‘Tax headache eased?’ IRS extends crypto relief to end of 2026

ambcryptoPublicado em 2026-03-19Última atualização em 2026-03-19

Resumo

The U.S. IRS has extended temporary tax relief for cryptocurrency investors until the end of 2026, allowing them to use alternative methods to calculate capital gains instead of relying solely on broker-submitted reports. This is the second such extension and aims to reduce tax burdens for investors. Previously, the mandatory FIFO (first-in, first-out) method often resulted in higher taxes by requiring the sale of older, more appreciated coins first. The alternative methods enable investors to potentially report more recent, lower-gain or loss-making sales. The relief also addresses operational challenges for crypto exchanges, which faced significant compliance burdens under the stricter reporting rules. The IRS is gradually phasing in reporting requirements and has proposed making electronic submission the default for tax documents.

The U.S. tax season is here, and there is some sigh of relief for crypto holders using centralized exchanges.

In its latest guidance, the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) gave crypto holders a free pass to use alternative methods to identify crypto sales for tax purposes instead of relying on their broker-submitted reports.

This is the second time the watchdog has extended the relief, and it could again help lower the tax bill for crypto investors. Initially, the agency mandated crypto exchanges to adopt the FIFO (first-in, first-out) method to track investors’ buy and sell prices for each coin.

For users, this meant that the oldest coins, which were acquired cheaply and have since appreciated significantly, should be reported first. This would result in a higher tax bill due to a higher capital gains tax.

With alternative reporting methods, however, you could include the most recently acquired coins that haven’t rallied much or are in the red.

Source: IRS

U.S. crypto tax compliance burden

According to Shehan Chandrasekera, head of tax at Coin Tracker, the IRS guidance will offer incredible relief to investors, albeit with a few friction points.

He said,

The IRS just quietly saved crypto investors from a massive tax headache by issuing Notice 2026-20.

The temporary relief will be extended up to the end of 2026. But the move isn’t out of just goodwill from the taxman.

Its strict crypto reporting regime has a compliance burden on operators. Notably, crypto exchanges must report the cost basis for each coin bought by each investor to the IRS, along with other data.

At the same time, a duplicate of the report should be given to the customer or physically mailed if the customer hasn’t opted for digital copies. Most brokers have complained that this would be a massive operational burden.

To alleviate this, the agency opted for phased-in reports, starting with only gross proceeds or total crypto sales in reports submitted in 2025. For crypto assets bought in 2026, cost basis data was included in the submitted reports (Form 1099-DA).

Earlier this month, the IRS proposed scrapping physical copies sent to customers and making ‘electronic submission’ the default for tax reports.


Final Summary

  • The IRS will allow crypto investors to use their reporting methods for crypto taxes until the end of the year, rather than relying on the strict broker-submitted reports.
  • The move comes as the agency grapples with ways of lowering tax compliance burdens for crypto investors and brokers.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat relief has the IRS extended to crypto holders until the end of 2026?

AThe IRS has extended temporary relief allowing crypto holders to use alternative methods to identify crypto sales for tax purposes instead of relying strictly on broker-submitted reports.

QWhy was the FIFO method problematic for crypto investors?

AThe FIFO method required reporting the oldest coins first, which were often acquired cheaply and had appreciated significantly, resulting in higher capital gains taxes.

QWhat is the IRS's motivation for extending this relief, according to the article?

AThe move isn't just out of goodwill; the strict crypto reporting regime places a significant compliance burden on both operators (exchanges) and investors, and the IRS is grappling with ways to reduce these burdens.

QWhat change did the IRS propose earlier this month regarding tax report delivery?

AThe IRS proposed scrapping physical copies of tax reports sent to customers and making 'electronic submission' the default method.

QWhat did Shehan Chandrasekera say about IRS Notice 2026-20?

AShehan Chandrasekera stated that 'The IRS just quietly saved crypto investors from a massive tax headache by issuing Notice 2026-20.'

Leituras Relacionadas

Has Hook Summer Really Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Narrative of Uniswap v4

"Hook Summer" Arrives? Sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite Uniswap v4 Narrative Amidst a slight market recovery, attention within the Ethereum ecosystem has shifted to Meme coins built on Uniswap v4's Hook protocol. Following ASTEROID, tokens like sato, sat1, Lo0p, and FLOOD have become market focal points, with market caps ranging from millions to tens of millions, bringing concentrated liquidity to a narrative-dry market. Uniswap v4 Hooks are "plugin smart contracts" that allow developers to inject custom logic at key points in a liquidity pool's lifecycle (initialization, adding/removing liquidity, swaps, etc.), making the AMM programmable. Recent representative projects include: * **sato**: Market cap peaked over $38M; uses a v4 curve mechanism for minting/burning, locking ETH as reserve. * **sat1**: Market cap briefly exceeded $10M, positioning as an "optimized sato," but later declined significantly. * **Lo0p**: Market cap neared $6.6M; a "lending AMM protocol" allowing users to borrow ETH against deposited LO0P tokens without immediate selling pressure. * **FLOOD**: Market cap approached $6M; channels trading reserves into Aave v3 to generate yield, which is retained in the pool. The emergence of these Hook-based tokens could drive long-term growth for the Uniswap ecosystem by attracting users and liquidity to v4 pools. Combined with Uniswap's activated fee switch (partially used to burn UNI), the long-term outlook for UNI appears positive. However, short-term UNI price appreciation is not directly guaranteed. Factors include the sustainability and lifecycle of these new tokens, their price volatility, overall market conditions, and regulatory pressures. Currently, Uniswap v4's TVL ($595M) lags behind v3 and v2, indicating Hook adoption still requires time to mature. In summary, the Hook ecosystem serves as "long-term nourishment" for UNI, but acts more as a "catalyst" than a direct "booster" in the short term. Note: These are early-stage experimental tokens and may carry unknown risks.

marsbitHá 4m

Has Hook Summer Really Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Narrative of Uniswap v4

marsbitHá 4m

Has Hook Summer Truly Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Uniswap v4 Narrative

With the broader market showing signs of recovery, a new wave of interest has emerged around Ethereum-based meme coins. Following ASTEROID, tokens like sato, sat1, Lo0p, and FLOOD, built upon the Uniswap v4 Hook protocol, are capturing market attention. Their market capitalizations range from millions to tens of millions of dollars, injecting much-needed focused liquidity into a market lacking narratives. This article explores whether this trend signifies an incoming "Hook Summer" and its potential impact on UNI's price. Hooks are essentially plug-in smart contracts for Uniswap v4 liquidity pools, allowing developers to inject custom logic at key points in a pool's lifecycle (like initialization, adding/removing liquidity, swaps). This transforms the AMM into programmable building blocks. Key highlighted projects include: * **sato**: Peaked over $38M market cap. It utilizes a v4 curve for minting/burning; buying locks ETH as reserve to mint new tokens, while selling redeems ETH from the reserve and burns tokens. * **sat1**: Market cap briefly exceeded $10M, promoted as an "optimized sato," but later declined significantly. * **Lo0p**: Reached nearly $6.6M. It's a lending AMM protocol where buying LO0P tokens locks them as collateral, allowing users to borrow ETH from the pool reserve at 40% LTV, aiming to improve capital efficiency for idle ETH in LPs. * **FLOOD**: Peaked near $6M. Its mechanism directs asset reserves from buys into Aave v3 to generate yield, with fees and interest retained in the pool to potentially influence the token's price long-term. In the long term, the development of the Hook ecosystem can attract users and liquidity to Uniswap v4, benefiting UNI's fundamentals—especially combined with the recent activation of the protocol fee switch, where a portion of fees is used to burn UNI. However, in the short term, these Hook-based tokens are unlikely to directly drive significant UNI price appreciation. Their impact is moderated by factors like token sustainability, price volatility, and broader market and regulatory conditions. Currently, Uniswap v4's TVL ($595M) still trails behind v2 and v3, indicating adoption and growth will take time. The article concludes that while the Hook ecosystem provides long-term "nourishment" for UNI, its short-term role is more of a "catalyst" than a "booster." Readers are cautioned that these are early-stage experimental tokens and may carry unknown risks.

Odaily星球日报Há 16m

Has Hook Summer Truly Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Uniswap v4 Narrative

Odaily星球日报Há 16m

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell Bitcoin, But Never a Net Sale

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Said We'd Sell Bitcoin, But Never Be a Net Seller In a recent podcast, MicroStrategy Executive Chairman Michael Saylor clarified the company's stance on potentially selling Bitcoin. Following MicroStrategy's earnings call statement about being prepared to sell BTC to fund dividends for its STRC (Strategic) credit product, Saylor emphasized the distinction between selling and being a "net seller." Saylor explained the core business model: MicroStrategy sells credit instruments like STRC and uses the proceeds to buy Bitcoin, which is viewed as "digital capital" expected to appreciate around 30-40% annually. A portion of these capital gains can then be used to pay the dividends on the credit products. He stressed that even if the company sells some Bitcoin for dividends, it simultaneously buys much more with new credit issuance. For example, after raising $3.2 billion from STRC sales in April, the dividend obligation was only $80-90 million, making the company a net buyer. The clarification aims to counter market narratives questioning the value of Bitcoin on MicroStrategy's balance sheet if it were never sold, and to dismiss claims of a "Ponzi scheme." Saylor reiterated his personal philosophy for investors: "Don't be a net seller of bitcoin" and ensure your Bitcoin holdings increase each year. Saylor also discussed Bitcoin's role as the foundation for "digital credit," noting that STRC has become the largest and most liquid preferred stock issue in the U.S., offering high risk-adjusted returns (Sharpe ratio). He highlighted Bitcoin's deep liquidity, stating that even large purchases by MicroStrategy do not move the market significantly, which is driven by macro factors, geopolitical tensions, and capital flows from ETFs and credit products. Finally, Saylor reflected on his early inspiration from sci-fi books, which motivated his path to MIT, and maintained his fundamental thesis on Bitcoin remains unchanged: it is superior digital capital enabling superior digital credit.

链捕手Há 21m

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell Bitcoin, But Never a Net Sale

链捕手Há 21m

Beaten SK Hynix Employees in China: Year-end Bonus Less Than 5% of Korean Staff's

"SK Hynix Chinese Staff Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts" Driven by the AI boom, South Korea's SK Hynix is experiencing record performance, with media reports predicting massive year-end bonuses for its employees, making them highly desirable in the matchmaking market. However, this prosperity starkly contrasts with the situation for the company's Chinese employees. According to reports, SK Hynix operates under a rule allocating 10% of operating profit for employee bonuses. While projections suggest Korean employees could receive bonuses reaching millions of RMB, a Chinese employee with over a decade of technical experience revealed the disparity: "If they get 3 million, Chinese staff get less than 5% of that." After adjustments based on KPI ratings, this employee's highest bonus was slightly over 100,000 RMB. Bonuses are paid annually in Korea but semi-annually in China. During the industry downturn in 2023-2024, Chinese employees received no bonus at all. The gap extends beyond bonuses. Recruitment posts for SK Hynix's Chinese factories (in Wuxi, Dalian, Chongqing) show engineer monthly salaries ranging from 10,000 to 35,000 RMB, with a 13th-month salary promised. Chinese employees also receive standard benefits like annual leave but lack stock incentives, which are reportedly unavailable to them. Furthermore, management positions in China are predominantly held by Korean personnel, though industry observers note a gradual increase in local middle managers over time. SK Hynix has confirmed the 10% bonus rule but cautioned that specific future bonus amounts remain unpredictable. The company forecasts strong demand for HBM and other high-value enterprise products for the next 2-3 years, driven by AI infrastructure investment. This focus on business-to-business markets may continue to constrain supply for consumer products, potentially prolonging price increases for components like memory.

链捕手Há 34m

Beaten SK Hynix Employees in China: Year-end Bonus Less Than 5% of Korean Staff's

链捕手Há 34m

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片