1.8 Trillion, The Largest Unicorn in History Shut Down

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-05-08Обновлено 2026-05-08

Введение

On May 6, 2026, Elon Musk announced that xAI, the AI startup he founded in 2023, would be dissolved as an independent entity and fully merged into SpaceX under the new name SpaceXAI. Concurrently, SpaceX agreed to lease its massive Colossus 1 data center, containing 220,000 Nvidia GPUs, to its competitor Anthropic. xAI's journey was meteoric. Formed with a 12-person team from DeepMind, OpenAI, and Google, it launched its "unrestricted" chatbot Grok within months. The company raised over $25 billion, reaching a peak valuation of $250 billion. However, it soon faced intense regulatory scrutiny over Grok's controversial outputs and saw a complete exodus of its founding team. Following SpaceX's $250 billion all-stock acquisition of xAI in February 2026, a rapid internal restructuring effectively ended its independence. The shutdown is strategically tied to SpaceX's upcoming historic IPO, targeting a valuation between $1.75 and $2 trillion. By leasing Colossus 1, SpaceX positions itself as a key AI infrastructure provider ahead of the listing. The merger also consolidates Musk's AI, space, defense, and automotive ambitions under one roof, with future plans exploring orbital AI computing. While the xAI brand is gone, its technology and objectives live on within SpaceX, setting the stage for Musk's next, larger act.

Another AI unicorn is gone.

Elon Musk announced that xAI has been merged into SpaceX, renamed SpaceXAI, and will no longer exist as an independent company.

xAI was founded in 2023. Musk led a 12-person team poached from DeepMind, OpenAI, and Google, and built the first version of Grok in four months. It raised over $25 billion in total funding, with its valuation once reaching $250 billion. Then came a series of departures among co-founders, followed by regulatory investigations, SpaceX's acquisition, and subsequent restructuring. From an independent company to its complete erasure, the whole process took just three months.

The rise and fall of this company is a story about speed, ambition, and integration. Its endpoint points to a bigger play: SpaceX's century IPO.

The Shut-Down Giant

xAI is gone.

On May 6th, Musk made two announcements on the same day. The first: xAI will no longer exist as an independent company and, after being merged into SpaceX, has been renamed SpaceXAI. The second: SpaceX has leased the entire Colossus 1 data center to Anthropic, consisting of 220,000 NVIDIA GPUs and over 300 megawatts of computing power, to be delivered within the month.

Placing these two events together creates a somewhat peculiar picture.

xAI and Anthropic were among the most direct competitors in the AI arms race of the past three years. Musk has publicly criticized Anthropic on social media as "anti-Western civilization," called Claude "misanthropic," and said Anthropic "never had a chance of winning." Then, on the very day xAI's name was erased, he leased his most critical computing asset to this company. Musk later explained on X that he spent nearly a week in intensive meetings with Anthropic's top leadership, concluding "they are extremely capable and genuinely care about getting things right, they didn't trigger my evil detector." He added: SpaceXAI retains the right to reclaim the computing power at any time if Claude's behavior endangers humanity.

This explanation sounds like someone trying to justify a concession, but the underlying business logic is clear—xAI has already fully migrated its training work to Colossus 2. Colossus 1 lying idle is a waste; leasing it out generates revenue and conveniently gives SpaceX a new "AI infrastructure provider" label before its IPO.

Regardless of the explanation, this combination marks a symbolic moment for those watching the AI industry. The name xAI has officially retired from history. A company once valued at $250 billion, having raised over $25 billion, went from announcing its acquisition by SpaceX to complete erasure in just three months.

In fact, questions about xAI's independence began the moment the acquisition was completed. In February 2026, SpaceX completed the acquisition of xAI in an all-stock deal, valuing SpaceX at $1 trillion and xAI at $250 billion, for a combined $1.25 trillion. Post-acquisition, xAI immediately launched a large-scale restructuring, with layoffs, organizational splits, and management reshuffles following one after another. The departure of co-founders was even faster than outsiders expected. By the end of March, the last of the 12 founding team members, co-founder Ross Nordeen, also left the company, leaving Musk alone holding up the signboard. In April, the CFO departed, and a vice president from SpaceX's Starlink was parachuted in as xAI's president. This was no longer the shape of a company with independent decision-making power.

From TruthGPT to a Hundred-Billion Empire, to an Empty Building

In March 2023, OpenAI released GPT-4. That same month, Musk signed an open letter calling for a six-month pause on developing AI models more powerful than GPT-4, joined by a long list of notable Silicon Valley figures. But even as the letter was still circulating online, Musk had quietly registered a new company and started poaching talent.

That company was xAI.

The history between Musk and OpenAI dates back to 2015. He was a co-founder of OpenAI, building the company from scratch with Sam Altman, with the original intent of creating a non-profit, human-safe AI research institution. He left the board in 2018, citing official reasons of directional disagreements with the team. In the following years, he watched OpenAI gradually transform into a for-profit entity, deeply align with Microsoft, and with ChatGPT sweeping the globe, become precisely what he initially didn't want it to be. This sentiment finally found an outlet in 2023.

He named the new product TruthGPT, later renamed Grok, inspired by a term from science fiction meaning "deep understanding." He said xAI would create an AI that "maximally seeks truth," unconstrained by political correctness or commercial compromise. He assembled a 12-person founding team from DeepMind, OpenAI, Google, and Microsoft, many of whom were top researchers in reinforcement learning and large models. Four months after the team was formed, the first version of Grok launched, accessible only to paying users of the X platform. The speed was remarkable even within the AI industry.

Capital's reaction to this story was more enthusiastic than many expected. By the end of 2023, xAI completed its first external funding round of $135 million. By mid-2024, it completed a $6 billion Series B, with Andreessen Horowitz, Sequoia Capital, and Lightspeed all participating, valuing the company at $24 billion. By October 2025, the latest funding round closed, pushing the valuation to $50 billion, with total funding exceeding $25 billion. Concurrently, xAI built the Colossus supercomputing center in Memphis, Tennessee, densely deploying 220,000 NVIDIA GPUs, touted as one of the world's fastest-deployed AI supercomputers. Musk saw it as xAI's core weapon to catch up with OpenAI.

On paper, this was a company sprinting at high speed. But the flip side of running fast is that trouble arrives just as quickly.

Grok's biggest selling point was being "unrestricted." Compared to ChatGPT and Claude, it was more willing to answer topics other AIs refused, with the company even launching a "Spicy Mode" setting that allowed users to unlock less restricted responses. This positioning quickly attracted a large number of users tired of AI "political correctness," but it also planted persistent compliance risks for xAI. In 2025, Grok first gave severely biased answers on Holocaust-related questions, then began interacting with users using language with white supremacist undertones. More seriously, Grok was found capable of generating deepfake pornographic content based on photos of real people, including minors. Regulatory investigations were launched successively in Europe, Asia, and the US, Turkish courts directly ordered Grok blocked, and regulators in multiple countries demanded xAI explain its safety mechanisms.

Musk's consistent explanation for these issues was "we're fixing it," but the rate at which external trust was being depleted was clearly faster than the repair rate.

Meanwhile, internal attrition was also happening at a pace hard to explain as normal iteration. The 12 co-founders began leaving one after another from the second half of 2025. Early core technical lead Igor Babuschkin, who had worked on AlphaGo at DeepMind and was a key architect of the initial Grok model, quietly left in July 2025 to start his own venture capital firm. Soon after, another co-founder, Manuel Kroiss, also departed. Following SpaceX's acquisition of xAI, restructuring began immediately, and several other co-founders left around that window. By March 2026, image generation team lead Zhang Guodong and another co-founder left in succession. The last remaining co-founder, Ross Nordeen, also announced his departure that same month. This meant that in xAI's less-than-three-year existence, all 12 founding team members had left, leaving only Musk himself.

A collective exodus of a company's founding team often signals one of two possibilities: either a fundamental divergence in vision, or the company's independence has become nominal, making staying meaningless. xAI's situation likely involved a bit of both.

After SpaceX's acquisition, the pace of restructuring was more urgent than outsiders imagined. The original four business lines were reorganized, the CFO left in April, a Starlink VP was parachuted in as xAI's president, and the original technical decision-making system within xAI began aligning with SpaceX's management logic. Meanwhile, Grok's training work had fully migrated to Colossus 2, and Colossus 1—the supercomputing center once touted as a key strategic asset—became idle resources available for external lease.

Where a company shifts its focus often speaks more about its actual state than official announcements.

When xAI was founded, Musk said its mission was "to understand the true nature of the universe." This statement carried some of Musk's trademark grandiosity, but it hid a real business logic: he wanted to use xAI to connect his portfolio of Tesla, SpaceX, and X into an AI-native ecosystem, with Grok as the brain of this ecosystem. This concept, in a sense, didn't fail; only the executing entity changed. AI remains a core strategic pillar of Musk's empire, Grok is still running, and Colossus is still expanding. It's just that the entity responsible is no longer an independent company called xAI, but a sub-brand called SpaceXAI.

The name changed, but the ambition didn't. It's just that the 12 people who started the journey together are all gone.

Musk's Next Card is Called the SpaceX IPO

The other message Musk sent on the day xAI disappeared points in a much larger direction.

Leasing Colossus 1 wholesale to Anthropic appears on the surface as a computing power transaction, but viewed on a larger timeline, it looks more like a strategic positioning move. SpaceX is sprinting towards one of the most significant milestones in its history—going public. According to current plans, the roadshow is set to begin on June 8th, with the IPO window likely falling between late June and early July, targeting a valuation between $1.75 trillion and $2 trillion. If successful, it would become the largest IPO in US history. Every card that can be shown to the market at this moment is crucial.

This deal gives SpaceX a new narrative role. The market's perception of SpaceX has been centered on rockets and Starlink, but in the current AI wave sweeping capital markets, relying solely on space logic may not be enough to maximize valuation imagination. Leasing Colossus 1 to Anthropic allows SpaceX to declare before its IPO: we are also a compute infrastructure provider relied upon by top global AI companies. Musk's own explanation was straightforward—xAI's training work has migrated to Colossus 2, Colossus 1 being idle is wasteful, so better turn it into cash flow while conveniently telling a new story.

The longer-term layout is in space. Anthropic expressed interest in orbital AI compute in the agreement, and both sides are exploring multi-gigawatt-level orbital compute power cooperation. This direction has been on Musk's mind for a while—earth-based data centers face power, land, and cooling bottlenecks, while space offers nearly unlimited solar energy and natural vacuum cooling conditions. If this path proves viable, SpaceX could become both a producer and delivery infrastructure provider for AI compute power, with Starlink handling transmission and Starship delivering the hardware, forming a self-contained closed loop. This is a bet that will take a decade to realize, but it provides a grand enough story framework for the IPO valuation.

xAI's merger, within this logic, is not a drag but an increment. Grok now runs directly within Tesla's vehicle systems, the US Department of Defense AI contracts previously awarded to xAI transferred to the SpaceX system with the merger, and the conditional acquisition agreement with Cursor was also incorporated. AI, space, defense, and autonomous driving—these threads are increasingly interlocking within Musk's empire in clear and deliberate ways.

xAI has completed its journey as an independent company. The next story unfolds on a much larger stage.

This article is from the WeChat public account "Rongzhong Finance" (ID: thecapital), author: Lv Jingzhi.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat was the final valuation and name of the AI unicorn xAI before it was shut down?

ABefore being shut down, xAI had a final valuation of $250 billion. It was subsequently merged into SpaceX and renamed SpaceXAI.

QWhat were the key controversies or regulatory issues faced by xAI's product, Grok?

AGrok faced controversies for giving seriously biased answers on topics like the Holocaust, interacting with users using racially charged language, and being capable of generating deepfake pornography, including of minors. These led to regulatory investigations in multiple jurisdictions and a court-ordered ban in Turkey.

QWhy did the entire founding team of xAI leave the company?

AThe entire founding team of xAI left, likely due to a combination of fundamental disagreements over the company's vision and the loss of the company's independence after its acquisition and integration into SpaceX.

QWhat strategic role does the leasing of Colossus 1 to Anthropic play for SpaceX's upcoming IPO?

ALeasing Colossus 1 to Anthropic allows SpaceX to present itself as a key AI infrastructure provider, generating cash flow and adding a compelling AI narrative to its IPO story, which is crucial for achieving its targeted $1.75-$2 trillion valuation.

QWhat is the long-term vision for AI computing power as hinted at in the article's discussion of SpaceX's plans?

AThe long-term vision involves deploying multi-gigawatt-level AI computing power in space, leveraging unlimited solar energy and natural vacuum cooling. SpaceX aims to create a closed-loop system where it produces and delivers AI compute infrastructure using Starlink for transmission and Starship for launch.

Похожее

Apple Also Has to Pay Rent Now

Apple Pays Rent Too: The Two-Way Flow of "Traffic Tax" and "AI Capability Rent" Between Tech Giants For over two decades, Google has paid Apple an estimated $20 billion annually to remain the default search engine on Safari, a "traffic tax" for a critical user entry point. However, in 2026, the direction of this cash flow partially reversed. Apple agreed to pay Google roughly $1 billion per year to license its Gemini AI models, as Apple's own models reportedly struggled with complex tasks. This creates a unique dynamic: Apple acts as the "landlord" in the established search ecosystem, collecting rent from Google for access. Simultaneously, in the emerging AI arena, Apple becomes the "tenant," paying Google for access to cutting-edge AI capabilities it cannot currently match internally. While Apple claims its new models are "distilled" from Gemini outputs and contain "not a drop" of Google's original code, core dependencies remain. Its knowledge base is refined using Gemini's outputs, and its most powerful cloud model runs on Google's infrastructure. Apple has structured the deal as non-exclusive, allowing it to theoretically switch AI suppliers—a hedge against over-reliance. The future hinges on whether advanced AI models become a commodity (cheap and abundant) or remain a concentrated, scarce resource (expensive and controlled by few). Apple is betting on the former, leveraging its massive device ecosystem to be a powerful, choosy customer. If the latter proves true, its bargaining power could erode. This power dynamic is extending to developers. Apple, Google, and WeChat are all pushing for apps to expose their core functions as standardized "actions" or "intents" that their respective AI assistants (Siri, Gemini, WeChat AI) can directly call. The new scarce resource is no longer just app store visibility, but "being selected by the AI." The currency of "rent" has changed from a 30% revenue share to ceding control over how users interact with an app's functions.

marsbit43 мин. назад

Apple Also Has to Pay Rent Now

marsbit43 мин. назад

Missed the SpaceX IPO? WEEX's "First Trade Protection" Lets You Experience US Stock Trading Risk-Free.

With the excitement around SpaceX's recent public listing reigniting interest in the US stock market, Chinese investors face significant challenges accessing compliant and convenient trading channels following regulatory actions against major online brokers. This article explores the available options, highlighting their risks and limitations. Traditional paths for US stock investments remain problematic. Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) and Listed Open-Ended Fund (LOF) products, while compliant, suffer from high fees, significant purchase premiums, and a very limited selection of assets. Small, unregulated offshore brokers pose substantial risks, including potential insolvency. While secure, VIP accounts at banks in Hong Kong or Singapore require high minimum deposits (often 1-2 million RMB) and in-person visits, placing them out of reach for most retail investors. The article positions cryptocurrency exchanges, specifically their TradFi (traditional finance on-chain) offerings, as a compelling alternative. Platforms like WEEX are noted for providing access to a wide range of US stocks and ETFs, including SpaceX (SPCXON), through tokenized assets. This method offers advantages such as a single account for both crypto and traditional assets, USDT-based settlement avoiding fiat complexities, flexible leverage, and robust risk management. To attract users, WEEX is promoting a "First Trade Guarantee" campaign. Running from June 15 to July 8 (UTC+8), it features a $30,000 prize pool. Users who trade $500 worth of US stock contracts can qualify for a guarantee on their first eligible trade: 100% loss coverage up to $30 or a 20% bonus on profits up to $30. The campaign is presented as a low-risk opportunity for both crypto natives and traditional investors to experience US stock trading.

marsbit45 мин. назад

Missed the SpaceX IPO? WEEX's "First Trade Protection" Lets You Experience US Stock Trading Risk-Free.

marsbit45 мин. назад

How Difficult is Chip Making? A Division Error Costs 475 Million Dollars

How Hard Is It to Make a Chip? A Division Error Cost $475 Million Chip expert Shi Kan, a researcher at the Chinese Academy of Sciences and a popular tech creator, explains the immense challenges of chip development. Chips are foundational to modern technology, but their creation is extraordinarily difficult. The journey from sand to a functional chip involves complex design and manufacturing, but a critical bottleneck is verification—ensuring the design works flawlessly before costly production. A single, undetected bug can have catastrophic consequences, as illustrated by the infamous 1994 Intel Pentium FDIV bug. A flaw in the floating-point division unit forced a recall costing $475 million. Unlike software, chips cannot be easily patched after manufacture, making "first-time success" paramount. However, industry surveys show only 24% of chip projects achieve this; over three-quarters require at least one costly re-spin due to design flaws. Verification has thus become the dominant phase, consuming up to 70% of the design cycle. The core challenge is a "verification impossible triangle" between high performance, good debuggability, and low cost. Exhaustively verifying a modern CPU core could take 15,000 years with software simulation, or 30 years with advanced hardware emulation—timeframes utterly impractical for development. Despite being essential, verification is often seen as unglamorous "dirty work," receiving less academic attention than fields like AI. Shi and his team are tackling this by developing an agile verification research framework called ENCORE, based on FPGA technology, to improve verification efficiency and debug capability. Beyond research, Shi engages in public science communication through long-form video content, aiming to demystify chip technology, AI, and computer science. He argues for the value of pursuing "hard and long-term" endeavors, whether in the meticulous world of chip verification or in creating substantive educational content, believing such sustained effort is likely the right path forward.

marsbit55 мин. назад

How Difficult is Chip Making? A Division Error Costs 475 Million Dollars

marsbit55 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Как купить S

Добро пожаловать на HTX.com! Мы сделали приобретение Sonic (S) простым и удобным. Следуйте нашему пошаговому руководству и отправляйтесь в свое крипто-путешествие.Шаг 1: Создайте аккаунт на HTXИспользуйте свой адрес электронной почты или номер телефона, чтобы зарегистрироваться и бесплатно создать аккаунт на HTX. Пройдите удобную регистрацию и откройте для себя весь функционал.Создать аккаунтШаг 2: Перейдите в Купить криптовалюту и выберите свой способ оплатыКредитная/Дебетовая Карта: Используйте свою карту Visa или Mastercard для мгновенной покупки Sonic (S).Баланс: Используйте средства с баланса вашего аккаунта HTX для простой торговли.Третьи Лица: Мы добавили популярные способы оплаты, такие как Google Pay и Apple Pay, для повышения удобства.P2P: Торгуйте напрямую с другими пользователями на HTX.Внебиржевая Торговля (OTC): Мы предлагаем индивидуальные услуги и конкурентоспособные обменные курсы для трейдеров.Шаг 3: Хранение Sonic (S)После приобретения вами Sonic (S) храните их в своем аккаунте на HTX. В качестве альтернативы вы можете отправить их куда-либо с помощью перевода в блокчейне или использовать для торговли с другими криптовалютами.Шаг 4: Торговля Sonic (S)С легкостью торгуйте Sonic (S) на спотовом рынке HTX. Просто зайдите в свой аккаунт, выберите торговую пару, совершайте сделки и следите за ними в режиме реального времени. Мы предлагаем удобный интерфейс как для начинающих, так и для опытных трейдеров.

1.5k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.01.15Обновлено 2026.06.02

Как купить S

Sonic: Обновления под руководством Андре Кронье – новая звезда Layer-1 на фоне спада рынка

Он решает проблемы масштабируемости, совместимости между блокчейнами и стимулов для разработчиков с помощью технологических инноваций.

2.3k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.04.09Обновлено 2025.04.09

Sonic: Обновления под руководством Андре Кронье – новая звезда Layer-1 на фоне спада рынка

HTX Learn: Пройдите обучение по "Sonic" и разделите 1000 USDT

HTX Learn — ваш проводник в мир перспективных проектов, и мы запускаем специальное мероприятие "Учитесь и Зарабатывайте", посвящённое этим проектам. Наше новое направление .

1.8k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.04.10Обновлено 2025.04.10

HTX Learn: Пройдите обучение по "Sonic" и разделите 1000 USDT

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на S (S) представлены ниже.

活动图片