如何看待香港发布稳定币发行人监管制度的咨询总结?| 曼昆律师速评

币界网Опубликовано 2024-07-24Обновлено 2024-07-24

币界网报道:

2024 年 7 月 17 日,香港财经事务及库务局(财库局)和金管局联合发布关于稳定币发行人拟议监管制度的咨询总结。

RIyCgF77m9.png

* 香港金管局新闻稿截图

此次咨询共计收集了来自 108 个市场参与者、行业协会、商业团体及其他相关方的反馈。绝大多数反馈支持为稳定币发行引入监管措施,以确保货币及金融稳定,同时增强透明度和提供充分的保护措施。此外,参与者普遍认可提出的监管要求和实施方案。与此同时,金管局也发布了稳定币发行人沙盒的参与名单。

随着稳定币在香港的推广逐步实现,其对本地加密货币行业的影响日益显著。为进一步探讨此趋势,曼昆律所特邀香港办公室负责人白溱与多年深度参与 Web3 的毛捷豪律师,共同分析稳定币发行及监管对香港加密行业未来发展的潜在影响。

白溱

曼昆律师事务所香港办公室负责人

香港公布了关于稳定币的咨询结果,这是虚拟资产领域的重要发展。此举在去年六月实施虚拟资产服务提供者牌照要求后进行,突显了香港政府在整合传统金融系统与蓬勃发展的虚拟资产市场方面的积极立场。

提议的监管框架强调基于风险和务实的方法来监管法币挂钩稳定币发行者。关键要求包括严格的储备管理和稳定机制,要求发行者用高质量和高流动性的储备资产充分支持稳定币。赎回要求和治理标准也是提议法规的关键方面,旨在确保投资者保护并减少对货币和金融稳定性的潜在风险。

为保障稳定币用户,提议的法规建议只有以下实体才能在香港出售法币挂钩稳定币或积极向公众推广此类服务:

  • 获得香港证监会牌照的稳定币发行者

  • 获得香港金融管理局认可的机构(如银行)

  • 获得香港证监会牌照的公司

  • 获得香港证监会牌照的虚拟资产交易平台

这些举措旨在确保市场规范化,促进金融科技创新,并进一步增强香港作为国际金融中心的地位。我很高兴看到这一最新进展,并坚信清晰的监管框架将鼓励更多公司参与这一领域的市场,从而提升香港虚拟资产领域的发展和信誉。

毛捷豪

曼昆律师事务所民商事团队

香港的稳定币发行人监管制度是这两天非常重要的监管议题,看到香港合规稳定币的逐步推进,感触颇深。Web3 发展至今,稳定币功不可没,在当下及不远的未来,包括跨境支付、链上金融在内的多个领域,稳定币已经且将持续扮演非常重要的角色,可以说是 Web3 发展的基石之一。

长期以来,我始终是支持对 Web3 进行部分中心化监管的,监管的意义在于从普世的角度对善意的用户进行最基本的制度保护,只有以相对中心化的方式让更多的人在进入的阶段信赖这个行业,相信自己不会无故受损,行业才能获得更多的增量和繁荣。稳定币作为重要基础设施,较之其他加密货币能触及更多的用户和场景,也是打通 Web2 和 Web3 的桥梁,应当以更高级别的合规义务对相关主体进行要求,避免再次发生 luna 事件。相信随着香港关于稳定币的制度不断落地后,围绕香港发展的 Web3 生态的更多可能性,将在不远的未来一一实现。

Похожее

Where Is the AI Infrastructure Industry Chain Stuck?

The AI infrastructure (AI Infra) industry chain is facing unprecedented systemic bottlenecks, despite the rapid emergence of applications like DeepSeek and Seedance 2.0. The surge in global computing demand has exposed critical constraints across multiple layers of the supply chain—from core manufacturing equipment and data center cabling to specialty materials and cleanroom facilities. Key challenges include four major "walls": - **Memory Wall**: High-bandwidth memory (HBM) and DRAM face structural shortages as AI inference demand outpaces training, with new capacity not expected until 2027. - **Bandwidth Wall**: Data transfer speeds lag behind computing power, causing multi-level bottlenecks in-chip, between chips, and across data centers. - **Compute Wall**: Advanced chip manufacturing, reliant on EUV lithography and monopolized by ASML, remains the fundamental constraint, with supply chain fragility affecting production. - **Power Wall**: While energy demand from data centers is rising, power supply is a solvable near-term challenge through diversified energy infrastructure. Expansion is further hindered by shortages in testing equipment, IC substrates (critical for GPUs and seeing price hikes over 30%), specialty materials like low-CTE glass fiber, and high-end cleanroom facilities. Connection technologies are evolving, with copper cables resurging for short-range links due to cost and latency advantages, while optical solutions dominate long-range scenarios. Innovations like hollow-core fiber and advanced PCB technologies (e.g., glass substrates, mSAP) are emerging to meet bandwidth needs. In summary, AI Infra bottlenecks are multidimensional, spanning compute, memory, bandwidth, power, and supply chain logistics. Advanced chip manufacturing remains the core constraint, while substrate, material, and equipment shortages present immediate challenges. The industry is moving toward hybrid copper-optical solutions and accelerated domestic supply chain development.

marsbit47 мин. назад

Where Is the AI Infrastructure Industry Chain Stuck?

marsbit47 мин. назад

Autonomy or Compatibility: The Choice Facing China's AI Ecosystem Behind the Delay of DeepSeek V4

DeepSeek V4's repeated delay in early 2026 has sparked global discussions on "de-CUDA-ization" in AI. The highly anticipated trillion-parameter open-source model is undergoing deep adaptation to Huawei’s Ascend chips using the CANN framework, representing China’s first systematic attempt to run a core AI model outside the CUDA ecosystem. This shift, however, comes with significant engineering challenges. While the model uses a MoE architecture to reduce computational load, it places extreme demands on memory bandwidth, chip interconnects, and system scheduling—areas where NVIDIA’s mature CUDA ecosystem currently excels. Migrating to Ascend introduces complexities in hardware topology, communication latency, and software optimization due to CANN’s relative immaturity compared to CUDA. The move highlights a broader strategic dilemma: short-term compatibility with CUDA offers practical benefits and faster adoption, as seen in CANN’s efforts to emulate CUDA interfaces. Yet, long-term over-reliance on compatibility risks inheriting CUDA’s limitations and stifling native innovation. If global AI shifts away from transformer-based architectures, strict compatibility could lead to technological obsolescence. Despite these challenges, DeepSeek V4’s eventual release could demonstrate the viability of a full domestic AI stack and accelerate CANN’s ecosystem growth. However, true technological independence will require building an original software-hardware paradigm beyond compatibility—a critical task for China’s AI ambitions in the next 3-5 years.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Autonomy or Compatibility: The Choice Facing China's AI Ecosystem Behind the Delay of DeepSeek V4

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片