veDAO研究院:BTC连续暴涨的背后,大牛市在即?

Odaily星球日报Опубликовано 2023-11-05Обновлено 2023-11-05

Введение

比特币价格已经达到了17个月来的最高点,这是自2022年5月以来的最高水平。这次涨势让很多人措手不及,随着这个“加密货币之王”的稳步上涨,给加密市场带来了牛市的氛围。

比特币价格已经达到了 17 个月来的最高点,这是自 2022 年 5 月以来的最高水平。这次涨势让很多人措手不及,随着这个“加密货币之王”的稳步上涨,给加密市场带来了牛市的氛围。那么推动涨势的原因有哪些?BTC 后续的发展又如何?

之前 veDAO 研究院的文章提到,虽然假新闻让 BTC 的价格经历了一波过山车,但市场情绪积极,后续的趋势将会向好。本篇,veDAO 研究院将带来近期 BTC 涨势相关的原因,以及后续走势的分析。

BTC 价格上升的原因

考虑到加密市场容易受到波动性的影响,不能将一个单一因素视为涨势的唯一原因。在过去的几天里,贝莱德的 BTC 现货 ETF 出现在 DTCC 的网站上,在被短暂删除后又重新添加回来,这也被认为是这次涨势的原因之一。除此之外,还有一些影响力更大的因素:

BTC 减半在即

距离 BTC 减半只有不到 6 个月的时间。加密货币社区预计,这个事件将开启下一个牛市周期。根据分析师 Michaël van de Poppe 等人的观点,现在(BTC 减半前的 6 至 10 个月)是投资山寨币的最佳时机,风投们已经迫不及待地希望开始获得资金支持。

veDAO研究院:BTC连续暴涨的背后,大牛市在即?

在投资者们数着日子期待他们的投资开始增值的时候,BTC 的矿工们则是对该事件感到担忧。矿工的担忧源于该事件将导致挖矿奖励减半,从每个区块的 6.25 BTC 减少到 3.125 BTC。但对于投资者来说,减半事件是有价值的,因为它减少了新挖出的 BTC 的增长。随着时间推移,矿工的运营成本也在增加。具体而言,挖矿基础设施变得更加复杂和昂贵。其他人抱怨电费上涨,而美国矿工可能会面临 30% 的税收,这引起了更多的不安。这是因为 BTC 哈希算力(解决不同哈希算法时计算机或硬件操作所需的算力)主要集中在美国。

美国银行危机与 BTC

今年 3 月发生的美国银行业危机对 BTC 和加密市场来说成为了一种福音。其中一个最重要的原因是加密货币与美国股市之间缺乏相关性。尽管银行体系在那之后相对稳定了,但当前的市场状况再次暗示着类似的情景正在形成。

  • 美国银行再次受到打击

veDAO研究院:BTC连续暴涨的背后,大牛市在即?

美国华尔街的四大银行——花旗(C)、摩根士丹利(MS)、高盛(GS)和美国银行(BAC)——目前处于自那次银行业危机以来的最低水平。这些银行的年初至今表现显示,目前它们的股价是最低的,甚至比今年 3 月还低。花旗集团的股价自年初以来下跌了 14% ,高盛的跌幅也接近 13% 。摩根士丹利的损失超过这两家,今年以来已经下跌了 16% ,而美国银行则以 23% 的跌幅领先。

  • 加密货币与美国银行呈负相关

尽管美国经济目前的状况并不支持银行或股市的看涨叙事,但加密市场的情况则截然不同。目前 BTC 与标普 500 和纳斯达克指数呈明显负相关,分别为-0.8 和-0.78 。

在 3 月份,随着银行面临巨大压力,BTC 价格与其他加密货币一起上涨,而巧合的是,BTC 现在也在上涨。这使得其他替代币也随之上涨,将整个加密市场的市值推高至 1.244 万亿美元。

从这个角度来看,美国银行机构的亏损正转化为加密货币投资者的利润,这表明资金流向该领域不仅仅受到美国的影响。然而,银行机构的持续亏损可能并非是 BTC 上涨的唯一原因。

巴以冲突的背后,美国国债与 BTC

BitMEX 联合创始人 Arthur Hayes 近期发文表示*,当前的经济正受到“全球战争”所影响,这催化了近期美国国债的抛售,随着国债不再安全,投资人正选择 BTC 和黄金作为替代的投资商品。

veDAO研究院:BTC连续暴涨的背后,大牛市在即?

自 2022 年中以来, 2 年期与 30 年期美国国债收益率差值首次转为正值

Arthur Hayes 阐述了对于当前中东地区的紧张局势可能对金融市场产生的影响,他指出随着美国政府持续军援以色列,这将导致美国国债的抛售。他解释道:“如果你是长期持有美国国债的投资者,最令人担忧的事情是美国政府并不认为自己的支出太多。如果美国的国防开支进入荒谬模式,那将有数万亿美元借款用于支持战争机器,这将使得政府需要卖出更多长期债券给投资人以吸纳资金,全球对于美国国债的不信任度将会进一步上升。这就是为什么债券在抛售,收益率上升。”

随着“巴以冲突”和“联准会(FED)暂停加息”推升美国国债收益率创下 16 年来新高,Arthur Hayes 认为,当长期美国国债对投资者不再提供安全性,投资者将寻求替代方案,而此背景下的首选资产正是黄金和 BTC。Arthur Hayes 认为,BTC 以及黄金上涨是因为在美国长期国债急剧下跌的背景下,这不是关于 ETF 是否获批的投机,而是 BTC 对未来美元贬值与战争所导致的高通货膨胀的反应。Arthur Hayes 还提到另一个债券暴跌的原因,当美联储加息循环进入尾声,美国经济又维持正常,投资人也不再有更多动机长持,这也将导致美国国债遭到抛售。

BTC 价格可能因其他因素上涨

veDAO研究院:BTC连续暴涨的背后,大牛市在即?

一群关键投资者也可能是促成这次涨势的原因之一。自 9 月 21 日以来,持有 100 到 1000 BTC 的鲸鱼地址,在一直在积累 BTC。一个月的时间里,这个群体的 BTC 持有量增加了 50, 000 BTC,价值 17 亿美元;这使得他们的持有量从 385 万 BTC 增加到了 390 万 BTC。

BTC 趋势

veDAO研究院:BTC连续暴涨的背后,大牛市在即?

截至撰写本文时,BTC 价格为 34, 572 美元,由于市场动力依然强劲,可能还会上涨。它保持在市场的中高位,上图展示的是从 2023 年初的低点到今年高点的 35, 184 美元进行的评估。

BTC 的价格较 12 月 31 日收盘价 16, 542 美元翻了一番,在上涨过程中突破了 61.8% 斐波那契位点 28, 067 美元,这是一个关键的回撤位。此次反弹的强劲动力也突破了 78.6% 斐波那契水平,至 31, 197 美元。

来自购买量增加的压力可能会推动 BTC 价格继续上涨,具有 35000 美元的看涨目标。在这种情况下,最合理的目标将是斐波那契图表顶部的 35184 美元水平。

但是,如果获利抛售开始,BTC 价格仍然可能出现下跌趋势。在这种情况下,BTC 的支持水平可能在 31, 197 美元左右,或者更可能在 28, 067 美元左右。在最严重的情况下,价格可能下跌到 25, 869 美元的水平。

结语

随着 BTC 价格持续攀升,市场情绪明显高涨。可以说 BTC 减半在即、美国银行业的压力、美国国债收益率上升等多重因素驱动了这轮价格上涨。尽管短期内可能还会有震荡,但从中长期来看,BTC 价格处于上升通道当中。对于投资者而言,如今仍是布局 BTC 的良机。随着减半效应的逐步释放,BTC 或将开启新的牛市周期,值得期待。

引用文档:https://cryptohayes.substack.com/p/the-periphery

关注我们

veDAO 是一家由 AI 驱动的web3趋势追踪&智能交易一站式平台,将大数据分析所呈现出的市场趋势与交易深度结合,致力于打造更适合Web2和Web3用户买卖投资的web3 AI 交易所。

veDAO 拥有行业领先的由链上分析&情绪指标构成的 AI 大语言模型,为用户提供主动型数据支持,结合智能、快捷、安全、实时监控的 AI 交易功能,截止目前,平台重度使用用户已超过 37000 人,关联 22000+Web3垂直行业 Twitter KOL,与 180+专业机构组成 veDAO 专家委员会,平台项目库超 8300+个,且有 220+星探与 veDAO 一起不断增加Web3项目。

veDAO 以两周一次版本更新的速度不断升级,决心搭建起Web2通往Web3的桥梁,成为未来Web2和Web3用户查项目、找热点、看趋势、一级投资、二级交易的首选平台。

Website:http://www.vedao.com/

🔴投资有风险,项目仅供参考,风险请自担哦🔴

Похожее

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit10 мин. назад

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit10 мин. назад

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit1 ч. назад

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit1 ч. назад

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片