Trump Media’s Crypto Bet Implodes With Massive $406M Quarterly Loss

bitcoinistОпубликовано 2026-05-11Обновлено 2026-05-11

Введение

Trump Media & Technology Group, parent company of Truth Social, reported a massive $406 million net loss in Q1 2026, sharply up from $31.7 million a year earlier. The collapse was driven primarily by $370 million in unrealized losses from digital asset investments. These include a $61 million loss on 756 million Cronos tokens and a nearly $500 million gap on 9,542 Bitcoin purchased near the 2025 market peak, though Bitcoin's recent recovery has reduced that paper loss. Adding to turmoil, CEO Devin Nunes resigned in late April. Meanwhile, the company's core media revenue was only $871,200, a minimal increase. Despite the financial losses, the company generated $18 million in operating cash flow by selling options on its pledged Bitcoin holdings. Its stock, once valued at over $97, now trades around $9, reflecting a more than 90% decline from its 2022 peak.

Trump Media & Technology Group’s stock now trades around $8.93. That number tells a story on its own. The parent company of Truth Social once peaked at $97.50 a share back in early 2022, and it has shed more than 90% of its value since then.

CEO Devin Nunes stepped down on April 22, adding leadership uncertainty to a company already under financial pressure.

A Bad Deal Gets Worse

756 million Cronos tokens sit on Trump Media’s books, purchased for close to $114 million as part of a deal with Crypto.com. By March 31, those tokens were valued at just $53 million — less than half what the company paid.

That loss compounded an already bruising quarter driven largely by Bitcoin purchases made near last summer’s market peak. The company bought roughly 9,500 Bitcoin at an average cost of around $108,519 per coin.

At quarter-end, the 9,542 Bitcoin it held carried a cost basis of $1.13 billion but a fair value of only $647 million — a gap of nearly $500 million. Bitcoin has since climbed back above $80,000, pushing the position’s value closer to $770 million.

WLFIUSD trading at $0.06 on the 24-hour chart: TradingView

The total damage for the first quarter of 2026 came to $406 million in net losses, up sharply from $31.7 million during the same period a year earlier.

According to a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, nearly $370 million of that figure came from unrealized losses on digital assets and equity holdings — meaning the company has not sold its positions at a loss, but the decline in market value still hit the books hard. An additional $108 million in investment losses was tied mostly to equity securities.

Image: Technext

Revenue Barely Moves

While crypto losses dominated the quarter, Trump Media’s core media business generated just $871,200 in revenue — a 6% increase from $821,200 in the first quarter of 2025.

That figure includes $810,100 in media revenue and $61,100 in management fees tied to Truth.Fi ETF offerings. For a publicly traded company sitting on over $2 billion in total financial assets, the revenue line is thin.

The company did manage to generate nearly $18 million in operating cash flow during the quarter, helped by selling options on its pledged Bitcoin holdings.

Of its total Bitcoin position, 4,260 BTC has been pledged as collateral for convertible notes, and another 2,000 BTC is held against covered call options as a hedge.

Featured image from Thomas Fuller/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images, chart from TradingView

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the main reason for Trump Media's massive quarterly loss of $406 million?

AThe main reason is a combination of large unrealized losses on its cryptocurrency holdings. Specifically, its Cronos tokens lost over half their value, and its significant Bitcoin position, purchased near the 2025 market peak, was worth far less than its cost basis at the end of the quarter.

QHow much did Trump Media pay for its Cronos tokens and what was their value at the quarter's end?

ATrump Media purchased 756 million Cronos tokens for approximately $114 million. By March 31, 2026, those tokens were valued at just $53 million.

QWhat was the value of Trump Media's Bitcoin position at quarter-end and how does it compare to its purchase cost?

AAt quarter-end, Trump Media's 9,542 Bitcoin had a cost basis of $1.13 billion but a fair market value of only $647 million, resulting in an unrealized loss of nearly $500 million.

QHow much revenue did Trump Media's core business generate in the first quarter of 2026?

ATrump Media's core media business generated $871,200 in revenue in the first quarter of 2026, a slight increase from the same period in 2025.

QWhat recent leadership change was announced at Trump Media & Technology Group?

ACEO Devin Nunes stepped down from his position on April 22, 2026.

Похожее

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

No one truly teaches you how to do research. You're often given a desk, a pre-selected problem, and vague instructions to "create something new." Consequently, many people reverse-engineer the job based on visible outputs—papers, posts, announcements—learning only how to *appear* like a researcher rather than how to *become* one. True research capability is built from stacking small, trainable skills, nearly all of which can be developed through deliberate practice. **Pick Your Own Problem:** Most researchers absorb problems from advisors or trends, lacking the underlying reasoning. Choosing a problem you genuinely care about, as John Schulman advises, leads to original work. Develop "taste" like a muscle: predict experiment outcomes, guess paper results from methods, and track which findings remain important over time. **Upgrade Your Inputs:** Relying on shared reading lists (arXiv hot lists, filtered group chats) leads to unoriginal conclusions. Undervalued old literature often holds crucial insights (e.g., MoE, LSTM, backpropagation). Richard Sutton's "The Bitter Lesson" or Claude Shannon's 1952 talk on creative thinking are more predictive than lengthy modern surveys. Breadth matters as much as depth: draw from neuroscience, mechanism design, hardware knowledge, and honest statistics. Read papers directly, especially appendices and limitations sections. **Write Everything Down:** As Paul Graham noted, writing exposes flaws in seemingly mature ideas. Writing is the cheapest defense against self-deception. Following Feynman's principle, Darwin programmatically wrote down facts contradicting his theory to combat memory bias. Maintain a detailed log of hypotheses, setups, predictions, results, and updated understandings. Reviewing past logs fosters essential humility.

marsbit46 мин. назад

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

marsbit46 мин. назад

Following US Ban on Fable 5, Zhipu AI's Stock Soars 47%

On June 15th, shares of Zhipu AI surged dramatically on the Hong Kong stock market, peaking at a 47.6% gain before closing 32.82% higher. This sharp increase was directly triggered by two recent industry events. On June 12th, Anthropic announced it was suspending global access to its latest flagship models, Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5, to comply with a U.S. government export control order. The next day, Zhipu AI announced it would open access to its latest open-source flagship model, GLM-5.2, under the permissive MIT license. The Anthropic incident highlighted a critical issue beyond raw model capability: the risk of sudden, unpredictable loss of access to advanced AI models, especially for developers and enterprises deeply integrated with them. This has shifted industry and market focus toward factors like stability, sustainable access, and controllability. Zhipu's move, promoting "frontier intelligence for all," positions its openly available model as a reliable and accessible alternative. The GLM-5.2 model emphasizes "Long Horizon Task" capabilities with a 1M context window, targeting complex, multi-step coding and engineering workflows where maintaining context is crucial. Analysts note this event exposes the risk of dependency on closed-source models subject to single jurisdictional controls, potentially accelerating a shift toward domestic base models and localized deployments. The market's reaction signals a new valuation dimension in AI: providers who can offer stable, long-term, and sustainably accessible AI capabilities are gaining strategic importance.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Following US Ban on Fable 5, Zhipu AI's Stock Soars 47%

marsbit1 ч. назад

Fully Entering the AI Era: Alipay Bets on Conversation, WeChat Holds Fast to Social

In May 2026, Alipay announced over 300 million AI payment transactions. Shortly after, WeChat opened its mini-programs for AI integration, sparking controversy by requiring developer source code access. This highlights their diverging approaches to AI integration. Alipay is testing "Project Treasure," an optional AI-native interface replacing traditional app grids with a conversational window. Users can command complex tasks (e.g., "book a ride and order coffee") handled end-to-end by AI. This shift follows an abandoned standalone AI app, focusing instead on enhancing its existing user base. For unmodified mini-programs, Alipay's AI uses "screen-reading" to simulate user interactions, bypassing the need for developer overhaul. It also introduced "Token Pay" for micro-transactions and "AI Wallets" for autonomous agent spending. WeChat, prioritizing its core social function, is taking an embedded approach. Its AI agent will operate within existing contexts like group chats and official accounts, assisting without a separate interface. To enable this, WeChat offers developers two paths: granting source code access for direct AI control ("Automatic Mode") or manually encapsulating services into standardized "Skills." Both place significant burden on developers. Key differences emerge in handling legacy services: WeChat demands developer cooperation (code or labor), while Alipay's screen-reading offers immediate, if potentially less stable, compatibility. Alipay's 3 billion AI transactions demonstrate user acceptance of AI-driven commercial actions. The divergent strategies may reshape mini-program ecosystems—Alipay passively "AI-fying" services, WeChat potentially favoring resource-rich developers—and set competing technical standards. Ultimately, the competition centers on where users entrust the command to "help me get things done."

marsbit1 ч. назад

Fully Entering the AI Era: Alipay Bets on Conversation, WeChat Holds Fast to Social

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片