XRP Price Alert: The RSI Setup That Led To A 60,000% Surge Has Returned

bitcoinistОпубликовано 2026-06-10Обновлено 2026-06-10

Введение

Amid XRP's recent sell-off to $1, market watchers note the return of a rare monthly RSI signal that previously preceded massive rallies—like the 60,000% surge in 2017. The RSI is now around 41.6, described as a deep oversold level seen only four times in 13 years. While past signals led to gains between 1,000% and 60,000%, analyst Sam Daodu cautions that those astronomical percentages started from extremely low prices and are unlikely to repeat from today's higher base. A more plausible outcome, according to the report, would be a recovery to the cycle high near $3.65—roughly a 3x move—over the next couple of years. For a move significantly beyond that, fundamental catalysts like the CLARITY Act and genuine ETF demand would be needed. Even if the bottom is in, the report suggests the full rally could take until 2027 to develop.

Amid the recent sell-off that pushed the XRP price to test the key $1 support level, a small window of optimism has started to show up again. The token is beginning to align with a rare monthly relative strength index (RSI) setup that—according to past cycles—has appeared before major, explosive rallies.

According to market expert Sam Daodu, the last three times this signal flashed—in 2017, 2020, and 2022—XRP went on to rally dramatically afterward. The gains in those periods ranged from 1,000% to 60,000%. However, there’s an important caveat: those enormous percentage outcomes started from extremely low price levels.

XRP Price Watch

Sam Daodu identified that XRP’s monthly RSI has fallen to about 41.6. In the report’s framing, that reading is not just low—it’s described as the lowest ever. The RSI level is characterized as a deep-oversold zone that XRP has only reached four times in 13 years.

In theory, oversold conditions can sometimes mark the beginning of a turn, which is why the signal has drawn attention again after the XRP price tested $1. Still, Daodu’s view includes a reality check about expectations.

While the earlier examples of significant price increases may be inspiring, they were driven by market conditions that are not easily replicated. For example, when the XRP price was under a penny in 2017, the subsequent rally carried it to $3.84 — a five-figure percentage gain.

The report argues that simply applying the same percentage-gain math to today’s higher price base would imply XRP reaching prices in the hundreds of dollars—something Daodu suggests is not realistic in the current cycle.

The Next Rally Could Stretch To 2027

So the question becomes: if the pattern “holds,” what outcome is plausible rather than fantasy? In the report’s estimate, reclaiming the $3.65 cycle high over the next year or two would be roughly a 3x move from current levels.

That kind of recovery is presented as believable, assuming broader market sentiment turns in crypto’s favor. Going substantially higher, such as $5 or beyond, is described as requiring more than just a technical bounce for the XRP price.

The report ties that possibility to fundamental catalysts, specifically noting that it would depend on the CLARITY Act passing and exchange-traded fund (ETF) demand genuinely expanding, not only RSI strength returning.

Even if the XRP price bottom is already in, the report suggests the rally that follows could take until 2027 to fully develop. It also adds that a flat price through the summer wouldn’t necessarily break the pattern, because the monthly RSI setup is designed to play out gradually over a longer timeline.

The daily chart shows XRP’s recovery to $1.13 after last week’s crash. Source: XRPUSDT on TradingView.com

Featured image created with OpenArt; chart from TradingView.com

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the rare technical signal that has reappeared for XRP according to the article, and what historical precedents are cited?

AThe article states that XRP is beginning to align with a rare monthly Relative Strength Index (RSI) setup that has fallen to a deep-oversold zone, around 41.6. Historically, this signal appeared three times before major rallies: in 2017, 2020, and 2022, after which XRP saw gains ranging from 1,000% to 60,000%.

QWhy does market expert Sam Daodu caution against expecting a repeat of the 60,000% surge from the current price level?

ADaodu cautions that the enormous percentage gains in the past (like 60,000%) started from extremely low price levels, such as when XRP was under a penny in 2017. Applying the same percentage math to today's higher price base would imply unrealistic prices in the hundreds of dollars for the current cycle.

QWhat is presented as a more plausible price target for XRP in the next 1-2 years if the pattern holds?

AThe report estimates that a plausible outcome, if the pattern holds and broader market sentiment improves, would be for XRP to reclaim its cycle high of $3.65. This would represent roughly a 3x move from the price levels mentioned in the article.

QAccording to the article, what fundamental developments would be required for XRP to move substantially beyond the $3.65 target, such as reaching $5 or more?

AThe report states that moving substantially higher than $3.65 would require more than just a technical bounce. It would depend on fundamental catalysts, specifically the passing of the CLARITY Act and a genuine expansion in exchange-traded fund (ETF) demand.

QWhat is the suggested timeline for a potential rally to fully develop, even if the price bottom is already in?

AThe article suggests that even if the price bottom for XRP is already in, the subsequent rally could take until 2027 to fully develop. It adds that a flat price through the summer wouldn't necessarily break the pattern, as the monthly RSI setup plays out gradually over a longer timeline.

Похожее

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

No one truly teaches you how to do research. You're often given a desk, a pre-selected problem, and vague instructions to "create something new." Consequently, many people reverse-engineer the job based on visible outputs—papers, posts, announcements—learning only how to *appear* like a researcher rather than how to *become* one. True research capability is built from stacking small, trainable skills, nearly all of which can be developed through deliberate practice. **Pick Your Own Problem:** Most researchers absorb problems from advisors or trends, lacking the underlying reasoning. Choosing a problem you genuinely care about, as John Schulman advises, leads to original work. Develop "taste" like a muscle: predict experiment outcomes, guess paper results from methods, and track which findings remain important over time. **Upgrade Your Inputs:** Relying on shared reading lists (arXiv hot lists, filtered group chats) leads to unoriginal conclusions. Undervalued old literature often holds crucial insights (e.g., MoE, LSTM, backpropagation). Richard Sutton's "The Bitter Lesson" or Claude Shannon's 1952 talk on creative thinking are more predictive than lengthy modern surveys. Breadth matters as much as depth: draw from neuroscience, mechanism design, hardware knowledge, and honest statistics. Read papers directly, especially appendices and limitations sections. **Write Everything Down:** As Paul Graham noted, writing exposes flaws in seemingly mature ideas. Writing is the cheapest defense against self-deception. Following Feynman's principle, Darwin programmatically wrote down facts contradicting his theory to combat memory bias. Maintain a detailed log of hypotheses, setups, predictions, results, and updated understandings. Reviewing past logs fosters essential humility.

marsbit13 мин. назад

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

marsbit13 мин. назад

Following US Ban on Fable 5, Zhipu AI's Stock Soars 47%

On June 15th, shares of Zhipu AI surged dramatically on the Hong Kong stock market, peaking at a 47.6% gain before closing 32.82% higher. This sharp increase was directly triggered by two recent industry events. On June 12th, Anthropic announced it was suspending global access to its latest flagship models, Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5, to comply with a U.S. government export control order. The next day, Zhipu AI announced it would open access to its latest open-source flagship model, GLM-5.2, under the permissive MIT license. The Anthropic incident highlighted a critical issue beyond raw model capability: the risk of sudden, unpredictable loss of access to advanced AI models, especially for developers and enterprises deeply integrated with them. This has shifted industry and market focus toward factors like stability, sustainable access, and controllability. Zhipu's move, promoting "frontier intelligence for all," positions its openly available model as a reliable and accessible alternative. The GLM-5.2 model emphasizes "Long Horizon Task" capabilities with a 1M context window, targeting complex, multi-step coding and engineering workflows where maintaining context is crucial. Analysts note this event exposes the risk of dependency on closed-source models subject to single jurisdictional controls, potentially accelerating a shift toward domestic base models and localized deployments. The market's reaction signals a new valuation dimension in AI: providers who can offer stable, long-term, and sustainably accessible AI capabilities are gaining strategic importance.

marsbit37 мин. назад

Following US Ban on Fable 5, Zhipu AI's Stock Soars 47%

marsbit37 мин. назад

Fully Entering the AI Era: Alipay Bets on Conversation, WeChat Holds Fast to Social

In May 2026, Alipay announced over 300 million AI payment transactions. Shortly after, WeChat opened its mini-programs for AI integration, sparking controversy by requiring developer source code access. This highlights their diverging approaches to AI integration. Alipay is testing "Project Treasure," an optional AI-native interface replacing traditional app grids with a conversational window. Users can command complex tasks (e.g., "book a ride and order coffee") handled end-to-end by AI. This shift follows an abandoned standalone AI app, focusing instead on enhancing its existing user base. For unmodified mini-programs, Alipay's AI uses "screen-reading" to simulate user interactions, bypassing the need for developer overhaul. It also introduced "Token Pay" for micro-transactions and "AI Wallets" for autonomous agent spending. WeChat, prioritizing its core social function, is taking an embedded approach. Its AI agent will operate within existing contexts like group chats and official accounts, assisting without a separate interface. To enable this, WeChat offers developers two paths: granting source code access for direct AI control ("Automatic Mode") or manually encapsulating services into standardized "Skills." Both place significant burden on developers. Key differences emerge in handling legacy services: WeChat demands developer cooperation (code or labor), while Alipay's screen-reading offers immediate, if potentially less stable, compatibility. Alipay's 3 billion AI transactions demonstrate user acceptance of AI-driven commercial actions. The divergent strategies may reshape mini-program ecosystems—Alipay passively "AI-fying" services, WeChat potentially favoring resource-rich developers—and set competing technical standards. Ultimately, the competition centers on where users entrust the command to "help me get things done."

marsbit37 мин. назад

Fully Entering the AI Era: Alipay Bets on Conversation, WeChat Holds Fast to Social

marsbit37 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片