US and South Korea Set to Share Data on the Terra-Luna Meltdown

CryptoPotatoОпубликовано 2022-07-07Обновлено 2022-07-07

Введение

The latest cross-border partnership will focus on probing crypto and other financial crimes.

In the aftermath of Terra’s historic debacle, regulatory scrutiny targetting the stablecoin industry through cooperative measures across borders has become urgent to authorities worldwide. According to a recent report, South Korean Justice Minister Han Dong-hoon has discussed with US officials potentially enhancing cooperation in fighting against security fraud and financial crimes.
Strengthening Ties on Crypto Regulations
Han Dong-hoon met chief officials from the US Securities and Commodities Task Force during a visit to New York on Tuesday, nodding for a cooperative investigation with the US agencies on the potential crimes involved in Terra’s collapse.
The partnership aims to strengthen information exchange across borders, doubling down investigative efforts on crypto and other financial crimes. In particular, Terra – the project being probed in both countries – is under the spotlight again:
“The two sides also agreed to share their latest investigation data on ongoing crypto cases, including the high-profile case surrounding the meltdown of stablecoin TerraUSD and its digital coin counterpart, Luna.”
The fall of Terra has caught legal scrutiny from global authorities. Last month, Korean prosecutors launched an investigation on the team, looking into possible fraud charges and market manipulation. Reportedly, a key member of the group was even banned from leaving the country.
Meanwhile, the SEC – the top US securities watchdog – expanded its scope of investigation on the Terra-based DeFi platform Mirror Protocol. The regulatory entity believed the protocol could have violated the Securities Act by offering investors to transact tokenized versions of popular stocks like Tesla and Airbnb.
In addition, the agency also looked into if the co-founder and CEO of Terra – Do Kwon – had violated the investor-protection regulations when he promoted UST and Luna before they collapsed.
Cross-Border Partnerships
Last week, the UK and US issued a joint statement on strengthening regulatory outcomes for digital assets across jurisdictions. Both authorities expressed concerns regarding the role of stablecoins and crypto-asset trading and lending platforms as the broader market downturn has revealed issues rooted in some problematic projects.
This came in the wake of crypto firms falling apart largely due to overly leveraging their existing assets during the bull market. As the bear market hits the industry, some have to file bankruptcy or claim insolvency as their debts pile up and their crypto positions get liquidated.

Похожее

Bitcoin Trading Strategy Breakdown: Celebrity Predictions and Classic Models All Fail, Only These Four Indicators Remain

Analysis of Bitcoin Trading Strategies: Why Celebrity Forecasts and Classic Models Fail, Leaving Only These Four Reliable Indicators This analysis examines the failure of common Bitcoin prediction methods and identifies four reliable indicators for constructing a trading strategy. The author reviewed all major BTC prediction approaches from 2017-2025, categorizing them into three groups: celebrity price targets (consistently over-optimistic), analytical models like Stock-to-Flow (broken post-2022), and on-chain signals. The key finding is that more data often creates confusion, not clarity. The strategy discards unreliable elements: celebrity predictions (incentivized to be extreme), pure models (invalidated by post-ETF market changes), and the Fear & Greed Index used alone (too many false signals). Four reliable indicators were selected: 1. **MVRV Z-Score:** Accurately identifies cycle bottoms when entering its green zone (e.g., 2018, 2020, 2022). Note: Its ability to call tops is now ineffective post-2024. 2. **SOPR (28-day MA):** Consistently signals bottoms when below 1.0, indicating holders are selling at a loss. 3. **ETF Net Flow:** A crucial post-2024 metric showing institutional momentum (e.g., sustained inflows = buying). 4. **Macro Liquidity (Fed policy & M2):** Sets the overall directional bias (e.g., bullish during easing cycles). The core strategy involves waiting for a multi-signal共振 (resonance). For example, a bottom signal requires MVRV in the green zone + SOPR < 1.0. A top signal requires overheated on-chain data + sustained ETF outflows. Macro policy sets the overall direction. The Fear & Greed Index is only used as a weighted confirmatory signal, never alone. Action is only taken when three or more indicators align. The author automated this into a monitoring system that sends Telegram alerts only when signals trigger. As of the article's date (April 15, 2026), the system showed a strong bottom signal: extreme fear (F&G=12), MVRV in the buy zone, and SOPR < 1.0. The only contrary signal was weak ETF flows. Historically, such triple on-chain共振 has preceded 100%+ returns. The conclusion emphasizes building a personal framework over relying on external predictions, allowing for iterative improvement and customization based on individual risk tolerance.

marsbit47 мин. назад

Bitcoin Trading Strategy Breakdown: Celebrity Predictions and Classic Models All Fail, Only These Four Indicators Remain

marsbit47 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片