Humanity Loses $31 Million, a Private Key Causes Token Price to Plunge 90%

Foresight NewsPublicado em 2026-06-09Última atualização em 2026-06-09

Resumo

On June 9th, the digital identity project Humanity Protocol suffered a major security breach resulting in over $31 million stolen from hundreds of wallets holding its H token. The attack was caused by the compromise of a private key belonging to a foundation member, leading the team to advise users against interacting with its bridge or liquidity pools. Following the incident, the price of the H token plummeted by over 90%, from around $0.70 to a low of $0.052, wiping out a significant portion of its market capitalization. The attacker allegedly minted 100 million new H tokens and began selling them for BNB. Humanity Protocol, founded in 2024, aimed to verify human users through palm-print biometrics and zero-knowledge proofs on Polygon CDK. Despite raising $50 million across two funding rounds and achieving a unicorn valuation, the project faced prior controversies. Shortly after its June 2025 token launch, reports emerged that only about 1 million of its 9 million registered IDs had completed biometric verification, suggesting 88% might be bots. Furthermore, allegations surfaced that the project might be a rebranded "shell" of a Chinese access control company, raising concerns about data privacy and authenticity. The project's founder, Terence Kwok, has a controversial business history. His previous venture, Tink Labs, burned through $170 million in funding before collapsing in 2020. The breach highlights the persistent critical risk of private key management in crypto....


Author: ChandlerZ, Foresight News


On June 9, according to on-chain analyst Specter's monitoring, wallets that have interacted with the digital identity project Humanity are under sustained attack. Hundreds of addresses holding H tokens have been compromised so far, with total losses exceeding $31 million. Approximately $9 million has been swapped for ETH, with another $9.9 million still held in the form of H tokens.



Humanity founder Terence Kwok subsequently confirmed the security incident, involving the leakage of a private key belonging to a foundation member. As a precaution, he advised users to temporarily refrain from interacting with the Humanity cross-chain bridge or any liquidity pools until further safety confirmation. The team is working with security experts and exchange partners to handle the situation and will continue to update the community on the progress.



The price of the H token plummeted from around 0.7 USDT to a low of 0.052 USDT, a drop of over 90% within 24 hours. At the time of writing, H is trading at 0.1368301 USDT, with its market capitalization falling from around $2 billion to approximately $35.7 million.


As of 11:00 AM on June 9, the attacker is suspected of minting 100 million new Humanity Protocol H tokens and is currently selling them off for BNB.




A Project That Never Truly 'Proved Humanity'


Humanity Protocol was founded in 2024, positioning itself as a decentralized digital identity network. Its core selling point was using palm print biometrics and zero-knowledge proofs to verify whether a user is a real human. Built on Polygon CDK (zkEVM), the project claimed to solve issues like Sybil attacks, fake accounts, and AI-generated identities without exposing personal information.


This narrative attracted significant capital attention in 2024. Humanity Protocol completed two rounds of funding totaling $50 million. A $30 million seed round at a $1 billion valuation included investors like Kingsway Capital, Animoca Brands, Blockchain.com, and Shima Capital. In January 2025, another $20 million round led by Pantera Capital and Jump Crypto raised the valuation to $1.1 billion.


The Humanity Foundation also assembled numerous well-known figures, led by Animoca Brands Chairman Yat Siu. Co-founders included Mario Nawfal, founder of the international blockchain consulting firm, and Yeewai Chong, a senior investment expert from Morgan Stanley and Ortus Capital.


On June 25, 2025, the H token launched via a Fairdrop mechanism, touted as the first-ever token distribution in Web3 history exclusively to verified humans. However, two days after launch, DL News reported leaked conversations from the founder. In the dialogue, Kwok admitted that out of the 9 million Human IDs created on the network, only about 1 million had completed biometric verification, implying that up to 88% of users might be bots.


Furthermore, according to revelations from X platform users SCoin (@ LianFang _) and AB Kuai . Dong (@_FOR AB ), Humanity Protocol (H) might be a "repackaged domestic project," with APP code material libraries still containing images from Shenzhen access control manufacturer Zhangteng Information, raising doubts about its authenticity. Netizens claimed much of its social media hype was self-generated by project-side accounts, with actual user participation questionable.



AB Kuai.Dong stated that those who previously completed verification with Humanity should be cautious. Zhangteng Information is allegedly backed by a Shanghai-based outsourcing company specializing in full identity recognition outsourcing. Additionally, whistleblower SCoin claimed the project collected large amounts of users' palm print data, raising privacy and security concerns.


This was fatal for a project whose core value proposition was "proving humanity." The H token fell over 61% within two days of launch, from around $0.05 to a low of $0.018.


The Founder's Previous Unicorn Burned Through $170 Million


Terence Kwok's personal resume added a footnote of risk to the project. In 2012, 20-year-old Terence Kwok dropped out of the University of Chicago and, inspired by a $900 roaming bill received during a trip, founded Tink Labs. The company provided free smartphones (branded Handy) to hotel rooms for guests to use abroad, replacing expensive roaming fees. This concept once captivated the capital market. Tink Labs raised $170 million successively from Foxconn, SoftBank, Innovation Works, and the founder of Meitu, reaching a valuation of $1.5 billion and becoming Hong Kong's first unicorn. At its peak, Handy devices covered 600,000 hotel rooms across 82 countries.


However, Kwok's aggressive expansion strategy soon met reality. Global roaming fees continued to decline, hotels were unwilling to pay for Handy devices, and the company began losing money from 2017. According to the Financial Times, SoftBank cut off funding for a key project after discovering that Tink Labs might have diverted funds from its Japanese joint venture to other loss-making markets. In July 2019, over 100 employees from its European, Middle Eastern, and African offices did not receive their salaries. Laid-off employees smeared cake on the walls and floors as they left the Oxford office. On August 1, Tink Labs officially shut down, entering bankruptcy proceedings in January 2020. A former HR director told the FT that Kwok only cared about "making money," and the entire $170 million investment evaporated.


Six years later, Kwok returned to the market with Humanity Protocol, once again securing a unicorn valuation from Pantera Capital and Jump Crypto.


Private Key Management: An Old Problem, a New Cost


Based on current information, this attack does not involve smart contract vulnerabilities or protocol-level security flaws. The attacker obtained a private key belonging to a foundation member, representing a failure in the most traditional security management.


The security landscape for the crypto industry in 2026 was already severe. According to CCN statistics, losses from DeFi hacks in the first four months of 2026 exceeded $1 billion, with most stolen funds still unrecovered. The $286 million attack on Drift Protocol on April 1 was the largest single incident of the year. Attackers are increasingly targeting validators, RPC nodes, and governance systems, not just smart contract vulnerabilities. However, private key leaks remain one of the most devastating attack types because they bypass all on-chain security mechanisms, directly granting control of assets.


For a project already burdened with the controversy of 88% bot users and a token down over 90% from its peak, a $31 million private key leak could be the final blow to trust. As of the time of writing, Kwok stated in his declaration that the team is working with security experts and exchange partners to handle the situation but did not mention any user compensation plan or explain why the foundation member's private key lacked basic protections like multi-signature or hardware isolation.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the total estimated loss in the Humanity Protocol security incident, and what were the main assets stolen?

AThe total estimated loss exceeded $31 million. Approximately $9 million was converted to ETH, and about $9.9 million remained in the form of H tokens.

QAccording to the article, what was the specific cause of the Humanity Protocol security breach?

AThe security breach was caused by the private key of a foundation member being compromised.

QWhat was a major controversy regarding Humanity Protocol's user verification process that was reported before the hack?

AA leaked conversation revealed that out of 9 million created Human IDs, only about 1 million had completed biometric verification, suggesting around 88% of users might be bots.

QWhat previous venture of Humanity Protocol's founder, Terence Kwok, failed after burning through $170 million in funding?

ATerence Kwok's previous venture was Tink Labs (branded Handy), which provided free smartphones to hotel rooms and failed after reportedly burning through $170 million in funding.

QHow did the article characterize the nature of the attack on Humanity Protocol in relation to common DeFi security failures?

AThe article characterized the attack not as a smart contract vulnerability, but as a traditional security management failure involving private key compromise, bypassing all on-chain security mechanisms.

Leituras Relacionadas

Wall Street's Most Famous 'Cassandra' Now Has His Sights Set on Nvidia

Michael Burry, the famed "Big Short" investor, has once again captured Wall Street's attention with a series of short positions against major tech and semiconductor stocks, most notably Nvidia. In late June and July, through his "Cassandra Unchained" newsletter, Burry disclosed short bets against Nvidia, Tesla, Applied Materials, Caterpillar, the SOXX semiconductor ETF, and later, Micron Technology. His core thesis revolves around potential distortions in the AI infrastructure boom, specifically questioning whether extended depreciation schedules (e.g., 6 years vs. a realistic 2-3 years for AI chips) by cloud giants like Microsoft and Google artificially inflate profits. He also raises concerns about possible "off-balance-sheet circular financing," where chip demand might be propped up by vendor-backed funding to clients. Nvidia's stock experienced volatility following these disclosures, briefly dipping but largely holding near Burry's reported entry points, leaving his positions roughly flat or slightly underwater as of late July. This move is part of a pattern for Burry, whose track record since his legendary 2008 bet is mixed. He has faced notable losses, such as on Tesla in 2021, while scoring on broader market turns like the 2020 pandemic crash. His methodology focuses intensely on free cash flow and scrutinizing original financial documents to spot overvaluation and structural risks, but it often struggles with timing the market. The article contrasts Burry's stance with other prominent investors. Steve Eisman, another "Big Short" figure, is not shorting Nvidia, citing strong fundamentals but expressing nervousness about sustainability. Jim Chanos agrees with the broad "accounting mismatch" concern—comparing it to the dot-com bubble—but targets financial leverage in private equity firms rather than the chip stocks themselves. While Nvidia's short interest remains relatively low at 1.3-1.4% of float, the massive stock size means absolute short losses have been significant, exceeding $5 billion earlier this year. The piece concludes that for ordinary investors, the key takeaway is not replicating specific short bets but learning from the critical frameworks these investors use: questioning rosy accounting, identifying structural vulnerabilities, and maintaining skepticism during market euphoria, even if pinpointing the exact catalyst for a downturn remains elusive.

marsbitHá 26m

Wall Street's Most Famous 'Cassandra' Now Has His Sights Set on Nvidia

marsbitHá 26m

Weekly Selection丨Epic Stock Market Volatility, Changxin Tech's IPO Reshapes Storage Landscape, Saylor Aims to Re-Anchor STRC Around September 8th

PANews Weekly Digest: Market Turmoil, Tech Breakthroughs, and Crypto Developments. The week saw significant volatility across global markets. South Korea's KOSPI index experienced extreme turbulence, including multiple trading halts, largely driven by sharp declines in AI hardware stocks like SK Hynix. In contrast, China's Changxin Xinqiao (CXC) achieved a landmark IPO with a market cap surpassing 4 trillion yuan, marking a major success for the domestic DRAM industry after a decade of losses. In the crypto and Web3 space, several key narratives emerged. AI is driving demand for new infrastructure, with projects like AI agent wallets and programmable payments gaining traction, attracting interest from firms like Coinbase. The Bitcoin mining sector is pivoting, with companies like MARA focusing on energy management as electricity becomes a core AI-era asset. Meanwhile, the RWA (Real World Assets) sector faces a "utilization puzzle," with hundreds of billions in on-chain assets remaining dormant. Notable market movements included a historic single-day surge of over 17% for the KOSPI index and a significant migration of $16.5 billion in staked ETH within the Lido ecosystem. Michael Saylor announced a target to re-peg the STRC stablecoin around September 8th. Other highlights include discussions on Ethereum's ambitious 2030 roadmap for scaling and privacy, analysis showing high protocol revenues not always translating to token price gains, and warnings from Citi about potential extreme commodity price shocks by late 2026.

marsbitHá 32m

Weekly Selection丨Epic Stock Market Volatility, Changxin Tech's IPO Reshapes Storage Landscape, Saylor Aims to Re-Anchor STRC Around September 8th

marsbitHá 32m

When the Market Begins to Question AI Capex: A Full Analysis of Q2 Earnings Reports from Five Tech Giants

In late July 2026, five major US tech giants—Alphabet, Intel, Microsoft, Meta, and Apple—released their Q2 earnings reports. While all companies exceeded revenue and profit expectations, driven by strong AI-related business growth, investor reactions diverged sharply due to concerns over escalating AI capital expenditures (capex) and their impact on free cash flow. Alphabet reported strong revenue growth and a surging cloud business, but its stock fell after announcing a doubled year-on-year capex and negative quarterly free cash flow for the first time. Intel posted its strongest revenue growth in over 15 years, but its stock experienced volatile trading after significantly raising its full-year capex guidance. Microsoft saw its stock surge after beating estimates and, crucially, lowering its capex forecast while projecting positive free cash flow. Meta faced the most severe sell-off as its profits declined despite revenue beats, with free cash flow plunging over 90% and its capex guidance raised. Apple reported record June-quarter results, but its stock plummeted after providing Q4 revenue guidance that fell short of expectations, citing supply chain constraints and forex headwinds. The overall takeaway is that the market's focus has shifted from validating AI demand to scrutinizing the timeline for returns on massive AI investments. Companies demonstrating a clearer path to managing capex and preserving free cash flow, like Microsoft, were rewarded, while those signaling continued aggressive spending faced investor skepticism.

Odaily星球日报Há 41m

When the Market Begins to Question AI Capex: A Full Analysis of Q2 Earnings Reports from Five Tech Giants

Odaily星球日报Há 41m

a16z: From Companies to DAOs, DUNA May Become the Next Generation Organizational Form

This article, "From Companies to DAOs: How DUNA Could Become the Next Organizational Form," traces the 500-year evolution of business collaboration. It begins with medieval structures like the *commenda* and Florentine *compagnia*, which exposed partners to personal risk. The modern corporation, exemplified by the Dutch East India Company (VOC), was a revolutionary leap, enabling large-scale, capital-intensive ventures by offering limited liability and reducing coordination costs. However, corporations introduced new challenges like principal-agent problems and bureaucratic overhead. The piece argues that software and internet-native protocols are now reducing these traditional overheads. Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) emerged as a new model for coordination without centralized management. Yet, DAOs face a significant legal vacuum: they lack legal recognition, leaving members exposed to unlimited personal liability, and their tokens are vulnerable to being classified as securities under unclear regulations (e.g., the Howey Test). This has forced projects into suboptimal workarounds like offshore foundations. The article identifies the Decentralized Unincorporated Nonprofit Association (DUNA) as a potential solution. Recently legalized in states like Wyoming, the DUNA provides a legal wrapper for decentralized networks. It grants key protections—legal personality, limited liability, and perpetual existence—to a group without imposing a traditional hierarchical management structure. This allows token-holder communities to govern, hold assets, and contract as a single legal entity, aligning with their decentralized nature. While DUNA doesn't solve all governance challenges or magically resolve securities law questions, it represents a crucial step. It fills the legal recognition gap, offering a native legal form for internet-scale, decentralized collaboration and extending the separation of personal risk from organizational venture into a new domain.

marsbitHá 1h

a16z: From Companies to DAOs, DUNA May Become the Next Generation Organizational Form

marsbitHá 1h

2026 Mid-Year Report On-Chain RWA: Tokenized Stock Market Cap Doubles in a Year, But 90% of Rights Are Hollow Shells

The 2026 Mid-Year Report on On-Chain RWA highlights a significant growth in tokenized stock market capitalization, which nearly doubled from $951 million in March to $1.89 billion by July. However, the report reveals a fundamental contradiction in this "layer 2.5" ecosystem: products with the strongest legal foundation (like regulated U.S. infrastructure) lack liquidity and distribution, while freely tradable offshored wrapper products often lack substantive ownership rights. The increase is driven largely by a few products (SECZ, FGRS, STRCx) and platforms (Ondo, xStocks, Securitize collectively hold over 85% share). While distributed value across networks like Ethereum, Solana, and BNB Chain has grown, the market remains fragmented. Products referencing the same underlying asset (e.g., Apple stock) are distinct legal liabilities with different intermediaries and jurisdictional rules, offering varying degrees of legal claim. The report cautions that headline numbers are misleading, as they reflect changes in distributed token value—driven by issuance, conversions, and price movements—not pure investor inflows. True "canonical shares" with legal ownership, wide wallet distribution, institutional liquidity, and independent on-chain price discovery do not yet exist at scale. Tokenized treasuries show stronger product-market fit, and ETFs may be easier to scale than single stocks. The core takeaway is a trade-off: legal certainty versus liquidity and composability.

marsbitHá 2h

2026 Mid-Year Report On-Chain RWA: Tokenized Stock Market Cap Doubles in a Year, But 90% of Rights Are Hollow Shells

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot
活动图片