are moving to memecoins because they offer fast, flexible, and constantly engaging trading with low fees and quick settlement, which better fits the current desire for quick entry and exit positions compared to NFTs that require more patience, higher upfront costs, and longer holding periods.

QWhich two NFT marketplaces currently account for the bulk of the total trading volume?

AOpenSea and Blur are the two marketplaces that account for the bulk of the total NFT trading volume.

QOn which blockchain are many of the new high-turnover memecoins being built?

AMany of the new high-turnover memecoins are being built on the Solana blockchain.

QWhat are two key technical features of the Solana network that support high memecoin trading activity?

AThe two key features of the Solana network that support high memecoin trading are its low transaction fees and fast settlement times.

QHow does the article describe the overall trend in NFT activity over the past year?

AThe overall NFT activity has gradually decreased over the past year, with few spikes and a flat trading pattern, indicating it is losing pace and is no longer in the spotlight.

Похожее

North Korean Hackers Loot $500 Million in a Single Month, Becoming the Top Threat to Crypto Security

North Korean hackers, particularly the notorious Lazarus Group and its subgroup TraderTraitor, have stolen over $500 million from cryptocurrency DeFi platforms in less than three weeks, bringing their total theft for the year to over $700 million. Recent major attacks on Drift Protocol and KelpDAO, resulting in losses of approximately $286 million and $290 million respectively, highlight a strategic shift: instead of targeting core smart contracts, attackers are now exploiting vulnerabilities in peripheral infrastructure. For instance, the KelpDAO attack involved compromising downstream RPC infrastructure used by LayerZero's decentralized validation network (DVN), allowing manipulation without breaching core cryptography. This sophisticated approach mirrors advanced corporate cyber-espionage. Additionally, North Korea has systematically infiltrated the global crypto workforce, with an estimated 100 operatives using fake identities to gain employment at blockchain companies, enabling long-term access to sensitive systems and facilitating large-scale thefts. According to Chainalysis, North Korean-linked hackers stole a record $2 billion in 2025, accounting for 60% of all global crypto theft that year. Their total historical crypto theft has reached $6.75 billion. Post-theft, they employ specialized money laundering methods, heavily relying on Chinese OTC brokers and cross-chain mixing services rather than standard decentralized exchanges. Security experts, while acknowledging the increased sophistication, emphasize that many attacks still exploit fundamental weaknesses like poor access controls and centralized operational risks. Strengthening private key management, limiting privileged access, and enhancing coordination among exchanges, analysts, and law enforcement immediately after an attack are critical to improving defense and fund recovery chances. The industry's challenge now extends beyond secure smart contracts to safeguarding operational security at the infrastructure level.

marsbit10 мин. назад

North Korean Hackers Loot $500 Million in a Single Month, Becoming the Top Threat to Crypto Security

marsbit10 мин. назад

Circle CEO's Seoul Visit: No Korean Won Stablecoin Issuance, But Met All Major Korean Banks

Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire's recent activities in Seoul indicate a strategic shift for the company, moving away from issuing a Korean won-backed stablecoin and instead focusing on embedding itself as a key infrastructure provider within Korea’s financial and crypto ecosystem. Despite Korea accounting for nearly 30% of global crypto trading volume—with a market characterized by high retail participation and altcoin dominance—Circle has chosen not to compete for the role of stablecoin issuer. Instead, Allaire met with major Korean banks (including Shinhan, KB, and Woori), financial groups, leading exchanges (Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone), and tech firms like Kakao. This approach reflects a broader industry transition: the core of stablecoin competition is shifting from issuance rights to systemic positioning. With Korean regulators still debating whether banks or tech companies should issue stablecoins, Circle is avoiding regulatory uncertainty by strengthening its role as a service and technology partner. The company is deepening integration with trading platforms, building connections, and promoting stablecoin infrastructure. This positions Circle to benefit regardless of which entity eventually issues a won stablecoin. Allaire also noted the potential for a Chinese yuan stablecoin in the next 3–5 years, underscoring a regional trend of stablecoins becoming more regulated and integrated with traditional finance. Ultimately, Circle’s strategy highlights that future influence in the stablecoin market will belong not necessarily to the issuers, but to the foundational infrastructure layers that enable cross-system transactions.

marsbit38 мин. назад

Circle CEO's Seoul Visit: No Korean Won Stablecoin Issuance, But Met All Major Korean Banks

marsbit38 мин. назад

SpaceX Ties Up with Cursor: A High-Stakes AI Gambit of 'Lock First, Acquire Later'

SpaceX has secured an option to acquire AI programming company Cursor for $60 billion, with an alternative clause requiring a $10 billion collaboration fee if the acquisition does not proceed. This structure is not merely a potential acquisition but a strategic move to control core access points in the AI era. The deal is designed as a flexible, dual-path arrangement, allowing SpaceX to either fully acquire Cursor or maintain a binding partnership through high-cost collaboration. This "option-style" approach minimizes immediate regulatory and integration risks while ensuring long-term alignment between the two companies. At its core, the transaction exchanges critical AI-era resources: SpaceX provides its Colossus supercomputing cluster—one of the world’s most powerful AI training infrastructures—while Cursor contributes its AI-native developer environment and strong product adoption. This synergy connects compute power, models, and application layers, forming a closed-loop AI capability stack. Cursor, founded in 2022, has achieved rapid growth with over $1 billion in annual revenue and widespread enterprise adoption. Its value lies in transforming software development through AI agents capable of coding, debugging, and system design—positioning it as a gateway to future software production. For SpaceX, this move is part of a broader strategy to evolve from a aerospace company into an AI infrastructure empire, integrating xAI, supercomputing, and chip manufacturing. Controlling Cursor fills a gap in its developer tooling layer, strengthening its AI narrative ahead of a potential IPO. The deal reflects a shift in AI competition from model superiority to ecosystem and entry-point control. With programming tools as a key battleground, securing developer loyalty becomes crucial for dominating the software production landscape. Risks include questions around Cursor’s valuation, technical integration challenges, and potential regulatory scrutiny. Nevertheless, the deal underscores a strategic bet: controlling both compute and software development access may redefine power dynamics in the AI-driven future.

marsbit1 ч. назад

SpaceX Ties Up with Cursor: A High-Stakes AI Gambit of 'Lock First, Acquire Later'

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片