Ethena rallies 14.5% in a day, but THIS will limit further gains

ambcryptoPublicado em 2026-04-09Última atualização em 2026-04-09

Resumo

Ethena (ENA) rallied 14.6% in 24 hours, extending gains from earlier in the week, partly driven by a broader crypto market boost following former President Trump's ceasefire announcement. The project's plan to diversify its USDe stablecoin reserves into non-crypto assets has also contributed to positive momentum, aiming to address declining yields and supply since the October 2025 market downturn. Despite the recent surge, ENA's overall trend remains bearish. Technical analysis on the 1-day chart shows lower highs, with the RSI below 50 and declining OBV, indicating sustained selling pressure. The price has struggled to break the key $0.095-$0.10 resistance zone, where a cluster of short liquidations is located. The 4-hour chart structure is also bearish, and a break above $0.095 is needed to shift momentum bullishly. Traders are advised to consider taking profits near current levels, as the relief rally may be over, and a downward move could follow. The resistance band remains a significant barrier to further gains.

Ethena [ENA] has rallied 14.6% over the past 24 hours, extending the gains it made on Monday, the 6th of April. The crypto market saw a bullish boost from the short liquidations that followed President Trump’s ceasefire announcement.

Ethena plans to diversify its USDe reserve assets into non-crypto assets, which is why ENA has been rallying even before the announcement. The crypto rout since October 2025 saw declining USDe supply and yield.

The protocol’s founder, Gary Young, had said that Ethena was poorly positioned since that crash. Including non-crypto reserve assets will boost its falling yield and aid market performance.

ENA’s trend remains bearishly poised

Source: ENA/USDT on TradingView

The lower highs on the 1-day timeframe, highlighted in white, showed that Ethena continued to labor under a bearish trend. The RSI was below neutral 50, and the OBV was in a slump, too.

This showed that the trend, selling pressure, and market structure were all in favor of the sellers. Even the rally in recent days, though it was high-volume, was unable to convincingly smash past the $0.094 local highs.

This was a complication for ENA bulls. Or, in a way, some pessimistic participants would say it makes the picture clearer. The sweep of the $0.095-$0.10 local highs means that the Ethena relief rally is over.

A new leg downward can commence from these liquidity pockets.

Traders’ call to action – Sell

Source: CoinGlass

The past month’s liquidation heatmap showed a cluster of short liquidations from $0.094 to $0.10. This was the same band of resistance that the price has struggled to clear in the past 12 hours of trading.

Source: ENA/USDT on TradingView

The 4-hour timeframe’s structure remained bearish. The $0.095 level must be beaten for the swing structure to shift bullishly. A breakout and retest as support can inform bulls that the momentum might continue.

Until then, traders can maintain a bearish bias and look to take profits from the bounce.


Final Summary

  • Ethena has racked up sizeable gains since the start of the week and was aided by the ceasefire announcement and crypto market bounce.
  • The $0.095-$0.10 resistance level remained in place, and traders should be prepared to take profits in this area as the swing structure remained bearish.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the main reason behind Ethena's 14.6% price rally in the past 24 hours?

AThe rally was primarily driven by a bullish boost from short liquidations following President Trump's ceasefire announcement, as well as Ethena's plan to diversify its USDe reserve assets into non-crypto assets.

QWhy is Ethena planning to diversify its USDe reserve assets into non-crypto assets?

AThe diversification aims to boost Ethena's falling yield and improve market performance, as the crypto rout since October 2025 led to declining USDe supply and yield, leaving the protocol poorly positioned.

QWhat key resistance level is ENA struggling to break, according to the technical analysis?

AENA is struggling to break the $0.095-$0.10 resistance level, which has been a significant barrier despite recent high-volume rallies.

QWhat do the RSI and OBV indicators suggest about ENA's market trend?

AThe RSI is below the neutral 50 level, and the OBV is in a slump, indicating that the trend, selling pressure, and market structure are all in favor of sellers.

QWhat trading bias does the article recommend for ENA based on its current market structure?

AThe article recommends maintaining a bearish bias and taking profits from the bounce, as the swing structure remains bearish unless ENA convincingly breaks and holds above $0.095.

Leituras Relacionadas

Borrowing Money from a Hundred Years Later, Building Incomprehensible AI

Tech giants like Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and Microsoft are undergoing a radical financial transformation due to AI. Their traditional "light-asset, high-free-cash-flow" model is being dismantled by staggering capital expenditures on AI infrastructure—data centers, GPUs, and power. Combined 2026 guidance exceeds $700 billion, a 4.5x increase from 2022, causing free cash flow to plummet (e.g., Amazon's fell 95%). To fund this, they are borrowing unprecedented sums through long-dated, multi-currency bonds (e.g., Alphabet's 100-year bond). The world's most conservative capital—pensions, insurers—is now funding Silicon Valley's most speculative bet. This shift makes these companies resemble heavy-asset industrials (railroads, utilities) rather than software firms, threatening their premium valuations. Historically, such infrastructure booms (railroads, fiber optics) followed a pattern: genuine technology, overbuilding fueled by competitive frenzy, aggressive debt financing, and a crash triggered by financial conditions—not technology failure. The infrastructure remained, but many original builders and financiers did not survive. The core gamble is a "time arbitrage": using cheap debt today to build scale and lock in customers before AI capabilities commoditize. They are betting that AI revenue will materialize before debt comes due. Their positions vary: Amazon is under immediate cash pressure; Meta's path to monetization is unclear; Alphabet has a robust core business buffer; Microsoft has the shortest path from infrastructure to revenue. The contract is set: the most risk-averse global capital has lent its time to Silicon Valley, awaiting a future that is promised but uncertain.

marsbitHá 1h

Borrowing Money from a Hundred Years Later, Building Incomprehensible AI

marsbitHá 1h

The 'VVV' Concept Soars 9x in Half a Year, The New AI Narrative on Base Chain

"The article explores the 'VVV' concept as the new AI-focused narrative within the Base ecosystem, centered around the token $VVV of the privacy-focused, uncensored generative AI platform Venice, led by crypto veteran Erik Voorhees. Venice has seen significant growth in 2026, with its API users surging, partly attributed to exposure from OpenClaw. The platform now boasts over 2 million total users and 55,000 paid subscribers. Correspondingly, the $VVV token price has risen over 9x this year. Key to its performance are tokenomics designed for value accrual: reduced annual emissions, subscription revenue used for buyback-and-burn, and a unique staking mechanism. Staking $VVV yields $sVVV, which can be used to mint $DIEM tokens. Each staked $DIEM provides a daily $1 credit for using Venice's API services, creating tangible utility. The article also highlights other tokens associated with the 'VVV' narrative. $POD, the token of distributed AI network Dolphin (which co-developed Venice's default AI model), saw a massive price surge. $cyb3rwr3n, a project for a Venice credit auction market, gained attention due to perceived connections to Venice's team despite official denials. Finally, $SR of robotics platform STRIKEROBOT.AI rose after announcing a partnership with Venice for robot vision-language model development. Overall, the 'VVV' ecosystem combines AI platform growth, deflationary tokenomics, and innovative utility mechanisms, driving significant investor interest and price action in related tokens."

marsbitHá 1h

The 'VVV' Concept Soars 9x in Half a Year, The New AI Narrative on Base Chain

marsbitHá 1h

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

The pre-IPO stock token market is experiencing significant turmoil following strong statements from AI giants Anthropic and OpenAI. Both companies have updated their official policies, declaring that any transfer of their company shares—including sales, transfers, or assignments of share interests—without prior board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized in their corporate records. This means buyers in such unauthorized transactions would not be recognized as shareholders and would have no shareholder rights. A major point of contention is the use of Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), which are legal entities commonly used by pre-IPO token platforms to pool investor funds and indirectly acquire shares from employees or early investors. The companies explicitly state they do not permit SPVs to acquire their shares, and any such transfer violates their restrictions. They warn that third parties selling shares through SPVs, direct sales, forward contracts, or stock tokens are likely engaged in fraud or are offering worthless investments due to these transfer limits. This stance directly threatens the core model of many pre-IPO token platforms, which rely on SPV structures. The announcement revealed additional risks within this model, such as complex "SPV-within-SPV" layering that obscures legal transparency, increases management fees, and creates a chain reaction risk of invalidation. Following the news, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). The market reaction highlights a divergence: while asset-backed pre-IPO tokens plummeted, purely speculative pre-IPO futures contracts, which are bilateral bets on future IPO prices with no claim to actual shares, remained relatively stable as they are unaffected by the transfer restrictions. The industry is split on the implications. Some believe the fundamental logic of pre-IPO token trading is broken if leading companies reject SPV-held shares, potentially causing a domino effect. Others, like Rivet founder Nick Abouzeid, argue that buyers of such unofficial tokens always knowingly accepted the risk of non-recognition by the company. The statements serve as a stark risk warning and a corrective measure for a market where valuations for some AI-related pre-IPO tokens had soared to irrational levels, far exceeding recent funding round valuations.

marsbitHá 2h

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片