多家游戏入驻,Ronin是否重回“链游基础设施叙事”的中心?

Odaily星球日报Опубликовано 2023-11-02Обновлено 2023-11-02

Введение

武器依然锋利——足够快的反馈和几乎能够忽略的交互成本。

原创 | Odaily星球日报

作者 | 0xAyA

多家游戏入驻,Ronin是否重回“链游基础设施叙事”的中心?

11 月 2 日,链游 Axie Infinity 开发商 Sky Mavis 与韩国游戏开发商 ACT Games 达成合作,计划将 ACT 的所有游戏引入 Ronin Network。Sky Mavis 将帮助 ACT 将其 Android 和 PC 端集换式卡牌游戏(TCG)Zoids Wild Arena 迁移到 Ronin Network。Zoids Wild Arena 最初基于 Polygon 推出,计划于 11 月 8 日迁移。“我们致力于保持游戏玩家和 IP 粉丝所期望的高标准游戏设计和用户体验,”ACT 游戏业务发展负责人 Viggo Chung 表示。

尽管 Sky Mavis 此前因 6 亿美元资产被盗案件而备受争议,且在去年的融资中表现不佳, 1.5 亿美元融资目标中仅募集 1100 万美元,估值缩水 1/3 。但作为 Ronin 区块链的创建者和主要开发者,Sky Mavis 依然在为自己的Web3游戏生态系统不懈努力,且继续和各种游戏工作室达成协议,以吸引他们加入 Ronin 生态并成为其中真正的一份子。

持续建设游戏生态

此前,Sky Mavis 与四家游戏工作室合作:Directive Games、Bali Games、Tribes Studio 和 Bowled.io,每家工作室现在都在利用 Ronin 开发自己的游戏。“这一宣布标志着一个新的转变,”Sky Mavis 联合创始人 Jeffrey “Jiho” Zirlin 在旧金山游戏开发者大会上接受采访时表示,Axie 只是 Ronin 游戏生态系统的开始,并相信 Axie 可以超越其第一款游戏,并最终成为像任天堂的马里奥或三丽鸥的 Hello Kitty 一样受众广泛的 IP 组合。

而在这其中,Directive Games 是跑在最前面的一个,其第一款 Ronin 游戏 《The Machines Arena》是一款 4 v 4 竞争性多人射击游戏,玩家在科幻环境中作为坦克角色、辅助或造成伤害的英雄相互战斗。该游戏采用第三人称视角,将提供多人游戏和单人游戏模式。

《Machines Arena》目前在 PC 上处于测试阶段,计划在 Epic 游戏商城上发布,Directive 还制定了 Machines Arena 的跨平台计划,即将在 iOS 和 Android 上推出移动版。

多家游戏入驻,Ronin是否重回“链游基础设施叙事”的中心?

而今年 7 月,Sky Mavis 宣布与 NFT 系列 CyberKongz 达成合作,其中包括向部分Web3游戏玩家提供数字资产奖励。 CyberKongz 将于 7 月 27 日推出新 NFT 系列 Genkai,总供应量为 2 万个,其中 4000 个将通过 Sky Mavis 内部 NFT 市场 Mavis Market 在 Ronin 上提供。Sky Mavis 表示,将使用 Genkai NFT 奖励每个 Mystic Axie 持有者。 此外,CyberKongz 将与 Ronin 合作开发一款以 Genkai 为特色的游戏。Sky Mavis 业务开发主管 Kathleen Osgood 表示,新游戏将通过与现有的 Axie Infinity 体验集成来实现互操作。

就在上个月,专注于元宇宙的P2E MMO 游戏 Pixels 迁移到 Ronin Network,此前 Pixels 完成 240 万美元种子轮融资,由 Animoca Brands 与 PKO Investments 领投。

什么样的链适合游戏?

尽管资产失窃事件一度使 Ronin 被抛弃,甚至一蹶不振,但他们仍然没有放弃自己的目标——为Web3游戏提供可定制的专用链,并同时保持低成本。这同时也是各路链游何以能最后胜出的关键基础:足够快的反馈和几乎能够忽略的交互成本,能够使区块链世界以外的用户无感知的参与。

而有 Axie 的成功案例在前,大多数项目方依然选择相信 Sky Mavis 团队的能力,并最终决定加入 Ronin 开发自己的游戏,生态系统愈发壮大的 Ronin 能否在与 Oasys 等游戏专用链的竞争中胜出,成为链游们最终的首选链?让我们持续关注。

Похожее

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit8 мин. назад

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit8 мин. назад

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit13 мин. назад

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit13 мин. назад

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbit19 мин. назад

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbit19 мин. назад

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

**Title: Has Bitcoin's Rebound Ended, Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?** **Summary:** Bitcoin's price has declined by 13% this week, signaling a potential return to late-stage bear market conditions. The price fell to around $67k, positioned between the Realized Price and Realized Cap Weighted Average. For the first time since early 2022, the Short-Term Holder cost basis has dropped below this key average, confirming a hallmark of late-cycle bear markets. Profitability metrics have collapsed sharply. The 7-day average of the Realized Profit/Loss ratio plummeted from a local high of 3.16 to 0.29, mirroring the February panic sell-off. Critically, the 90-day average never breached the threshold of 2, indicating the recent rally to $82k was a bear market bounce, not a structural shift. Realized losses surged to $1.35 billion daily, with $770 million coming from Long-Term Holders selling at a loss. This accelerating redistribution of supply from weak to strong hands is a necessary but ongoing process for a market bottom. The rally stalled almost precisely at the aggregate cost basis (~$83k) of US spot Bitcoin ETF investors, turning that level into strong resistance and leaving the average ETF holder underwater again. Spot market flows have turned decisively negative, showing sellers are dominating order books despite the price drop. While a significant futures long liquidation event cleared over $400 million in leverage, providing a potential reset, sustained spot demand is yet to materialize. Options markets continue to price in higher future volatility (Implied Volatility) than recent price action (Realized Volatility) has shown, with a persistent skew towards put options, indicating ongoing demand for downside protection. In conclusion, multiple metrics point to a fragile market structure. Resistance at the ETF cost basis, accelerating realized losses, dominant spot selling, and cautious options pricing all suggest the bear market trend persists. A sustainable recovery likely requires a resurgence of spot demand, ETF holders returning to profit, and a clear reduction in selling pressure.

marsbit19 мин. назад

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

marsbit19 мин. назад

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

In today's TechFlow Intelligence Briefing, several major tech stories highlight a growing theme of trust and credibility gaps across AI, crypto, and finance. AI company Anthropic has publicly called for a global pause in AI development, citing risks from Claude's "recursive self-improvement." Ironically, this coincides with reports the company is preparing for a massive IPO targeting a near $1 trillion valuation. This perceived hypocrisy, coupled with widespread user complaints about Claude's declining performance, is sparking debate over whether the safety warning is genuine or a competitive tactic. Meanwhile, in a substantive security move, Anthropic open-sourced a framework for AI-powered vulnerability discovery. In the crypto market, Bitcoin's price drop below $61,000 triggered over $1.16 billion in liquidations, flipping the market into a state where more BTC is held at a loss than at a profit, a historical bearish signal. On the corporate front, SpaceX's highly anticipated IPO is generating immense Wall Street excitement, with Goldman Sachs projecting 100x revenue growth by 2030. However, the S&P 500 has refused to fast-track the company's inclusion post-IPO, potentially limiting immediate institutional demand. Separately, ByteDance's AI app Doubao lost over 6 million monthly active users after introducing a subscription model, highlighting the challenges of AI monetization. Other notable developments include Nvidia certifying HBM4 memory from Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron; Cloudflare's acquisition of front-end tooling company VoidZero; and its CEO warning that bot traffic now exceeds human traffic online. The underlying narrative connects these events: a trust crisis. From AI firms' contradictory actions and crypto volatility to the clash between SpaceX's hyped narrative and institutional rules, a pattern is emerging where stated intentions and actual practices are increasingly misaligned.

marsbit35 мин. назад

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

marsbit35 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片