Why Hyperliquid is ‘quietly outgrowing’ Coinbase on THESE fronts

ambcryptoPublicado em 2026-02-11Última atualização em 2026-02-11

Resumo

Hyperliquid, a decentralized exchange (DEX), is significantly outperforming Coinbase in key metrics, with nearly double the notional trading volume ($2.6T vs. $1.4T). Its native token, HYPE, has also delivered superior investor returns, up 32% YTD compared to COIN's 27% decline. Both platforms are competing to become an "everything exchange," but Hyperliquid has rapidly expanded beyond crypto into tokenized assets like gold and silver, which now account for over 30% of its volume. It currently handles 10% of Binance’s perpetual volumes, 32% of Bybit’s, and 24% of OKX’s. Despite regulatory risks being a concern, Hyperliquid’s growth continues, with its token eyeing key support levels amid renewed market interest.

Over the past few months, Hyperliquid has been playing catch-up to major centralized exchanges (CEXs). Now, it has begun flipping them on key metrics.

According to the analytics firm Artemis, the DEX platform is “quietly outgrowing” Coinbase with nearly 2x in notional trading volume.

“Notional trading volume: Coinbase $1.4T, Hyperliquid $2.6T. That’s nearly 2x Coinbase’s volume... from an onchain exchange. And the market is noticing.”

The outperformance has gone beyond ecosystem traction. Hyperliquid’s native token, HYPE, has also surpassed Coinbase’s COIN in investor returns. On a year-to-date (YTD) basis, HYPE holders have netted 32% while COIN holders were down 27% – A nearly 60% lead on investor gains.

The race for ‘everything exchange’

The comparison between the two platforms makes sense because both are pushing towards an “everything exchange” vision. Coinbase covers services spanning asset custody, trading, prediction markets, and more.

Similarly, Hyperliquid aims to house all finance under one roof and has made significant strides despite being operational for over a year.

After conquering the crypto perpetual markets and rivaling incumbents like Binance, Hyperliquid’s debut into tokenized markets via equity perps exploded. Now, over 30% of Hyperliquid’s DEX volume comes from non-crypto assets, dominated by gold and silver.

The results? Slow and steady clawing of market share from Binance and other top centralized players. Since last August, Hyperliquid has handled over 10% of Binance’s perpetual volumes.

Although the October crash led to a cool-off of the ratio to 10%, the perp DEX platform traction has since been climbing again. Compared to Bybit, Hyperliquid now handles 32% of its perpetual volumes and 24% of OKX’s activity.

Overall, at press time, the perp DEX was handling over 6% of total CEX volumes, with a strong renewed traction in 2026.

HYPE eyes key support

Market watchers have cautioned that the only threats to the massive growth can be a hack or regulatory risk, especially from the U.S Department of Justice (DoJ).

“Agree here that hype’s biggest risk is regulatory. They need to get much more embedded with the tradfi elites as regulators will eventually get involved.”

That said, HYPE has been a key beneficiary of the traction, with rising revenue funding token buybacks.

However, HYPE’s cool-off isn’t over yet, and a retest of $26-$28 support zone (white) could offer new buying opportunities if risk sentiment improves after the U.S inflation print scheduled for Friday.


Final Thoughts

  • Hyperliquid saw 2x more derivatives market activity compared to Coinbase.
  • The DEX platform handled over 6% of total CEX perpetual volumes amid renewed traction in 2026.

Perguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the article, how does Hyperliquid's notional trading volume compare to Coinbase's?

AAccording to analytics firm Artemis, Hyperliquid's notional trading volume is nearly 2x that of Coinbase, with $2.6T compared to Coinbase's $1.4T.

QWhat is the year-to-date (YTD) performance difference between the HYPE token and Coinbase's COIN stock?

AOn a YTD basis, HYPE holders have netted a 32% gain, while COIN holders were down 27%, giving HYPE a nearly 60% lead in investor gains.

QWhat significant non-crypto market did Hyperliquid debut in, and what is its impact?

AHyperliquid debuted in tokenized markets via equity perps, and now over 30% of its DEX volume comes from non-crypto assets, which are dominated by gold and silver.

QWhat percentage of Binance's perpetual volumes has Hyperliquid handled since last August?

ASince last August, Hyperliquid has handled over 10% of Binance's perpetual volumes.

QWhat are cited as the primary threats to Hyperliquid's massive growth?

AThe primary threats cited are a potential hack or regulatory risk, especially from the U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ).

Leituras Relacionadas

Apple Also Has to Pay Rent Now

Apple Pays Rent Too: The Two-Way Flow of "Traffic Tax" and "AI Capability Rent" Between Tech Giants For over two decades, Google has paid Apple an estimated $20 billion annually to remain the default search engine on Safari, a "traffic tax" for a critical user entry point. However, in 2026, the direction of this cash flow partially reversed. Apple agreed to pay Google roughly $1 billion per year to license its Gemini AI models, as Apple's own models reportedly struggled with complex tasks. This creates a unique dynamic: Apple acts as the "landlord" in the established search ecosystem, collecting rent from Google for access. Simultaneously, in the emerging AI arena, Apple becomes the "tenant," paying Google for access to cutting-edge AI capabilities it cannot currently match internally. While Apple claims its new models are "distilled" from Gemini outputs and contain "not a drop" of Google's original code, core dependencies remain. Its knowledge base is refined using Gemini's outputs, and its most powerful cloud model runs on Google's infrastructure. Apple has structured the deal as non-exclusive, allowing it to theoretically switch AI suppliers—a hedge against over-reliance. The future hinges on whether advanced AI models become a commodity (cheap and abundant) or remain a concentrated, scarce resource (expensive and controlled by few). Apple is betting on the former, leveraging its massive device ecosystem to be a powerful, choosy customer. If the latter proves true, its bargaining power could erode. This power dynamic is extending to developers. Apple, Google, and WeChat are all pushing for apps to expose their core functions as standardized "actions" or "intents" that their respective AI assistants (Siri, Gemini, WeChat AI) can directly call. The new scarce resource is no longer just app store visibility, but "being selected by the AI." The currency of "rent" has changed from a 30% revenue share to ceding control over how users interact with an app's functions.

marsbitHá 1h

Apple Also Has to Pay Rent Now

marsbitHá 1h

Missed the SpaceX IPO? WEEX's "First Trade Protection" Lets You Experience US Stock Trading Risk-Free.

With the excitement around SpaceX's recent public listing reigniting interest in the US stock market, Chinese investors face significant challenges accessing compliant and convenient trading channels following regulatory actions against major online brokers. This article explores the available options, highlighting their risks and limitations. Traditional paths for US stock investments remain problematic. Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) and Listed Open-Ended Fund (LOF) products, while compliant, suffer from high fees, significant purchase premiums, and a very limited selection of assets. Small, unregulated offshore brokers pose substantial risks, including potential insolvency. While secure, VIP accounts at banks in Hong Kong or Singapore require high minimum deposits (often 1-2 million RMB) and in-person visits, placing them out of reach for most retail investors. The article positions cryptocurrency exchanges, specifically their TradFi (traditional finance on-chain) offerings, as a compelling alternative. Platforms like WEEX are noted for providing access to a wide range of US stocks and ETFs, including SpaceX (SPCXON), through tokenized assets. This method offers advantages such as a single account for both crypto and traditional assets, USDT-based settlement avoiding fiat complexities, flexible leverage, and robust risk management. To attract users, WEEX is promoting a "First Trade Guarantee" campaign. Running from June 15 to July 8 (UTC+8), it features a $30,000 prize pool. Users who trade $500 worth of US stock contracts can qualify for a guarantee on their first eligible trade: 100% loss coverage up to $30 or a 20% bonus on profits up to $30. The campaign is presented as a low-risk opportunity for both crypto natives and traditional investors to experience US stock trading.

marsbitHá 1h

Missed the SpaceX IPO? WEEX's "First Trade Protection" Lets You Experience US Stock Trading Risk-Free.

marsbitHá 1h

How Difficult is Chip Making? A Division Error Costs 475 Million Dollars

How Hard Is It to Make a Chip? A Division Error Cost $475 Million Chip expert Shi Kan, a researcher at the Chinese Academy of Sciences and a popular tech creator, explains the immense challenges of chip development. Chips are foundational to modern technology, but their creation is extraordinarily difficult. The journey from sand to a functional chip involves complex design and manufacturing, but a critical bottleneck is verification—ensuring the design works flawlessly before costly production. A single, undetected bug can have catastrophic consequences, as illustrated by the infamous 1994 Intel Pentium FDIV bug. A flaw in the floating-point division unit forced a recall costing $475 million. Unlike software, chips cannot be easily patched after manufacture, making "first-time success" paramount. However, industry surveys show only 24% of chip projects achieve this; over three-quarters require at least one costly re-spin due to design flaws. Verification has thus become the dominant phase, consuming up to 70% of the design cycle. The core challenge is a "verification impossible triangle" between high performance, good debuggability, and low cost. Exhaustively verifying a modern CPU core could take 15,000 years with software simulation, or 30 years with advanced hardware emulation—timeframes utterly impractical for development. Despite being essential, verification is often seen as unglamorous "dirty work," receiving less academic attention than fields like AI. Shi and his team are tackling this by developing an agile verification research framework called ENCORE, based on FPGA technology, to improve verification efficiency and debug capability. Beyond research, Shi engages in public science communication through long-form video content, aiming to demystify chip technology, AI, and computer science. He argues for the value of pursuing "hard and long-term" endeavors, whether in the meticulous world of chip verification or in creating substantive educational content, believing such sustained effort is likely the right path forward.

marsbitHá 1h

How Difficult is Chip Making? A Division Error Costs 475 Million Dollars

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片