[dragon and tiger list] Be alert to the risk of BTC breaking, a large number of bulls burst their positions to increase the chance of decline

Huobi ResearchОпубликовано 2022-04-22Обновлено 2022-04-23

Введение

The overall market explosion scale maintained a high level, increasing the risk of decline.

1. Market trend: long positions increased and the market was shaky

The overall market explosion scale maintains a high level. Especially after March 31, 2022, the explosion scale of bulls is always significantly higher than that of bears, indicating that the overall market trend is weak. Recently, the size of bulls in the overall market was up to US $400 million. On April 21, bulls were exposed to US $248 million, while bears were exposed to US $69 million. It can be seen that the frequent losses of bulls mean that the possibility of breaking the current market is still very high.

In terms of daily K-line, the price of BTC shows a shock decline. At present, the moving average is very effective in suppressing BTC. The 120 day moving average can prevent BTC from rebounding upward. In terms of range fluctuation, BTC operates above the US $36077 corresponding to 50% of Fibonacci. Considering that the recent trading volume shows the characteristics of fragmentation, bulls have not organized an effective offensive, which is a high probability event of price decline during the sideways trading period.

2. Interpretation of panic index:

The panic index operates at a position lower than 30. At present, the fluctuation space is very small and has lasted for several trading days. Therefore, the panic index also constitutes the adjustment form of a local triangle. After leaving the triangle area, the unilateral trend of mainstream currencies such as BTC will continue. The panic index has remained below 50 since 2022, indicating that the strength of bulls is not dominant, the panic may spread at any time, and the future price decline is also expected.

3. Dragon and tiger list:

During the overall withdrawal of mainstream currencies, the rising currencies decreased significantly. Among the top 100 currencies in terms of market value, the stable and platform currencies with the highest growth were more resistant to decline, while Dai, usdc, bus and other stable currencies rebounded slightly. Among the rising currencies, DCR has a large increase, while other currencies have a limited increase.

Increase list

DCR

As a cottage version of BTC, the trading volume of DCR is relatively low, and the short-term volume is not enough to attract large funds to enter the market. In the context of the poor performance of most mainstream currencies, the rise of DCR is only a case, so the tracking risk is high and it is not suitable to invest more funds to buy.

Matic

Matic is a protocol and framework for building and connecting Ethereum compatible blockchain networks. Aggregate scalable solutions on Ethereum to support multi chain Ethereum ecosystem.

Matic network is a second layer extensible platform, which realizes fast, simple and safe off chain transactions. It can not only pay transactions, but also realize generalized off chain smart contracts. Matic network is an important contributor to the Ethereum ecosystem. It is committed to the implementation of plasma MVP (minimum running plasma), walletconnect protocol and Ethereum event reminder engine dagger, and has made outstanding contributions. Matic tokens are used for equity bets and participate in the proof consensus mechanism of the side chain network.

Matic's price is stable, and its lock up volume fluctuates slightly. From the perspective of price trend, matic has obvious interval fluctuation characteristics. Therefore, in the case of poor market, matic's short-term fluctuation will appear. In the interval shock stage, the mild trend of matic may continue. The daily trading volume is small, and the price may remain stable.

Decline list

In the decline list, SNx, ZIL and EOS are all currencies with strong short-term performance, and there has been a contraction callback. Therefore, the current market is in the stage of long-term wait-and-see and strong short strength. The bottom will further confirm that BTC and mainstream currencies will stabilize and rise.

Похожее

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit1 ч. назад

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit1 ч. назад

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit2 ч. назад

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit2 ч. назад

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit2 ч. назад

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit2 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片