Breaking: KeyFi Files Lawsuit Against Celsius, Millions Of Dollars At Risk?

BitcoinistОпубликовано 2022-07-08Обновлено 2022-07-08

Введение

The popular pseudonym Twitter account Oxb1 has revealed the identity of the user behind it and, as rumors claimed, it...

The popular pseudonym Twitter account Oxb1 has revealed the identity of the user behind it and, as rumors claimed, it is linked to lending company Celsius. Jason Stone founder and CEO of investment firm KeyFi wrote a thread explaining its relationship with the lending company and why it has decided to file a lawsuit against it.
Filed on July 7th in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, KeyFi accused Celsius of not honoring its contractual obligations to pay for “the millions of dollars it is owed” to the Stone-led company. This entity entered into a handshake agreement with Celsius to manage its clients’ funds.
The lending and borrowing crypto company attracts clients by offering high interest on their deposits, as the document explained, this forced them to seek yield with an external party, KeyFi. The latter took the funds and invested them in decentralized finance protocols, staking, non-fungible tokens (NFTs), and other strategies.
The company managed the funds via the Oxb1 Ethereum address which held millions of dollars in Celsius’ client funds. In late 2020, the document claims, KeyFi and Celsius decided to formalize their agreement and create a new company called Celsius KeyFi. Stone explained:
After discussions with Celsius in mid 2020, Celsius began an acquisition of KeyFi’s assets and team. Thereafter, I pivoted KeyFi to staking and deploying DeFi strategies for Celsius. In August 2020, 0xb1 was created, along with other addresses, to send Celsius’ customer deposits to us to manage.
Clients were unaware of these activities and were unaware that the company included, as part of their terms of service, a clause in which they allegedly agreed to transfer ownership of the funds from their addresses to Celsius. At one point, KeyFi managed over $2 billion in assets.

Bitcoin Celsius BTC BTCUSD

BTC’s price trends to the downside on the 4-hour chart. Source: BTCUSD Tradingview Celsius A Ponzi Scheme?
In late 2021, Stone and his team discovered that “Celsius had lied to us”. KeyFi was tasked with setting positions and applying investment strategies under the agreement that Celsius was hedging their actions.
However, Stone discovered that the company had “naked exposure to the market”. In other words, Celsius was not mitigating the risk from KeyFi positions or protecting itself against impermanent loss.
In addition, the document clients that the company was using its clients’ funds to prompt up the value of its native token CEL and manipulate the market. The document filed with the NY court says:
The parties’ relationship began to break down when Stone discovered that not only did Defendants lack basic security controls to protect the billions of dollars in customers’ funds they held, but that they were actively using customer funds to manipulate crypto-asset markets to their benefit. The most egregious example of this was Plaintiff’s discovery that Celsius used customer bitcoin deposits to inflate its own crypto-asset called the “Celsius token” (“CEL”).
In March 2021, Stone and his team decided to terminate the relationship but were met with opposition from Celsius. Stone claims he has been trying to reach an agreement with the company but failed.
Celsius has been attracting a lot of attention after it halted all users’ withdrawals, and allegedly entered a state of insolvency. Thus, Stone and KeyFi are looking for compensation via court.
The exact amount of money to be paid to KeyFi, if they win the case, will be determined by the court.
Given the public speculation about the company’s solvency, and my observation of Celsius’ loose relationship with the truth, I feel it is only prudent to finally set the record straight. I have brought legal action against Celsius to settle this issue once and for all.
— 0xb1 (@0x_b1) July 7, 2022
The document accused the CEO and Celsius’ founder Alex Mashinsky of “enriching himself” and allegedly transferring funds from the Oxb1 address to “his wife” and the company of running a “Ponzi Scheme”. At the time of writing, there is no official statement from Mashinsky or Celsius about these accusations.

Похожее

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

No one truly teaches you how to do research. You're often given a desk, a pre-selected problem, and vague instructions to "create something new." Consequently, many people reverse-engineer the job based on visible outputs—papers, posts, announcements—learning only how to *appear* like a researcher rather than how to *become* one. True research capability is built from stacking small, trainable skills, nearly all of which can be developed through deliberate practice. **Pick Your Own Problem:** Most researchers absorb problems from advisors or trends, lacking the underlying reasoning. Choosing a problem you genuinely care about, as John Schulman advises, leads to original work. Develop "taste" like a muscle: predict experiment outcomes, guess paper results from methods, and track which findings remain important over time. **Upgrade Your Inputs:** Relying on shared reading lists (arXiv hot lists, filtered group chats) leads to unoriginal conclusions. Undervalued old literature often holds crucial insights (e.g., MoE, LSTM, backpropagation). Richard Sutton's "The Bitter Lesson" or Claude Shannon's 1952 talk on creative thinking are more predictive than lengthy modern surveys. Breadth matters as much as depth: draw from neuroscience, mechanism design, hardware knowledge, and honest statistics. Read papers directly, especially appendices and limitations sections. **Write Everything Down:** As Paul Graham noted, writing exposes flaws in seemingly mature ideas. Writing is the cheapest defense against self-deception. Following Feynman's principle, Darwin programmatically wrote down facts contradicting his theory to combat memory bias. Maintain a detailed log of hypotheses, setups, predictions, results, and updated understandings. Reviewing past logs fosters essential humility.

marsbit1 ч. назад

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

marsbit1 ч. назад

Following US Ban on Fable 5, Zhipu AI's Stock Soars 47%

On June 15th, shares of Zhipu AI surged dramatically on the Hong Kong stock market, peaking at a 47.6% gain before closing 32.82% higher. This sharp increase was directly triggered by two recent industry events. On June 12th, Anthropic announced it was suspending global access to its latest flagship models, Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5, to comply with a U.S. government export control order. The next day, Zhipu AI announced it would open access to its latest open-source flagship model, GLM-5.2, under the permissive MIT license. The Anthropic incident highlighted a critical issue beyond raw model capability: the risk of sudden, unpredictable loss of access to advanced AI models, especially for developers and enterprises deeply integrated with them. This has shifted industry and market focus toward factors like stability, sustainable access, and controllability. Zhipu's move, promoting "frontier intelligence for all," positions its openly available model as a reliable and accessible alternative. The GLM-5.2 model emphasizes "Long Horizon Task" capabilities with a 1M context window, targeting complex, multi-step coding and engineering workflows where maintaining context is crucial. Analysts note this event exposes the risk of dependency on closed-source models subject to single jurisdictional controls, potentially accelerating a shift toward domestic base models and localized deployments. The market's reaction signals a new valuation dimension in AI: providers who can offer stable, long-term, and sustainably accessible AI capabilities are gaining strategic importance.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Following US Ban on Fable 5, Zhipu AI's Stock Soars 47%

marsbit1 ч. назад

Fully Entering the AI Era: Alipay Bets on Conversation, WeChat Holds Fast to Social

In May 2026, Alipay announced over 300 million AI payment transactions. Shortly after, WeChat opened its mini-programs for AI integration, sparking controversy by requiring developer source code access. This highlights their diverging approaches to AI integration. Alipay is testing "Project Treasure," an optional AI-native interface replacing traditional app grids with a conversational window. Users can command complex tasks (e.g., "book a ride and order coffee") handled end-to-end by AI. This shift follows an abandoned standalone AI app, focusing instead on enhancing its existing user base. For unmodified mini-programs, Alipay's AI uses "screen-reading" to simulate user interactions, bypassing the need for developer overhaul. It also introduced "Token Pay" for micro-transactions and "AI Wallets" for autonomous agent spending. WeChat, prioritizing its core social function, is taking an embedded approach. Its AI agent will operate within existing contexts like group chats and official accounts, assisting without a separate interface. To enable this, WeChat offers developers two paths: granting source code access for direct AI control ("Automatic Mode") or manually encapsulating services into standardized "Skills." Both place significant burden on developers. Key differences emerge in handling legacy services: WeChat demands developer cooperation (code or labor), while Alipay's screen-reading offers immediate, if potentially less stable, compatibility. Alipay's 3 billion AI transactions demonstrate user acceptance of AI-driven commercial actions. The divergent strategies may reshape mini-program ecosystems—Alipay passively "AI-fying" services, WeChat potentially favoring resource-rich developers—and set competing technical standards. Ultimately, the competition centers on where users entrust the command to "help me get things done."

marsbit1 ч. назад

Fully Entering the AI Era: Alipay Bets on Conversation, WeChat Holds Fast to Social

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片