Holding Crypto Now Means Losing Money Continuously

marsbitPublicado em 2026-01-21Última atualização em 2026-01-21

Resumo

"Crypto expert cyclop argues that the traditional 'buy and hold' strategy is no longer effective in today's crypto market due to extreme token dilution. Since 2017, the number of tokens has exploded, with attention per token dropping drastically as supply grew 24x per capita. Most new tokens are designed to fail with high fully diluted valuations and heavy unlocks. The winning strategy has shifted from finding a single '100x coin' to capitalizing on rapid liquidity rotations. The author details how they turned $8,000 into seven figures by mastering these rotations: starting with airdrops (e.g., Arbitrum), then early Solana memecoins (e.g., POPCAT, WIF), followed by 'real yield' protocols (e.g., Hyperliquid), and finally 'house tokens' of casino-like platforms (e.g., Pump.fun). The market cycles through phases: value (real revenue) -> helicopter money (airdrops) -> casino (memes) -> crash -> structured extraction (ICOs, points) -> repeat. Success in 2026 requires identifying these rotations early, using clear triggers for entry, practicing strict risk management with invalidation conditions, and taking profits aggressively. The key is to stack compounded gains from multiple rotations rather than holding stagnant assets."

Author: cyclop

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Guide: In the crypto market, the myth of 100x growth still exists, but the rules have completely changed. Veteran trader cyclop points out that with the explosive growth of token supply (the number of tokens per capita has increased 24 times), the traditional "buy and hold" strategy has become a wealth graveyard.

This article deeply analyzes the market paradigm shift from 2017 to the present, revealing how liquidity rapidly rotates among airdrops, Solana Memecoins, real-yield protocols (like HYPE), and "casino-type" platforms.

Standing at the threshold of 2026, the author provides a new practical framework: don't try to find that one ten-thousand-fold coin, but achieve class transition through compound interest by capturing the cyclical rotation of "value-casino-structural extraction." For investors stuck in a "bear market mentality" but eager to return to the peak, this is not just a guide but a complete cognitive reset.

Full text below:

In the past two years, I turned $8,000 into a seven-figure sum in cryptocurrency.

Most people think this kind of performance can't be replicated anymore—I disagree. I think now is the best time to start the journey from $10,000 to $1,000,000 (even though it sounds crazy).

(Serious warning: This article is long. Bookmark it now so you don't miss it, but be sure to read it through; it might change the way you view this market.)

Even though no one talks about "altseason" verbally anymore, most people still cling to the same mindset:

They are waiting for a huge wave, a time when all coins rise together, and you just need to buy a bag of coins that will carry you to wealth.

  • Hold forever
  • Look for "the one coin"
  • Ignore rotations
  • Pray the market rewards patience

This mindset did make money when token supply was limited and narratives could last for months.

In 2024, this is usually a mistake. In 2025, it will be a mistake most of the time. And by 2026, it will be a definitive mistake. Not because 100x is impossible.

But because the way to achieve 100x has changed.

Part 1: 2017-2021, What Changed?

The market was diluted into a token-printing machine

In early 2017, CoinMarketCap tracked about 796 cryptocurrencies. That's not a typo—fewer than 1,000. Back then, about 800 currencies felt like "a lot." Today? CoinGecko statistics show that in 2024, about 5,300 new tokens are created every day.

In practice, this means:

  • "Discovery" was real. There weren't endless alternatives back then.
  • If you gained exposure (featured on CMC, listed on an exchange, had a basic narrative + some promotion), there were limited places for liquidity to go, so it would really flow to you.
  • People bought random things because the menu was small, and everyone was learning synchronously.

This is why "just appearing on CMC + gaining attention" was an advantage in 2017-2021. Everyone had room to survive.

The Attention-to-Supply Ratio Collapsed

The most important thing that has changed since 2021 is:

Attention did not scale proportionally. But token supply exploded.

Crypto users did increase.

But the number of tokens exploded so much more violently that the value of attention per token became lower and lower.

Crypto.com estimates:

  • 106 million cryptocurrency holders in January 2021
  • 295 million holders in December 2021
  • 580 million holders in December 2023

Supply side (coins/projects): CoinGecko's GeckoTerminal data shows:

  • 428,383 projects in 2021
  • 20,170,928 projects by 2025

Now for the core part: How diluted has the market become?

In 2021, there was about 1 token for every 689 crypto holders. By 2025, there is about 1 token for every 29 holders.

In just a few years, the per capita supply increased by about 24 times.

This means: Before, attention had few places to go, so random coins could be discovered.

Now, you're competing against an ocean of new tokens every day—so "holding a bag of coins and waiting stupidly is no longer a strategy.

Massive New Launches Are Designed to Underperform

The old cycle had many low-priced token launches, and there was still real upside in the market. The common model now is:

  • Launch with a high fully diluted valuation (high FDV)
  • Low float
  • Heavy token unlocks
  • Early holders looking for exit liquidity

Memento Research tracked 118 major token launches in 2025:

  • 84.7% were priced below their Token Generation Event (TGE) valuation
  • Median performance: down 71.1% from launch FDV, down 66.8% in market cap

This is why "just buying new listings" became a losing strategy. But here's the twist:

Even in this diluted, brutal market—if you can pick the right narrative early, you can still make money. (More on that later)

Part 2: Why Small Players Get Exploited by the Default Path

The Illusion of "Fair Launch"

Retail no longer trusts VCs and is unwilling to buy these overvalued altcoins after TGE, so the market created a new product: A casino where anyone can "get in early." No VCs, no high valuation at TGE.

The Pump.fun era arrived. Some data:

  • 13.55 million Pump.fun wallet addresses
  • Only 55,296 (0.4%) wallets realized profits exceeding $10,000
  • This means 99.6% did not reach that mark, and over 90% are losing money

So yes, a tiny group of people scored huge wins.

But the median result is donating liquidity to the token developers, their insider friends, paid KOLs, the Pump.fun developers, or just faster players and trading bots. While users fight for scraps, the house prints money frantically.

  • Pump.fun has charged over $935 million in fees since launch

The same dynamic exists in prediction markets: An analysis cited by Finance Magnates stated that over 70% of Polymarket's 1.7 million trading addresses realized losses.

If your plan is "I'm going to be the exception," you need a real edge. Otherwise, you're just a random variable in a negative distribution.

Part 3: The 2026 Theme is Rotation, Not Altseason

In a diluted market where most new coins underperform, the behavior of liquidity has changed:

  • Liquidity is highly concentrated
  • Liquidity moves fast
  • Liquidity needs a story
  • Liquidity leaves faster than you think

So, the winning method is not "picking altcoins." It is:

  • Identifying the next rotation early
  • Riding the wave
  • Taking profits before the next rotation begins

This is why 100x can still happen in 2026: not from one coin, but from stacked rotations + position management + exiting like a pro.

Part 4: From 2023-2025, Rotation Was the Only Real Way to Win

If you look at the past 2-3 years, the pattern is very clear: You didn't win by "holding one coin to death." You won by catching the right rotation early—and then rotating again.

Rotation 1 - Airdrops (Where I Made My First Six Figures)

When my capital was small, I didn't plan to win by trading better. I was betting on asymmetry—opportunities where the gain didn't depend on the size of the principal.

Airdrops are exactly that. They reward time, not capital, so in that arena, I was on equal footing with people who had six-figure assets.

When the market was dead and no one cared (BTC was at the bottom), I was doing the boring work—staying active, using protocols. Then the market recovered, and everyone started "farming." By then, the advantage was gone. This is why early effort paid off.

Arbitrum ($ARB) launched on March 23, 2023. Optimism ran multiple airdrops over time—same rotation logic: early + persistence = hefty returns.

This is how I got my first real capital—not by a miraculous 100x hold, but by getting into this meta-narrative early before it got crowded. I started with $8,000, spent about $400 farming a few airdrops, which eventually gave me six-figure profits.

Rotation 2 - Early Solana Memecoins (Where I Made My First Seven Figures)

After airdrops (helicopter money), liquidity rotated to the "casino." Money comes and goes quickly. The market started craving something new—Solana Memes became the simplest answer.

I found POPCAT at around a $2.5 million market cap, and WIF at a $30 million market cap (they reached $2B and $4B market caps months later, respectively): gains of 100-1000x.

I succeeded not because I was a trading genius. But because I was immersed in the market 24/7, the market was dull, and these "shiny new Solana coins" were basically the only meta-narrative with real momentum at the time. There were fewer than 5 coins with a market cap over $1 million back then, so if you got in early, the winners were extremely easy to identify.

Rotation 3 - "Real Yield" Becomes the New Flex (Template: HYPE)

After the dopamine from Memes, the market started craving something else. Not "utility in two years," not "vibes." But something you could explain in one sentence that sounded like a real business.

This is why Hyperliquid ($HYPE) hit so hard. It wasn't just a "new token." Its story was:

  • Real trading activity
  • Real fee revenue
  • Token benefits directly (buybacks)

Love it or hate it, this is where the market, tired of "casinos" and "extraction," turned: visible value capture. Even if you weren't that "smart," you could spot this: when everyone is tired of Memes, they start paying for narratives that look mature.

Rotation 4 - Then the Meta Advances: "Don't Play the Casino, Own the Casino"

This is the most interesting part of crypto. People will gamble on 5,000 Memes...... ......and then suddenly realize the only sure way to win is the platforms that charge the fees.

This is when "house tokens" and "platform plays" start to shine. Pump.fun is the perfect example of this era: users fight for scraps, bots harvest everyone, and the house quietly prints money daily. This is not a moral judgment, just the law of how markets work.

The rotation is always the same:

  • First, you trade the tokens
  • Then you trade the platforms that extract from those tokens

Rotation 5 - When the Market Gets Too Degenerate, It Swings Back to "Real World" Narratives

After a while, people get tired. They start wanting narratives that can live even without pure hype:

  • Stablecoins
  • Payments
  • Settlement layers
  • Things ordinary humans actually use

This is deliberately boring. And boring narratives often win late because they are the only ones that don't require a constant stream of new fools buying at higher prices to sustain. This is why later you see more attention flow to stories like PayFi / stablecoin infrastructure.

So, What's Next?

First, let's be honest about the current situation. BTC is around $91k-$93k now, which looks "bullish" on paper, but feels exactly the opposite. We are still about 25% down from the all-time high in October 2025 (~$124.7k), and the market mentality is still in "bear market mode."

Why? Because we just experienced the largest liquidation event most people have ever seen—around $19 billion wiped out in 24 hours around October 10-11, 2025.

In such a market, money concentrates into 1-2 directions that work right now, and everything else bleeds. This is the same logic as the airdrop phase before the last big run: the market is half-dead—but if you're early enough, that one meta-narrative can still make big money.

So the task now is not "find 50 potential coins." It is: find the few rotations that can run without retail participation and dig deeper into them harder than anyone else.

The current sentiment is: Most tokens are useless, especially L1s/L2s

This is the dominant market sentiment right now: Most tokens are meaningless and will eventually go to zero because they:

  • Have no real utility
  • Generate no real revenue
  • Exist primarily as exit liquidity

This hits L1s/L2s the hardest. Because you can't play this game forever: raise at absurd valuations, launch at absurd FDV, have 8 users, make $20 a month, and pretend you're worth $15 billion. (Starknet, zkSync, Aptos—you know the type.)

Will this sentiment reverse? Maybe. But I don't even need to predict that, because the implication is obvious......

What the market wants next is a new model: Real Yield + Buybacks

After 3 years of "extraction," people finally understand the class structure: Creators -> VCs -> KOLs -> Bots/Traders -> Finally, everyone who buys too late

For most retail, this game is negative expectancy: you buy tokens and pray you're not the last exit liquidity. This is why the market is now desperately craving tokens that act like "businesses."

A simple model: If a token has a $1B market cap, and the protocol earns $800M in real revenue, and 50% of that is used to buy back tokens... then that asset has a valuation floor. It can't just go to zero unless revenue collapses.

This is exactly value-investing logic from the stock market: when market sentiment is garbage and everyone is fearful, people stop buying "dreams" and start buying "cash flow." Cash flow is the best narrative in a fearful market.

Then Helicopter Money Returns—And the Casino Comes Back

This is the part everyone forgets. The "value phase" doesn't last forever. At some point, the market starts printing money wildly again: something pumps, people get lucky, airdrops start hitting, a new wave puts money back in people's hands.

Once people feel rich, the market instantly switches from "show me revenue" to "show me the fastest 10x opportunity." That's when the casino phase returns. Memes, NFTs, whatever new stupid thing is invented. Doesn't matter. The rule is always the same: it has no value, but it offers crazy multiples, and everyone wants fast money.

Then it crashes. And after the crash...

The Market Moves to the Next "Extraction Narrative" (ICOs, Utility Tokens, Structured Launches)

After getting rugged in the casino, the market doesn't immediately become "fundamental." It usually pivots to a more structured extraction model that lets people spend money again, like:

  • ICOs / "public rounds"
  • Points metas
  • "Utility tokens"
  • Launch mechanisms where you pay for access and someone sells to you later

So the cycle loops: Value (Revenue) -> Helicopter Money -> Casino -> Crash -> Structured Extraction -> Repeat

Nothing in crypto grows forever. What grows is what the market is emotionally hungry for at that moment. So the way to win in 2026 is not "hold and pray." It is: Identify rotations early -> Ride them -> Leave before they become obvious.

Part 5: How to Actually Achieve 100x Growth in 2026

A 100x in 2026 isn't from one trade. It's from stacked rotations. You win by stacking "correct phases," not by praying you found the one.

This is the system I use:

Pick a Maximum of 2 Rotations

One稳健 rotation (revenue/infrastructure) + one aggressive rotation (casino/structured). If you track 10 meta-narratives, you'll be late to every one.

Buy "Triggers," Not "Vibes"

Before I go heavy, I want clear triggers. For example:

  • Fee/revenue trends up for consecutive weeks
  • Users return without outrageous incentives
  • Distribution channels open up (integrations, major platforms, real attention)
  • The narrative starts spreading but hasn't hit mainstream yet

No trigger, no entry.

Define "Invalidation" Before Entry Most people lose not because they are wrong. But because they won't exit. No one ever went broke taking profit (even $1). Remember that. Your invalidation checklist should be boring:

  • Usage collapses
  • Revenue is fake
  • Liquidity rotation leaves
  • Tokenomics/unlocks start dumping

If invalidation hits, you exit. No argument.

Position Management - Three-Layer Stack

This is how you get huge gains without going to zero:

  • Beta (Liquid leaders in the rotation)
  • Picks & Shovels (Infrastructure that wins no matter what)
  • Lottery Tickets (Small caps that fit the narrative perfectly) Only lottery tickets = gambling odds. Only beta = capped gains.

Profit-Taking is the Real Core Advantage

Rotations end faster than you think. So:

  • Scale out on strong pumps
  • Don't fall in love with mid-caps
  • Always know where you're rotating to next

If you don't have a next rotation target, you'll ride the "rollercoaster" all the way back down.

Part 6: The Trap That Catches Most People

The trap is thinking: "If I just hold long enough, it must go up." This worked when the market was small. It doesn't now.

Because now:

  • Supply is infinite
  • New coins launch to dump
  • Most tokens exist to harvest you

So, if your plan is still:

  • Buy random new coins
  • Hold mid-caps for the supposed "big cycle"
  • Chase trends that are already hot

...you are playing a "harvesting" game customized just for you.

Rotation is the exploit. Because rotation is how liquidity behaves now.

Every week I watch:

  • Which sectors have real fee growth
  • Which apps have active users returning
  • Where volume and open interest are shifting positively
  • Where liquidity incentives are being deployed
  • Is the narrative early, or has it become talk of the "top 10 coins"

Most people don't miss narratives. They arrive after the narrative becomes obvious.

So in 2026, like every year before, the winners won't be the "right ones." They will be the "early ones"—and they will keep rotating.

Perguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the article, why has the 'buy and hold forever' strategy become ineffective in the current crypto market?

AThe 'buy and hold forever' strategy has become ineffective because the crypto landscape has been massively diluted. The number of tokens has exploded (increasing by about 24x per capita since 2021), creating infinite supply and intense competition for attention. Most new tokens are designed to perform poorly with high fully diluted valuations (FDV), low floats, and heavy unlocks, making them exit liquidity for early holders rather than long-term investments.

QWhat is the core winning strategy proposed for the 2026 crypto market, as opposed to finding 'the one coin'?

AThe core winning strategy for 2026 is not to find a single '100x coin' but to capture rotational cycles. This involves identifying the next narrative early (e.g., value/cash flow, airdrops, memecoins, casino platforms), riding the momentum, and taking profits before the liquidity rotates to the next trend, using compounded gains to achieve growth.

QWhat were the five key rotational cycles identified from 2023-2025 that provided major profit opportunities?

AThe five key rotational cycles were: 1. Airdrops (asymmetric returns for early participants). 2. Early Solana Memecoins (massive multipliers for being early in a new meta). 3. 'Real Yield' protocols (e.g., HYPE, with narratives around real revenue and buybacks). 4. 'House Tokens' or platform plays (betting on the casinos extracting fees, like Pump.fun). 5. A swing back to 'real-world' narratives (stablecoins, payments, settlement layers) when the market becomes oversaturated with speculation.

QWhat common trap do most retail investors fall into in the current market, according to the author?

AMost retail investors fall into the trap of believing that 'if I hold long enough, it will eventually go up.' This is a losing strategy because the modern market is designed for extraction: token supply is infinite, new listings are meant to dump, and most tokens exist solely to harvest latecomers as exit liquidity.

QWhat specific framework does the author recommend for managing positions and taking profits in a rotational market?

AThe author recommends a three-layer stacking system for position management: 1. Beta (liquid leaders in the rotation). 2. Pick-and-shovel plays (infrastructure that wins regardless). 3. Lottery tickets (small-cap coins perfectly aligned with the narrative). The core advantage is disciplined profit-taking: selling into strength, not falling in love with mid-cap coins, and always knowing where to rotate next to avoid riding the gains back down.

Leituras Relacionadas

Wall Street's Most Famous 'Cassandra' Now Has His Sights Set on Nvidia

Michael Burry, the famed "Big Short" investor, has once again captured Wall Street's attention with a series of short positions against major tech and semiconductor stocks, most notably Nvidia. In late June and July, through his "Cassandra Unchained" newsletter, Burry disclosed short bets against Nvidia, Tesla, Applied Materials, Caterpillar, the SOXX semiconductor ETF, and later, Micron Technology. His core thesis revolves around potential distortions in the AI infrastructure boom, specifically questioning whether extended depreciation schedules (e.g., 6 years vs. a realistic 2-3 years for AI chips) by cloud giants like Microsoft and Google artificially inflate profits. He also raises concerns about possible "off-balance-sheet circular financing," where chip demand might be propped up by vendor-backed funding to clients. Nvidia's stock experienced volatility following these disclosures, briefly dipping but largely holding near Burry's reported entry points, leaving his positions roughly flat or slightly underwater as of late July. This move is part of a pattern for Burry, whose track record since his legendary 2008 bet is mixed. He has faced notable losses, such as on Tesla in 2021, while scoring on broader market turns like the 2020 pandemic crash. His methodology focuses intensely on free cash flow and scrutinizing original financial documents to spot overvaluation and structural risks, but it often struggles with timing the market. The article contrasts Burry's stance with other prominent investors. Steve Eisman, another "Big Short" figure, is not shorting Nvidia, citing strong fundamentals but expressing nervousness about sustainability. Jim Chanos agrees with the broad "accounting mismatch" concern—comparing it to the dot-com bubble—but targets financial leverage in private equity firms rather than the chip stocks themselves. While Nvidia's short interest remains relatively low at 1.3-1.4% of float, the massive stock size means absolute short losses have been significant, exceeding $5 billion earlier this year. The piece concludes that for ordinary investors, the key takeaway is not replicating specific short bets but learning from the critical frameworks these investors use: questioning rosy accounting, identifying structural vulnerabilities, and maintaining skepticism during market euphoria, even if pinpointing the exact catalyst for a downturn remains elusive.

marsbitHá 19m

Wall Street's Most Famous 'Cassandra' Now Has His Sights Set on Nvidia

marsbitHá 19m

Weekly Selection丨Epic Stock Market Volatility, Changxin Tech's IPO Reshapes Storage Landscape, Saylor Aims to Re-Anchor STRC Around September 8th

PANews Weekly Digest: Market Turmoil, Tech Breakthroughs, and Crypto Developments. The week saw significant volatility across global markets. South Korea's KOSPI index experienced extreme turbulence, including multiple trading halts, largely driven by sharp declines in AI hardware stocks like SK Hynix. In contrast, China's Changxin Xinqiao (CXC) achieved a landmark IPO with a market cap surpassing 4 trillion yuan, marking a major success for the domestic DRAM industry after a decade of losses. In the crypto and Web3 space, several key narratives emerged. AI is driving demand for new infrastructure, with projects like AI agent wallets and programmable payments gaining traction, attracting interest from firms like Coinbase. The Bitcoin mining sector is pivoting, with companies like MARA focusing on energy management as electricity becomes a core AI-era asset. Meanwhile, the RWA (Real World Assets) sector faces a "utilization puzzle," with hundreds of billions in on-chain assets remaining dormant. Notable market movements included a historic single-day surge of over 17% for the KOSPI index and a significant migration of $16.5 billion in staked ETH within the Lido ecosystem. Michael Saylor announced a target to re-peg the STRC stablecoin around September 8th. Other highlights include discussions on Ethereum's ambitious 2030 roadmap for scaling and privacy, analysis showing high protocol revenues not always translating to token price gains, and warnings from Citi about potential extreme commodity price shocks by late 2026.

marsbitHá 24m

Weekly Selection丨Epic Stock Market Volatility, Changxin Tech's IPO Reshapes Storage Landscape, Saylor Aims to Re-Anchor STRC Around September 8th

marsbitHá 24m

When the Market Begins to Question AI Capex: A Full Analysis of Q2 Earnings Reports from Five Tech Giants

In late July 2026, five major US tech giants—Alphabet, Intel, Microsoft, Meta, and Apple—released their Q2 earnings reports. While all companies exceeded revenue and profit expectations, driven by strong AI-related business growth, investor reactions diverged sharply due to concerns over escalating AI capital expenditures (capex) and their impact on free cash flow. Alphabet reported strong revenue growth and a surging cloud business, but its stock fell after announcing a doubled year-on-year capex and negative quarterly free cash flow for the first time. Intel posted its strongest revenue growth in over 15 years, but its stock experienced volatile trading after significantly raising its full-year capex guidance. Microsoft saw its stock surge after beating estimates and, crucially, lowering its capex forecast while projecting positive free cash flow. Meta faced the most severe sell-off as its profits declined despite revenue beats, with free cash flow plunging over 90% and its capex guidance raised. Apple reported record June-quarter results, but its stock plummeted after providing Q4 revenue guidance that fell short of expectations, citing supply chain constraints and forex headwinds. The overall takeaway is that the market's focus has shifted from validating AI demand to scrutinizing the timeline for returns on massive AI investments. Companies demonstrating a clearer path to managing capex and preserving free cash flow, like Microsoft, were rewarded, while those signaling continued aggressive spending faced investor skepticism.

Odaily星球日报Há 33m

When the Market Begins to Question AI Capex: A Full Analysis of Q2 Earnings Reports from Five Tech Giants

Odaily星球日报Há 33m

a16z: From Companies to DAOs, DUNA May Become the Next Generation Organizational Form

This article, "From Companies to DAOs: How DUNA Could Become the Next Organizational Form," traces the 500-year evolution of business collaboration. It begins with medieval structures like the *commenda* and Florentine *compagnia*, which exposed partners to personal risk. The modern corporation, exemplified by the Dutch East India Company (VOC), was a revolutionary leap, enabling large-scale, capital-intensive ventures by offering limited liability and reducing coordination costs. However, corporations introduced new challenges like principal-agent problems and bureaucratic overhead. The piece argues that software and internet-native protocols are now reducing these traditional overheads. Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) emerged as a new model for coordination without centralized management. Yet, DAOs face a significant legal vacuum: they lack legal recognition, leaving members exposed to unlimited personal liability, and their tokens are vulnerable to being classified as securities under unclear regulations (e.g., the Howey Test). This has forced projects into suboptimal workarounds like offshore foundations. The article identifies the Decentralized Unincorporated Nonprofit Association (DUNA) as a potential solution. Recently legalized in states like Wyoming, the DUNA provides a legal wrapper for decentralized networks. It grants key protections—legal personality, limited liability, and perpetual existence—to a group without imposing a traditional hierarchical management structure. This allows token-holder communities to govern, hold assets, and contract as a single legal entity, aligning with their decentralized nature. While DUNA doesn't solve all governance challenges or magically resolve securities law questions, it represents a crucial step. It fills the legal recognition gap, offering a native legal form for internet-scale, decentralized collaboration and extending the separation of personal risk from organizational venture into a new domain.

marsbitHá 1h

a16z: From Companies to DAOs, DUNA May Become the Next Generation Organizational Form

marsbitHá 1h

2026 Mid-Year Report On-Chain RWA: Tokenized Stock Market Cap Doubles in a Year, But 90% of Rights Are Hollow Shells

The 2026 Mid-Year Report on On-Chain RWA highlights a significant growth in tokenized stock market capitalization, which nearly doubled from $951 million in March to $1.89 billion by July. However, the report reveals a fundamental contradiction in this "layer 2.5" ecosystem: products with the strongest legal foundation (like regulated U.S. infrastructure) lack liquidity and distribution, while freely tradable offshored wrapper products often lack substantive ownership rights. The increase is driven largely by a few products (SECZ, FGRS, STRCx) and platforms (Ondo, xStocks, Securitize collectively hold over 85% share). While distributed value across networks like Ethereum, Solana, and BNB Chain has grown, the market remains fragmented. Products referencing the same underlying asset (e.g., Apple stock) are distinct legal liabilities with different intermediaries and jurisdictional rules, offering varying degrees of legal claim. The report cautions that headline numbers are misleading, as they reflect changes in distributed token value—driven by issuance, conversions, and price movements—not pure investor inflows. True "canonical shares" with legal ownership, wide wallet distribution, institutional liquidity, and independent on-chain price discovery do not yet exist at scale. Tokenized treasuries show stronger product-market fit, and ETFs may be easier to scale than single stocks. The core takeaway is a trade-off: legal certainty versus liquidity and composability.

marsbitHá 2h

2026 Mid-Year Report On-Chain RWA: Tokenized Stock Market Cap Doubles in a Year, But 90% of Rights Are Hollow Shells

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot
活动图片