Vanguard, BlackRock lead the ETF wave as market remains in ‘extreme fear’

ambcryptoPublicado em 2026-02-26Última atualização em 2026-02-26

The crypto market is sending mixed signals right now. On the price charts, things look better. At press time, the total market value had risen by 3.36% and was back to around $2.26 trillion. However, among investors, confidence is still very low.

Despite the prices going up, the Crypto Fear and Greed Index is still stuck in “Extreme Fear.” This shows that many people are still worried after the recent ups and downs. Instead of feeling excited, they are afraid the recovery won’t last.

And yet, according to LunarCrush, financial firms have dominated social media conversations over the past 24 hours.

This surge in attention around major financial firms can be closely tied to the growing influence of ETFs in both traditional markets and crypto.

Vanguard and BlackRock steal the spotlight

At the top of the list was Vanguard with 11.73k mentions. Social media chatter around Vanguard spiked by 146%, pushing daily mentions to an all-time high of 13.4k.

The post noted,

“Engagements are up 481% from the daily average.”

This was mainly because of massive inflows into its S&P 500 ETF, VOO. With over $30 billion added this year alone, Vanguard has become a key entry point for investors seeking stability.

Close behind was BlackRock with 9.27k mentions, whose Bitcoin [BTC] ETF has become the main gateway for institutional money into crypto.

Additionally, other sentiments around BlackRock are also adding to the hype.

“BLK is the firm people either trust with their retirement or point to when explaining why corporations behave badly. Both crowds were loud today.”

JP Morgan Chase and Goldman Sachs trail behind

JPMorgan Chase has also gained attention with 8.2k mentions, as investors look for stability beyond crypto ETFs. Over 282+ spikes suggest fresh news, likely comments from CEO Jamie Dimon or new macro positioning, sparking renewed attention.

On the contrary, Goldman Sachs saw a noticeable drop in mentions, making it the only top-five firm losing social traction. This usually happens when market sentiment turns cautious.

Meanwhile, Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) stood out as the only venture capital firm among trillion-dollar institutions. Its steady discussion was likely tied to its AI and crypto investments, along with visibility from co-founder Marc Andreessen.

Other major firms like Apollo Global Management, Fidelity Investments, Galaxy Digital, Blackstone, Temasek Holdings, KKR, Pantera Capital, and Bridgewater Associates were also part of the broader conversation.

Notably, Jane Street and Third Point saw unusually large spikes in attention, likely driven by specific trading or regulatory developments. Finally, Pantera’s rise reflected sustained momentum in crypto-focused discussions.

Social sentiment may be driving investor sentiment

The aforementioned data should be read within context though. Just recently, Google Trends revealed that global searches for “crypto” were at their lowest level in over a year. In August 2025, interest was at its peak. However, at press time, it had dropped to just 25.

That’s not all either as the “Bitcoin going to zero” phrase reached its highest level ever in February too.

Simply put, while most people are rushing for the exits, the world’s biggest money managers are quietly settling in and preparing for the next phase.


Final Summary

  • “Extreme Fear” reflects emotional exhaustion among retail investors, not necessarily market collapse.
  • Social media data suggested that attention may be shifting away from tokens and towards the institutions controlling access.

Leituras Relacionadas

Borrowing Money from a Hundred Years Later, Building Incomprehensible AI

Tech giants like Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and Microsoft are undergoing a radical financial transformation due to AI. Their traditional "light-asset, high-free-cash-flow" model is being dismantled by staggering capital expenditures on AI infrastructure—data centers, GPUs, and power. Combined 2026 guidance exceeds $700 billion, a 4.5x increase from 2022, causing free cash flow to plummet (e.g., Amazon's fell 95%). To fund this, they are borrowing unprecedented sums through long-dated, multi-currency bonds (e.g., Alphabet's 100-year bond). The world's most conservative capital—pensions, insurers—is now funding Silicon Valley's most speculative bet. This shift makes these companies resemble heavy-asset industrials (railroads, utilities) rather than software firms, threatening their premium valuations. Historically, such infrastructure booms (railroads, fiber optics) followed a pattern: genuine technology, overbuilding fueled by competitive frenzy, aggressive debt financing, and a crash triggered by financial conditions—not technology failure. The infrastructure remained, but many original builders and financiers did not survive. The core gamble is a "time arbitrage": using cheap debt today to build scale and lock in customers before AI capabilities commoditize. They are betting that AI revenue will materialize before debt comes due. Their positions vary: Amazon is under immediate cash pressure; Meta's path to monetization is unclear; Alphabet has a robust core business buffer; Microsoft has the shortest path from infrastructure to revenue. The contract is set: the most risk-averse global capital has lent its time to Silicon Valley, awaiting a future that is promised but uncertain.

marsbitHá 28m

Borrowing Money from a Hundred Years Later, Building Incomprehensible AI

marsbitHá 28m

The 'VVV' Concept Soars 9x in Half a Year, The New AI Narrative on Base Chain

"The article explores the 'VVV' concept as the new AI-focused narrative within the Base ecosystem, centered around the token $VVV of the privacy-focused, uncensored generative AI platform Venice, led by crypto veteran Erik Voorhees. Venice has seen significant growth in 2026, with its API users surging, partly attributed to exposure from OpenClaw. The platform now boasts over 2 million total users and 55,000 paid subscribers. Correspondingly, the $VVV token price has risen over 9x this year. Key to its performance are tokenomics designed for value accrual: reduced annual emissions, subscription revenue used for buyback-and-burn, and a unique staking mechanism. Staking $VVV yields $sVVV, which can be used to mint $DIEM tokens. Each staked $DIEM provides a daily $1 credit for using Venice's API services, creating tangible utility. The article also highlights other tokens associated with the 'VVV' narrative. $POD, the token of distributed AI network Dolphin (which co-developed Venice's default AI model), saw a massive price surge. $cyb3rwr3n, a project for a Venice credit auction market, gained attention due to perceived connections to Venice's team despite official denials. Finally, $SR of robotics platform STRIKEROBOT.AI rose after announcing a partnership with Venice for robot vision-language model development. Overall, the 'VVV' ecosystem combines AI platform growth, deflationary tokenomics, and innovative utility mechanisms, driving significant investor interest and price action in related tokens."

marsbitHá 37m

The 'VVV' Concept Soars 9x in Half a Year, The New AI Narrative on Base Chain

marsbitHá 37m

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

The pre-IPO stock token market is experiencing significant turmoil following strong statements from AI giants Anthropic and OpenAI. Both companies have updated their official policies, declaring that any transfer of their company shares—including sales, transfers, or assignments of share interests—without prior board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized in their corporate records. This means buyers in such unauthorized transactions would not be recognized as shareholders and would have no shareholder rights. A major point of contention is the use of Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), which are legal entities commonly used by pre-IPO token platforms to pool investor funds and indirectly acquire shares from employees or early investors. The companies explicitly state they do not permit SPVs to acquire their shares, and any such transfer violates their restrictions. They warn that third parties selling shares through SPVs, direct sales, forward contracts, or stock tokens are likely engaged in fraud or are offering worthless investments due to these transfer limits. This stance directly threatens the core model of many pre-IPO token platforms, which rely on SPV structures. The announcement revealed additional risks within this model, such as complex "SPV-within-SPV" layering that obscures legal transparency, increases management fees, and creates a chain reaction risk of invalidation. Following the news, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). The market reaction highlights a divergence: while asset-backed pre-IPO tokens plummeted, purely speculative pre-IPO futures contracts, which are bilateral bets on future IPO prices with no claim to actual shares, remained relatively stable as they are unaffected by the transfer restrictions. The industry is split on the implications. Some believe the fundamental logic of pre-IPO token trading is broken if leading companies reject SPV-held shares, potentially causing a domino effect. Others, like Rivet founder Nick Abouzeid, argue that buyers of such unofficial tokens always knowingly accepted the risk of non-recognition by the company. The statements serve as a stark risk warning and a corrective measure for a market where valuations for some AI-related pre-IPO tokens had soared to irrational levels, far exceeding recent funding round valuations.

marsbitHá 1h

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

marsbitHá 1h

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

The pre-IPO token market has been rocked by strong statements from Anthropic and OpenAI. Both AI giants have updated official warnings, declaring that any sale or transfer of their company shares without explicit board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized on their corporate records. This directly targets Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), the common legal structure used by pre-IPO token platforms. These platforms typically use an SPV to acquire shares from employees or early investors, then issue blockchain-based tokens representing a claim on the SPV's economic benefits. Anthropic and OpenAI's position means that if an SPV's share purchase lacked authorization, the underlying asset could be deemed worthless, nullifying the token's value. Anthropic explicitly warned that any third party selling its shares—via direct sales, forwards, or tokens—is likely fraudulent or offering a valueless investment. The crackdown highlights risks in the popular SPV model, including complex multi-layered "Russian doll" SPV structures that obscure legal ownership, add fees, and concentrate risk. If one layer is invalidated, the entire chain could collapse. Following the announcements, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). In contrast, purely speculative pre-IPO prediction contracts remained stable, as they involve no actual share ownership. The move is seen as a corrective measure amid a market frenzy where some pre-IPO token valuations (e.g., Anthropic's token hitting a $1.4 trillion implied valuation) far exceeded recent official funding rounds. Opinions are split: some believe this undermines the core logic of pre-IPO token trading if top companies reject SPVs, while others argue buyers always assumed this legal risk when accessing unofficial channels. The statements serve as a stark warning and a potential catalyst for market de-leveraging and clearer boundaries.

Odaily星球日报Há 1h

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

Odaily星球日报Há 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片