U.S. Faces Scrutiny Over Bitcoin Sale Despite Strategic Reserve Order

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-01-06Última atualização em 2026-01-06

Resumo

The U.S. government is under scrutiny for allegedly violating its own Executive Order 14233, which mandates that seized Bitcoin must be held in a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and not sold. Despite this, the U.S. Marshals Service transferred approximately 57.55 BTC (worth $6.3 million) seized in a legal case involving Samourai Wallet to Coinbase Prime, effectively selling it. This action contradicts the order’s intent to treat Bitcoin similarly to gold reserves. U.S. Senator Cynthia Lummis has criticized the move, warning it could weaken the country’s strategic position as other nations accumulate Bitcoin. The incident raises concerns about inconsistent crypto policies and eroding trust in U.S. digital asset strategy.

The controversy has been whether the U.S. government is breaking its own rule by selling Bitcoin that was supposed to be kept as part of the national Bitcoin reserve. They already passed Executive Order 14233 that if the government seized the Bitcoin, then it should not be sold.

In November 2025, The Developer of the Samourai Wallet was involved in a legal case, and as part of the Plea Deal with the U.S. Department of justice they agreed to surrender about 57.55 BTC worth $6.3 million. This seized Bitcoin was handled by the U.S. Marshals Service, which manages all the seized assets. Instead of holding the Bitcoin, the Blockchain data shows that the BTC was transferred to Coinbase Prime, which was a private exchange platform. Now the Wallet shows the Zero Balance. This clearly shows that Bitcoin has been sold.

What the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Is and Why This Sale Raises Questions

As per the Executive Order of 14233 Any Bitcoin that was seized must be kept in the Strategic Bitcoin Reserves. The Order clearly states that the Government BTC shall not be sold. The Thai Order is passed to keep Bitcoin like the Gold Reserve, not for selling out quickly. The U.S. government has approximately 325,000 BTC in its Reserve, which is primarily accumulated from law enforcement seizures. As per the order, if the Bitcoin were sold, then it would violate this executive order.

Cynthia Lummis, a U.S. Senator and a strong Bitcoin supporter, has publicly criticized the situation. She said that the government should not sell Bitcoin when the President ordered agencies to preserve it. She also warns that the other countries are preserving Bitcoin, but the U.S. could be weakening its strategic positions.

This situation raised Serious Concerns that whether the Federal Agencies are ignoring the white house directives or the U.S. Crypto policies are inconsistent. These types of actions could decrease the trust in the U.S. Crypto Strategy and would put the U.S. behind other Countries in Digital Asset Competition. The lawmakers and the crypto community are closely watching until there is a clear explanation from the U.S. government.

Highlighted Crypto News:

‌Whale Wallet Bought HYPE, Made Profit on ETH; Bull Run Ahead?

TagsBitcoinbitcoin reserve

Criptomoedas em alta

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main controversy surrounding the U.S. government's recent Bitcoin sale?

AThe controversy is whether the U.S. government is violating its own Executive Order 14233 by selling Bitcoin that was supposed to be held in the national Bitcoin reserve instead of being sold.

QHow much Bitcoin was seized from the Samourai Wallet developer and what was its value?

AApproximately 57.55 BTC was seized, worth $6.3 million at the time.

QWhich government agency handled the seized Bitcoin and where was it transferred?

AThe U.S. Marshals Service handled the seized Bitcoin and transferred it to Coinbase Prime, a private exchange platform.

QWhat does Executive Order 14233 specify about seized Bitcoin?

AExecutive Order 14233 states that any seized Bitcoin must be kept in the Strategic Bitcoin Reserves and shall not be sold, similar to how gold reserves are maintained.

QWho has publicly criticized the government's action and what was their concern?

AU.S. Senator Cynthia Lummis criticized the action, stating that the government should not sell Bitcoin when ordered to preserve it, and warned this could weaken the U.S. strategic position compared to other countries accumulating Bitcoin.

Leituras Relacionadas

UNI Doubles in Two Months Against the Trend: A 5-Year-Overdue Value Realization

Amidst a generally stagnant crypto market in June and July, UNI, the governance token of Uniswap, saw a significant surge, nearly doubling in price from around $2.3 to $4.6. This rally represents a delayed but significant value reassessment, triggered by the practical implementation of its long-debated "fee switch" mechanism. The key turning point was the on-chain execution of the UNIfication proposal in December 2025. It activated a protocol fee on select pools, directed Unichain sequencer revenue (net of costs) to a communal treasury, executed a one-time burn of 100 million UNI, and established a system where all protocol revenue flows into a "TokenJar" contract. This treasury has a single exit: purchasing and permanently burning UNI via a "Firepit" contract. Initially, the market reacted tepidly as the generated revenue and corresponding burn rate were modest. The narrative shifted dramatically in July 2025 with two major developments. First, the launch of Robinhood Chain, tailored for tokenized stocks, rapidly became a primary source of volume and fees for Uniswap, at one point contributing nearly half of its weekly fees. Second, governance votes successfully expanded the fee mechanism to v4 pools and initiated a temperature check for fees on Robinhood Chain. The activation of v4 fees caused the protocol's daily revenue earmarked for UNI burns to nearly triple. The core of UNI's recent price action is the transition from a pure governance token to a cash-flow asset with a permanent, protocol-funded buyer. Its effectiveness is amplified by UNI's mature and widely distributed supply, with no major impending unlocks to dilute the impact of the buybacks. The sustainability of this rally now hinges on whether the transaction volume, particularly on Robinhood Chain, persists after its initial gas subsidies expire, determining if this is a genuine value realization or a subsidy-fueled spike.

marsbitHá 1h

UNI Doubles in Two Months Against the Trend: A 5-Year-Overdue Value Realization

marsbitHá 1h

Breaking: Google Earth Urgently Pulls Back Nano Banana 2 Image Generation Feature!

Google Earth's newly launched "Create image" feature, powered by the Nano Banana 2 AI image generation model, was abruptly withdrawn shortly after its release due to being "played" by users. The feature allowed users to generate and overlay AI-created visuals directly onto real-world satellite and 3D maps in Google Earth. The tool enabled creative applications like historical recreations (e.g., visualizing ancient Pompeii), generating informational graphics for landmarks, and envisioning architectural projects or futuristic cityscapes on real terrain. It operated under "geospatial grounding," meaning the AI respected the underlying geography, topography, and perspective of the chosen map view. The model also integrated with Gemini to retrieve relevant factual information. However, upon release, users quickly tested its limits. A prominent example involved reimagining Philadelphia's historic Independence Hall as a post-apocalyptic ruin overrun by "happy" zombies, evil clowns, and giant alien mechs. This highlighted both the feature's playful potential and its risks regarding the generation of inappropriate or misleading content on realistic maps, leading to its swift temporary removal. Google stated it would re-release the feature after implementing "enhanced guardrails." Analysts note this move strategically leverages Google's vast proprietary geospatial data, positioning its AI not just for artistic generation but for spatially accurate world visualization—a unique advantage in the competitive AI image generation landscape.

marsbitHá 2h

Breaking: Google Earth Urgently Pulls Back Nano Banana 2 Image Generation Feature!

marsbitHá 2h

Altman Admits: Overestimated AI Snatching Jobs! Huang Renxun: The Unemployment Narrative Is Completely Backwards

Sam Altman has revised his earlier predictions about AI rapidly replacing jobs, admitting he overestimated the speed at which AI would eliminate entry-level white-collar roles. Speaking on the "Invest Like the Best" podcast, he stated that people do not truly want an AI CEO, as accountability and human connection remain critical. He found that individuals prefer interacting with people who can be held responsible for decisions. Similarly, NVIDIA's Jensen Huang argued that the narrative of AI destroying jobs is misguided. He distinguishes between tasks and jobs, noting that while AI can automate specific tasks, entire jobs—encompassing communication, judgment, coordination, and accountability—are not eliminated. He cited examples like radiologists and software engineers, where demand for these roles has increased as AI handles repetitive tasks, allowing for business expansion and the creation of more positions. Data from a University of Maryland and LinkUp study supports this, showing that U.S. job postings for new graduates have actually risen, countering the fear of vanishing entry-level roles. However, a significant shift is occurring: the traditional entry-level tasks that help newcomers gain experience are being automated, making initial career access more challenging. The key insight is that as AI takes over standardized tasks, the enduring value of human work shifts toward areas of responsibility, trust-building, and final decision-making—aspects that AI cannot replicate. The real "moat" for professionals lies in these irreplaceable human elements.

marsbitHá 3h

Altman Admits: Overestimated AI Snatching Jobs! Huang Renxun: The Unemployment Narrative Is Completely Backwards

marsbitHá 3h

Trading

Spot

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar ORDER

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de Orderly (ORDER) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar Orderly (ORDER) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu Orderly (ORDER)Depois de comprar o teu Orderly (ORDER), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona Orderly (ORDER)Transaciona facilmente Orderly (ORDER) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

284 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.02

Como comprar ORDER

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de ORDER (ORDER) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片