ABA Survey Shows User Concerns On Stablecoins In Crypto Market Structure Bill Debate

bitcoinistОпубликовано 2026-03-11Обновлено 2026-03-11

Введение

The debate over the CLARITY Act, which aims to define the U.S. crypto market structure, remains stalled amid disagreements between the banking and crypto sectors. At an American Bankers Association (ABA) summit, Senator Angela Alsobrooks highlighted the complexity of negotiations, noting that both sides are likely to be dissatisfied. Banking representatives view stablecoin rewards as a threat to traditional deposits, while the crypto industry argues they are essential consumer incentives. A new ABA survey revealed that 42% of consumers support banning stablecoin rewards if they limit banks' lending capacity. Additionally, 90% of respondents do not currently own stablecoins, and only 17% are likely to use them in the next year. ABA CEO Rob Nichols emphasized that crypto companies offering bank-like products should meet the same regulatory standards as banks. The legislation's next critical step is a Senate Banking Committee markup. If approved, it could merge with a version from the Senate Agriculture Committee before a full Senate vote.

The debate surrounding the CLARITY Act, a key piece of legislation aimed at defining the crypto market structure in the US, remains stalled as the banking and crypto sectors engage in a fierce contest for its passage.

Negotiations Between Banking And Crypto Sectors

At an American Bankers Association (ABA) summit in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday, Democratic Senator Angela Alsobrooks emphasized the complexity of ongoing negotiations between the two financial sectors.

She noted that both banking representatives—who view stablecoin rewards as a potential threat to traditional deposits—and the crypto industry, which argues that these rewards serve as essential consumer incentives, are likely to leave the table feeling “just a little bit unhappy.”

Notably, Senator Alsobrooks has been collaborating with Republican Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina to facilitate the long-delayed Senate Banking Committee markup on the legislation.

As reported by Bitcoinist last week, the current dynamics surrounding the CLARITY Act suggest that even if Democrats oppose it in upcoming committee discussions, it could still advance along party lines.

In such a scenario, Tillis’ support would be crucial if the Democrats remain unified in their opposition to the bill’s key provisions. His decisions could ultimately determine whether the legislation moves forward or remains at a standstill. Alsobrooks explained:

The compromise that Senator Tillis and I are working on is designed to put guardrails in place. We want to prevent deposit flight while allowing innovation to flourish.

42% Favor Ban On Stablecoin Rewards

The American Bankers Association also presented new survey results that underscore the sector’s concerns. Consumers, by a margin of 6-to-1, agree that as Congress establishes rules for digital assets, it should proceed cautiously to avoid undermining the existing financial system, particularly regarding community banks.

Additionally, 42% of consumers believe that Congress should prohibit stablecoin issuers from offering interest and rewards if such practices threaten to limit the funds banks have available for lending.

The survey further revealed that stablecoin adoption remains low, with 90% of respondents indicating they do not currently own any stablecoin, and 80% stating that they have never owned one. Only 17% expressed a likelihood of buying or using stablecoins in the next year.

ABA President and CEO Rob Nichols reiterated the need for regulation: “Consumers are clear: Any fintech or crypto company offering bank-like products should adhere to the same rigorous standards that apply to banks,” he stated.

As negotiations continue, with President Donald Trump openly supporting the crypto sector, the next crucial step will be a Senate Banking Committee markup hearing.

If the CLARITY Act passes this stage, it could be merged with a version that has already gained approval from the Senate Agriculture Committee. Subsequently, a final version would be put forth for a vote in the full Senate.

The daily chart shows the total crypto market cap at $2.36 trillion on Tuesday. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the main reason the banking sector is concerned about stablecoin rewards according to the ABA survey?

AThe banking sector views stablecoin rewards as a potential threat to traditional deposits, fearing they could lead to deposit flight and limit the funds banks have available for lending.

QWhat percentage of consumers surveyed by the ABA believe Congress should ban stablecoin rewards if they threaten bank lending?

A42% of consumers believe Congress should prohibit stablecoin issuers from offering interest and rewards if such practices threaten to limit bank lending funds.

QWho are the key senators working on a compromise for the CLARITY Act, and what is their stated goal?

ADemocratic Senator Angela Alsobrooks and Republican Senator Thom Tillis are working on a compromise. Their goal is to put guardrails in place to prevent deposit flight while allowing innovation to flourish.

QWhat does the ABA survey reveal about current stablecoin adoption among consumers?

AThe survey shows stablecoin adoption remains low, with 90% of respondents not currently owning any stablecoin and 80% stating they have never owned one. Only 17% expressed a likelihood of buying or using stablecoins in the next year.

QWhat is the next crucial legislative step for the CLARITY Act after ongoing negotiations?

AThe next crucial step is a Senate Banking Committee markup hearing. If it passes there, it could be merged with a version approved by the Senate Agriculture Committee and then put to a vote in the full Senate.

Похожее

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

**Summary: The Value Distribution of Stablecoins** The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from mere trading tools into broader channels for dollar access. It divides the stablecoin ecosystem into four layers to analyze how value is distributed: 1. **Issuance Layer:** Mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the spread between reserve yield and user costs (e.g., Tether, Circle). This layer currently earns the largest profit margin. 2. **Infrastructure Layer:** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and asset management (e.g., Bridge, BVNK). This is the "unglamorous" but critical work, building the essential bridges between crypto and real-world finance. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer:** Integrates stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and provides enterprise financial software (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase). They act as the access point for businesses. 4. **Application Layer:** The end-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlements, or as a store of value. They benefit from convenience but have little pricing power. The core thesis is that while the issuance layer currently dominates profits, the often-overlooked **infrastructure layer holds significant long-term potential**. The real challenge and barrier to mass adoption is not the on-chain transfer of stablecoins (which is simple), but the complex "last mile" integration into existing business workflows, banking systems, and regulatory frameworks across different countries. Companies in this layer are currently in a "land grab" phase, investing heavily to build networks, secure bank partnerships, and establish compliance pathways. While their position is currently pressured by the profitable issuers above and distribution platforms below, the article suggests that if stablecoins become a default financial rail for businesses, the infrastructure providers who have done the hard work of integration will ultimately gain strong pricing power and become entrenched, essential players.

marsbit1 ч. назад

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

marsbit1 ч. назад

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from a mere trading tool into a broad "dollar channel." It analyzes the industry's value chain through four layers: 1. **Issuance Layer (e.g., Tether, Circle):** The top layer that mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the thickest interest rate spread. 2. **Infrastructure Layer (e.g., Bridge, BVNK):** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling critical but complex "dirty work" like fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and cross-border settlement. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase):** Embeds stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and integrates with enterprise software. 4. **Application Layer:** End-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlement, or storing value. The author posits that while the issuance layer currently captures the most profit, the most overlooked and potentially critical layer is infrastructure. The core challenge for stablecoin adoption isn't the on-chain transfer (which is simple), but bridging the gap between blockchain and the real-world financial system. This involves solving practical problems for businesses: fiat conversion, reconciliation, tax handling, and user onboarding. Infrastructure companies are currently in a difficult "land-grab" phase—building networks, securing banking relationships, and achieving compliance country-by-country. They face pressure from both the profitable issuance layer above and distribution platforms below. However, the author suggests this layer is building a crucial moat. Once stablecoins become a default business rail, the infrastructure players who have done the hard work of integration may gain significant, durable value and pricing power.

链捕手1 ч. назад

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

链捕手1 ч. назад

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

No one truly teaches you how to do research. You're often given a desk, a pre-selected problem, and vague instructions to "create something new." Consequently, many people reverse-engineer the job based on visible outputs—papers, posts, announcements—learning only how to *appear* like a researcher rather than how to *become* one. True research capability is built from stacking small, trainable skills, nearly all of which can be developed through deliberate practice. **Pick Your Own Problem:** Most researchers absorb problems from advisors or trends, lacking the underlying reasoning. Choosing a problem you genuinely care about, as John Schulman advises, leads to original work. Develop "taste" like a muscle: predict experiment outcomes, guess paper results from methods, and track which findings remain important over time. **Upgrade Your Inputs:** Relying on shared reading lists (arXiv hot lists, filtered group chats) leads to unoriginal conclusions. Undervalued old literature often holds crucial insights (e.g., MoE, LSTM, backpropagation). Richard Sutton's "The Bitter Lesson" or Claude Shannon's 1952 talk on creative thinking are more predictive than lengthy modern surveys. Breadth matters as much as depth: draw from neuroscience, mechanism design, hardware knowledge, and honest statistics. Read papers directly, especially appendices and limitations sections. **Write Everything Down:** As Paul Graham noted, writing exposes flaws in seemingly mature ideas. Writing is the cheapest defense against self-deception. Following Feynman's principle, Darwin programmatically wrote down facts contradicting his theory to combat memory bias. Maintain a detailed log of hypotheses, setups, predictions, results, and updated understandings. Reviewing past logs fosters essential humility.

marsbit3 ч. назад

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

marsbit3 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片