eToro Reports Strong Q1 Profit Growth Despite Crypto Trading Slump

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-05-13Última atualização em 2026-05-13

Resumo

eToro reported strong Q1 profit growth despite a downturn in cryptocurrency trading. Net income rose 37% year-over-year to $82 million, driven largely by a nearly 400% surge in commodities trading volume, which accounted for about 60% of trading commissions. Key metrics also showed growth: net contribution increased 19% to $258 million, adjusted EBITDA grew 35% to $109 million, and assets under management climbed 15% to $17 billion. While commodities thrived, crypto activity declined. The number of crypto trades fell 32% year-over-year in April, with the average investment per trade dropping 22%. To bolster its offerings, eToro launched an AI-powered "Agent Portfolios" feature and enhanced its AI agent, Tori, with Grok 4.2 market sentiment analysis. The company also expanded by activating its BitLicense for New York crypto trading, adding Japanese equities, and finalizing the acquisition of self-custody wallet provider Zengo. By late April, total assets under management had risen further to $18.7 billion.

With a 37% year-over-year increase in net income to $82 million, EToro was able to weather a dip in cryptocurrency activity thanks to a spike in commodities trading.

On Tuesday, the business said that its net income increased 37% year-over-year to $82 million, up from $60 million in the first quarter of 2025. Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, or adjusted EBITDA, increased by 35% to $109 million from $80 million the previous year, while net contribution increased by 19% to $258 million.

Nearly 400% Surge in Commodities Trading

Commodities trading, which increased volumes by almost 400% year-over-year, was the primary driver of the positive performance, accounting for around 60% of trading commissions in the quarter. The business has activated its BitLicense to commence crypto trading in New York and extended its equities offering to include Japanese companies, bringing its exchange coverage to 26.

A total of 4.02 million funded accounts increased by 12%, while assets under management increased by 15%, reaching $17 billion. As of the 31st of March, the firm’s cash and short-term investments totaled $1.3 billion.

Crypto volumes fell even as commodities trade surged. In April, with the profits, statistics indicated that there were two million trades using cryptocurrencies, a 32% year-over-year decline, and a 22% decline in the amount invested per trade, to $207.

On the product side, eToro introduced an Agent Portfolios feature driven by AI and strengthened its cooperation with xAI. Tori, their AI investing agent, now incorporates market sentiment powered by Grok 4.2.

Additionally, on April 30, the business finalized its purchase of Zengo, a supplier of self-custodial crypto wallets. CEO Yoni Assia said that this move furthers eToro’s aim of connecting conventional finance with on-chain infrastructure. April saw total money transfers reach $1.4 billion, an increase of 53% year-over-year, while assets under management continued their ascent to $18.7 billion, an increase of 19% year-over-year.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Bhutan’s GMC Launches Fast-Track Licensing for Global Financial Firms

TagseToroexchange

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the year-over-year percentage increase in eToro's Q1 net income and what was the total amount?

AeToro's net income increased by 37% year-over-year to a total of $82 million in Q1.

QWhat specific type of trading activity offset the decline in cryptocurrency trading volume at eToro?

AA nearly 400% surge in commodities trading activity offset the decline in cryptocurrency trading volume, accounting for around 60% of trading commissions for the quarter.

QHow did the number of cryptocurrency trades and the average investment per trade change in April compared to the previous year?

AIn April, the number of cryptocurrency trades declined by 32% year-over-year to two million, and the average amount invested per trade fell by 22% to $207.

QWhat two recent developments did eToro mention regarding its product offerings and AI capabilities?

AeToro introduced an AI-driven Agent Portfolios feature and enhanced its AI investing agent, Tori, by integrating market sentiment analysis powered by Grok 4.2 through its partnership with xAI.

QWhat strategic acquisition did eToro finalize at the end of April and what was its stated purpose?

AeToro finalized the acquisition of Zengo, a self-custodial crypto wallet provider, to further its goal of connecting traditional finance with on-chain infrastructure.

Leituras Relacionadas

Supply Chain, Energy, and Bloc Formation: Untangling the Core Threads of 2026 AI Investment

The core thesis for 2026 investment is a shift from traditional growth-inflation analysis towards a geopolitical framework of strategic blocs, supply chain reconfiguration, and capital expenditure (capex) direction. The US is moving from a global guarantor role towards a more bounded "camp system," reshaping trade, security, and technology flows. Key investment themes emerge from this realignment: production-capable US-aligned economies (e.g., Japan, South Korea), regional security focusing on Latin America, and the hard constraint of energy/grid capacity enabling reshoring. Europe's strength lies not in macro growth but in its high-quality "pick-and-shovel" industrial, electrical, and automation exporters serving the global capex cycle. AI remains the central US-China strategic battleground, driving massive investment in compute, power, and manufacturing stacks, with robotics gaining prominence. The investment implication is a rotation away from crowded US mega-cap tech momentum toward global beneficiaries of this restructuring: electrification equipment, industrial automation, energy storage, grid infrastructure, and select non-US markets. 2026 will be defined by investment intensity driven by geopolitical repositioning, not near-term commercial maturity.

marsbitHá 35m

Supply Chain, Energy, and Bloc Formation: Untangling the Core Threads of 2026 AI Investment

marsbitHá 35m

Appeals Court Rejects Sam Bankman-Fried Bid For New FTX Trial

A federal appeals court has rejected Sam Bankman-Fried's bid for a new trial, upholding his convictions in the FTX fraud case. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals denied defense claims of an unfair trial, sharply narrowing his legal options. His team could still petition the US Supreme Court. The ruling reinforces the legal precedent from one of crypto's most consequential cases, keeping focus on FTX's collapse, customer losses, and ongoing bankruptcy proceedings. For the market, the decision underscores the lasting impact of FTX on regulatory debates concerning exchange oversight, custody rules, and asset segregation as the industry works to rebuild trust.

bitcoinistHá 40m

Appeals Court Rejects Sam Bankman-Fried Bid For New FTX Trial

bitcoinistHá 40m

Apple Also Has to Pay Rent Now

Apple Pays Rent Too: The Two-Way Flow of "Traffic Tax" and "AI Capability Rent" Between Tech Giants For over two decades, Google has paid Apple an estimated $20 billion annually to remain the default search engine on Safari, a "traffic tax" for a critical user entry point. However, in 2026, the direction of this cash flow partially reversed. Apple agreed to pay Google roughly $1 billion per year to license its Gemini AI models, as Apple's own models reportedly struggled with complex tasks. This creates a unique dynamic: Apple acts as the "landlord" in the established search ecosystem, collecting rent from Google for access. Simultaneously, in the emerging AI arena, Apple becomes the "tenant," paying Google for access to cutting-edge AI capabilities it cannot currently match internally. While Apple claims its new models are "distilled" from Gemini outputs and contain "not a drop" of Google's original code, core dependencies remain. Its knowledge base is refined using Gemini's outputs, and its most powerful cloud model runs on Google's infrastructure. Apple has structured the deal as non-exclusive, allowing it to theoretically switch AI suppliers—a hedge against over-reliance. The future hinges on whether advanced AI models become a commodity (cheap and abundant) or remain a concentrated, scarce resource (expensive and controlled by few). Apple is betting on the former, leveraging its massive device ecosystem to be a powerful, choosy customer. If the latter proves true, its bargaining power could erode. This power dynamic is extending to developers. Apple, Google, and WeChat are all pushing for apps to expose their core functions as standardized "actions" or "intents" that their respective AI assistants (Siri, Gemini, WeChat AI) can directly call. The new scarce resource is no longer just app store visibility, but "being selected by the AI." The currency of "rent" has changed from a 30% revenue share to ceding control over how users interact with an app's functions.

marsbitHá 1h

Apple Also Has to Pay Rent Now

marsbitHá 1h

Missed the SpaceX IPO? WEEX's "First Trade Protection" Lets You Experience US Stock Trading Risk-Free.

With the excitement around SpaceX's recent public listing reigniting interest in the US stock market, Chinese investors face significant challenges accessing compliant and convenient trading channels following regulatory actions against major online brokers. This article explores the available options, highlighting their risks and limitations. Traditional paths for US stock investments remain problematic. Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) and Listed Open-Ended Fund (LOF) products, while compliant, suffer from high fees, significant purchase premiums, and a very limited selection of assets. Small, unregulated offshore brokers pose substantial risks, including potential insolvency. While secure, VIP accounts at banks in Hong Kong or Singapore require high minimum deposits (often 1-2 million RMB) and in-person visits, placing them out of reach for most retail investors. The article positions cryptocurrency exchanges, specifically their TradFi (traditional finance on-chain) offerings, as a compelling alternative. Platforms like WEEX are noted for providing access to a wide range of US stocks and ETFs, including SpaceX (SPCXON), through tokenized assets. This method offers advantages such as a single account for both crypto and traditional assets, USDT-based settlement avoiding fiat complexities, flexible leverage, and robust risk management. To attract users, WEEX is promoting a "First Trade Guarantee" campaign. Running from June 15 to July 8 (UTC+8), it features a $30,000 prize pool. Users who trade $500 worth of US stock contracts can qualify for a guarantee on their first eligible trade: 100% loss coverage up to $30 or a 20% bonus on profits up to $30. The campaign is presented as a low-risk opportunity for both crypto natives and traditional investors to experience US stock trading.

marsbitHá 1h

Missed the SpaceX IPO? WEEX's "First Trade Protection" Lets You Experience US Stock Trading Risk-Free.

marsbitHá 1h

How Difficult is Chip Making? A Division Error Costs 475 Million Dollars

How Hard Is It to Make a Chip? A Division Error Cost $475 Million Chip expert Shi Kan, a researcher at the Chinese Academy of Sciences and a popular tech creator, explains the immense challenges of chip development. Chips are foundational to modern technology, but their creation is extraordinarily difficult. The journey from sand to a functional chip involves complex design and manufacturing, but a critical bottleneck is verification—ensuring the design works flawlessly before costly production. A single, undetected bug can have catastrophic consequences, as illustrated by the infamous 1994 Intel Pentium FDIV bug. A flaw in the floating-point division unit forced a recall costing $475 million. Unlike software, chips cannot be easily patched after manufacture, making "first-time success" paramount. However, industry surveys show only 24% of chip projects achieve this; over three-quarters require at least one costly re-spin due to design flaws. Verification has thus become the dominant phase, consuming up to 70% of the design cycle. The core challenge is a "verification impossible triangle" between high performance, good debuggability, and low cost. Exhaustively verifying a modern CPU core could take 15,000 years with software simulation, or 30 years with advanced hardware emulation—timeframes utterly impractical for development. Despite being essential, verification is often seen as unglamorous "dirty work," receiving less academic attention than fields like AI. Shi and his team are tackling this by developing an agile verification research framework called ENCORE, based on FPGA technology, to improve verification efficiency and debug capability. Beyond research, Shi engages in public science communication through long-form video content, aiming to demystify chip technology, AI, and computer science. He argues for the value of pursuing "hard and long-term" endeavors, whether in the meticulous world of chip verification or in creating substantive educational content, believing such sustained effort is likely the right path forward.

marsbitHá 1h

How Difficult is Chip Making? A Division Error Costs 475 Million Dollars

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow