Zhou Shen's New Song 'Chronicle of the Moon' Released: Clearly Marked as Strictly Prohibited for AI Training and Voice Imitation

marsbitPublicado em 2026-04-02Última atualização em 2026-04-02

Resumo

On April 1, Chinese singer Zhou Shen released the theme song "Yue Zhi Ji" for the fantasy drama "Yue Lin Qi Ji," with a notable copyright declaration explicitly prohibiting the use of the work for artificial intelligence (AI) training. This marks the first case in China where such a restriction was imposed at the time of a song’s release, setting a precedent for protecting vocal rights and creative sovereignty in the digital age. The statement specifies that unauthorized use—including covers, re-recording, remixing, or distribution—is strictly forbidden. It explicitly bans the use of the work in AI training, imitation, learning, or generation activities, addressing growing concerns over AI voice replication and algorithm-driven music plagiarism. Zhou Shen has previously emphasized that while AI can achieve technical precision, it cannot replicate the emotional depth and artistic essence of human performance. As AI music commercializes by 2026, this proactive measure establishes a legal and technical framework to safeguard original vocal works and clarifies authorization standards for AI training data. Industry experts believe such declarations will simplify copyright enforcement by establishing intent at the source. Leading artists like Zhou are helping define ethical and legal boundaries for human-AI collaboration, reaffirming that irreplaceable human emotion remains central to artistic creation.

On April 1, renowned Mandopop singer Zhou Shen released the theme song 'Chronicle of the Moon' for the ancient costume fantasy drama 'Moon Scale Chronicles,' with a clear copyright notice in the song's introduction and lyric sheet stating 'Prohibited for Artificial Intelligence (AI) Training.' This move marks the first case in China where copyright red lines were drawn against AI technology at the time of the work's release, signaling that musicians have entered a new phase of 'digital defense' in protecting their voice rights and creative sovereignty.

The notice specifies in detail: Without the written permission of the copyright owner, any use or distribution (including covers, re-recordings, remixes, etc.) is strictly prohibited; without authorization, the work is strictly forbidden for use in AI training, imitation, learning, generation, and other activities. This directly addresses the increasingly rampant phenomena of 'AI voice cloning' and 'algorithmic song washing' in the industry. Zhou Shen has previously expressed a rational perspective on AI technology in public, emphasizing that while AI can achieve extreme precision through algorithms, it cannot replicate the 'vivid emotions' and artistic soul honed through repeated refinement in human singing.

In 2026, as AI music enters commercial exploration, this 'hardcore' notice not only builds a technical firewall for original voices but also provides a standardized paradigm for addressing the authorization legitimacy of AI training data. Industry experts believe that this approach, which locks in intentional infringement from the source of the work, will significantly lower the threshold for evidence in subsequent copyright enforcement. With leading artists taking the initiative, the music industry is accelerating the construction of legal consensus on the boundaries of human-machine collaboration, reaffirming that irreplaceable human emotion remains the core moat of artistic creation amid the wave of technological advancement.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the title of Zhou Shen's new song and what specific copyright declaration does it carry?

AThe title of Zhou Shen's new song is '月之纪' (Yue Zhi Ji), and it carries a copyright declaration that explicitly prohibits its use for AI training and voice imitation.

QWhy is Zhou Shen's copyright statement for '月之纪' considered a landmark case in China?

AIt is considered a landmark case because it is the first instance in China where a copyright statement specifically prohibiting use for AI training was issued at the time of a work's release, setting a precedent for digital copyright protection.

QAccording to the article, what specific uses of the song are strictly prohibited without written permission?

AWithout written permission, it is strictly prohibited to use the song in any way, including cover versions, re-recording, remixing, or for AI training, imitation, learning, and generation activities.

QWhat does Zhou Shen believe is the key difference between AI-generated music and human performance?

AZhou Shen believes that while AI can achieve extreme precision through algorithms, it cannot replicate the 'vivid emotion' and artistic soul that comes from the meticulous polishing of a human performance.

QWhat broader industry impact does the article suggest Zhou Shen's declaration could have?

AThe article suggests that this declaration sets a standardized model for the legitimacy of AI training data authorization and helps build a legal consensus on the boundaries of human-AI collaboration, reinforcing that irreplaceable human emotion is the core of artistic creation.

Leituras Relacionadas

WSJ: Unveiling the Secret Jury That Controls Disputes on Polymarket

Last month, Garrick Wilhelm lost a $567 bet on the Polymarket prediction platform about whether a ceasefire would be reached with Hezbollah. When a truce was announced, some traders argued it counted, but Wilhelm disagreed. The dispute was settled not by Polymarket, but by a decentralized group of UMA token holders who vote on such disagreements. As trading surges, resolving ambiguous outcomes is a growing challenge for prediction markets. Unlike competitors like Kalshi that decide internally, Polymarket outsources dispute resolution to UMA. Its token holders, mostly anonymous and with voting power weighted by holdings, arbitrate cases. Critics argue this system is prone to manipulation, as voters can also bet on the same markets they judge. A Wall Street Journal analysis found that over the past year, at least 60% of active UMA voters had corresponding Polymarket accounts and held positions in disputes they voted on. Voting power is also concentrated among a few large holders. Polymarket says only 0.2% of bets go to UMA and that the system disperses authority. Its founder has acknowledged flaws and promised fixes. UMA's backers deny any proven manipulation, dismissing critics as sore losers. The platform penalizes voters in the minority to incentivize "correct" outcomes. Disputes are rising, covering topics from a streamer's pregnancy announcement to Iran. This model also helps Polymarket argue it's an offshore platform outside U.S. regulation, a shift made after a 2022 settlement with the CFTC. Some losing traders have formed groups to protest, targeting entities like UMA.rocks, which aggregates votes. Its founder says traders often blame UMA for their own mistakes. A recently ousted committee member, Scout, admitted to both betting and voting but argued involved voters research more thoroughly. He highlighted the dilemma: "Either you have conflicted traders deciding, or you have uninformed outsiders voting. There is no perfect answer right now."

marsbitHá 32m

WSJ: Unveiling the Secret Jury That Controls Disputes on Polymarket

marsbitHá 32m

China's AI Circle Has Just Established a Pecking Order, and Capital Is Already Changing the Rules Again

The article describes how the valuation logic for major Chinese AI model companies has undergone three dramatic shifts between 2022 and 2026, driven by capital's changing priorities. The first phase (around 2022) was **technology-driven valuation**, where funding was based on model performance and benchmark scores. This logic was disrupted when DeepSeek's R1 model demonstrated that comparable capabilities could be achieved at a fraction of the cost, challenging the notion of technical superiority as an unassailable moat. The second phase shifted to **IPO window-driven valuation**. Following favorable listing conditions in Hong Kong, capital flowed to companies like Zhipu and MiniMax with the clearest path to a public listing. However, this focus on liquidity over fundamentals became apparent as their Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) lagged far behind international peers like Anthropic. The third and current phase is **national strategy-driven valuation**. This shift was marked by the state-backed "Big Fund" leading a major investment in DeepSeek, signaling that leading domestic AI models are now viewed as strategic national assets comparable to semiconductor manufacturing. This new logic, combined with soaring US valuation benchmarks (e.g., OpenAI at $850B), propelled the combined valuation of China's top AI firms ("The Four Dragons"/"Five Strong") past 1 trillion RMB. The article presents a "pricing leap model": each shift is triggered by a key event that invalidates the old logic, leading to rapid capital reallocation under a new narrative before its flaws (particularly the gap in fundamental ARR metrics) become evident. It concludes that the next major test for these valuations will be a return to scrutinizing core business fundamentals, specifically ARR growth, suggesting a fourth pricing shift is imminent.

marsbitHá 57m

China's AI Circle Has Just Established a Pecking Order, and Capital Is Already Changing the Rules Again

marsbitHá 57m

'Stock God' Trump's 3,642 Trades Disclosed: The 'Perfect Closed Loop' of Policy and Portfolio

Summary: Donald Trump's First Quarter stock trades, totaling 3,642 transactions, have been disclosed. While the White House maintains the trades were managed by an advisor and complied with disclosure laws, they reveal a portfolio heavily aligned with his policy agenda. The trades show a rotation away from major tech stocks like Microsoft, Amazon, and Meta, and into semiconductor and AI hardware companies such as NVIDIA, AMD, Broadcom, Dell, and Intel. Notably, Trump's account purchased Dell stock before he publicly praised the company, after which its stock rose. The Dell family also pledged funds to a Trump-affiliated policy project. A critical case is Intel. The Trump administration converted $8.9 billion in CHIPS Act subsidies into a 9.9% equity stake, making the U.S. government Intel's largest shareholder. Months later, Trump's personal account also bought Intel stock. This intertwines national industrial policy with potential personal financial interest. Unlike typical insider trading concerns, this situation creates a "closed loop": policy decisions (e.g., subsidies, tariffs, crypto regulation) can boost the value of his holdings, and those holdings may, in turn, influence future policy directions. This blending of presidential power and personal portfolio, while legally disclosed, raises profound questions about conflicts of interest that current rules do not address.

marsbitHá 1h

'Stock God' Trump's 3,642 Trades Disclosed: The 'Perfect Closed Loop' of Policy and Portfolio

marsbitHá 1h

Dialogue with Figure Robotics Founder: Behind the $39 Billion Valuation Lies Ambition to Mass-Produce Millions of Units

Title: Figure's Founder on the $39B Valuation and the Ambition to Mass Produce a Million Humanoid Robots In a Sourcery podcast interview, Figure founder and CEO Brett Adcock discusses the rapid rise of his humanoid robotics company. With a valuation that surged 15x in 18 months to $39 billion, Figure aims to create general-purpose humanoid robots for work in factories and homes. Adcock states that the company's primary goal is to make robots that perform real, paid work autonomously. He shares Figure's aggressive scaling plan: producing thousands of robots this year, with an ultimate ambition to reach one million units annually. Adcock explains Figure's vertically integrated strategy, designing its own motors, sensors, and joints to control its supply chain and destiny. He details the challenges, including achieving long-term, reliable, end-to-end autonomous operation—a feat no one has yet accomplished. The biggest risk is executing this complex vision at scale, but Adcock believes the potential market is enormous, representing a significant portion of global GDP. The interview also covers his departure from OpenAI, citing that Figure's internal AI team eventually surpassed OpenAI's capabilities for robotics applications. Adcock concludes by highlighting his focus for the year: large-scale commercial deployment of robots and advancing toward a "general robot" capable of any human task, potentially seeing the first signs of AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) in the physical world at Figure.

marsbitHá 1h

Dialogue with Figure Robotics Founder: Behind the $39 Billion Valuation Lies Ambition to Mass-Produce Millions of Units

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片