Microsoft Announces Commercial-Grade Quantum Computer to be Completed in Three Years: Will the Boots Land?

marsbitPublicado em 2026-06-15Última atualização em 2026-06-15

Resumo

Microsoft announces plans to build a commercially viable quantum computer by 2029, a significant acceleration from the previous industry consensus of a decade. The breakthrough is fueled by their new Majorana 2 quantum chip, which boasts a record-breaking average qubit lifetime of 20 seconds—a 1,000-fold reliability improvement over its predecessor. This leap was achieved by leveraging topological qubits, a theoretically more stable technology using Majorana zero modes, and switching the core superconducting material from aluminum to lead. Crucially, Microsoft's "Discovery" agentic AI platform accelerated the R&D process. AI agents autonomously analyzed vast experimental data, optimized manufacturing parameters (like the lead alloy composition), and solved issues like "ghost noise," dramatically speeding up experimentation. While the 20-second coherence time is a landmark, challenges remain: scaling from 12 qubits to the millions needed for practical applications, managing compilation costs, and verifying quantum results. Skeptics call for peer-reviewed data, and questions persist about whether even 20 seconds is sufficient for complex algorithms like breaking RSA encryption. The race is on with other approaches (superconducting, trapped ions), but Microsoft's confidence in its topological roadmap signals a potential shortcut to a scalable quantum future.

Microsoft recently released its new generation quantum chip, Majorana 2. The company claims the average survival time of qubits on this chip has reached an astonishing 20 seconds, a 1000-fold improvement in reliability over the previous generation. Based on this, Microsoft made a bold statement: "By 2029, we will have a commercially valuable, scalable quantum computer." Just last year, the mainstream industry expectation was "ten years from now." Now, Microsoft has directly halved that timeframe.

In the R&D process of this chip, Microsoft heavily leveraged its own AI platform "Microsoft Discovery's" agentic AI, allowing AI teams to collaborate like human research teams, autonomously analyzing massive experimental data, proposing hypotheses, and optimizing manufacturing processes. One is the hardware breakthrough in quantum computing, the other is the software assist from artificial intelligence. Two of the most cutting-edge fields are now reinforcing each other.

What is a Quantum Chip?

A quantum chip manipulates qubits (quantum bits). A qubit can exist in a superposition of 0 and 1. Before measurement, it's like a spinning coin, simultaneously carrying the possibility of both 0 and 1. The superposition state of two qubits can encompass four possibilities: 00, 01, 10, 11; three qubits correspond to eight possibilities... and so on. The quantum state of n qubits is 2^n-dimensional. Through carefully designed operations, quantum gates (the logical gates in quantum computing) manipulate the phase of the quantum state, causing probability amplitudes to interfere within the superposition, thereby amplifying the correct answer. This is why quantum computers are said to possess "exponential computational power."

Furthermore, two entangled qubits share a peculiar correlation: measuring one instantly determines the state of the other, regardless of the distance between them. By leveraging these quantum properties, quantum computers are expected to tackle tasks that are difficult for classical computers to perform efficiently.

A quantum chip is a specialized processor used to generate, manipulate, and measure these qubits. It doesn't use traditional transistors but employs superconducting circuits, trapped ions, photons, or even topological materials to capture quantum states and make them perform calculations according to a prescribed logic, i.e., quantum gates.

Weaknesses of Quantum Chips

Despite their power, qubits possess a fatal weakness: extreme sensitivity and fragility.

The superposition state of a qubit can collapse instantly into a definite 0 or 1 when subjected to even minor external disturbances, such as temperature fluctuations, electromagnetic radiation, or cosmic rays, thereby losing its parallel computing capability. This phenomenon is called decoherence.

Before Microsoft's Majorana 1 chip, the typical lifetime of mainstream superconducting qubits was only tens of microseconds. This meant they would often 'die' shortly after being prepared, before much computation could be done. Therefore, a key metric for evaluating a quantum chip is the qubit lifetime, also known as coherence time.

Microsoft's claim of a 20-second qubit lifespan has caused an earthquake-like reaction within the industry. For quantum operations, 20 seconds is an astronomical figure. Performing a quantum gate operation only requires a microsecond (one-millionth of a second). Twenty seconds theoretically allows for twenty million operations, enough to run fairly complex quantum algorithms. Microsoft even drew an analogy: "This improvement is roughly equivalent to inventing a phone battery that lasts nearly three years on a single charge, compared to the original one-day battery."

Twenty seconds is just the average; some qubits can even last up to a minute. The previous generation Majorana 1 only achieved a lifetime on the millisecond scale, which is why Microsoft states "reliability improved 1000-fold."

So, how did Microsoft achieve this? The answer lies in its chosen technical route: topological quantum computing.

Microsoft's Secret Weapon: Topological Qubits

Most mainstream quantum chips, like those from Google and IBM, use superconducting qubits. This technology is relatively mature, but to avoid environmental interference, it requires extremely low temperatures, close to absolute zero (-273°C). It also suffers from short lifetimes and is prone to errors.

For 20 years, Microsoft has pursued a different, theoretically more advantageous but more challenging path: topological qubits.

If you punch one hole or two holes in a piece of paper and crumple it up, the paper deforms, but the holes remain. One hole doesn't become two, and two don't become one. The number of holes in the paper is a topological invariant. Similarly, the sequence in which two ropes are braided together is also a topological invariant. Topological qubits leverage this topological invariance to protect quantum information. The information isn't stored in specific particles but in the braiding texture formed by the exchange of positions of quasiparticles (collective excitations in particle systems). This storage method is non-local, meaning small disturbances like noise and heat struggle to disrupt the overall topological structure. Consequently, topological qubits are inherently much less sensitive to environmental noise and far more stable than other types of qubits.

The quasiparticle Microsoft uses has a legendary name: Majorana fermion. In 1937, Italian physicist Ettore Majorana predicted the existence of a peculiar fermion whose antiparticle is itself. This particle hasn't been conclusively discovered yet. In the early 21st century, scientists began searching for its analog in condensed matter physics: a quasiparticle called a Majorana zero mode (MZM). When two Majorana zero modes exchange positions in two-dimensional space, the overall quantum state changes; the order of exchange affects the final outcome, similar to how different braiding methods result in different plaits.

In 1997, physicist Alexei Kitaev, then at the Landau Institute in Russia, first theorized the use of Majorana fermions for topological quantum computing. In 2005, Microsoft established Station Q, with Kitaev as a core member at the time. Microsoft has since been committed to this technical path, investing nearly 20 years. In 2025, Microsoft released the first-generation Majorana chip, proving the principle feasibility of topological qubits. They revolutionarily used a topological superconductor, enabling a novel state of matter for more stable quantum computing. Today's Majorana 2 represents a tangible leap in performance, turning principle into practice.

A key improvement lies in the material change: the first-generation Majorana chip used aluminum for its topological superconductor, while the second generation switched to lead. Lead is commonly used as radiation shielding. Using it as a superconductor can significantly thicken the qubit's shield, protecting the fragile quantum state from cosmic ray interference. This seemingly non-disruptive change, coupled with AI optimization of hundreds of process parameters, ultimately led to the 1000-fold reliability improvement.

However, currently, Majorana 2 only integrates 12 qubits. To achieve a commercially valuable universal quantum computer, the industry consensus is that at least several million qubits are needed. Bridging the gap from 12 to 1 million involves countless engineering and physics challenges. Microsoft's confidence in stating 2029 indicates strong belief in their topological route. Theoretically, the error-correction overhead for topological qubits is much lower than other mainstream schemes. If successfully implemented, they have the potential to mature faster than other approaches.

AI's Contribution: How Agentic AI Accelerates Quantum Chip R&D

Another crucial factor in Microsoft's 1000-fold reliability leap is the "assist" from agentic AI. Microsoft's Microsoft Discovery platform deploys agentic AI, where multiple AI agents can take on different roles, such as data analyst, experimental designer, and literature researcher, autonomously completing scientific research workflows under human scientist guidance.

It starts with the core material of the Majorana chip. The first generation used aluminum as the superconductor, while the second generation switched to lead. Changing materials is a complex chain reaction. The team spent years understanding all the trade-offs. Finding the precise doping recipe required hundreds of experiments. Now, AI can first identify high-probability targets through simulation, ideally reducing the required experiments to just one.

This is just the beginning. Quantum chip manufacturing involves countless aspects: software, architecture, material stack, processes, measurement, etc. Changing one parameter can trigger chain reactions. Human engineers struggle to monitor all variables simultaneously, but AI agents can. Crucially, Microsoft's quantum team has accumulated nearly two decades of vast experimental data, in various formats, held by scientists in different countries with different backgrounds. AI agents can synthesize this data and uncover correlations invisible to humans, as no single person possesses such a broad perspective.

Another AI killer app is accelerating experiments. Creating topological quantum states requires simultaneously adjusting hundreds of voltage parameters, followed by measurement—the most time-consuming and delicate part of quantum computing. Previously, a scientist might take weeks to manually complete one round of measurement. The team tried automation with early machine learning methods but failed. It wasn't until they trained a dedicated AI agent using the Microsoft Discovery platform that they reduced the entire cycle by several orders of magnitude. AI can scan the entire parameter space in parallel, automatically determining the lowest point where everything can function normally and pinpointing it.

Finally, AI also helped solve the "ghost noise" problem. At one point, experimental data was consistently off, and scientists spent a long time troubleshooting without success. Later, an AI agent integrated physical models, device logs, and process knowledge to identify an uncalibrated temperature sensor from the raw data that was subtly corrupting the measurement results.

It's fair to say that without AI's involvement, the 1000-fold performance leap of Majorana 2 might have taken several more years to achieve. This reinforces a growing consensus: quantum computing and artificial intelligence can mutually reinforce each other. AI accelerates the R&D of quantum computing hardware, and future quantum computers will, in turn, boost AI by providing exponential computational power for machine learning.

Will the Boots Land?

Microsoft is not the only player in this arena. The path to the "quantum shore" isn't limited to topological quantum chips; there are also superconducting quantum chips, trapped-ion chips, photonic quantum chips, and silicon spin qubits. Governments worldwide are also ramping up investments. China has large-scale deployments in quantum communication and quantum computing; the US has allocated significant funding to quantum computing companies; the EU has launched its "Quantum Flagship" initiative.

Can Microsoft truly deliver a commercial-grade quantum computer by 2029? Paul Stevenson, a physics professor at the University of Surrey in the UK, commented that Microsoft seems to have made a breakthrough in manufacturing reliable qubits. If the results hold up to scrutiny, the timeline sounds reasonable. However, many scientists are hoping to see more detailed data that has undergone peer review, as Microsoft's related papers on this achievement have not yet completed the peer-review process.

Of course, amidst Microsoft's high-profile announcements and excitement, several questions warrant calm consideration. First, are 20 seconds enough? A 20-second qubit lifetime is indeed a staggering leap compared to tens of microseconds. However, practical quantum algorithms require hundreds of millions or billions of quantum gate operations. Even at one microsecond per operation, 20 seconds only allows for twenty million steps, still several orders of magnitude short of the numbers needed for tasks like cracking RSA encryption or precisely simulating drug molecules. Remember, decoherence is a limit set by physical laws, something engineering can never completely overcome. Second, there's the compilation cost issue. Every time a quantum computer solves a problem, it first requires compiling on a classical computer to translate the problem into a specific quantum circuit, and then solving equations based on the quantum chip's parameters to obtain the electromagnetic pulse sequences corresponding to the quantum gates. This compilation process isn't universal; it's one-off per problem. Moreover, the classical computing power consumed by compilation itself might be comparable to, or even exceed, the cost of solving the problem directly using classical methods. Third, what if the quantum computer outputs a wrong answer? Humans cannot verify it with a classical computer; if they could, they wouldn't need the quantum computer in the first place. If the final answer is wrong, there's no way to know where the error occurred.

The dream of building a commercial-grade quantum computer is like a boot hanging in the air,迟迟不肯落地. One day, even if it lands, it might just be a dull thud. Looking back at the history of science and technology, progress sometimes resembles "willows planted unintentionally grow into shade, while flowers cultivated with great care fail to bloom." What is highly anticipated may not be realized, and breakthroughs might emerge from the most unexpected places.

References

https://news.microsoft.com/source/features/innovation/majorana-2-microsoft-discovery-agentic-ai/

https://www.bluequbit.io/blog/quantum-chips

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cj4p7gyvp52o

https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/2035004303467917427?share_code=14f9XN3e5wlBq&utm_psn=2035105136662553502&utm_source=wechat_session&utm_medium=social&s_r=0&wechatShare=1

This article is from WeChat public account: 心智观察所 , Author: 心智观察所

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the key performance breakthrough Microsoft announced for its new Majorana 2 quantum chip, and by what factor has reliability improved compared to the previous generation?

AMicrosoft announced that its new Majorana 2 quantum chip achieves an average quantum bit (qubit) lifetime of 20 seconds. This represents a 1000-fold improvement in reliability compared to the previous generation, Majorana 1.

QWhat is the core theoretical advantage of Microsoft's topological qubit technology compared to mainstream superconducting qubits used by companies like Google and IBM?

AThe core theoretical advantage of Microsoft's topological qubit is its inherent resistance to environmental noise and decoherence. Quantum information is stored non-locally in the topological 'braiding' of quasi-particles (Majorana zero modes), making the qubit state much more stable and less susceptible to disruptions from temperature fluctuations or electromagnetic interference.

QHow did Microsoft's 'agentic AI' system, part of the Microsoft Discovery platform, contribute to the development of the Majorana 2 chip?

AMicrosoft's agentic AI accelerated the research by autonomously analyzing vast experimental data, proposing hypotheses, and optimizing manufacturing parameters. It helped identify optimal material compositions (e.g., switching from aluminum to lead), parallel-scanned parameter spaces to find operational 'sweet spots,' dramatically reduced measurement cycle times, and even diagnosed a 'ghost noise' issue caused by an uncalibrated sensor, compressing years of potential work into a shorter timeframe.

QAccording to the article, what is Microsoft's stated timeline for building a commercially valuable, scalable quantum computer, and how does this compare to the industry's previous mainstream expectation?

AMicrosoft stated it aims to build a commercially valuable, scalable quantum computer by 2029. This timeline is approximately half the duration of the industry's previous mainstream expectation of 'ten years from now' (which, if stated last year, would have pointed to around 2034).

QWhat are two major practical challenges or questions raised in the article regarding the path to a practical, commercial quantum computer, even with a 20-second qubit lifetime?

AThe article raises several challenges: 1) Algorithmic Scale: A 20-second lifetime allows for about 20 million quantum gate operations, but practical algorithms for tasks like breaking RSA encryption or simulating complex molecules may require billions or trillions of operations, leaving a significant gap. 2) Compilation Overhead: Each problem requires a unique compilation process on a classical computer to translate it into quantum circuits and control pulses. This process itself can be computationally expensive, potentially negating the quantum speedup for some problems. 3) Error Verification: It is difficult to verify if a quantum computer's answer is correct for problems that are intractable for classical computers, creating a trust issue.

Leituras Relacionadas

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

**Summary: If the AI Bubble is Bursting, What Will Remain?** The debate around an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high valuations while Jensen Huang sees immense opportunity. This echoes the dot-com bubble, which saw massive wealth destruction but ultimately left behind critical infrastructure like undersea cables and broadband, enabling future giants like Amazon and Netflix. Similarly, today's AI boom involves trillions invested in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs, while application-layer revenue remains comparatively modest. This investment-disparity signals a bubble. However, the core technological progress is real and accelerating. AI inference costs have plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, making intelligence increasingly cheap and accessible. This cost collapse is unlocking vast new demand. Instead of reducing spending, enterprises are tripling their AI cloud expenditure. Cheap "tokens" enable AI to move beyond simple chatbots into complex workflows—automating code writing, legal document review, financial analysis, and scientific research. This follows "Jevons's paradox": improved efficiency leads to greater total consumption. The market is now undergoing a necessary purification, weeding out "API-wrapper" startups with no real moat. The deeper evolution involves a shift from capital expenditure (CapEx) on infrastructure to operational expenditure (OpEx) on value-creation in applications. While hardware vendors currently profit most, long-term value will migrate to AI-native firms solving vertical industry problems. Ultimately, a market correction will cleanse speculative excess but will not reverse the AI+ trend. The massive physical and algorithmic infrastructure being built will endure, becoming a cheap, utility-like foundation. Just as the internet became indispensable to all industries post-2000, AI is poised to empower and redefine every sector, moving society irreversibly toward an intelligence-augmented era. The bubble may burst, but the underlying productive momentum is solid.

链捕手Há 6m

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

链捕手Há 6m

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella argues that in the AI era, a company's true competitive edge, or "moat," is not determined by choosing the single most powerful model, but by its ability to build a continuous "learning loop." This system integrates and evolves by connecting human workflows, domain expertise, organizational judgment, and employee experience. He posits that future companies will accumulate two types of capital: Human Capital (employee knowledge, judgment, creativity) and "Token Capital" (a firm's own built and owned AI capabilities). Importantly, AI amplifies rather than devalues human capital. Human direction is essential to guide progress, as computational power alone is aimless. The core opportunity lies in creating a closed-loop system where human and token capital reinforce each other in a compound, self-improving cycle. A company must be able to preserve its unique institutional knowledge—its "company veteran" expertise—even if it switches underlying general-purpose AI models. This requires private evaluation benchmarks, reinforcement learning environments based on internal data, and queryable knowledge bases. Nadella warns against a future where economic value is concentrated by a few dominant models that commoditize entire industries' knowledge. Instead, the priority should be building a broad "frontier ecosystem" where every company, industry, and nation can own its learning loop. This allows organizations to retain control of their intellectual property, amplify employee capabilities, and ensure the economic value created by AI is captured within their own businesses and communities. True corporate sovereignty in the AI age comes from turning organizational knowledge into a compounding system that creates enduring, defensible value.

marsbitHá 41m

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

marsbitHá 41m

ETFs Are Just the Ticket: The True Institutionalization of Bitcoin Is Happening Where You Can't See It

Beyond the Bitcoin ETF spotlight, a deeper institutionalization is underway, leveraging Bitcoin as a foundational financial primitive. Institutions are using Bitcoin for purposes long reserved for assets like U.S. Treasuries and gold: as collateral for loans, insurance reserves, and the backbone of rated bonds. Examples include a Barbados-based insurer capitalizing with $40M in Bitcoin reserves and Ledn's $188M securitization of Bitcoin-backed loans, which received the first-ever investment-grade rating (BBB-) from S&P for a digital asset-backed security. This structure was stress-tested during a 27% price drop in early 2026, triggering automatic liquidations that functioned as designed but revealed the systemic risk of synchronized selling across leveraged positions. Infrastructure is evolving to support this, with platforms like Anchorage Digital's Atlas network enabling secure, institutional-grade settlement and collateral management. Strategies like basis trades and corporate treasuries (exemplified by companies like MicroStrategy issuing billions in equity and debt to fund Bitcoin acquisitions) further integrate Bitcoin into financial mechanics. While ETFs solved "how to own" Bitcoin, these developments answer "what to do with it," embedding the asset into the working machinery of finance—as collateral upon which loans, derivatives, and structured products are built. The real, enduring institutional shift is happening in these largely invisible plumbing and financing systems.

marsbitHá 48m

ETFs Are Just the Ticket: The True Institutionalization of Bitcoin Is Happening Where You Can't See It

marsbitHá 48m

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

ZEC Co-Founder Addresses Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Plans to Sunset Orchard Pool A security vulnerability was recently discovered in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, raising key concerns. The primary questions are whether the flaw was exploited, if user funds are safe, whether users can verify the total ZEC supply, and if other similar vulnerabilities exist. Analysis suggests the vulnerability was likely not exploited prior to its discovery. It was found proactively by a researcher using specialized tools, not due to an active breach. The development team and mining pools acted quickly to contain the issue. Typical financially-motivated attacks would likely have left visible on-chain evidence, which has not been observed. User funds in Orchard are considered safe and should be recoverable, assuming no prior exploitation. If the flaw was never used, all legitimate funds can be withdrawn. The article outlines risks associated with moving funds to transparent addresses or other pools, but concludes that leaving assets in place is a reasonable option. Currently, users cannot independently verify that the total ZEC supply hasn't been inflated due to this bug. However, the planned Ironwood network upgrade is designed to resolve this. It will permanently close the Orchard pool to new deposits and internal transfers, allowing only withdrawals. This mechanism will cap total withdrawals at the amount of legitimately deposited funds, enabling anyone to cryptographically verify the supply post-upgrade. Multiple teams, including Shielded Labs, have conducted extensive audits focused on counterfeiting vulnerabilities, assisted by advanced AI tools. No additional flaws of this type have been found so far, increasing confidence that no other similar undisclosed vulnerabilities exist. In summary, evidence indicates the Orchard bug was probably not used, user funds are secure, and no other counterfeiting flaws are currently known. The upcoming Ironwood upgrade will restore users' ability to independently verify the total ZEC supply, closing this chapter.

Foresight NewsHá 52m

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

Foresight NewsHá 52m

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar CHIP

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de USD.AI (CHIP) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar USD.AI (CHIP) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu USD.AI (CHIP)Depois de comprar o teu USD.AI (CHIP), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona USD.AI (CHIP)Transaciona facilmente USD.AI (CHIP) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

347 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.02

Como comprar CHIP

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de CHIP (CHIP) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片